• Today: November 02, 2025

Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor

02 November, 2025
301
Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor (AIR 1933 Cal 833) — Attempt & Miscarriage (IPC 312/511) | The Law Easy

Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor

Attempt to cause miscarriage — when intent is not enough (IPC 312/511).

Calcutta High Court 1933 AIR 1933 Cal 833 Criminal Law IPC 312/511 ~5 min read
Illustration for Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor (1933)
```
Gulzar Hashmi 02 Nov 2025 India Attempt asgarali-pradhania-v-emperor
```

Quick Summary

Case Title: Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor | Citation: AIR 1933 Cal 833

The Court said: an attempt needs a real, effective step towards the offence. Here, the items offered were harmless and could not cause miscarriage. So, even with bad intent, the law on attempt (IPC 312/511) was not met.

Issues

  • Can the appellant be guilty of attempting to cause miscarriage when the substance used was not capable of causing it?

Rules

Attempt (IPC 511): A person who attempts an offence punishable with imprisonment, and in such attempt does any act towards its commission, is punishable.

Causing Miscarriage (IPC 312): Punishes causing miscarriage without the woman’s consent; attempt would require an act that can bring about miscarriage.

  • Act must be capable of producing the prohibited result.
  • Mere preparation or ineffective steps are not enough.

Facts — Timeline

Timeline graphic for the Asgarali case

Background: Complainant, aged 20, lived with her father. Appellant was a married neighbour who had lent money to her father.

Relationship: He gave gifts and promised marriage; sexual intercourse followed and she became pregnant.

Suggestion: He told her to take drugs to end the pregnancy.

Delivery of items: He brought a bottle with red liquid and a packet of powder. She tasted a little powder, found it salty and strong, and spat it out; she did not drink the liquid.

Second visit: He pressed her to take the items; she refused. He tried to pour the liquid, holding her chin; she shouted; family and neighbours arrived; he fled.

Medical check: No poison detected. In the tasted quantity, the substances could not harm her or the uterus.

Trial & Appeal: Convicted under IPC 312/511 for attempt to cause miscarriage. He appealed.

Arguments

Prosecution

  • He intended to cause miscarriage and took steps to make her consume the items.
  • Trying to pour the liquid into her mouth shows an act towards the offence.

Appellant

  • No real “attempt” since the substances were harmless in the given quantity.
  • Failure was not due to outside interference; the act itself could not cause miscarriage.

Judgment

Judgment illustration for Asgarali case

Held: Conviction set aside. The Court ruled that offering or trying to administer a harmless substance is not an act towards the offence of causing miscarriage. An attempt needs an act that is capable of achieving the prohibited result. Here, medical evidence showed incapacity; thus, no attempt under IPC 312/511.

Ratio Decidendi

For criminal attempt, the act must move from preparation to a proximate act that can produce the result. If the means are inherently or quantitatively incapable of causing miscarriage, the law of attempt does not apply.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies the boundary between intention and attempt in IPC.
  • Protects against over-criminalising acts that cannot achieve the offence.
  • Guides use of medical evidence to evaluate capability in attempt cases.

Key Takeaways

  1. Attempt requires an act that is capable of causing miscarriage (IPC 312/511).
  2. Harmless or ineffective means do not satisfy the proximity test.
  3. Failure must be due to an external factor, not inherent incapacity, to count as attempt.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “No Power, No Attempt.”

  • No Power: Means were incapable of causing miscarriage.
  • No Attempt: Law needs a capable, proximate act.
  • Result Matters: Capacity, not just intent, decides liability.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Is there an attempt to cause miscarriage when the substance used cannot cause miscarriage?

Rule: IPC 511 + IPC 312 — act must go beyond preparation and be capable of producing miscarriage.

Application: Items were medically harmless in the given quantity; trying to make her consume them was not a capable, proximate act.

Conclusion: No criminal attempt; conviction cannot stand.

Glossary

Attempt
A step beyond preparation that is capable of completing the offence if not interrupted.
Proximate Act
An immediate, effective step towards the crime, not a distant or ineffective move.
Incapacity (of Means)
When the method or quantity cannot bring about the intended result.

FAQs

No. There must be a capable act moving directly towards the offence.

It proved the liquid and powder were not harmful in the consumed quantity, so the act lacked capacity.

Because the steps taken were ineffective to cause miscarriage; failure was not due to outside factors.

Capacity + proximity are essential; mere desire or weak steps do not make an attempt.
Reviewed by The Law Easy Attempt IPC 312 IPC 511 Calcutta HC
```

Comment

Nothing for now