• Today: November 02, 2025

Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana v. State of Gujarat

02 November, 2025
251
Section 372 CrPC Victim Appeal — Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana v. State of Gujarat (2012) | The Law Easy

Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana v. State of Gujarat

Easy-English explainer on Section 372 CrPC: victim’s right to appeal, leave requirements, and how it runs alongside the State’s appeal.

Gujarat High Court 2012 238/2012 Criminal Procedure ~7 min read India
Author: Gulzar Hashmi Published:
Courtroom illustration for Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana case

Quick Summary

(2012) 238/2012

The Court confirmed that a victim’s appeal under Section 372 CrPC is a real, standalone right. It does not depend on a State appeal. If both appeals are filed against the same order, both can go on. A victim who is also the complainant needs leave under Section 378(4) to challenge acquittal; if not the complainant, no such leave is needed. For inadequate sentence/compensation, leave is not required at the instance of the victim.

Issues

  • Is the victim’s appeal under Section 372 CrPC maintainable when the State has also appealed the same order?
  • Can the Court refuse the State’s appeal because the victim’s appeal is already admitted?
  • Must a victim seek leave before appealing an acquittal under the proviso to Section 372?

Rules

  • Victim’s appeal is substantive and independent under Section 372 CrPC.
  • Victim and State rights operate in different spheres; one does not oust the other.
  • Both appeals (Victim & State) against the same order for the same relief are maintainable.
  • Leave under Section 378(4) applies when the victim is also the complainant appealing an acquittal.
  • If the victim is not the complainant, no leave is required to appeal under Section 372.
  • For inadequate sentence/compensation, no leave is needed at the instance of the victim.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline graphic for Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana case
Acquittal: Accused are acquitted in a criminal case.
Victim’s appeal: Widow Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana files appeal under Section 372 CrPC against acquittal.
State’s appeal: State of Gujarat also appeals the same acquittal order.
Dispute: Questions arise on maintainability, concurrency of appeals, and need for leave.
Holding: Court clarifies scope of victim’s right and leave requirements.

Arguments

Appellant (Victim)

  • Section 372 creates an independent right to appeal.
  • State’s appeal does not bar the victim’s appeal.
  • No leave needed when the victim is not the complainant.

Respondent/State

  • Appeals should be streamlined; avoid duplications.
  • Leave rules must be respected where applicable.

Judgment

Judgment illustration for the Makwana case

The High Court held that the victim can file an independent appeal against an acquittal even if the State has also appealed. The State’s appeal is not barred by the victim’s appeal and vice versa. If the victim is also the complainant, leave under Section 378(4) is needed to appeal an acquittal; otherwise, no leave is required. For challenges to inadequate sentence or compensation, leave is not needed at the instance of the victim.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 372 CrPC grants a substantive, stand-alone right to victims. This right coexists with the State’s right and is not dependent on it. Leave rules depend on whether the victim is also the complainant and on the relief sought.

Why It Matters

  • Centers the victim’s voice in criminal appeals.
  • Prevents procedural dead-ends when the State appeals.
  • Clarifies leave requirements to avoid dismissals on technicalities.

Key Takeaways

  1. Victim’s appeal under Section 372 is independent and maintainable.
  2. State and victim appeals can proceed together on the same order.
  3. Leave under Section 378(4) is needed only when the victim is also the complainant appealing acquittal.
  4. No leave is needed for victim’s appeal on inadequate sentence/compensation.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “V.I.P. — Victim Is Parallel”

  • Victim has an independent right (S.372).
  • Is leave needed? Only if victim = complainant for acquittal appeals.
  • Parallel with State appeal—both can run together.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Can a victim file and pursue an appeal under Section 372 when the State also appeals? Is leave required?

Rule: Section 372 gives a substantive, independent right; Section 378(4) leave applies if victim is the complainant for acquittal appeals.

Application: Both appeals may proceed; leave depends on complainant status and the relief sought.

Conclusion: Victim’s appeal is maintainable; concurrent with State’s; leave required only in specific complainant scenarios.

Glossary

Section 372 CrPC
Gives the victim a right to appeal against certain orders.
Section 378(4) CrPC
Leave needed for a complainant to appeal against acquittal.
Maintainability
Whether a court can hear a case/appeal on law and procedure.

Student FAQs

No. It is a separate statutory right under Section 372 CrPC.

When the victim is also the complainant appealing an acquittal (S.378(4)).

Yes. Victim and State appeals can proceed concurrently.

No. For these, the victim does not need leave.

Victim’s right to appeal is real, practical, and not second to the State’s right.

Comment

Nothing for now