• Today: November 02, 2025

chaganlal-v-anantaraman-1961-air-mad-415

02 November, 2025
151
M.C. Chaganlal Sowear v. P. Anantaraman & Anr. (1961) — Mortgage Interest as Charge | Case Explainer

M.C. Chaganlal Sowear v. P. Anantaraman & Anr. (1961)

Is interest under a mortgage also a charge on the property for redemption?

Court: Madras HC Year: 1961 Citation: AIR 1961 Mad 415 Area: Property / Mortgage ~6 min read Author: Gulzar Hashmi India
Hero image for Chaganlal v. Anantaraman, AIR 1961 Mad 415

Quick Summary

This case fixes a simple rule for redemption: unless the mortgage deed clearly says otherwise, interest due is also charged on the mortgaged property. So, to redeem, the mortgagor must pay the mortgage money—which includes principal and interest.

CASE_TITLE: M.C. Chaganlal Sowear v. P. Anantaraman & Anr. PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: mortgage interest charge, redemption, mortgage money SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: TPA s.58(a), TPA s.60, AIR 1961 Mad 415 PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-01 AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi LOCATION: India Slug: chaganlal-v-anantaraman-1961-air-mad-415

Issues

  • Can the mortgagee treat interest as a charge on the mortgaged property in the absence of a contrary contract?

Rules

Transfer of Property Act, 1882

  • Section 58(a): Defines mortgage and the idea of securing payment of a debt (principal + interest).
  • Section 60: Right of redemption—mortgagor can redeem by paying the mortgage money due under the deed (normally principal + interest and other sums, unless contracted otherwise).

Facts (Timeline)

20 Mar 1930: Mortgage executed by the 2nd respondent and his undivided brother (with their uncle) for ₹2,000.
5 Mar 1952: 2nd respondent sells the mortgaged property to 1st respondent, directing him to redeem the mortgage.
Tender to Redeem: 1st respondent offers ₹2,000 (principal). Appellant (mortgagee) demands principal plus interest and other sums per deed.
Suit (O.S. 114/1952): Filed by 1st respondent in District Munsif Court, Poonamallee.
Trial Court: Grants redemption on deposit of ₹2,000 (principal only).
District Judge: Sets aside; remands to fix the full amount due to mortgagee (including interest etc.).
Single Judge (HC): Restores Trial Court decree; grants leave to appeal.
Present Appeal: By the mortgagee before the Madras High Court.
Timeline of events in AIR 1961 Mad 415

Arguments

Appellant (Mortgagee)

  • Redemption requires payment of mortgage money (principal + interest + sums due).
  • Interest is charged on the property unless deed says otherwise.
  • District Judge was right to remand for full amount ascertainment.

Respondent (Purchaser/Mortgagor)

  • Offered principal; interest should not block redemption.
  • Deed and conduct allow redemption on principal alone.
  • Supports Trial Court’s decree.

Judgment

The Madras High Court allowed the appeal. It held that the District Judge’s reading of the mortgage deed was correct and there was no contract to the contrary excluding interest as a charge. Therefore, interest payable formed part of the mortgage money to be cleared before redemption. The order of remand to ascertain the actual amount due (including interest etc.) was restored.

Judgment concept image: interest as charge on mortgaged property

Ratio Decidendi

In mortgage law, interest is ordinarily part of the security and is charged on the mortgaged property along with principal. Unless the deed clearly shows a different bargain, redemption requires payment of the entire mortgage money (principal + interest and other due sums).

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies exam-favourite point: interest travels with the security.
  • Shows how courts handle right of redemption under TPA s.60.
  • Emphasises drafting: to exclude interest as charge, deed must say so clearly.

Key Takeaways

  • Default rule: principal + interest must be paid to redeem.
  • A contrary contract must be explicit; silence favours the default.
  • Courts may remand to compute the actual amount due.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “PIC to Redeem” — Principal + Interest = Consideration to redeem.

  1. Probe the Deed: Any clear clause excluding interest as charge?
  2. Include Interest: If no exclusion, add interest to the mortgage money.
  3. Compute & Pay: Ascertain full dues; redemption follows payment.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Whether interest under the mortgage is also a charge on the property and must be paid for redemption.

Rule: Under TPA ss.58(a), 60, mortgage money generally includes principal + interest unless a contrary contract exists.

Application: Deed did not exclude interest as charge; mortgagee entitled to insist on full dues; lower court’s principal-only approach was incorrect.

Conclusion: Appeal allowed; remand to fix the actual amount due (including interest).

Glossary

Mortgage Money
Total sum due under the mortgage—usually principal + interest + agreed sums.
Charge
A security interest over property for payment of money (here, interest as part of security).
Right of Redemption
Mortgagor’s right to reclaim property by paying the mortgage money (TPA s.60).

FAQs

Can parties exclude interest as a charge?

Yes, but the deed must say so clearly. Courts will not infer exclusion.

If principal is tendered, must the mortgagee accept?

Not if interest and other sums are still due under the deed and law.

Why did the Court order a remand?

To compute the actual dues (including interest etc.) before granting redemption.

Reviewed by The Law Easy Property Law Mortgage Case Brief
Top
```

Comment

Nothing for now