• Today: November 02, 2025

Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (1989)

02 November, 2025
251
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (1989) — Work Made for Hire, Copyright & Agency Test

Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (1989)

U.S. Supreme Court 1989 Bench: Marshall, J. (for Court) Citation: 490 U.S. 730 Area: Copyright Reading time: ~7 min
Author: Gulzar Hashmi
Location: India
Published:
Easy English
Sculpture commission concept with artist tools representing CCNV v. Reid
```

Quick Summary

Who owns a commissioned artwork? The Court said: first, ask if the creator is an employee under common-law agency factors. If yes, the employer owns it when made in the job. If no, it is not a work made for hire unless there is a written agreement and the work fits a listed category. Here, the sculptor worked as an independent contractor. So, absent a proper work-for-hire writing, the artist kept the copyright. Any claim of joint authorship needs real creative contributions by both sides.

  • Employee vs. independent contractor is decided by agency factors.
  • No written work-for-hire agreement → default author is the creator.
  • Collaboration can support joint authorship, but facts must show it.

Issues

  1. Does an artist keep copyright in a commissioned sculpture when there is no written work-for-hire agreement?
  2. Was the sculptor an employee or an independent contractor under common-law agency principles?
  3. Do the commissioning party’s inputs make them a joint author?

Rules

  • Work Made for Hire (Copyright Act 1976): Employer is the author for works by employees within scope; or for certain commissioned categories with a written agreement.
  • Common-law agency factors: right to control, skill required, source of tools, location, duration, benefits, tax treatment, method of payment, hired party’s role in hiring assistants.
  • Joint authorship: Two or more authors intend to merge their copyrightable contributions into one work.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline of CCNV v. Reid events

Commission CCNV asked sculptor James Earl Reid to create a statue on homelessness for a DC pageant.

Creation Reid worked in his Baltimore studio with his own tools; CCNV members visited and gave suggestions.

Payment CCNV paid a fixed price on delivery; they did not sign a copyright or work-for-hire agreement.

Conflict Both sides filed copyright registrations; CCNV claimed ownership as a work for hire.

Lower courts District Court sided with CCNV; appeal followed.

1989 Supreme Court held Reid was not an employee; without a proper writing, the sculpture was not a work made for hire.

Arguments

Appellant: CCNV

  • The work served CCNV’s mission and followed CCNV’s direction.
  • CCNV funded and supervised key aspects; it should own the copyright.
  • Alternatively, CCNV claimed joint authorship.

Respondent: Reid

  • He was an independent contractor: own studio, tools, and expert skill.
  • Paid per project with no employee benefits or tax withholding.
  • No written work-for-hire agreement; default authorship stays with creator.

Judgment

The Court held that Reid was not an employee. The sculpture was not a work made for hire because there was no written agreement and the commission did not meet the statute’s listed categories with a proper writing. Therefore, Reid retained copyright. Any CCNV claim to co-ownership depends on proof of joint authorship standards.

Gavel symbolizing Supreme Court decision in CCNV v. Reid

Ratio Decidendi

Employee? Decide with agency factors. If yes and within scope, employer is author. If not, a commissioned work is owned by the creator unless a written work-for-hire deal applies to a listed category. Suggestions and oversight alone do not convert a contractor into an employee.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies ownership of commissioned works in creative fields.
  • Encourages clear written contracts before work begins.
  • Provides a practical checklist using agency factors.

Key Takeaways

  1. Without a proper writing, most commissioned works are not works for hire.
  2. Agency factors decide employee status, not labels.
  3. Control, tools, location, duration, and payment style all matter.
  4. Joint authorship needs copyrightable input and intent to merge contributions.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: R-E-I-D = Right to control, Employee test, Inked writing, Default to creator

  1. Right to control? Use agency factors.
  2. Employee or contractor? Decide with evidence.
  3. Inked writing? If none, default author is the creator.

IRAC Outline

Issue Rule Application Conclusion
Who owns the sculpture’s copyright? Work-for-hire doctrine; agency factors; need for a written agreement for commissioned categories. Reid worked independently with own tools, short term, paid by project; no written work-for-hire. Reid is the author; not a work for hire. Joint authorship only if proven.

Glossary

Work Made for Hire
A work authored by the employer (employee within scope) or by contract for listed categories with a written agreement.
Agency Factors
Legal checklist to decide employee vs. contractor status.
Joint Authorship
Two or more authors combine copyrightable contributions with intent to create one work.

Student FAQs

Only if the ideas turn into copyrightable expression and both parties intended to be co-authors.

Parties can sign an assignment later. But to be a work for hire for commissioned categories, the writing should exist at creation time.

Only if they clearly show a signed agreement that the work is made for hire and the work fits a listed category.

Long-term control, on-site work, employer tools, regular salary, benefits, tax withholding, and supervision suggest employee status.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: work made for hire, CCNV v. Reid, agency factors SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: commissioned sculpture, joint authorship, Copyright Act 1976
```

Comment

Nothing for now