• Today: November 02, 2025

cst-v-sai-publication-fund-2002-4-scc-57

02 November, 2025
101
CST v. Sai Publication Fund (2002) 4 SCC 57 — Trust Selling Books at Cost Not a Dealer | The Law Easy

CST v. Sai Publication Fund

Citation: 2002 (4) SCC 57

Supreme Court of India India 2002 Author: Gulzar Hashmi Area: Sales Tax / Charities ~6 min read
Illustration for CST v. Sai Publication Fund case
```

Quick Summary

A trust printed Saibaba’s teachings and sold the material to devotees at a small price to recover costs. The tax department said the trust was a dealer doing business and must pay sales tax. The Supreme Court said no: the sales were only to support the trust’s religious purpose, not a commercial activity.

Issues

  • Is the trust a dealer under Section 2(11) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959?
  • Do its publication sales amount to business under Section 2(5A)?

Rules

  • Where a trust sells literature at a nominal price only to spread its message and cover costs, the activity is not business.
  • Without a profit motive or trade intent, the trust is not a dealer and sales tax does not apply.

Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Ss. 2(11) & 2(5A)

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline illustration of key facts in CST v. Sai Publication Fund
Trust formed: Four devotees created Sai Publication Fund to spread Saibaba’s message.
Publications: Books, pamphlets, and other literature issued under “Sai Publications”.
Pricing: Sold at nominal price to recover costs; proceeds stayed within the trust.
Objects only: Funds could be used solely to advance trust purposes; fall-back to Shirdi Sansthanam if objects failed.
Dispute: Revenue claimed dealer status and business activity → sales tax demand.

Arguments

Appellant (Revenue)

  • Regular sale of books amounts to business.
  • Therefore, the trust is a dealer and liable for sales tax.
  • Activity resembles trade in publications.

Respondent (Trust)

  • Main object is devotional spread, not commerce.
  • Sales are incidental and priced only to meet costs.
  • No profit motive; proceeds remain trust property.

Judgment

Judgment concept image for CST v. Sai Publication Fund

The Supreme Court held that the trust is not a dealer and its activity is not business under the Act. The literature sales were only a means to spread the message and recover costs. No commercial intent, no sales tax.

Ratio (Core Principle)

Where sales are incidental to a charitable or religious object and priced to cover costs, the activity is not “business” and the entity is not a “dealer” for sales tax.

Why It Matters

  • Guides charities and trusts on when small-value sales are tax-neutral.
  • Separates devotion-driven distribution from commercial trade.
  • Useful for exam answers on dealer/business definitions.

Key Takeaways

  • No profit motive → no “business”.
  • Incidental sales for objects of trust ≠ dealer activity.
  • Nominal pricing to recover costs supports non-commercial character.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “FAITH, NOT TRADE”

  1. FAITH purpose leads the activity.
  2. NOT for profit—only cost recovery.
  3. TRADE? No—hence no dealer status.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Are publication sales by the trust “business,” making it a “dealer” under the Act?

Rule: Incidental, cost-covering sales for religious/charitable objects are not business; entity not a dealer.

Application: Trust sold at nominal price to spread message; proceeds stayed within trust; no profit motive.

Conclusion: Not business; not a dealer; no sales tax liability.

Glossary

Dealer
A person or entity engaged in business of buying/selling goods under the Act.
Business
Trade/commerce activity, usually with a profit motive or commercial character.
Nominal Price
A small price aimed at recovering costs, not making profit.

Student FAQs

To spread Saibaba’s teachings and recover printing and distribution costs— not to earn profit.

No. The Court looked at purpose and profit motive. Here, sales were incidental to a religious object.

Only the trust, and only for its objects; funds remained trust property.

Section 2(11) (dealer) and Section 2(5A) (business) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Reviewed by The Law Easy Sales Tax Charity Law Dealer Definition Business Test
```

Comment

Nothing for now