CST v. Sai Publication Fund
Citation: 2002 (4) SCC 57
Quick Summary
A trust printed Saibaba’s teachings and sold the material to devotees at a small price to recover costs. The tax department said the trust was a dealer doing business and must pay sales tax. The Supreme Court said no: the sales were only to support the trust’s religious purpose, not a commercial activity.
Issues
- Is the trust a dealer under Section 2(11) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959?
- Do its publication sales amount to business under Section 2(5A)?
Rules
- Where a trust sells literature at a nominal price only to spread its message and cover costs, the activity is not business.
- Without a profit motive or trade intent, the trust is not a dealer and sales tax does not apply.
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Ss. 2(11) & 2(5A)
Facts (Timeline)
Arguments
Appellant (Revenue)
- Regular sale of books amounts to business.
- Therefore, the trust is a dealer and liable for sales tax.
- Activity resembles trade in publications.
Respondent (Trust)
- Main object is devotional spread, not commerce.
- Sales are incidental and priced only to meet costs.
- No profit motive; proceeds remain trust property.
Judgment
The Supreme Court held that the trust is not a dealer and its activity is not business under the Act. The literature sales were only a means to spread the message and recover costs. No commercial intent, no sales tax.
Ratio (Core Principle)
Where sales are incidental to a charitable or religious object and priced to cover costs, the activity is not “business” and the entity is not a “dealer” for sales tax.
Why It Matters
- Guides charities and trusts on when small-value sales are tax-neutral.
- Separates devotion-driven distribution from commercial trade.
- Useful for exam answers on dealer/business definitions.
Key Takeaways
- No profit motive → no “business”.
- Incidental sales for objects of trust ≠ dealer activity.
- Nominal pricing to recover costs supports non-commercial character.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic: “FAITH, NOT TRADE”
- FAITH purpose leads the activity.
- NOT for profit—only cost recovery.
- TRADE? No—hence no dealer status.
IRAC Outline
Issue: Are publication sales by the trust “business,” making it a “dealer” under the Act?
Rule: Incidental, cost-covering sales for religious/charitable objects are not business; entity not a dealer.
Application: Trust sold at nominal price to spread message; proceeds stayed within trust; no profit motive.
Conclusion: Not business; not a dealer; no sales tax liability.
Glossary
- Dealer
- A person or entity engaged in business of buying/selling goods under the Act.
- Business
- Trade/commerce activity, usually with a profit motive or commercial character.
- Nominal Price
- A small price aimed at recovering costs, not making profit.
Student FAQs
Related Cases
Share
Related Post
Tags
Archive
Popular & Recent Post
Comment
Nothing for now