• Today: November 02, 2025

E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

02 November, 2025
251
E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1954) — Accrual & Right to Receive

E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1954)

Accrual of income needs a right to receive. Also, look at the real nature of trades—business or capital.

Supreme Court of India 1954 AIR 470 (1954) Income Tax ~4 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi
Location: India
Published: 2025-11-02
Slug: ed-sassoon-and-company-ltd-v-commissioner-of-income-tax
Hero image for E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Quick Summary

This case teaches two simple things. First, income “accrues” only when you have a legal right to receive it. Second, to decide tax treatment, look at the real nature of the transaction. Here, profits from trades in silver bullion and shares were treated as business income, not capital receipts.

CASE_TITLE: E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: accrual of income; right to receive; business income SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: capital vs revenue; Income Tax Act 1922; silver bullion; shares AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi LOCATION: India PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-02
```

Issues

  • Did income accrue or arise to the taxpayer?
  • Was there a vested right to receive the amount?

Rules

Accrual Principle: Income does not accrue unless there is a present, enforceable right to receive the amount.

Character Principle: The true nature of the transaction—seen in the surrounding facts—decides whether a receipt is capital or revenue.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline for E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Company profile: E.D. Sassoon & Co. ran several businesses, including trading activities.
Trades executed: In the assessment year, it bought and sold silver bullion and shares.
Profit booked: These trades produced profits.
Claim by company: Profits were capital receipts, said to be investment-linked, not business-linked.
Revenue’s stand: The profits were revenue income from business and taxable.
Key dispute: Are the profits business income or capital gains? And did income legally accrue?

Arguments

Appellant (Company)

  • Trades were investments, forming part of capital structure.
  • Profits were capital receipts, not taxable as revenue.
  • Accrual requires a right to receive; not established for some items.

Respondent (Revenue)

  • Pattern shows business motive and regular activity.
  • Profits are revenue income, taxable as business income.
  • Where services/trades are complete, there is a vested right to receive—hence accrual.

Judgment

The Court held that the profits from the silver and share trades were taxable business income. The trades were part of the company’s regular operations and driven by profit-making. The Court also reiterated that income accrues only when there is a right to receive it. Where that right arises from completed business activity, accrual follows.

Judgment illustration for E.D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Ratio Decidendi

Accrual = Right to Receive. And the nature of repeated, profit-oriented trades points to business income, not capital receipts.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies when income accrues in law.
  • Distinguishes business income from capital receipts using real-world conduct.
  • Guides taxpayers dealing in commodities and shares.

Key Takeaways

  1. No right to receive, no accrual.
  2. Look at the pattern and purpose of trades.
  3. Regular, profit-driven trades → business income.
  4. Labels like “investment” are not conclusive.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “Right First, Nature Next.”

  • Step 1: Ask: Do we have a right to receive now?
  • Step 2: Check the nature—business or capital?
  • Step 3: Tax under the proper head: business if it is regular profit-making.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Whether income accrued and whether profits were business income or capital receipts.

Rule: Accrual requires a present right to receive; character depends on real nature of transactions.

Application: Trades in silver and shares were regular and profit-oriented; right to receive arose from completed dealings.

Conclusion: Profits were business income and taxable.

Glossary

Accrue
Income becomes due because there is a legal right to receive it.
Capital Receipt
Amount linked to capital structure or investment, usually not revenue in nature.
Business Income
Profits from regular, organized, profit-making activities.

FAQs

When the taxpayer has a present, enforceable right to receive the amount—not just an expectation.

They look at the real conduct: frequency, scale, intention to profit, and how the activity fits into the business.

Because the trades formed part of regular, profit-oriented operations—pointing to revenue (business) income.

“Accrual equals right to receive; repeated profit-oriented trades equal business income.”
Reviewed by The Law Easy Categories: Income Tax Business Income Accrual
```
ed-sassoon-and-company-ltd-v-commissioner-of-income-tax
© 2025 The Law Easy — All rights reserved.
Timeline visual

Comment

Nothing for now