Enercon (India) Ltd and Ors. v. Enercon GmbH and Anr

Quick Summary

This case is about making a messy arbitration clause work. The agreement named London as the venue but did not name the seat of arbitration. When disputes arose, the process stalled. The Supreme Court of India stepped in and said: look at the parties’ real intent, fix the clause, and move forward. Since Indian law governed the contract, the seat was held to be India. The clause was valid and workable under Section 45.

Holding India is the seat; Indian courts have supervisory jurisdiction; arbitration agreement is operative.

Issues

1. Was there a properly concluded contract between the parties?
2. Where is the seat of arbitration under the clause?

Rules

• Courts should apply a practical, flexible, businesslike approach.
• Courts can make an “unworkable” clause workable by honoring the parties’ intent and filling gaps.
• At the Section 45 stage, the check is limited: is the agreement null, void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed?

Arguments

Judgment (Held)

The Supreme Court held that the arbitration agreement is valid and workable. At the referral stage under Section 45, the court only checks if it is null, void, inoperative, or incapable. It passed this test.

Seat fixed as India. Because Indian law governed the contract, Indian courts have supervisory jurisdiction. The Bombay High Court’s contrary view was overruled.

Ratio Decidendi

• Courts should respect the commercial intent and make defective clauses effective where possible.
• Seat determines the procedural law and supervisory court; venue alone is not decisive.
• Where governing law and context point clearly, the court may fill the missing seat.

Why It Matters

Enercon is cited whenever a clause is clumsy but the parties clearly wanted arbitration. It teaches drafters to name the seat and teaches courts to save bargains where the intent is plain.

Key Takeaways

• Always write the seat. Do not rely only on “venue.”
• Courts can cure drafting gaps if the intent to arbitrate is clear.
• Section 45 referral: a light-touch validity check, not a mini-trial.
• Governing law and context can point to the correct seat.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “SEAT SAVES SAIL”

1. SEAT: Name the seat, not just the venue.
2. SAVES: Courts save workable bargains.
3. SAIL: Arbitration can sail on with supervisory courts fixed.

3-Step Hook: Intent → Fill the gap → Seat = India.

IRAC Outline

Glossary

Seat of Arbitration

The legal home of the arbitration; decides procedure and supervisory court.

Venue

Physical place of hearings; does not decide the governing procedural law.

Section 45

Referral to arbitration unless the agreement is null, void, inoperative, or incapable.

FAQs

Related Cases