• Today: November 02, 2025

Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab

02 November, 2025
251
Section 319 CrPC Explained: Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) | The Law Easy

Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2014)

A student-friendly guide to when courts can add a new accused under Section 319 CrPC.

```
Supreme Court of India Year: 2014 Constitution Bench (5-J) AIR 2014 SC 1400; (2014) 3 SCC 92 Criminal Procedure Reading: ~8 min
Author: Gulzar Hashmi India Published: 2025-11-02
Illustration for Section 319 CrPC explainer
```

Quick Summary

This case explains when and how a court may add a new person as an accused under Section 319 CrPC. The power is extra-ordinary, discretionary, and must be used sparingly. The court can act during the inquiry or the trial, but not at the committal stage (Sections 207–209).

  • Evidence must be strong and clear from what appears in court.
  • Standard is above prima facie used at charge framing, yet below conviction certainty.
  • Sessions Court can proceed under Section 193 CrPC after committal (as in Dharam Pal).
```

Issues

  1. At what stage can power under Section 319 CrPC be used?
  2. What kind of material justifies invoking this power?
  3. In what manner should the court exercise this power?

Rules

“Inquiry” in Section 319 refers to the court’s inquiry after the charge-sheet reaches the court. It is different from the police investigation and is also distinct from the trial. The trial begins only after charges are framed.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline illustration of the case events
Diverse rulings emerge: Courts across India give different views on how far Section 319 CrPC can go in adding an accused mid-proceeding.
Reference to larger bench: A three-judge bench notes overlap with Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana and recommends a Constitution Bench.
Constitution Bench convened: A five-judge bench is formed to settle the scope, timing, and method of using Section 319 CrPC.

Arguments

Appellant

  • Power under Section 319 must be narrow and careful, not routine.
  • Only strong courtroom evidence should trigger addition of a new accused.
  • Inquiry and trial are separate phases; timing matters.

Respondent

  • Court should ensure the real offender does not escape.
  • Section 319 applies during inquiry as well; limiting it to trial shrinks its purpose.
  • Sessions can act post-committal under Section 193, aligned with Dharam Pal.

Judgment

Judgment illustration for the Supreme Court case
  • Section 319 power is extra-ordinary and discretionary; use it sparingly.
  • Not to be used merely because the judge feels someone else may be guilty.
  • Invoke only when strong and cogent evidence arises from material before the court.
  • Trial begins after charges are framed; inquiry is a separate stage.
  • Power can be used any time from the start of inquiry till judgment, except during Sections 207–209 and committal.
  • Dharam Pal affirmed: Sessions Court has original power under Section 193 after committal to proceed against others based on police papers.
  • Standard of satisfaction: more than prima facie (at charge) but short of conviction certainty.
  • Named or unnamed in FIR can be summoned. If previously discharged, follow Sections 300 & 398.

Ratio

The court’s duty is to bring the real offender to trial. Section 319 is a safety valve: it lets the court add a new accused when the courtroom evidence points strongly to their role, but it guards against casual or speculative additions.

Why It Matters

This ruling gives a clear, student-ready framework on timing, evidence standard, and limits for adding an accused. It balances fairness to the accused with society’s interest in punishing the real culprit.

Key Takeaways

  • Use Section 319 only on strong, in-court evidence.
  • Applies during inquiry and trial; not at committal.
  • Standard: above prima facie, below conviction level.
  • Sessions can act after committal via Section 193.
  • Named/unnamed in FIR may be summoned; heed Secs. 300 & 398 if discharged.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “Inquire, not Imagine; Strong, not Soft; Sessions, not Supply.”

  1. Inquire, not Imagine: Act during court inquiry/trial; not at committal (Sections 207–209).
  2. Strong, not Soft: Evidence must be strong and clear—above prima facie.
  3. Sessions, not Supply: After committal, Sessions has power under Section 193; supply-of-documents stage is excluded.

IRAC Outline

Issue

When and how may a court add a new accused under Section 319 CrPC, and what evidence is required?

Rule

Section 319 applies during court inquiry or trial; use is exceptional, based on strong and cogent in-court evidence; standard above prima facie; excludes committal stage.

Application

Given conflicting views, the Constitution Bench clarifies timing, evidence threshold, and the Sessions Court’s power under Section 193 after committal.

Conclusion

Courts may add an accused from inquiry start to judgment (excluding committal). Do so sparingly, only on strong courtroom material pointing to complicity.

Glossary

Inquiry
Court’s pre-trial stage after charge-sheet, distinct from investigation and from trial.
Committal
Magistrate sends the case to Sessions; the supply-of-documents stage under Sections 207–209.
Section 193 CrPC
Gives Sessions Court original power to proceed against others after committal.

FAQs

It lets the court summon a new accused during inquiry or trial when strong and clear evidence emerges from testimony led before the court.

It is not available during committal and supply-of-documents stages under Sections 207–209 CrPC.

More than a prima facie view used at charge framing, but less than proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction.

Yes. Under Section 193 CrPC, Sessions Court has original jurisdiction to proceed against others on the police papers.

CASE_TITLE: Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2014)

PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 319 CrPC, add accused, inquiry vs trial, Supreme Court 2014

SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: Dharam Pal, Section 193 CrPC, committal stage, strong and cogent evidence

PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-02

AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi

LOCATION: India

Criminal Procedure Section 319 Supreme Court

Reviewed by The Law Easy

```

Comment

Nothing for now