• Today: November 02, 2025

L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax

02 November, 2025
301
L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax — Offshore Supply & Permanent Establishment | The Law Easy

L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax

Offshore supply income and permanent establishment (PE) in India—explained in clean, student-friendly English.

Supreme Court of India A.A.R. No. 858-861 of 2009 LS Cables Ltd. v. DIT International Tax ~4 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi
Location: India
Published: 2025-11-02
Slug: l-s-cables-ltd-v-director-of-income-tax
Hero image for L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax

Quick Summary

LS Cables, a South Korean supplier, sold transmission cables to PGCIL. Its Indian agent only helped with clearance, transport, and installation support. The Court held: no permanent establishment (PE) in India and no Indian tax on offshore supply income.

CASE_TITLE: L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: offshore supply income; permanent establishment; agency PE SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: ancillary activities; installation support; PGCIL; Indian taxation of foreign companies AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi LOCATION: India PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-02
```

Issues

  • Is offshore supply income of LS Cables taxable in India?
  • Did LS Cables have a permanent establishment (PE) in India?

Rules

General Rule: A foreign company’s offshore supply income is not taxable in India unless it has a permanent establishment (PE) in India.

Agency PE Test: An agent creates a PE only if it habitually concludes contracts or plays the principal role leading to contract conclusion. Purely ancillary services do not create a PE.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline for L S Cables Ltd. v. Director of Income-tax
Company: LS Cables Ltd., South Korea—maker of power transmission cables.
Contracts: Supplies to PGCIL for cables and related equipment.
Indian agent: Alpasso Industries Pvt. Ltd. handled customs, transport, and installation support.
No local base: LS Cables had no office, branch, or fixed place in India.
Limited authority: Agent had no power to enter or conclude contracts on LS Cables’ behalf.

Arguments

Appellant (Assessee)

  • All supplies were offshore; title passed outside India.
  • Agent did only ancillary support; no contract power → no PE.
  • Therefore, no Indian tax on offshore supply profits.

Respondent (Revenue)

  • Indian activities were linked to Indian projects → business connection.
  • Presence of an agent in India suggested a de facto PE.
  • Profits should be taxed in India as arising from Indian operations.

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that LS Cables had no PE in India. The Indian agent’s functions were ancillary and supportive—customs clearance, logistics, and on-site assistance—without any authority to conclude contracts. Hence, the offshore supply income was not taxable in India.

Judgment illustration for LS Cables case

Ratio Decidendi

No authority → No Agency PE. Support-only activities by an Indian agent do not amount to a PE. Without a PE, offshore supply profits escape Indian taxation.

Why It Matters

  • Guides foreign EPC/supply contracts serving Indian projects.
  • Shows how ancillary agents differ from contract-concluding agents.
  • Helps structure contracts to keep offshore supplies outside Indian tax.

Key Takeaways

  1. PE needs power: Habitual contract authority or principal role.
  2. Ancillary work ≠ PE: Clearance, logistics, and assistance are not enough.
  3. Offshore title pass supports non-taxability in India.
  4. Keep documentation clear on where contracts are concluded.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “No Power, No PE.”

  • Step 1: Ask: Does any Indian person conclude contracts?
  • Step 2: If only support tasks, then no PE.
  • Step 3: Offshore supplies → not taxable in India.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Taxability of offshore supply and existence of a PE in India.

Rule: No Indian tax on offshore supply unless a PE exists; agency PE requires contract authority or principal role.

Application: Agent had no contract power and did only ancillary tasks; title passed offshore.

Conclusion: No PE and no Indian tax on offshore supply income.

Glossary

Permanent Establishment (PE)
A fixed place of business or a dependent agent with power to conclude contracts on behalf of a foreign enterprise.
Agency PE
A PE formed through an agent who habitually concludes contracts or plays the principal role leading to contract conclusion.
Ancillary Activities
Support tasks like customs, storage, delivery, and on-site assistance that do not create a PE by themselves.

FAQs

No. Only agents with contract power (or principal role) create an agency PE. Pure support agents do not.

If installation is incidental and the agent lacks contract authority, it still may not create a PE. Facts decide.

Ensure contracts are concluded offshore, title passes offshore, and Indian agents do only support functions without authority.

Not necessarily. For non-residents, tax attribution generally needs a PE in India for business profits.
Reviewed by The Law Easy Categories: International Tax Permanent Establishment Offshore Supply
```
l-s-cables-ltd-v-director-of-income-tax
© 2025 The Law Easy — All rights reserved.
Timeline visual

Comment

Nothing for now