• Today: November 02, 2025

Probodh Kumar Das v. The Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd

02 November, 2025
251
Probodh Kumar Das v. The Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd. (AIR 1940 PC 1) — Section 53A is a Shield, Not a Sword

Probodh Kumar Das v. The Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd. (AIR 1940 PC 1)

Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is a shield, not a sword.

Privy Council 1940 Judicial Committee AIR 1940 PC 1 Property / TPA §53A ~7 min
Tea estate dispute illustration for Probodh Kumar Das v. Dantamara Tea Co.

Case Meta

CASE_TITLE: Probodh Kumar Das v. The Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd.
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 53A TPA, part performance, possession, defensive equity
SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: unregistered sale agreement, registered title, export quota rights
PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-01
AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi
LOCATION: India
Slug: probodh-kumar-das-v-the-dantamara-tea-co-ltd

Quick Summary

This case explains the true reach of Section 53A, Transfer of Property Act, 1882. A buyer in possession under an unregistered agreement can use Section 53A to defend that possession. But the buyer cannot use it to claim ownership or to sue a later purchaser who holds a valid registered title. The Privy Council confirmed: 53A is a shield, not a sword.

Issues

  • Does Section 53A allow a transferee in possession under an unregistered sale agreement to assert ownership rights?
  • Can Section 53A give the transferee an actionable right to challenge a later transferee with a registered deed?

Rules

  • Section 53A TPA: protects a transferee who has taken possession in part performance of a contract, by preventing the transferor (and persons claiming under them) from disturbing that possession.
  • It is a defensive right; it does not create title and does not grant an independent right to sue.

Facts (Timeline)

Timeline Image
Timeline of events in the tea estate dispute

Mortgage & Auction: A tea estate in Chittagong was mortgaged and later bought at auction by Gillanders, Arbuthnot & Co. without a formal conveyance.

1931 – Agreement with S.N. Roy: Gillanders agreed to sell to S.N. Roy by an unregistered agreement. Roy paid part of the price and took possession. No deed was executed.

1934 – Registered Sale: Gillanders sold the estate to Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd. through a registered deed. The company was recognised for the estate’s export quota.

Suit: The appellant, Probodh Kumar Das, claiming through Roy, sued to declare that Dantamara had no title to the land and quota rights, relying on Section 53A.

Procedural History: Trial court allowed the claim; High Court reversed, holding Section 53A cannot found such a suit. Appeal went to the Privy Council.

Arguments

Appellant

  • Roy was in possession after part performance; Section 53A should protect his position.
  • Therefore, the later registered transferee should not defeat his claim to the estate and related quota rights.

Respondent

  • Section 53A is only a defence to resist dispossession; it does not create ownership.
  • The respondent has a registered title; the appellant cannot sue on Section 53A to defeat a registered conveyance.

Judgment

Judgment Image
Judgment concept image for the Privy Council decision

The Privy Council dismissed the appeal. Section 53A does not give an active right to sue or a title in the transferee. It only bars the transferor and those claiming under the transferor from disturbing the transferee’s possession when the contract has been partly performed and the transferee is willing to perform the rest. A later purchaser with a registered deed cannot be defeated by using Section 53A as an offensive claim.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 53A creates a personal equity of defence to protect possession; it does not transfer ownership or create a cause of action. Hence, it cannot be used to upset a valid registered title of a subsequent transferee.

Why It Matters

  • Clarifies the defensive nature of part performance under Indian law.
  • Signals the importance of registration for transferring title in immovable property.
  • Guides litigation strategy: use Section 53A to defend possession, not to claim title.

Key Takeaways

  1. Shield only: Section 53A protects possession; it is not a source of title.
  2. No right to sue: It cannot be the basis of an offensive claim.
  3. Registration matters: A later registered transferee stands on stronger ground.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “53A = POS”Possession Only Shield.

  • Step 1: Ask: “Am I defending my possession?” If yes, 53A may help.
  • Step 2: Check readiness to perform your part of the contract.
  • Step 3: Remember: No title without a registered deed.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Can a transferee under an unregistered sale use Section 53A to assert ownership or defeat a later registered purchaser?
Rule: Section 53A protects possession by way of defence; it creates no title and no cause of action.
Application: The appellant, claiming through Roy, tried to use 53A offensively to deny respondent’s registered title. That goes beyond 53A’s scope.
Conclusion: Appeal dismissed; 53A cannot be used as a sword against a registered transferee.

Glossary

Part Performance
Doing acts under a contract (like paying money, taking possession) so the other side is stopped from acting unfairly.
Registered Title
Ownership recorded through a formal registered deed under law.
Defensive Equity
A right used to defend a position (like possession), not to start a lawsuit for ownership.

FAQs

It confirms that Section 53A is only a defence to protect a transferee’s possession. It does not create ownership or a right to sue.

Yes, if you have performed or are willing to perform your part, Section 53A can protect your possession against the seller and those claiming under the seller.

Generally, no. Section 53A does not create title in you. A registered deed has stronger force for ownership.

For immovable property, title normally passes through a registered conveyance. Possession plus an unregistered agreement is not enough for ownership.

“53A = Shield, not Sword.” Use it to defend possession, not to claim title.
Property Law TPA §53A 1940
Reviewed by The Law Easy

Comment

Nothing for now