• Today: November 02, 2025

state-of-maharashtra-v-christian-community-welfare-council-of-india-air-2004-sc-7

02 November, 2025
251
State of Maharashtra v. Christian Community Welfare Council of India (AIR 2004 SC 7) — Arrest of women after sunset | The Law Easy

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY WELFARE COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation: AIR (2004) SC 7 Supreme Court of India Jurisdiction: India Arrest of Women Reading time: ~8 min

Author: Gulzar Hashmi India Published: 2025-11-02 PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: arrest of women after sunset, lady constable, recorded reasons SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: custodial safeguards, police powers, women’s rights Slug: state-of-maharashtra-v-christian-community-welfare-council-of-india-air-2004-sc-7
Illustration for State of Maharashtra v. Christian Community Welfare Council

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court set practical rules for arresting women. As a general rule, avoid arrest after sunset and before sunrise. Try to have a lady constable present. But if delay will harm investigation and a lady constable is not available, the arrest may still be made with reasons recorded before or immediately after. The Court thus modified the High Court’s absolute ban and created a balanced, safeguard-based approach.

Judgment summary graphic for arrest of women after sunset

Issues

  1. Can a woman be arrested without the presence of a lady constable?
  2. Can a woman be arrested after sunset and before sunrise in any circumstance?

Rules

  • Lady constable: Make all efforts to secure her presence at arrest.
  • Exception: If not possible and waiting will hurt the investigation, the officer may arrest without a lady constable for lawful reasons, but must record reasons before or immediately after the arrest.
  • Night hours: As a norm, do not arrest women after sunset/before sunrise. Proceed only if strictly necessary with written reasons and other safeguards.

Facts (Timeline)

Crime Branch, Nagpur took one Junious Adam Illamatti into custody; he was later found dead in custody.
His wife Jarina/Jarnia Adam went to inquire; she was allegedly detained and molested by police.
Trial court punished 10 police officers with 3 years’ imprisonment and fine; appeal pending before High Court.
Christian Community Welfare Council of India filed a criminal writ; Jarina was added as petitioner no. 2.
Writ sought proper inquiry into the custodial death and ₹10 lakh compensation for Jarina.
High Court directed compensation and issued strict directions about arrest of women (no arrest without lady constable; no night arrest).
On appeal, the Supreme Court modified the directions by creating a recorded-reasons exception.
Case timeline for Christian Community Welfare Council case

Arguments (Appellant vs Respondents)

State of Maharashtra

  • Absolute ban is impractical; emergencies require flexibility.
  • Permit arrest with recorded reasons when delay harms investigation.

Respondents

  • Women need strong safeguards in custody situations.
  • Insist on lady constable presence and no night arrest to prevent abuse.

Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld compensation to the widow and modified the High Court’s blanket directions. It held that police should try to have a lady constable and avoid night arrests. However, if this is not possible and waiting will impede investigation, police may arrest a woman at any hour for lawful reasons, provided reasons are recorded before or immediately after the arrest.

Ratio Decidendi

  • Safeguard-first rule: Lady constable presence and day-time arrest are the norm.
  • Exception through reasons: When necessity demands, arrest can proceed without a lady constable and at night, but only with written reasons.
  • Balance approach: Protect women’s dignity while ensuring effective investigation.

Why It Matters

This case gives a workable field guide for police and a clear safety net for women. It rejects extremes and builds a rule of recorded necessity plus accountability.

Key Takeaways

  • Prefer day-time arrest for women.
  • Lady constable presence is expected.
  • Maintain dignity and safety at all times.
  • Exceptions allowed with written reasons.
  • Arrest may occur at night if necessary.
  • Balance between rights and investigation.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic — “LADY-R

  • Lady constable — try to ensure presence.
  • Avoid night arrests as a norm.
  • Delay harmful? Don’t wait.
  • Your reasons — write them.
  • Record before/after the arrest.

3-Step Hook:

  1. Check safeguards: Lady constable and daytime?
  2. Check necessity: Will delay harm investigation?
  3. Check paperwork: Record reasons and proceed.

IRAC Outline

IRAC Element Answer (Easy English)
Issue Rules for arresting women at night and the need for a lady constable.
Rule Prefer lady constable and daytime arrest; exceptions only with recorded reasons and necessity.
Application High Court’s absolute ban softened; Supreme Court allows narrow exceptions to keep investigation effective.
Conclusion Compensation affirmed; arrest directions modified to a safeguards-plus-necessity model.

Glossary

Lady Constable
A woman police official whose presence adds safety and dignity during arrest or search.
Recorded Reasons
Written justification by the officer explaining why immediate arrest was necessary.
Custodial Safeguards
Measures to protect a detainee’s dignity, safety, and rights while in police control.

FAQs

Normally no. But if delay will harm the investigation and the reasons are recorded, it is allowed with safeguards.

Try to ensure presence. If not possible and waiting would impede investigation, arrest can proceed with written reasons.

Reasons must be recorded before or immediately after the arrest explaining why the exception was used.

No. It preferred day arrests but allowed night arrests in strict necessity with recorded reasons.

Yes. The High Court ordered compensation to the widow; the Supreme Court addressed the arrest guidelines.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Category: Women & Law Police Powers Constitutional
Top
```

Comment

Nothing for now