• Today: November 02, 2025

Tolaram v. State of Rajasthan

02 November, 2025
301
Tolaram v. State of Rajasthan (1997) – Section 216 CrPC in Summons Trials, No Retrial Power
```

Tolaram v. State of Rajasthan

Section 216 CrPC applies to summons trials. Amend the accusation if needed, but no retrial; use Section 217 to recall witnesses.

Rajasthan High Court 1997 1997 CRILJ 2156 Criminal Procedure ~7 min read
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: Section 216 CrPC, Section 217 CrPC, amendment of accusation SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: retrial power, Section 225A IPC, summons trial
Author: Gulzar Hashmi · India · Published: | Slug: tolaram-v-state-of-rajasthan
Rajasthan High Court building with icons for CrPC Sections 216 and 217
```
```
Quick Summary

Key point: Section 216 CrPC lets the court correct the accusation in any trial, including a summons trial. If the section was wrong, fix it.

But the Magistrate cannot order a retrial. Use Section 217 to recall or re-examine witnesses after the change. Here, the proper section was Section 225A IPC, not 225 IPC.

Issues
  1. Does Section 216 CrPC cover summons trials?
  2. Could the ACJM (Railways), Jodhpur legally order a retrial?
  3. Was the amendment of accusation under Section 216 proper?
Rules
  • Section 216 CrPC applies to all trials. It exists to keep the accused fully informed of the correct accusation.
  • No retrial power in such a situation. After alteration, use Section 217 to recall or re-examine witnesses.
  • Accusation must fit the facts. If a wrong section was used, the court can change it to the correct section (here, 225A IPC).
Facts (Timeline)

08 Aug 1992 Two prisoners were lodged in Central Jail, Jodhpur; to be produced in Jaisalmer next day.

09–11 Aug Constables (led by Tola Ram) escorted them; one prisoner escaped on train near Lohawat.

12 Aug Report lodged; case first under Section 224 IPC, later theory under 225 IPC.

Jun 1993 Magistrate framed accusation under 225B IPC; trial began; 9 PWs, 3 DWs examined.

May 1995 Prosecution sought change under Section 216 to 223 & 225A(b) IPC; Magistrate also ordered retrial.

High Court Held: Section 216 applies; no retrial; proceed under Section 217; amendment to 225A sustained.

Timeline from escort duty to escape, amendment request, and High Court ruling
Arguments
Petitioners (Accused)
  • Section 216 does not cover summons trials.
  • Ordering retrial is illegal and prejudicial.
  • Amendment late in trial helps prosecution fill gaps.
State
  • 216 applies to all trials; purpose is correct notice.
  • Facts match Section 225A IPC, so amendment proper.
  • Any prejudice can be cured by Section 217 recall.
Judgment
  • Section 216 applies to summons trials.
  • Retrial direction was without authority; it was quashed.
  • Amendment to 225A IPC sustained to reflect the correct offence.
  • Magistrate to proceed under Section 217 CrPC and allow necessary recall on both sides.
Gavel with arrows showing 'Amend under s.216' and 'Proceed under s.217' and a cross over 'Retrial'
Ratio Decidendi

Correct, don’t restart. Use Section 216 to correct the accusation in any trial, and Section 217 to fairly adjust evidence. A retrial is not the cure.

Why It Matters
  • Protects fair notice to the accused without derailing trials.
  • Stops unwarranted retrials that waste time and help fill gaps.
  • Shows how to cure prejudice via Section 217.
Key Takeaways
  • 216 → Applies to all trials.
  • Fix accusation to match facts.
  • 225A IPC not 225 IPC in this case.
  • 217 → Recall & re-examine.
  • No retrial to fill gaps.
  • Ensure no prejudice to either side.
Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook
Mnemonic “Fix—Not—Flip”Fix charge (s.216), Not retrial, Flip witnesses by recall (s.217) only if needed.
  1. Identify the correct section.
  2. Amend under Section 216.
  3. Adjust proof under Section 217.
IRAC Outline
Issue

Does Section 216 apply to summons trials and can a Magistrate order retrial after altering the accusation?

Rule

Section 216 applies to all trials; Section 217 provides recall. Retrial is not the remedy for amendment.

Application

Facts matched Section 225A IPC, so amendment was proper. Retrial would unfairly aid the prosecution.

Conclusion

Amendment sustained; retrial set aside; proceed with recall under Section 217 and decide per law.

Glossary
Summons Trial
Simplified trial procedure used for less serious offences; no formal “charge” but an accusation is stated.
Amendment (s.216)
Court’s power to correct the accusation to reflect the right offence.
Recall (s.217)
Right of both sides to recall or further examine witnesses after an alteration.
FAQs

Yes, if needed to correct the accusation. Any prejudice is addressed by recalling witnesses under Section 217.

No. But the accused must still know the accusation. Section 216 can correct that accusation if it is wrong.

Because it nullifies prior steps and lets the prosecution fill gaps. The law provides recall under Section 217, not a fresh trial.

The accusation was aligned with Section 225A IPC instead of Section 225 IPC, based on the facts found.
Reviewed by The Law Easy Categories: Criminal Procedure Charge & Accusation Trial Management
Top
```
CASE_TITLE
Tolaram v. State of Rajasthan
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS
Section 216 CrPC, Section 217 CrPC, amendment of accusation
SECONDARY_KEYWORDS
retrial power, Section 225A IPC, summons trial
PUBLISH_DATE
2025-11-02
AUTHOR_NAME
Gulzar Hashmi
LOCATION
India
SLUG
tolaram-v-state-of-rajasthan
CITATION
1997 CRILJ 2156

Comment

Nothing for now