• Today: November 02, 2025

V.V.R.N.M. Subbayya Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income Tax

02 November, 2025
201
Residential Status of HUF — V.V.R.N.M. Subbayya Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1951) | Easy Case Note

V.V.R.N.M. Subbayya Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Supreme Court of India | AIR 1951 101 | Jurisdiction: India

Income Tax Residential Status of HUF Section 4A(b), 1922 Act ~6 min read India Gulzar Hashmi 02 Nov 2025
PRIMARY_KEYWORDS: HUF residential status; control and management; Section 4A(b)
SECONDARY_KEYWORDS: head and brain; British India; Income Tax Act 1922; domicile vs residence
CASE_TITLE: V.V.R.N.M. Subbayya Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income Tax • PUBLISH_DATE: 2025-11-02 • AUTHOR_NAME: Gulzar Hashmi • LOCATION: India
Hero image for the HUF residential status case

Quick Summary

The case explains how to decide where a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is resident for tax. The Court said: look for the head and brain—the real control and direction of the HUF’s tax-relevant affairs. If control and management are wholly outside British India, the HUF is non-resident under Section 4A(b) of the 1922 Act.

Issues

  1. Was the assessee HUF a resident in British India under Section 4A(b)?

Rules

  • Control & Management Test: Residence of a HUF depends on where its control and management actually function.
  • Section 4A(b), 1922: A HUF (or firm/AOP) resides in British India unless its control and management are wholly outside British India.

Facts (Timeline)

Optional Illustration
Timeline of key facts in Subbayya Chettiar case

Residence Abroad: The Karta lived in Ceylon with his wife and child, and carried on business there.

Assets in India: He owned house property and other assets in India.

Visit to India: During the relevant year, he came to India for family litigation and stayed for 101 days.

Business Steps: He started two partnership firms in India and stayed some time after the start.

Arguments

Appellant (Assessee HUF)

  • Real control and management were in Ceylon.
  • Indian presence and partnerships were temporary/ancillary.
  • So, the HUF should be treated as non-resident.

Respondent (Revenue)

  • Activities in India showed a seat of power within British India.
  • Starting firms and staying for 101 days pointed to residence.

Judgment

Optional Illustration
Judgment highlight for HUF residence test
  • Control & Management = Head and Brain: It means the controlling and directing power and must function in a place with some permanence.
  • “Affairs” are tax-relevant: Only those affairs that matter for the Income Tax Act are counted.
  • “Wholly” matters: The word allows the seat of control to be split. For non-residence, the whole control must be outside British India.

Ratio Decidendi

A HUF is resident where its real control and management operate. Temporary visits or scattered actions do not decide residence. To claim non-resident, the control and management must be wholly outside British India.

Why It Matters

  • Guides how to judge a HUF’s residential status for tax.
  • Separates place of control from mere physical presence.
  • Still useful when reading later laws using the control-and-management idea.

Key Takeaways

  • Head & Brain Test: Find where real decisions are made.
  • Permanence: Control must operate with stability, not momentary acts.
  • Wholly Outside: To be non-resident, all control must be outside British India.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “Head Here? Resident Here.”

  1. Locate Head: Where are key tax affairs directed?
  2. Check Permanence: Is the control stable at that spot?
  3. Apply 4A(b): Only if control is wholly outside India → non-resident.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Whether the HUF was resident in British India under Section 4A(b).

Rule: Residence follows the place where control and management of tax-relevant affairs function; non-residence needs control wholly outside India.

Application: Karta’s India stay and partnerships were not enough if the head and brain were outside; look for stable control location.

Conclusion: Residence turns on the real seat of control; split or temporary activity does not by itself decide it.

Glossary

HUF
Hindu Undivided Family, a joint family unit recognized for tax.
Karta
The person who manages the HUF’s affairs.
Control & Management
The real directing power—policy and key decisions.
Residence (Tax)
Where a person/entity is treated as resident for taxing income.

FAQs

No. The key is where the HUF’s control and management really work with some permanence, not just days of presence.

Then it is not “wholly outside”. The HUF will be treated as resident unless the entire control is outside India.

The Court focused on affairs relevant to the Income Tax Act—how income and fiscal matters are directed and controlled.

Because control must operate in a place with some stability; temporary steps do not show the true seat of power.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Slug: v-v-r-n-m-subbayya-chettiar-v-commissioner-of-income-tax
Income Tax HUF Residence
```

Comment

Nothing for now