Skip to content
The Law Easy
Energy Law Complete notes

Energy Law: Complete Notes

About this subject ▶ Watch this part of the lecture (00:00) Energy Law runs from why energy needs law at all to how the law is guiding India from coal and oil towards clean energy. Switching on a fan, charging a phone, riding a bus or cooking on a gas stove puts a person at the end of a long chain…

110 min read Published

Cover: Energy Law: Complete Notes

Watch the lecture

Energy Law Complete Course

On this page

About this subject

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (00:00)

Energy Law runs from why energy needs law at all to how the law is guiding India from coal and oil towards clean energy. Switching on a fan, charging a phone, riding a bus or cooking on a gas stove puts a person at the end of a long chain made of laws, licences and regulators; connecting each rule to everyday life makes it easy to remember. For every important case, learn the facts, the question, the decision and, above all, the principle, which is what is applied in examination answers.

Why Energy Needs Law

Modern life (grid-charged phones, electric water pumps, gas stoves, diesel or CNG buses, farm pumps, hospital machines, factories) cannot be imagined without energy. Yet energy is not ready-made: coal is mined, carried by train to a power plant and burnt to heat water; steam turns a turbine that produces electricity, which travels over transmission lines to a substation and through local wires to the home, where a meter is read and a bill sent. This one journey raises many legal questions:

  • Who owns the coal underground (landowner, State or Union)? Who may mine it, on what terms, and how are miners protected from accidents?
  • Who may build the plant, and who fixes its selling price? Who may lay wires across private land?
  • Can the discom refuse to connect a poor household? What if the bill is wrong?
  • Who pays for the smoke the plant releases? (Harder still for a nuclear reactor or a large dam.)
Key point

Energy is essential, dangerous and valuable at the same time. Essential, so people must get it; dangerous, so it must be handled safely; valuable, so ownership and profit are disputed. Hence hundreds of energy statutes, rules, regulations and policies.

What Energy Law Covers

Key point

Energy Law is the body of law that governs how energy is found, produced, converted, transported, sold and used, and how the harm energy causes to people and the environment is controlled. It covers the whole chain, from a coal mine or an oil well to the switch in the room.

The food, energy and water nexus

Farms need energy for pumps and fertilisers, power plants need huge amounts of water, and dams both produce electricity and store irrigation water. So food, energy and water are studied together as the food, energy and water nexus: a decision in one affects the other two.

Classification of energy

KindMeaning and examples
PrimaryFound in nature: coal, crude oil, natural gas, uranium, sunlight, wind.
SecondaryMade from primary energy; electricity is the best example.
Non-renewableCoal, oil and gas: formed over millions of years and will run out one day.
RenewableSolar, wind and water: replaced by nature.

Many Indian villages still use traditional fuels such as firewood and cow dung for cooking, so the law of clean cooking is very much a part of Energy Law.

Six sources of Energy Law

  1. The Constitution, which divides the power to make energy laws between the Union and the States.
  2. Statutes of Parliament and State legislatures, such as the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Petroleum Act, 1934.
  3. Delegated legislation: rules made by the Government and regulations made by regulators under those statutes.
  4. Policies, such as the National Electricity Policy and the National Action Plan on Climate Change. They do not bind like statutes, but many statutes require regulators to follow them.
  5. Orders of regulators and judgments of courts.
  6. International law, such as the Paris Agreement on climate change.

The Constitution and Energy

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (05:06)

The Seventh Schedule has three lists: List I (Union List), where only Parliament legislates; List II (State List), where the States legislate; and List III (Concurrent List), where both can legislate, but a law of Parliament prevails in case of conflict.

SubjectEntryPosition and consequence
ElectricityEntry 38, List IIIConcurrent. Parliament made the Electricity Act, 2003 and States also make electricity laws; this explains why there is a Central Commission and State Commissions.
Oil and gasEntry 53, List IUnion. Covers regulation and development of oilfields and mineral oil resources, and petroleum and petroleum products; hence the Petroleum Act and the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act are central laws.
Mines and mineralsEntry 54, List I; Entry 23, List IIShared under Union control (see below).
Atomic energy and the mineral resources needed to produce itEntry 6, List IEntirely a Union subject.

Mines and minerals

Entry 54, List I empowers Parliament to regulate mines and mineral development to the extent that Parliament declares by law that Union control is expedient in the public interest. Entry 23, List II gives the States power over mines and mineral development, but subject to List I. When Parliament makes such a declaration, as it has in the Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, 1957, the State power shrinks to that extent.

Article 297

All lands, minerals and other things of value under the ocean within the territorial waters, the continental shelf or the exclusive economic zone of India vest in the Union. So the oil and gas under the seas belong to the Union of India, not to any State or company. This Article played a central role in a famous dispute between the companies of two brothers.

Key point

Formula: electricity is shared, oil and atomic energy are central, and mines are shared under Union control.

Energy Policy

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (07:49)

A policy is a plan of the Government that sets goals and chooses the means to reach them. Energy policy asks which sources to develop, how to price energy, how to ensure every citizen gets it, and how to protect the environment while doing so.

Integrated Energy Policy (2006)

In August 2006, an Expert Committee of the Planning Commission chaired by the economist Kirit Parikh submitted its report on an Integrated Energy Policy.

Key point

Energy security (Integrated Energy Policy): the country is energy secure when it can supply lifeline energy to all citizens irrespective of their ability to pay, and meet their demand for safe and convenient energy at competitive prices, at all times, even during shocks and disruptions that can reasonably be expected. "Lifeline energy irrespective of ability to pay" shows that energy policy is about basic needs, not only markets.

Draft National Energy Policy (2017)

Released by NITI Aayog in June 2017, it named four objectives: access to energy at affordable prices; improved security and independence; greater sustainability; and economic growth.

Key point

Access, security, sustainability and growth: almost every energy law tries to balance these four.

  • Section 3, Electricity Act, 2003 requires the Central Government to prepare a National Electricity Policy and a tariff policy.
  • The National Electricity Policy was issued in February 2005. The Tariff Policy was first notified in January 2006 and revised in January 2016.
  • In 2026, a new draft National Electricity Policy has been prepared, but it has not yet been adopted.

Are they binding? Ordinary policies are not laws. But Section 61(i) requires the commissions to be guided by these two policies when they make tariff regulations.

Case

Energy Watchdog case (Supreme Court). Held: the revised tariff policy has the force of law, and so does a related direction of the Ministry of Power, since both were issued under Section 3. Principle: in the power sector, policy can become law.

Tariffs and Subsidies

A tariff is the price charged for energy together with the method of calculating it. In a perfect market price reflects cost, but energy is a basic need that many cannot afford, so governments reduce the price for some people. This reduction is a subsidy.

Cross-subsidyDirect subsidy
One group of consumers pays more than the cost so that another can pay less. Industries and shops often pay a higher electricity tariff, and the extra money keeps tariffs low for farmers and poor households.The Government itself pays from its budget.
  • The Electricity Act says tariffs should progressively reflect the cost of supply and cross-subsidies should be reduced.
  • The Tariff Policy, 2016 asks commissions to bring tariffs within plus or minus 20 per cent of the average cost of supply. It allows special support for below-poverty-line consumers who use very little electricity, but even their tariff should be at least half of the average cost of supply.
  • Section 65: a State Government that wants to subsidise any class of consumers must pay the discom in advance.

Oil and gas subsidies

  • Petrol prices were freed from Government control in June 2010, diesel prices in October 2014.
  • Since 1 January 2015, under the PAHAL scheme, consumers buy cooking gas cylinders at market price and the subsidy is paid directly into their bank accounts (direct benefit transfer). This reduces leakage because the subsidy reaches the real consumer.
  • The Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana, launched on 1 May 2016 at Ballia in Uttar Pradesh, gives free cooking gas connections to women from poor households.

Subsidies create a constant tension: tariffs too low and discoms lose money and cannot maintain supply; tariffs too high and the poor lose access. The law tries to keep subsidies targeted, transparent and paid for.

Taxes on Energy and Mineral Royalty

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (12:48)

Electricity

  • Taxed by the States under Entry 53, List II (taxes on consumption or sale of electricity), usually called electricity duty on the bill. Electricity is not under GST.
  • Article 287: unless Parliament by law provides otherwise, a State cannot tax electricity consumed by or sold to the Government of India, or electricity used in running a railway.
  • Article 288 similarly protects water and electricity handled by an authority created by Parliament to manage an inter-State river.

Petroleum

  • When GST came in 2017, five products were kept outside it for the time being: crude oil, high speed diesel, petrol, natural gas and aviation turbine fuel. Under Article 279A(5), the GST Council will recommend the date from which they come under GST.
  • Until then, the Centre levies excise duty (Entry 84, List I) and the States levy sales tax or VAT (Entry 54, List II). That is why petrol prices differ from State to State.
  • A special windfall tax on domestic crude oil was imposed in July 2022, when global oil prices rose sharply, and abolished in December 2024.

Coal: tax serving environmental goals

  • July 2010: Clean Energy Cess of ₹50 per tonne, later raised to ₹400 per tonne, meant for clean energy projects.
  • July 2017: replaced under GST by a compensation cess of the same amount.
  • September 2025: compensation cess on coal removed and GST on coal raised from 5 to 18 per cent; in the same reform, GST on solar panels, wind turbines and similar renewable energy devices cut from 12 to 5 per cent.

Royalty

A company extracting a mineral such as coal pays royalty to the State that owns it. For decades, whether royalty is a tax was disputed.

Case

Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India (2024): nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court; majority of 8:1, judgment by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud. Held: royalty is not a tax; it is a payment the lessee makes to the owner of the mineral under the lease. The contrary view in India Cement Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu was overruled. The States have power to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing land, and the Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act does not take it away. Justice B.V. Nagarathna dissented. A later order of August 2024 softened the blow: no such tax for any period before 1 April 2005; interest and penalty for the period up to the judgment waived; past dues payable in instalments over 12 years from 1 April 2026. Principle: royalty is not a tax, and State taxing power over mineral rights survives; this matters greatly for coal.

Energy Jurisprudence in the World

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (16:40)

Energy jurisprudence means the basic legal ideas and principles that govern energy. International law shows four of them.

  1. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources. On 14 December 1962 the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 1803, recognising the right of peoples and nations to control their natural wealth, such as oil and minerals, for national development. Newly independent countries used it to take control of oil and mines run by foreign companies.
  2. Energy security through cooperation. After the oil price rise of the 1970s, consumer countries formed the International Energy Agency (1974) to coordinate responses to supply shocks. Oil exporters had earlier formed OPEC, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (1960).
  3. Protection of energy investment. The Energy Charter Treaty (signed at Lisbon, December 1994; in force April 1998) protects foreign energy investors and lets them bring claims directly against host States before international arbitration. Many countries felt it protects fossil fuel investments too strongly and makes climate action costly, so the European Union withdrew with effect from June 2025.
  4. Energy as a human right. No treaty states a right to energy in plain words, but Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recognise the right to an adequate standard of living, impossible without the light, clean cooking and health care that energy brings. Article 14(2)(h) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women mentions electricity directly: States must ensure rural women adequate living conditions, including housing, sanitation, electricity and water supply, transport and communications. India is a party.
Case

Joseph v. City of Johannesburg (October 2009, Constitutional Court of South Africa): a landlord failed to pay the electricity bills, and the city's power company cut off the tenants' supply without telling them. The tenants had no contract with the company. Held: they were entitled to procedural fairness, meaning notice and an opportunity to be heard, before disconnection, because electricity was a basic municipal service provided to the residents. Principle: access to a basic service attracts procedural fairness even without a contract with the supplier.

The Right to Electricity in India

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (20:15)

The Constitution does not list energy or electricity among the fundamental rights. Courts protect access through Article 21 (no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law), reading "life" as a life with human dignity, including the basic necessities that make it possible.

Case

Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh: a case on acquiring land for housing. Held: the right to shelter is part of Article 21, and it includes adequate living space, a safe and decent structure, clean and decent surroundings, sufficient light, pure air and water, electricity, sanitation and civic amenities like roads. Principle: electricity entered constitutional law as part of the right to shelter.

Case

Om Prakash v. Balkar Singh (Punjab and Haryana High Court, December 2022): Om Prakash possessed a shop; his landlord Balkar Singh claimed the tenancy had ended and Om Prakash was an illegal occupant, and the shop's electricity was cut. The Additional District Judge refused restoration. Held (Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul, allowing the petition): electricity, being a basic necessity, is an integral part of the right to life under Article 21; while a person is in possession, it cannot be withheld merely because a tenancy or title dispute is pending. Supply was ordered restored, on payment of dues, until the civil suit on possession was decided. Principle: electricity cannot be withheld from a person in possession as a weapon in a private dispute; this is the clearest statement linking electricity directly with Article 21.

Key point

Exam tip: limits of Om Prakash. It is a single-judge High Court decision in a landlord-tenant dispute. It protects a person in possession from being cut off as a weapon in a private dispute. It gives no right to free electricity, and does not stop a discom from disconnecting for non-payment, theft or safety reasons after following the law. Supply was restored only on payment of dues.

Case

Dilip v. Satish (Supreme Court, May 2022): a criminal appeal about a forged certificate. The Court restated as settled law that electricity is a basic amenity of which a person cannot be deprived, and that a discom cannot refuse a tenant a connection just because the landlord refuses a no objection certificate; it only has to check whether the applicant occupies the premises. Principle: electricity is a basic amenity, and occupation of the premises is enough for a connection. It is not an Article 21 ruling, because the Court did not rest the statement on Article 21.

The statutory right: Section 43

Under Section 43 of the Electricity Act, a discom must supply electricity to the owner or occupier of any premises on application.

Case

K.C. Ninan v. Kerala State Electricity Board (2023, Supreme Court). Held: the Section 43 duty is not absolute; lawful conditions, such as clearing old dues, may be attached to it.

Example

Prince runs a small shop as a tenant. His landlord cuts the electricity to force him out. While Prince is in possession, a court can order the supply restored, because electricity is a basic necessity linked to a dignified life. But Prince must pay his charges, and the discom may still disconnect him for theft or for refusing to pay after due notice.

Key point

In India, the right to electricity is a right to fair and non-arbitrary access on lawful conditions, not a right to free electricity.

Sustainable Development Goal 7

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (24:34)

In September 2015 the United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with 17 goals. Goal 7: "Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all." Affordable means people can pay for it; reliable, it does not fail; sustainable, it does not destroy the environment; modern, clean electricity and clean cooking fuels rather than smoky firewood.

Target (by 2030)Content
7.1Universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services.
7.2Substantial increase in the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.
7.3Double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency.
7.aInternational cooperation to share clean energy research and technology and promote clean energy investment.
7.bExpand infrastructure and upgrade technology for modern, sustainable energy in developing countries, including least developed countries, small island States and landlocked countries.

Global position: the Tracking SDG 7 report of 2025 found about 666 million people without electricity, mostly in Africa south of the Sahara, and about 2.1 billion without clean cooking. This is energy poverty: it keeps children from studying after dark and fills homes with smoke that harms health, above all women's.

India's progress

  • Village electrification: on 28 April 2018 every inhabited village in the Government's list was declared electrified, the last being Leisang in Manipur. But a village counts as electrified even if many homes are still dark.
  • Saubhagya (2017) connected households: about 2 crore 86 lakh homes by March 2022.
  • Ujjwala: gas connections to poor families for clean cooking.
  • UJALA (January 2015): energy efficiency; more than 36 crore LED bulbs distributed.
  • Renewables (target 7.2): one of the largest solar programmes in the world.
Key point

SDG 7 is a political commitment, not a treaty. No court enforces it directly, but it guides national policy; Indian laws and schemes on access, efficiency and renewable energy are the tools through which India works towards it.

Energy Security and Sustainable Development

Key point

Energy security (International Energy Agency): the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. The Integrated Energy Policy definition is wider, adding lifeline energy for every citizen.

Energy security has a short-term side (surviving a sudden supply shock) and a long-term side (steady investment in supply). India is especially exposed to the short-term risk, because it imports close to nine-tenths of the crude oil it uses.

Key point

Sustainable development (Brundtland Commission report, 1987): development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Case

Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (Supreme Court). Held: sustainable development, the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle are part of the law of the land.

The two ideas pull in different directions. Coal gives India cheap, secure electricity from its own mines, helping energy security and development; but it pollutes the air and warms the planet, threatening sustainable development.

Key point

Energy Law must constantly balance access, security and sustainability; every energy statute is an attempt to strike that balance.

The Power Sector: How Electricity Reaches the Consumer

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (29:43)

Electricity reaches almost every home, shop, farm and factory, so the power sector has the largest body of energy law.

StageWhat happens
GenerationA plant burns coal or gas, or uses falling water, wind, sunlight or nuclear fuel, to run a machine that produces electricity.
TransmissionElectricity travels long distances over high voltage lines (tall steel towers along highways); high voltage means less energy is lost.
DistributionVoltage is stepped down at substations near towns and villages, and local wires carry electricity to each building.
Key point

The company that owns the local wires, fixes the meter and sends the bill is the distribution licensee, commonly called a discom (distribution company).

Grid balance and load despatch

Electricity cannot easily be stored in large quantities, so at every moment the electricity put into the grid must match the electricity taken out; if the balance fails badly, the grid collapses. In July 2012 the grid failed on two days and a very large part of northern, eastern and north-eastern India lost power. The Act therefore creates a National Load Despatch Centre, Regional Load Despatch Centres and State Load Despatch Centres, which watch the grid, schedule and despatch electricity; every generator and licensee must follow their directions.

Each stage raises legal questions: who may build plants, own lines or sell to a house and at what price; what follows a wrong bill, a cut without notice or theft by hooking a wire onto the line; and who keeps the wires safe.

The Early Electricity Laws

Indian Electricity Act, 1910

Made when a few private companies supplied electricity in big cities. Its main idea was licensing: a supplier needed a Government licence fixing its area and duties. It also dealt with safety, such as how lines must be laid and protected. Under its Section 37, the Government made the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956, with detailed safety standards for wiring, earthing, overhead lines and electrical installations, which governed electrical safety for more than 50 years.

Electricity Supply Act, 1948

After independence, electricity was needed on a massive scale for irrigation, industry and villages, beyond what private companies could provide. The 1948 Act created State Electricity Boards, State-owned bodies doing generation, transmission and distribution within the State, and provided for the Central Electricity Authority, a technical body planning the national power system.

Key point

A vertically integrated utility is one in which all stages (generation, transmission, distribution) sit inside one organisation, as in a State Electricity Board.

Case

Gujarat Electricity Board v. Shantilal R. Desai: under Section 7 of the 1910 Act, when a private licence ended, the authorities had an option to purchase the licensee's undertaking. In January 1959 the Bombay State Electricity Board gave notice to Shantilal R. Desai, a private licensee, that it would purchase his undertaking when his licence expired in February 1962; after Gujarat became a separate State, the Gujarat Electricity Board took over the claim. The licensee argued that a mere notice was not enough, and that a 1948 Act Board could not use a 1910 Act option. Held (Supreme Court, Justice K.S. Hegde): the notice itself was the exercise of the option, and Section 71 of the Electricity Supply Act allowed the Board to step into the shoes of the licensing authority for this purpose. Principle: State Electricity Boards could lawfully take over private licensees' undertakings, one way the Boards came to run supply in most of India.

Decline of the Boards

For about four decades the Boards built a large network and electrified many villages. But tariffs were often fixed with an eye on votes rather than costs; farmers frequently got free or very cheap power that the State did not always pay for; and much electricity was lost through weak wires and theft. The Boards ran heavy losses and could neither pay suppliers nor invest in new plants. In 1991, as part of economic liberalisation, the Electricity Laws Amendment Act allowed private companies to build generating stations and sell power to the Boards, but investors hesitated because their only buyers, the Boards, were financially weak.

Reform and the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (35:33)

The reform idea: take tariff fixing out of the hands of politicians and give it to an independent expert body, a regulatory commission.

Example

A regulator is like an umpire: it does not play the game, but ensures the game is played by the rules.

Odisha (then Orissa) led the way: the Orissa Electricity Reform Act, 1995 split its State Electricity Board into separate companies, and in 1996 the State set up India's first State Electricity Regulatory Commission.

The Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 did two main things:

  1. It created the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), mainly to regulate the tariff of generating companies owned or controlled by the Central Government, and also of other generating companies selling electricity in more than one State, and to regulate inter-State transmission.
  2. It allowed each State to set up a State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC) to fix tariffs within the State. A State Commission was optional.

The CERC was constituted in July 1998 and in 1999 framed conduct of business regulations (how petitions are filed, heard and decided), beginning a culture of fixing tariffs in open hearings, after hearing the public, by reasoned orders. But the reform was incomplete: three laws (1910, 1948, 1998) stayed in force, often pulling in different directions, so one complete modern law was needed.

The Electricity Act, 2003

In force from 10 June 2003.

  • Section 185 repealed the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, but saved what had been done under them.
  • Section 76: the Central Commission set up under the 1998 Act continues as the Central Commission. Section 82: existing State Commissions continue, and every State must now have one; it is no longer optional.

Aims (preamble): to develop the electricity industry, promote competition, protect consumers' interests, supply electricity to all areas, rationalise tariffs, keep subsidy policies transparent, and promote efficient and environmentally benign policies. It also provides for the CEA, the regulatory commissions and an Appellate Tribunal. Courts read the whole Act in the light of these aims.

Eight big ideas

  1. Generation is free from licensing for anyone meeting the technical standards.
  2. Transmission, distribution and trading need a licence.
  3. State Electricity Boards were to be reorganised; most States split them into separate generation, transmission and distribution companies.
  4. Open access: a buyer can use others' wires to receive electricity from a seller of his choice.
  5. Tariffs fixed by independent commissions or discovered through competitive bidding.
  6. Statutory consumer rights: right to a connection, standards of performance, grievance forums.
  7. Strong provisions against theft of electricity.
  8. A specialised appellate tribunal.

The 2007 amendment

  • Softened the language on cross-subsidies.
  • Made open access available on payment of a surcharge.
  • Raised the rate of assessment for unauthorised use of electricity.
  • Made theft a cognizable and non-bailable offence.

The Regulators and Their Roles

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (40:40)

Ministry of Power and the Central Electricity Authority

  • Ministry of Power makes policy, not tariffs. Under Section 3 the Central Government prepares the National Electricity Policy and tariff policy in consultation with the States and the CEA; under Section 107 it can give policy directions to the Central Commission in matters of public interest (a State Government can do the same for its Commission under Section 108); it also makes rules under the Act.
  • Central Electricity Authority (CEA), the technical expert or "engineer of the system". Under Section 73 it advises the Government and lays down technical standards for plants and lines, safety requirements, grid standards and rules for installing meters; under Section 3(4) it prepares the National Electricity Plan once in five years. It does not fix tariffs.

Central and State Commissions

FunctionCentral Commission (Section 79)State Commission (Section 86)
TariffGenerating companies owned or controlled by the Central Government; other generating companies with a composite scheme for generating and selling in more than one State; inter-State transmissionGeneration, supply, transmission and wheeling within the State; also regulates discoms' power purchase, including the price under their agreements
LicencesInter-State transmission and inter-State tradingLicences within the State
DisputesInvolving generating companies or transmission licensees on these matters; may refer to arbitrationBetween licensees and generating companies, or refer to arbitration (Section 86(1)(f))
OtherSpecifies the Grid Code and standards of serviceMust promote co-generation and renewable electricity, and may require every discom to buy a fixed percentage from such sources (Section 86(1)(e))

Wheeling means carrying electricity over a licensee's wires for someone else.

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity and other bodies

  • Set up under Section 110. Under Section 111, any person aggrieved by an order of a commission or an adjudicating officer may appeal within 45 days.
  • Section 125: appeal from the Tribunal to the Supreme Court within 60 days, only on the grounds in Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, i.e. a substantial question of law.
  • Forum of Regulators (Section 166), constituted by the Central Government, where heads of the Central and State Commissions meet to bring some uniformity.
  • Grievance forums and the electricity ombudsman sit at the bottom of the ladder, close to the consumer.
Key point

Appeal ladder: Commission → Appellate Tribunal → Supreme Court.

Case

PTC India Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, judgment by Justice S.H. Kapadia): the CERC made regulations under Section 178 capping the trading margin, the profit an electricity trader may charge. PTC India challenged their validity before the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal under Section 111; the Tribunal doubted its power. Held: the Court drew a clear line between regulations and orders (see the table below). The Appellate Tribunal hears appeals against orders, so it cannot declare a regulation invalid; validity can be challenged only through judicial review in a High Court or the Supreme Court, though the Tribunal may interpret a regulation while hearing an appeal against an order. The ceiling on trading margins was upheld. Principle: challenge an order before the Appellate Tribunal, but a regulation through a writ petition.

Regulation (Section 178)Order (Section 79)
Subordinate legislation; a general rule for everyone; can override terms of existing contractsDecides a particular dispute
Validity challengeable only by judicial review (writ) in a High Court or the Supreme CourtAppealable to the Appellate Tribunal
Key point

The Ministry makes policy, the CEA sets technical standards, the commissions fix tariffs and decide disputes, and the Appellate Tribunal corrects their orders.

Generation without a Licence

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (45:55)

Section 7: any generating company may establish, operate and maintain a generating station without a licence if it complies with the technical standards for grid connection. Before 2003 a power plant needed many permissions; this was a revolution. Exception, Section 8: a large hydroelectric station needs the concurrence of the CEA, because dams raise questions of safety, river use and water sharing.

Captive generation

Key point

Section 2(8): captive generating plant means a power plant set up by any person to generate electricity primarily for his own use, including a plant set up by a cooperative society or association of persons for its members' use.

Under Section 9, any person may build and operate a captive plant and dedicated transmission lines; for example, a cement factory may build its own power plant beside the factory. To check that a plant is really captive and not a disguised commercial plant, Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005 sets two tests:

  1. Captive users hold at least 26 per cent of the ownership.
  2. They consume at least 51 per cent of the electricity generated in a year.

A plant failing these tests is treated as an ordinary generating station, and its users lose captive benefits such as freedom from the cross-subsidy surcharge.

Licences for Transmission, Distribution and Trading

Section 12: no person shall transmit, distribute or trade in electricity unless he holds a licence under Section 14 or is exempted under Section 13. Generation is free; these three are licensed.

Under Section 14, the Appropriate Commission (Central Commission for inter-State matters, State Commission within a State) grants licences. Its provisos create deemed licensees who need not apply:

  • The Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utilities (deemed transmission licensees).
  • A Government that itself transmits or distributes electricity.
  • A distribution licensee needs no separate licence for trading.

Parallel licences: a proviso allows a distribution licence to two or more persons in the same area, each using its own distribution system, to bring competition into distribution. Very few have been granted because a second network of wires is costly. In 2025 the Central Government proposed an Electricity Amendment Bill which, among other things, would let a discom use another licensee's network so that consumers could choose their supplier. But these proposals have not yet become law.

Exemption (Section 13): on the Government's recommendation, the Commission may exempt local bodies, panchayats, users associations, cooperative societies, non-governmental organisations and franchisees.

Franchisee (proviso to Section 14): a discom may give part of its area to another person to distribute on its behalf without a separate licence, but the discom remains responsible to consumers. This is how a private company can run distribution in a town while the licence stays with the State discom.

Open Access

Key point

Section 2(47): open access is the non-discriminatory provision for the use of transmission lines or distribution systems by any licensee, consumer or generator, under the Commission's regulations. The wires are treated like a highway: the owner cannot refuse others the road, but may charge a toll.

Example

Prince runs a large factory. A solar company in another district sells electricity cheaper than his local discom. Through open access he buys directly from the solar company; the electricity reaches his factory over the wires of the transmission company and the discom, and he pays them for using their wires. He gets a choice of seller.

The local discom, however, loses a big paying customer whose higher tariff helped keep tariffs low for farmers and poor households (cross-subsidy). So:

ChargeProvisionPurpose
Cross-subsidy surchargeSection 42(2)Compensates the discom for the lost cross-subsidy.
Additional surchargeSection 42(4)Covers fixed costs the discom has already incurred to serve the consumer.

Open access gives freedom, but at a price. To promote clean energy, the Green Energy Open Access Rules, 2022 allow consumers with a contracted demand or sanctioned load of 100 kilowatt or more to buy green power through open access, a much lower threshold than for ordinary open access.

How Electricity Tariffs Are Fixed

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (51:58)

A tariff is the price of electricity and the method of calculating it. It decides what a generator gets for the electricity it sells, what a transmission company gets for carrying it, and what a household pays.

A household bill usually has two parts: a fixed charge, which depends on the sanctioned load, and an energy charge, which depends on the units consumed.

Key point

One unit = one kilowatt-hour (kWh): the electricity used by a 1,000 watt heater running for one hour.

The Electricity Act, 2003 gives two routes for fixing tariffs: determination by the commission (Section 62) and competitive bidding (Section 63).

Route 1: Determination by the Commission (Section 62)

The commission examines the costs of the generator or licensee (fuel, interest, depreciation and a reasonable return on equity) and then fixes the tariff. This is often called the cost-plus method. Section 62 covers four kinds of tariff:

  1. supply by a generating company to a discom;
  2. transmission;
  3. wheeling;
  4. retail sale to consumers.

No undue preference: Section 62(3)

The commission must not show undue preference to any consumer, but it may differentiate according to the load factor, power factor, voltage, total consumption, time of supply, geographical position of an area, nature of supply and purpose of supply. That is why a factory, a shop, a farm and a home pay different tariffs. The differences must rest on these grounds and cannot be arbitrary.

Guiding principles: Section 61

When making tariff regulations, the commission must keep in mind, among other things:

  • commercial principles;
  • competition and efficiency;
  • safeguarding consumer interest while allowing reasonable recovery of costs;
  • multi-year tariff principles;
  • promotion of co-generation and renewable energy.

After the 2007 amendment, clause (g) says the tariff should progressively reflect the cost of supply and should also reduce cross-subsidies in the manner specified by the commission.

Key point

Note the word "reduce". The Act earlier spoke of eliminating cross-subsidies. Parliament softened this because eliminating them at once would hurt poor consumers.

Procedure: Section 64

The applicant must publish its tariff petition, the public may file objections, and the commission must issue its tariff order within 120 days. Tariff fixing is thus a public process.

Route 2: Competitive Bidding (Section 63)

Notwithstanding Section 62, the commission shall adopt a tariff determined through a transparent process of bidding held under guidelines issued by the Central Government. The discom invites bids and the company offering the lowest tariff wins.

PointSection 62: DeterminationSection 63: Competitive bidding
How the tariff is reachedCommission fixes it after examining costs (cost-plus)Commission adopts the tariff discovered in transparent bidding
Role of the commissionExamines fuel, interest, depreciation and return on equityDoes not examine costs again; only checks that bidding was transparent and followed the guidelines
Scope and useCovers supply by a generator to a discom, transmission, wheeling and retail saleMost new solar and wind projects today are awarded this way

Subsidy: Section 65

If a State Government wants a class of consumers, such as farmers, to pay less than the commission's tariff, it must pay the subsidy in advance. If it does not, its direction does not operate and the commission's tariff applies. This protects discoms from unfunded political promises.

Power Purchase Agreements and Disputes

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (55:40)

Once the price is fixed, buyer and seller sign a power purchase agreement (PPA), usually for 25 years. It fixes the tariff, quantity, payment terms and risks. Two clauses produce most of the litigation:

  • Force Majeure clause: excuses a party when an event beyond its control, such as a flood or a war, prevents performance. "Force Majeure" is French for "superior force".
  • Change in law clause: allows the tariff to be adjusted when a new law or tax raises or lowers the cost.

Forum for Disputes between Discoms and Generators

Case

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Essar Power Limited: The Gujarat Electricity Board agreed to buy 300 MW from Essar Power's Hazira plant, the rest of the output being meant for the Essar group. The agreement had an arbitration clause. Alleging that Essar was supplying its own group more than the permitted share, the Board's successor, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam, went to the State Commission under Section 86(1)(f). Essar invoked arbitration, and the Gujarat High Court appointed a retired Chief Justice of India as sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Held (Supreme Court, Justice Markandey Katju): The High Court's appointment was set aside. Clause (f) is a special provision: every dispute between a licensee and a generating company must be decided by the State Commission or an arbitrator it nominates. Section 174 says the Act overrides other laws; Section 175 says it is in addition to them. Where the two truly conflict, Section 174 is the principal provision and prevails.

Principle: Disputes between discoms and generators belong to the Commission; a court cannot appoint an arbitrator for them under the general arbitration law.

Fuel Price Risk, Force Majeure and Change in Law

Case

Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (the most important case on PPAs): The litigation included Adani Power's claims against Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and its other buyers. Through Section 63 bidding, Adani Power won long contracts to supply power from its Mundra plant in Gujarat to Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam and the two Haryana discoms, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam. Tata Power's Mundra company had also contracted to supply several States. Both relied on Indonesian coal. In 2010 and 2011 Indonesia required its coal to be sold at international market prices; costs rose sharply and the bid tariffs became unprofitable. The generators asked the Central Commission for relief; it granted a compensatory tariff, largely upheld by the Appellate Tribunal. Consumer groups such as Energy Watchdog, and several discoms, appealed.

Held (Supreme Court, Justice R.F. Nariman):

  1. Jurisdiction: A plant supplying more than one State has a composite scheme under Section 79(1)(b), so the Central Commission had jurisdiction, even though the tariff was fixed by bidding.
  2. No Force Majeure: The agreements themselves said a change in fuel cost is not Force Majeure. Where a contract itself deals with a risk, frustration under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act does not apply. A mere rise in price does not make performance impossible.
  3. Indonesian law not a "change in law": The clause referred only to Indian law.
  4. Indian coal policy was a change in law: A 2013 change in Indian coal policy reduced domestic coal supply to such plants, and relief could be given for it.

The compensatory tariff was set aside and the matter remitted for relief only for the change in Indian law.

Principle: A bidder who quotes a tariff takes the fuel-price risk unless the contract shifts it. Courts will not rewrite a bid because it has become unprofitable.

Case

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adani Power Mundra Limited (April 2023): When the dispute returned, the Supreme Court (Justice B.R. Gavai) dismissed the Haryana discoms' appeal. It upheld the compensation allowed by the Commission and the Appellate Tribunal for the shortfall in domestic coal, calculated on the whole contracted capacity, applying the principle of restitution. Concurrent findings of two expert bodies should not be disturbed lightly.

Key point

Restitution: the party hit by a change in law must be put back in the same economic position as if the change had not happened.

Termination for Delay in a Solar Contract

Case

M.P. Power Management Company Limited v. Renew Clean Energy Private Limited: Madhya Pradesh's power purchasing company awarded Renew Clean Energy a 51 MW solar contract (agreement signed November 2015). The chosen land was encroached, so the purchaser itself let the project shift to a new site, where construction went ahead. In August 2017 it terminated the agreement for a missed land-acquisition deadline and claimed a penalty of about ₹11.95 crore. The Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside the termination (the delay was only 16 days beyond the outer limit and partly caused by the purchasing company's own conduct) but upheld the contractual penalty for delay.

Held (Justice R. Banumathi): The Supreme Court dismissed the purchasing company's appeal and affirmed both parts.

Principle: A buyer who allows performance to continue cannot later terminate for a delay it helped to cause, though a penalty agreed for that delay may still be recovered.

Consumer Rights under the Electricity Act

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:02:49)

Who Is a Consumer: Section 2(15)

A consumer is any person supplied with electricity for his own use by a licensee, the Government or any other person supplying electricity to the public, and includes any person whose premises are for the time being connected to receive electricity.

Key point

Two points: the electricity must be for the person's own use; and the definition covers the occupier of connected premises, not only the person named on the bill.

Duty to Supply on Request: Section 43

Every distribution licensee shall, on an application by the owner or occupier of any premises, supply electricity to those premises within one month of receiving the application.

  • A tenant is an occupier; the law does not limit supply to owners.
  • If new mains or a new substation are needed, supply must follow as soon as that work is done, or within the period fixed by the Commission.
  • For a village or hamlet with no supply arrangement at all, the Commission may extend the period.
  • After the 2007 amendment, an Explanation requires the application to be complete in all respects, with the required documents and payment of necessary charges.
  • Under sub-section (3), a discom that fails to supply in time is liable to a penalty of up to ₹1,000 for each day of default.

Universal Service Obligation and Section 44

This duty is called the universal service obligation: a discom cannot pick and choose its customers. Like a railway that must carry every passenger with a ticket, it must connect every applicant who fulfils the conditions. Section 44 gives the only excuse: the discom is not bound to supply if it is prevented by cyclone, floods, storms or other occurrences beyond its control.

Rights and Tools of the Discom

  • Sections 45 to 47: recover the tariff and other charges, recover the expense of giving the connection, and ask for reasonable security.
  • Section 50: the State Commission makes an Electricity Supply Code covering recovery of charges, billing intervals, disconnection for non-payment, restoration of supply, prevention of tampering and entry of the discom's staff into premises.
  • Section 55: electricity must be supplied only through a correct meter installed under the CEA's regulations.

Protection against Disconnection: Section 56(1)

If a consumer neglects to pay a charge, the licensee may cut off supply only after not less than 15 clear days' notice in writing. Under the proviso, supply shall not be cut if the consumer deposits under protest, while the dispute is pending, either the amount claimed or the average monthly charge of the preceding six months, whichever is less. A consumer with a genuine billing dispute can thus keep the lights on.

Two-Year Limitation: Section 56(2)

No sum due from a consumer is recoverable after two years from the date it first became due, unless it has been shown continuously as arrears in the bills; and in such a case the licensee shall not cut off supply.

Case

Prem Cottex v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited: Prem Cottex's cotton yarn mill in Panipat got an extended load and a new meter in 2006. The meter needed a multiplying factor of 10, but the discom mistakenly billed with a factor of 5 for about three years. On discovering the mistake in 2009, it raised a short assessment of about ₹1.35 crore. The mill argued that the demand was barred by Section 56(2) because the electricity had been consumed long before; the National Consumer Commission dismissed its complaint.

Held (Supreme Court, Justice V. Ramasubramanian): Appeal dismissed. A sum becomes first due only when a bill for it is issued; in a case of mistake, the period begins when the mistake is discovered. The correct amount was first billed in 2009, so the demand was in time. Once two years have really passed, the sub-section bars both recovery and disconnection.

Principle: The two-year rule protects consumers from stale demands, but does not let a consumer escape paying for electricity undercharged by genuine mistake when the licensee acts after discovering it.

Standards of Performance and Grievance Redressal

  • Section 57: the Commission fixes standards of performance (for example, how quickly a fault must be repaired or a new meter installed). A licensee that fails them must pay compensation to the affected person, as the Commission decides, within 90 days.
  • Section 42(5) and (6): every discom must set up a forum for redressal of consumer grievances; a dissatisfied consumer may go to the electricity ombudsman appointed by the State Commission.

Consumer Protection Law Saved: Section 173

Nothing in the Electricity Act has effect so far as it is inconsistent with the Consumer Protection Act, the Atomic Energy Act or the Railways Act. The Act names the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, now replaced by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. A consumer facing a deficiency in electricity service, such as a wrong bill or a careless disconnection, can therefore also approach a consumer commission.

Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Rules, 2020

Made by the Central Government in December 2020, these rules turn the duties of discoms into clear, enforceable timelines. After a 2024 amendment, a new connection must generally be given within:

AreaTime limit for a new connection
Metropolitan areas3 days
Other municipal areas7 days
Rural areas15 days
Hilly rural areas30 days

The rules also cover metering, billing, disconnection, reliability of supply, standards of performance, compensation and call centres.

Key point

A prosumer is a person who consumes electricity from the grid and also produces electricity, for example through rooftop solar panels, and supplies the surplus back to the grid. The 2020 Rules recognise this new kind of consumer.

Example

Prince rents a shop and applies for a connection; the landlord is abroad and unreachable. As an occupier under Section 43, Prince cannot be refused merely because he is not the owner; once his application is complete and charges are paid, he must be connected within the legal time limit. Later he gets a bill ten times his normal bill. He deposits his average monthly charge under protest and complains to the grievance forum, so his supply cannot be cut while the dispute is pending.

Leading Cases on Consumer Rights and Duties

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:10:44)

Must a New Owner Pay the Old Owner's Dues?

Case

K.C. Ninan v. Kerala State Electricity Board (2023): Nineteen appeals from Kerala, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Assam and West Bengal were heard together. In each, the previous owner had left electricity dues unpaid and supply had been cut; the owners had usually borrowed on the security of the premises, and some were in liquidation. The premises were auctioned, generally "as is where is", and the discoms refused to connect the purchasers until the old dues were paid.

Held (three-judge bench, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, May 2023):

  1. The Section 43 duty to supply is not absolute; it is subject to the charges and compliances lawfully required by the discom.
  2. The duty is owed to the owner or occupier of particular premises, so a consumer is always linked to the premises supplied.
  3. The Section 50 power to make the supply code is wide enough to require a new owner to clear the previous owner's arrears; such a provision has a reasonable nexus with the objects of the Act.
  4. An "as is where is" auction buyer is on notice that the seller takes no responsibility for dues such as electricity charges.

Under Article 142, the discoms in those cases were directed to waive interest accrued from the date the purchasers applied for supply.

Principle: The Section 43 right to a connection is real but not unconditional. Where a State's supply code lawfully requires it, a new owner must clear old dues before getting supply. The case also shows the limits of the right to electricity.

Example

If Prince buys a factory in an auction, his first question should be whether any electricity dues are pending on it.

Strict Liability for Live Wires

Case

M.P. Electricity Board v. Shail Kumari (one of the most important cases on the liability of electricity suppliers): On the night of 23 August 1997, factory worker Jogendra Singh, cycling home in the rain, was electrocuted by a live wire lying on the road. His widow and family claimed compensation from the Electricity Board; the Board argued an unknown person who had drawn the wire to steal electricity, so the death was not its fault. The trial court refused compensation; the Madhya Pradesh High Court allowed the family's appeal, and the Board went to the Supreme Court.

Held (Supreme Court, Justice K.T. Thomas): Appeal dismissed, applying the strict liability rule of the English case Rylands v. Fletcher. Supplying electricity through wires in public places is a hazardous activity. The "act of a stranger" exception applies only when the stranger's act could not be foreseen; theft by tapping lines was a known risk the Board should have guarded against.

Principle: An electricity supplier is strictly liable for death or injury caused by its live wires; the victim need not prove negligence.

Key point

Strict liability: a person who carries on a hazardous activity is liable for the harm it causes even if he was not negligent.

Limits of a Special Statutory Forum

Case

Punjab State Electricity Board v. Guru Nanak Cold Storage and Ice Factory: Under the old Acts, the Board disconnected a cold storage's supply in August 1982 for non-payment and later recovered the arrears. The cold storage claimed about ₹93 lakh as damages for the disconnection and wanted it decided by the special arbitration under the old electricity laws; the High Court agreed.

Held (Supreme Court, Justice K. Ramaswamy): The Board's appeal was allowed. The special statutory arbitration covered only the disputes the Acts specifically sent to it. A claim for damages for disconnection was an ordinary civil claim, to be decided in the ordinary way.

Principle: A special forum created by a statute can decide only what the statute gives it.

PointPunjab SEB v. Guru Nanak Cold StorageGujarat Urja Vikas Nigam v. Essar Power
LawOld electricity ActsElectricity Act, 2003
DisputeConsumer's claim for damages for disconnectionDispute between a discom and a generator
OutcomeOutside the special statutory arbitration; ordinary civil claimThe Act itself sends the dispute to the Commission

Unauthorised Use and Theft of Electricity

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:15:36)

The Act draws a sharp line between two kinds of misuse: unauthorised use, a civil matter, and theft, a crime.

Unauthorised Use: Section 126

The Explanation lists five forms. Electricity is used:

  1. by artificial means;
  2. by a means not authorised by the licensee;
  3. through a tampered meter;
  4. for a purpose other than the authorised one;
  5. for premises other than the authorised premises.
Example

Farhan takes a domestic connection at a cheap tariff and runs a flour mill with it. He uses electricity for an unauthorised purpose even though he pays for every unit.

Procedure

  1. An assessing officer inspects the premises.
  2. If he concludes that unauthorised use is taking place, he makes a provisional assessment and serves it on the occupier.
  3. The occupier may file objections, after which a final assessment is made.
  • The assessment covers the whole period of unauthorised use; if that period cannot be found, the 12 months before the inspection.
  • Charges are calculated at twice the normal tariff.
  • Section 127: appeal to an appellate authority within 30 days, only after depositing half the assessed amount.
  • Section 145: civil courts cannot entertain suits on matters the assessing officer or appellate authority is empowered to decide.

Theft: Section 135

The key word is dishonestly. Whoever dishonestly taps a licensee's lines, tampers with a meter, uses a tampered meter, damages a meter so as to interfere with accurate metering, or uses electricity for an unauthorised purpose, commits theft.

  • Punishment: imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both.
  • First conviction: fine not less than three times the financial gain from the theft.
  • Second conviction: fine not less than six times the gain.
  • Where the load stolen exceeds 10 kW, a second conviction also carries imprisonment of at least six months, extendable to five years.

Procedural provisions

  • Section 151B (2007 amendment): offences under Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 are cognizable and non-bailable.
  • Section 153: States may set up Special Courts for speedy trial.
  • Section 152: some cases may be compounded, i.e., settled by paying a fixed sum instead of facing trial.

Unauthorised Use and Theft Compared

PointUnauthorised use (Section 126)Theft (Section 135)
NatureCivil matterCrime
IntentionNo dishonest intention neededDishonesty needed
ConsequenceCivil assessment at twice the tariffCriminal punishment
Decided byAssessing officer and appellate authorityCriminal court, usually a Special Court
Key point

The same act, such as tampering with a meter, may lead to both a civil assessment and a criminal prosecution.

Consumer Commission Has No Jurisdiction

Case

U.P. Power Corporation Limited v. Anis Ahmad (2013): The National Consumer Commission had upheld several consumer complaints against assessments for unauthorised use and action for theft; the power companies appealed.

Held (Supreme Court, Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, July 2013): Appeals allowed. Under Section 173 the Consumer Protection Act prevails in case of conflict, but a consumer commission can decide only complaints about a deficiency in service or an unfair trade practice. An assessment under Section 126, or action for offences under Sections 135 to 140, is not such a matter; these have their own machinery (assessing officer and appellate authority; Special Courts).

Principle: A complaint against an assessment for unauthorised use, or against action for theft, is not maintainable before a consumer commission. For ordinary billing mistakes and poor service, the consumer commission remains open.

The Electricity Rules and Other Rules

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:20:34)

The Act gives the framework; much of the detail lives in rules. Under Section 176, the Central Government makes rules to carry out the Electricity Act. The most important set is the Electricity Rules, 2005, notified on 8 June 2005.

  • Rule 3 (captive generating plant): tests of 26% ownership and 51% consumption, and how they apply to a cooperative society, an association of persons and a special purpose company owning a power station. If captive users fail the consumption test in any year, all the plant's electricity that year is treated as supply by an ordinary generating company.
  • Rule 7: the grievance forum under Section 42(5) shall consist of officers of the discom itself. That is why the ombudsman under Section 42(6), appointed or designated by the State Commission, is such an important second level.
  • Rule 8: where the Central Commission has fixed a generating company's tariff, a State Commission cannot determine it again.
  • Rule 9: an inter-State trading licensee may also buy from a seller in a State and resell to a buyer in the same State without a separate State licence.
  • Other rules: directions of load despatch centres, the surcharge for inter-State open access, and the working of police and courts in theft cases until Special Courts are set up.

Recent Amendments

  • Electricity Amendment Rules, December 2022: automatic monthly pass-through of changes in fuel and power purchase costs. Earlier, when coal became costlier, a discom waited months for the Commission to allow a higher tariff while its losses grew. Now the change is passed on monthly through a formula fixed by the State Commission, and the account is corrected once a year.
  • 2025 amendment: allowed consumers to own, lease or operate energy storage systems, such as large batteries.
Key point

True-up: the yearly correction of the account after monthly pass-through of fuel and power purchase costs.

Other Sets of Rules

  • Electricity Late Payment Surcharge and Related Matters Rules, 2022: made because discoms were not paying generators on time. They fix a surcharge on delayed payments, allow old dues to be cleared in instalments, and allow supply to a defaulting discom to be regulated.
  • Green Energy Open Access Rules, 2022: promote the purchase of clean power.
  • Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Rules, 2020: enforceable timelines for ordinary consumers.

Safety: From the 1956 Rules to CEA Regulations

Section 185 of the Act of 2003 kept the old Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 alive until the CEA made safety regulations under Section 53. The CEA did so in 2010 (regulations on measures relating to safety and electric supply) and replaced them with new safety regulations in 2023. Electrical safety today is governed mainly by CEA regulations.

The Energy Conservation Act, 2001

Every unit of energy saved need not be produced and causes no pollution, so saving energy is often the cheapest and cleanest source of energy. This idea lies behind the Act, which received assent on 29 September 2001; its main provisions came into force on 1 March 2002. It does not ban energy use: it sets standards, requires information and audits, and penalises those who ignore their duties.

1. Bureau of Energy Efficiency (Sections 3 and 13)

Section 3 creates the Bureau of Energy Efficiency, the Central Government's expert body on energy efficiency, managed by a Governing Council. Under Section 13 it recommends standards for appliances and buildings, prepares codes, arranges training, certifies energy managers and accredits energy auditors.

2. Appliances (Section 14)

The Central Government can fix energy consumption standards for notified equipment and appliances and require them to carry labels: the familiar star label on an air conditioner or refrigerator. More stars mean less electricity for the same work, helping buyers choose efficiently.

3. Designated Consumers

The Central Government can declare an energy-intensive user a designated consumer. The Schedule lists such industries, including power stations, fertilisers, cement, iron and steel, aluminium, pulp and paper, textiles and railways. A designated consumer must appoint a certified energy manager, get an energy audit by an accredited energy auditor, report its energy use, and follow the energy consumption norms fixed for it.

Energy savings certificates and Perform, Achieve and Trade

A 2010 amendment added energy savings certificates under Section 14A, on which the Government based the market scheme Perform, Achieve and Trade. Each designated consumer gets a target to reduce its energy use per unit of product. Beating the target earns certificates; falling short means buying certificates from others or facing a penalty.

Example

Farhan's cement plant is a designated consumer. If it saves more energy than required, he earns certificates, which he can sell to Prince, whose steel plant fell short. The scheme rewards efficient plants and makes inefficiency costly.

4. Buildings (Section 15)

The Central Government prescribes an energy conservation code for buildings, which States can modify to suit local climate. Section 15 empowers State Governments to enforce the code, designate a State agency for energy conservation and direct energy audits.

5. Penalties (Section 26)

Failure to comply with the main directions (appointing an energy manager, getting an energy audit, following the norms) may attract a penalty of up to ₹10 lakh, and up to ₹10,000 for every day of continuing failure. Since the 2022 amendment, Section 26 also adds further penalties: where energy consumption norms are breached by an industrial unit or vessel, up to twice the price of every metric ton of oil equivalent consumed in excess of the norms; for vehicle manufacturers, a penalty for each non-compliant vehicle sold; and for non-conforming appliances, a penalty for each appliance. Penalties are imposed by an adjudicating officer after an inquiry. Since the 2010 amendment, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity hears appeals under this Act too.

Note

Updated from the lecture: the lecture gave only the penalty of up to ₹10 lakh plus up to ₹10,000 a day. The correct position is that the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022 substituted Section 26: the ₹10 lakh and ₹10,000-a-day penalty remains the general penalty, but there are now additional penalties, including up to twice the price of every metric ton of oil equivalent consumed in excess of the prescribed norms (industrial units and vessels), ₹25,000 or ₹50,000 per vehicle sold for vehicle manufacturers who breach fuel consumption norms, and a per-appliance penalty for non-conforming appliances. Source: The Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Section 12, substituting Section 26).

The Energy Conservation Amendment Act, 2022

Assented to on 19 December 2022, it made four major changes:

  1. the Central Government may specify a carbon credit trading scheme;
  2. designated consumers may be required to meet a minimum share of energy needs from non-fossil sources, such as green hydrogen or renewable electricity;
  3. the building code became the Energy Conservation and Sustainable Building Code, which also applies to large residential buildings;
  4. vehicles and vessels were brought within energy consumption norms.

It also enlarged the Bureau's Governing Council.

Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, 2023

Notified on 28 June 2023, the scheme creates an Indian carbon market. One carbon credit certificate = one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent reduced or removed. Heavy industries get targets to reduce the greenhouse gas emission intensity of their products (emissions per tonne of product); in 2025 and early 2026, targets were notified for aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, pulp and paper, petroleum refining, petrochemicals and textiles. Beating the target earns credits; failing means buying them. The Act, which began as a law on saving energy, is now the base of India's carbon market.

Key point

Energy Conservation Act in one line: standards for appliances, targets for industries, codes for buildings, and credits for carbon.

Public-Private Partnership in the Power Sector

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:29:43)

Key point

A public-private partnership (PPP) is an arrangement in which the Government and a private company share the work and risks of building and running infrastructure. The Government usually provides the policy, approvals and a secure buyer; the private company brings money, technology and management skill.

Why was it needed? Power plants and networks cost thousands of crores of rupees. After the State Electricity Boards fell into losses, the public sector alone could not meet demand, so India opened the sector in stages, each creating a new form of partnership.

Forms of Partnership

  1. Private generation: from 1991, private companies could build generating stations and sell power to the State Boards.
  2. Competitive bidding under Section 63: Central Government guidelines of 19 January 2005 for procuring power through tariff-based bidding; the lowest tariff wins.
  3. Ultra Mega Power Projects: launched by the Ministry of Power around 2006; very large coal-based plants of about 4,000 MW each. The Government does the difficult groundwork first: special companies set up by the Power Finance Corporation first acquire land, obtain clearances and arrange fuel and water, and are then handed over to the private bidder quoting the lowest tariff. Sasan (Madhya Pradesh) and Krishnapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) went to Reliance Power; Mundra (Gujarat) went to Tata Power. The Mundra imported-coal dispute in the tariff cases shows how risk allocation in such partnerships finally reaches the courts.
  4. Private transmission: inter-State transmission projects are awarded through tariff-based competitive bidding under guidelines first issued in 2006; the winner builds the line and earns a fixed transmission charge for many years.
  5. Private distribution: under the Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000, the Delhi Vidyut Board was split up, and in 2002 its distribution business went to BSES Rajdhani, BSES Yamuna and North Delhi Power Limited (now Tata Power Delhi Distribution). In each, the private partner holds 51% and the Delhi Government 49%.
  6. Distribution franchise: the discom keeps its licence, but a private company runs distribution in a particular area. The first in India was Torrent Power for the Bhiwandi circle in Maharashtra (agreement signed in December 2006).

Most solar and wind power in India today also comes from private developers selected through auctions by public agencies such as the Solar Energy Corporation of India.

  1. The contract must allocate risks clearly, especially fuel risk, change in law and delay in land or clearances.
  2. The buyer must pay on time, which is why the late payment surcharge rules were made.
  3. Sanctity of contracts matters: if a Government reopens tariffs after a private company has invested, investors lose confidence.
  4. The regulator must protect consumers, so that private profit does not become public loss.

Oil, Petroleum and Natural Gas: The Oil and Gas Chain

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:33:52)

Electricity is only one part of the energy story. Cars, trucks, tractors, ships and aeroplanes run on oil; many homes cook on gas; factories use gas to make fertilisers and steel. India also imports most of its crude oil. Energy Law therefore cannot be understood through electricity alone: the law governs oil and gas from the well to the petrol pump and the gas pipeline in the kitchen.

Basic terms

  • Crude oil: the thick liquid that comes out of the ground. It is not used directly.
  • Refinery: breaks crude oil into useful products such as petrol, diesel, kerosene, aviation fuel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG, the cooking gas in cylinders).
  • Natural gas: found underground, often along with oil.
  • Liquefied natural gas (LNG): natural gas cooled until it becomes a liquid; it can be carried by ships.
  • Compressed natural gas (CNG): natural gas compressed and filled in vehicles.
  • Piped natural gas (PNG): natural gas supplied to homes through pipes.
  • Hydrocarbons: a general word for oil and gas, because they are made of hydrogen and carbon.

The three stages of the industry

StageWhat it covers
UpstreamExploration and production: searching for oil and gas under land or sea and taking it out.
MidstreamTransport and storage: pipelines, tankers and storage tanks.
DownstreamRefining, marketing and distribution: petrol pumps, gas agencies and city gas networks.
Key point

Each stage has its own law. Keep the three-stage picture (upstream, midstream, downstream) in mind: it helps place every statute on oil and gas.

Evolution and Historical Background of Oil and Gas

  • 1889: oil was struck at Digboi in Assam, where the story of oil in India began.
  • 1901: a refinery started working at Digboi. For the next half century oil was produced on a small scale by private and foreign companies.
  • After independence: the Government decided that the search for oil should be led by the public sector.
  • August 1956: the Oil and Natural Gas Commission was formed; it became a statutory body in 1959. Oil India Limited also traces its origin to 1959.
  • February 1974: the Commission discovered the huge offshore field of Bombay High, which began production in May 1976. In the same decade the Government took over the Indian businesses of foreign oil marketing companies.
  • Administered pricing mechanism: for many years the Government controlled the prices of petroleum products. This mechanism was dismantled on 1 April 2002, except for kerosene sold through ration shops and domestic cooking gas.
  • Opening up (late 1990s): private and foreign companies were invited to explore for oil and gas under the New Exploration Licensing Policy.
  • 2006: Parliament created an independent regulator for the midstream and downstream sectors.
  • 2016: the Government adopted a new licensing policy.
  • 2025: Parliament modernised the old oilfields law.

Who Regulates Oil and Gas

Oil and gas fall under Entry 53 of the Union List, and under Article 297 all minerals under the seas vest in the Union. The Union therefore dominates this sector. Several bodies share the work:

  • Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas: makes policy and signs contracts for exploration.
  • Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (set up in 1993): the technical arm of the Ministry for the upstream sector; manages exploration contracts and data.
  • Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB): regulates the midstream and downstream sectors, but not production.
  • Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO): based in Nagpur and headed by the Chief Controller of Explosives; grants safety licences under the Petroleum Act, the Explosives Act and the gas cylinder rules.
  • Oil Industry Safety Directorate (set up in 1986): lays down safety standards for oil and gas installations.
Key point

Division of work: policy with the Ministry; upstream with the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons; midstream and downstream markets with the PNGRB; safety with PESO and the Oil Industry Safety Directorate.

The Petroleum Act, 1934

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:38:49)

Petrol and diesel catch fire easily, and a single careless act at a fuel depot can kill many people. The Petroleum Act, 1934 therefore regulates the import, transport, storage, production, refining and blending of petroleum, mainly for safety.

Definition and classes of petroleum: Section 2

Section 2 defines petroleum as any liquid hydrocarbon or mixture of hydrocarbons, and any inflammable mixture containing liquid hydrocarbons.

Key point

Flash point: the lowest temperature at which the vapour of a liquid catches fire when a flame is brought near it. The lower the flash point, the more dangerous the liquid.

ClassFlash pointExample
Petroleum Class ABelow 23°CPetrol
Petroleum Class B23°C or more but below 65°CKerosene and diesel
Petroleum Class C65°C or more but below 93°CFurnace oil

The stricter rules apply to the more dangerous classes.

The core rule and rule-making power

  • Section 3: no one shall import, transport or store petroleum except in accordance with the rules made under Section 4 and, where the rules require a licence, under a licence.
  • Section 4: the Central Government may make rules on matters such as the places of import, the conditions of licences, the authorities who grant them, and the design of containers.
  • Penalties: small fines and short imprisonment, because the Act is a safety law rather than a criminal law.

The Petroleum Rules, 2002

The detailed law is in the Petroleum Rules, 2002, notified on 13 March 2002, which replaced the Petroleum Rules of 1976. They lay down conditions for storage tanks, tankers, petrol pumps, safety distances and fire protection. The licensing authority is the Chief Controller of Explosives.

Example

Prince wants to open a petrol pump on a highway. He needs a licence under the Petroleum Rules to store petrol and diesel, and his pump must meet the rules on tank design, safety distances and fire-fighting equipment. If he stores petrol in a shed without a licence, he commits an offence under the Act.

The Explosives Laws and Gas Cylinders

Two other statutes are often confused with the Petroleum Act.

The Explosives Act, 1884: a regulatory law

  • Section 5: the Central Government may make rules for regulating, by licence, the manufacture, possession, use, sale, transport, import and export of explosives.
  • Section 7: the Central Government may make rules for the entry, inspection, search and seizure of explosives.

Under these two sections the Government has made rules for gas cylinders. The first Gas Cylinders Rules were made in 1981; they were replaced in 2004; today the Gas Cylinders Rules, 2016 apply. They govern the design, filling, testing, storage and transport of cylinders containing compressed gases, including the domestic cooking gas cylinder and the CNG cylinder in a car. When a cooking gas cylinder is filled, stored in a godown and delivered to a house, every step is governed by rules made under the Explosives Act.

The Explosive Substances Act, 1908: a criminal law

This Act is completely different. It is aimed at the malicious use of explosives, such as bomb attacks.

  • Section 3: punishes causing an explosion likely to endanger life or property.
  • Section 4: punishes attempting to cause such an explosion, or making or keeping explosives with that intent.
  • Section 5: punishes possessing explosive substances in suspicious circumstances, and puts on the accused the burden of showing a lawful object.
  • 2001 amendment: certain powerful explosives, such as RDX, are treated as a special category; causing an explosion with them can be punished with death or rigorous imprisonment for life.
  • Section 7: a prosecution needs the consent of the District Magistrate.

Comparison

PointExplosives Act, 1884Explosive Substances Act, 1908
PurposeTo prevent accidentsTo punish crime
MethodLicences and rulesHeavy criminal punishment
Typical violatorA gas agency storing cylinders without a licenceA person who keeps a bomb

The Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:43:37)

Moving upstream to the search for oil and gas, this Act regulates oilfields and the development of mineral oil resources.

  • Section 3: defines mineral oils to include natural gas and petroleum.
  • Sections 5 and 6: the Central Government makes rules for the grant of leases and for the conservation and development of mineral oils.
  • Section 6A (inserted in 1969): the holder of a lease must pay royalty on the oil and gas produced, at the rates in the Schedule.

For decades this short Act worked mainly through its rules. But the industry changed: new kinds of hydrocarbons, like shale gas and coal bed methane, became important, and investors wanted stable and modern law.

The Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Amendment Act, 2025

The Amendment Act received assent on 28 March 2025. Its main changes:

  1. Wider definition of mineral oils: any naturally occurring hydrocarbon, including coal bed methane, shale gas and shale oil, tight gas and gas hydrates. Coal, lignite and helium are excluded.
  2. Petroleum lease: the old mining lease is replaced by a petroleum lease, covering the whole range of activities from exploration to production.
  3. New Section 4A: no one shall carry on these operations, on land or at sea, except under a petroleum lease.
  4. Stability for investors: the terms of a lease cannot be changed later to the disadvantage of the lessee.
  5. Wider rule-making power: sharing of data and infrastructure, safety, decommissioning of old fields, reducing carbon emissions and setting up renewable energy projects in oilfields.
  6. Decriminalisation: most violations are no longer prosecuted. An adjudicating authority of the rank of Joint Secretary or above can impose a penalty of up to ₹25 lakh, plus up to ₹10 lakh for every day the violation continues. Appeals go to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, which also serves as the appellate tribunal for the petroleum regulator.

Existing leases and licences are saved.

The Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959 and the Petroleum Exploration Licence

Made under the Oilfields Act, these Rules created the two classic concessions of the oil world.

  • Rule 4: no one shall prospect for petroleum without a petroleum exploration licence, and no one shall mine petroleum without a petroleum mining lease.
  • A petroleum exploration licence permits searching for oil and gas in an area.
  • A petroleum mining lease permits producing them commercially after a discovery.

Who grants them: Rule 5

Rule 5 follows Article 297:

AreaGrantorRoyalty goes to
Offshore (vests in the Union)Central GovernmentCentral Government
Onshore (petroleum vests in the State)State Government, only with the prior approval of the Central GovernmentState Government
  • An exploration licence is granted for 4 years, with extensions of one year at a time until the exploration period ends.
  • A mining lease is ordinarily granted for 20 years over an area of about 250 square kilometres.
  • The lessee pays royalty to the Government that owns the petroleum.
Example

A company finds signs of oil in the desert of Rajasthan. It first needs a petroleum exploration licence from the State Government, granted with the approval of the Centre. If it makes a commercial discovery, it needs a petroleum mining lease to produce the oil, and it pays royalty to the State. If the discovery were under the sea off the coast of Gujarat, the Central Government would grant the licence and receive the royalty.

In 2025, after the amendment of the Oilfields Act, the Government moved to replace the 1959 Rules with new rules built around a single petroleum lease.

The Hydrocarbon Licensing Regime

The rules say what kind of licence is needed; the licensing policy and the contract signed with the Government decide which company gets the licence and on what economic terms.

The nomination regime

In the early years the Government simply nominated its own companies, the Oil and Natural Gas Commission and Oil India, to explore particular areas. In the 1980s and 1990s some blocks were offered to private companies in limited rounds.

The New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP)

  • Approved in 1997; first round of bidding in 1999.
  • Private and foreign companies could compete with public companies on equal terms.
  • Nine rounds were held between 1999 and 2012.
  • The contract used was the production sharing contract: the company first recovers its costs from the oil and gas produced; the remaining production, called profit petroleum, is shared between the company and the Government.
  • The problem: the Government had to check every cost claimed, which led to long disputes. A company had little reason to keep costs low, because higher costs meant a larger recovery before sharing.

The Hydrocarbon Exploration and Licensing Policy (HELP), March 2016

HELP replaced NELP and made four major changes:

  1. Revenue sharing contract: the Government gets a share of the gross revenue from the very beginning, so there is no need to check costs.
  2. Uniform licence: one licence covers all kinds of hydrocarbons, conventional and unconventional. Earlier, a company that found shale gas in its oil block needed a separate licence.
  3. Open acreage licensing: a company can choose an area and express interest at any time, instead of waiting for the Government to offer blocks. Open acreage bidding started in 2017, supported by a National Data Repository of geological data.
  4. Marketing and pricing freedom: companies may market their gas and fix its price, subject to some conditions.
PointProduction sharing contract (NELP)Revenue sharing contract (HELP)
What the Government sharesProfit, after costs are recoveredRevenue, from day one
AdministrationNeeds heavy monitoring of costsSimpler to administer

Reliance Natural Resources Limited v. Reliance Industries Limited

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:51:06)

This is the most important case in Indian oil and gas law. It arose from a family dispute but decided who really controls the natural gas under India's seas.

Case

Reliance Natural Resources Limited v. Reliance Industries Limited (2010): Reliance Industries, as part of a group holding a production sharing contract, discovered a large gas field in the Krishna Godavari basin off the eastern coast in 2002. In June 2005 Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani, the two sons of the founder of the Reliance group, settled their differences through a family memorandum of understanding mediated by their mother, Kokilaben Ambani. The memorandum divided the group's businesses; a new company, Reliance Natural Resources, controlled by Anil Ambani, was to receive a large quantity of gas from the field of Reliance Industries, controlled by Mukesh Ambani, at a fixed low price for many years. A scheme of demerger was sanctioned by the Bombay High Court. When disputes arose, Reliance Natural Resources sought to enforce the price and quantity promised; a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court largely accepted its claim. Reliance Natural Resources, Reliance Industries and the Union of India all appealed.

Issue: whether a private family arrangement could decide the price and allocation of natural gas produced from a field that belongs to the nation.

Bench: three judges, decided on 7 May 2010. The main judgment was written by Justice P. Sathasivam for himself and Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan; Justice B. Sudershan Reddy wrote a separate judgment, differing on some points but reaching the same result.

Held: the High Court's judgment was set aside. (1) Under Article 297, the natural gas under the territorial waters and continental shelf vests in the Union, which holds it for the purposes of the Union, that is, for the people as a whole; the Government holds it in trust, like a trustee. (2) The contractor under the production sharing contract does not become the owner of the gas in a way that lets it sell the gas on its own terms; it must follow the Government's policy on pricing and utilisation. (3) A private family arrangement cannot override the Government's gas utilisation policy or its decisions on price. The Court recalled an earlier Constitution Bench ruling that the people of the entire country have a stake in natural gas and its benefit must be shared by the whole country. The judgments discussed the public trust doctrine (the State holds natural resources as a trustee for the public), which Justice Reddy explained at length. The two companies were directed to renegotiate their gas supply terms within the framework of Government policy.

Principle: natural gas and other offshore resources are national wealth held by the Union in trust for the people. Private contracts and family settlements must yield to the Government's policy on their price and use.

Key point

Study this case together with the coal block allocation case (Manohar Lal Sharma), because both apply the idea of public trust to energy resources.

The Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974

This Act answers how the Government finances the development of the oil industry.

  • It created the Oil Industry Development Board.
  • Section 15: a cess (a tax for a specific purpose) is levied on crude oil and natural gas produced in India.
  • The money first goes to the Consolidated Fund of India; Parliament may then make it available to the Board.
  • The Board uses the funds to give financial and other assistance for activities that help develop the oil industry, such as exploration, research and training.
  • The company that runs India's strategic petroleum reserves is a subsidiary of this Board.

The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (1:55:19)

Before 2006 there was no independent regulator for pipelines, city gas networks and petroleum marketing. As the sector opened to private companies, new questions arose: who may lay a gas pipeline, whether a pipeline owner can refuse to carry gas for others, and who decides which company will supply gas to a city. Parliament answered with the PNGRB Act, 2006.

Aims (Preamble)

  • To regulate the refining, processing, storage, transportation, distribution, marketing and sale of petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas, excluding the production of crude oil and natural gas.
  • To protect the interests of consumers and companies.
  • To ensure uninterrupted and adequate supply in all parts of the country.
  • To promote competition.

Functions of the Board: Section 11

  • Protects consumer interests by fostering fair trade and competition.
  • Registers companies that market petroleum products and set up storage facilities and LNG terminals.
  • Authorises entities to lay, build and operate common carrier or contract carrier pipelines and city or local gas distribution networks.
  • Regulates access to these facilities and their transportation tariffs.
  • Lays down technical standards, including safety standards.

The authorisation system

The authorisation system is the heart of the Act.

  • Sections 16 to 19: no one can lay a pipeline or build a city gas distribution network without the Board's authorisation. The Board selects entities through a transparent process, often competitive bidding.
  • Section 20: the Board may declare a pipeline a common carrier or a contract carrier.
  • Exclusivity: when the Board authorises a company to develop a city gas network, it may give a period of exclusivity so that the company can recover its investment.
  • Section 22: the Board fixes transportation tariffs for pipelines by regulations.
Common carrierContract carrier
Must carry gas for other users on a non-discriminatory basis, like a public road.Carries gas under firm contracts with specific users.

Disputes, penalties and appeals

  • Sections 24 and 25: a bench of the Board decides disputes between entities and has the powers of a civil court.
  • Section 28: civil penalty of up to ₹1 crore for each contravention, with further amounts for continuing contraventions and higher penalties for restrictive trade practices.
  • Appeals: to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, which serves as the appellate tribunal under this Act too, and from there to the Supreme Court.
Key point

The same tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hears appeals in electricity, petroleum regulation and energy conservation.

Example

Farhan's company wins the Board's authorisation to supply piped gas and CNG in a district. It must lay the network within the time fixed by the Board and follow its safety standards. For some years no other company can build a competing network there. But the company cannot refuse to connect a household in its area without good reason, and its conduct is subject to the Board's regulations.

Limits of the Board's power

Case

Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board v. Indraprastha Gas Limited (2015): Indraprastha Gas supplies CNG and piped gas in Delhi. The Board, under regulations it had made, passed an order fixing its network tariff and compression charge and reducing what it could charge. The Delhi High Court quashed the order and held the relevant regulations beyond the Board's power. The Board appealed. Held (1 July 2015, judgment by Justice Dipak Misra): appeal dismissed. The Act allows the Board to fix transportation tariffs for common and contract carriers, and for city gas networks in the sense used in the Act, but it does not give the Board a general power to fix the network tariff, compression charge or retail price of an entity running its own city gas network. Principle: a regulator has only the powers its statute gives; the power to fix a transportation tariff is not a general power to fix prices.

Safety and Energy Security in Oil and Gas

Safety

Oil and gas are inflammable and sometimes explosive, and accidents can be disastrous. In May 2020 a gas well of Oil India at Baghjan in the Tinsukia district of Assam blew out; in June it caught fire. The fire could be fully controlled only in November, and it damaged the surrounding villages, wetlands and a national park. Such accidents show why safety standards, emergency plans and strict licensing matter.

Energy security

  • India imports close to nine-tenths of the crude oil it uses, so any war or disruption in the oil-producing regions of the world can raise prices overnight.
  • Strategic petroleum reserves: large underground rock caverns filled with crude oil at Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru and Padur, with a total capacity of about 5.33 million tonnes, built to cushion such shocks.
  • Domestic gas pricing reform (April 2023): the price of gas from older fields was linked to 10% of the price of the Indian basket of crude oil, within a floor and a ceiling.

The law of oil and gas is therefore not only about licences; it is also about protecting the country from shocks.

Coal, Mining and Nuclear Energy: Development of Mines and Coal in India

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:01:47)

Coal still produces most of India's electricity and is India's largest domestic source of energy. Unlike crude oil, most of which is imported, India has huge coal reserves under its own land, mainly in Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Telangana. But coal lies under forests, farms and villages, often where tribal communities live. Coal law must therefore deal at once with ownership of minerals, acquisition of land, the rights of local people, the safety of miners and protection of the environment.

Early mining and safety law

  • Commercial coal mining began in the late eighteenth century in the Raniganj coalfield of Bengal, under the East India Company. The railways increased demand and many private collieries opened.
  • Because mining is dangerous, the first mining safety law came in 1901. It was replaced by the Mines Act, 1923, and then by the Mines Act, 1952, which came into force on 1 July 1952.
  • A government office for the inspection of mines was set up in 1902; its headquarters moved to Dhanbad in 1908. Since 1967 it has been called the Directorate General of Mines Safety (DGMS), still based in Dhanbad.
  • In 1952 Parliament also passed the Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, which set up a Coal Board to promote conservation and safety. It was replaced by the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974, which dissolved the Coal Board from 1 April 1975.

Nationalisation of coal

By the 1960s private coal mining had a bad name. Official records of the Ministry of Coal describe the ills of that period as unscientific mining, environmental degradation and exploitation of labour. Many owners dug out the easy coal, left the rest wasted and ignored workers' safety. The Government nationalised the industry in steps:

  1. 1971: management of coking coal mines (which supply coal for making steel) taken over.
  2. Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972: nationalised them from 1 May 1972; Bharat Coking Coal Limited was formed to run them.
  3. 1973: management of the other coal mines taken over first, and then they were nationalised.
  4. November 1975: Coal India Limited formed as the holding company for the nationalised mines.

Parliament and the Protection of Natural Resources

Mines and minerals are shared between the Union and the States. Entry 54 of the Union List gives Parliament power over the regulation of mines and mineral development, but only to the extent that Parliament declares by law that Union control is expedient in the public interest. The key technique of Parliament is therefore the declaration. Section 2 of the MMDR Act, 1957 contains exactly such a declaration. Once Parliament has declared, the States can act only within the space the central law leaves to them.

How Parliament has used this power

  • 1970s: nationalised coal.
  • 2015: introduced auctions.
  • 2020: opened coal to commercial mining.
  • 2023: created a special regime for critical minerals, like lithium.
  • 2025: made further reforms.

Parliament also keeps watch through its committees and through the reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General, which are laid before it. In 2012 a CAG report criticised the allocation of coal blocks without competitive bidding and estimated very large windfall gains to private allottees. That report set the stage for the coal block litigation.

Natural resources as public trust

Natural resources like coal are national wealth. The State holds them in trust for the people and must deal with them fairly and for the common good.

Case

Natural Resources Allocation, In re (2012): a reference answered in September 2012 by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia. Held: the Constitution does not require auction as the only method of allotting natural resources; auction is one method among many. But whatever method the State chooses must be fair, transparent and non-arbitrary under Article 14. Principle: auction is not constitutionally mandatory, but every allocation of natural resources must satisfy Article 14. The coal block cases applied this balance.

The Regulatory Mechanism of Mines

Many bodies regulate a single coal mine, and their roles must be kept apart:

BodyRole
Ministry of CoalMakes policy for coal; through the Central Government, controls the allocation of coal blocks.
State GovernmentGrants the mining lease and collects royalty; for coal it needs the previous approval of the Central Government.
DGMSEnforces the safety law in mines.
Coal Controller's OrganisationPermission to open or reopen mines, grading of coal and coal statistics.
Indian Bureau of Mines (Ministry of Mines)For minerals other than coal, petroleum, atomic minerals and minor minerals: approves mining plans and looks after conservation.
Ministry of EnvironmentEnvironmental and forest clearances.
Coal Mines Provident Fund OrganisationProvident fund and pensions of coal workers.

The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:08:04)

The main law on mining is the MMDR Act, 1957.

Section 4: the basic rule

No person shall undertake any reconnaissance, prospecting or mining operations in any area except under a reconnaissance permit, a prospecting licence or a mining lease. Section 4 also bars transporting or storing minerals without lawful authority.

OperationMeaning
ReconnaissanceA quick preliminary survey.
ProspectingExploring to find out whether a mineral exists and in what quantity.
MiningActually taking the mineral out.

Section 5: restrictions on grant

  • The holder must be an Indian national or a company registered in India.
  • For minerals in Parts A and B of the First Schedule, no permit, licence or lease can be granted without the previous approval of the Central Government. Coal is a Part A mineral, so every coal lease needs central approval.
  • Evidence of the mineral and an approved mining plan are required before a lease is granted.

Section 9: royalty

Royalty is the payment made to the owner of the mineral for every tonne removed. The rates are in the Second Schedule; the Central Government may revise them, but not more than once in three years. The Supreme Court held in 2024 that royalty is not a tax.

The 2015 amendment

  • Made auction the normal method of granting mineral concessions.
  • Fixed the period of mining leases for most minerals at 50 years, after which the area goes back to auction.
  • Section 9B: every mining-affected district has a District Mineral Foundation, a trust working for the benefit of people and areas affected by mining. Lessees pay into it an amount linked to royalty, up to one-third of the royalty for new leases.
  • Section 9C: a national trust for mineral exploration, funded by lessees at 2% of royalty.

Later amendments

  • 2020 (Mineral Laws Amendment Act): removed the restriction that coal could be mined only for one's own use; private companies can now mine coal and sell it in the market.
  • 2021: captive mines allowed to sell part of their output; non-auctioned leases became transferable.
  • 2023: a list of 24 critical and strategic minerals added; a new exploration licence created for deep-seated and critical minerals. Six minerals, including lithium, were removed from the list of atomic minerals so that they could be auctioned. Lithium matters for batteries, and batteries matter for clean energy.
  • 2025: the national exploration trust renamed the National Mineral Exploration and Development Trust; contribution raised from 2% to 3% of royalty; new minerals may be added to an existing lease; a one-time extension of lease area allowed; the Centre empowered to set up mineral exchanges; the cap on sales by captive mines removed.

Illegal mining

  • Section 21: mining without a lease or permit is punishable with imprisonment up to 5 years and a fine that may extend to ₹5 lakh per hectare of the area. The offence is cognizable. Minerals, tools and vehicles used in illegal mining can be seized.
  • Section 23C: States may make rules to prevent illegal mining, transport and storage, for example through check posts and weighbridges.

The Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:12:04)

This law shaped the coal industry for forty-five years.

  • Appointed day: 1 May 1973.
  • Section 3(1): on the appointed day, the right, title and interest of the owners in the coal mines listed in the Schedule were transferred to the Central Government and vested absolutely in it, free from all incumbrances, meaning the mines passed to the Government clean, without any mortgage or charge attached.
  • The former owners received compensation under the Act.

Restriction on who could mine coal: captive mining

  • 1976 amendment: ended private coal mining, with one exception: private companies producing iron and steel could mine coal for their own use. This is captive mining.
  • 1993: the exception was widened to include power generation, washing of coal and other end uses notified by the Government.
  • 1996: production of cement notified as another end use.
  • For decades coal was a public sector monopoly; private companies could mine only for their own plants. A Bill to open coal to private commercial mining was introduced in 2000, but it never passed.

Status today

The Act no longer exists. The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 had created a new system for allocating coal mines, so Parliament repealed the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act and the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act through the Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2017; the repeal took effect in January 2018.

Key point

The repeal did not undo nationalisation. The saving clause of the repealing law protects rights and titles that had already vested, so the mines that vested in the Government in 1973 remain with the public sector.

The Coal Block Allocation Case

Because of the monopoly, private steel, power and cement companies could get coal only by being allocated a captive coal block. From 1993 blocks were allocated through a Screening Committee of the Government, and some were allocated to State Government companies through the Government dispensation route. There was no auction, and there were allegations that valuable blocks were being handed out without any fair process.

Case

Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary (2014): a group of public interest petitions challenged these allocations. Bench of three judges: Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph; judgment delivered on 25 August 2014.

Held: (1) Allocations through the Screening Committee were illegal and arbitrary, because the process had no consistency, no transparency and no objective criteria. (2) Allocations through the Government dispensation route were also illegal, because State Governments and their companies were not eligible to mine coal for commercial purposes under the Nationalisation Act. Applying the principle of Natural Resources Allocation, In re, the Court reiterated that the Government need not always auction, but it must never allot natural resources arbitrarily.

Order on consequences (24 September 2014): almost all allocations made since 1993, over 200 blocks, were cancelled. For 42 blocks already producing or about to produce, cancellation took effect from 31 March 2015, so that coal supply would not suddenly stop. Only four blocks were spared, those tied to an ultra mega power project and to central public sector companies. Allottees were ordered to pay an additional levy of ₹295 for every tonne of coal already extracted.

Principle: natural resources are held by the State in trust for the people. An allocation that is arbitrary and non-transparent will be struck down, however large the consequences.

The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015

After the judgment the Government had to reallocate the cancelled blocks quickly. It issued an ordinance on 21 October 2014, which became the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015. The Act received assent on 30 March 2015 but is deemed to have come into force from the date of the ordinance.

The three Schedules

  • Schedule I: all the cancelled blocks.
  • Schedule II: the 42 blocks covered by the order of September 2014.
  • Schedule III: 32 blocks earmarked for specified end uses.

An officer called the Nominated Authority, not below the rank of Joint Secretary, conducts the auctions and allotments and issues orders vesting the mines in the successful bidders.

At first the auctions were for specified end uses, such as power and steel. The Mineral Laws Amendment Act, 2020 removed this end-use restriction, and from June 2020 the Government began auctioning coal blocks for commercial mining, in which the successful bidder can sell the coal in the open market. After nearly fifty years private commercial coal mining returned to India, this time through transparent auctions.

Mining Lease in the Coal Sector

Section 11A of the MMDR Act allows the Central Government to select companies for coal by auction through competitive bidding. It also allows allotment without auction to Government companies, and to a power generator that won its project through competitive tariff bidding.

Example

Prince runs a mining company and wants to mine coal. The steps are:

  1. The Central Government, through the Nominated Authority or under Section 11A of the MMDR Act, auctions a coal block.
  2. If Prince wins, he receives a vesting or allotment order.
  3. The State Government grants him the mining lease, with the previous approval of the Central Government under Section 5.
  4. He must get his mining plan approved and obtain environmental and forest clearances.
  5. He must acquire the land, by agreement or through the Coal Bearing Areas procedure, and the rights of forest dwellers must be respected.
  6. He pays royalty to the State, the contribution to the District Mineral Foundation and the contribution to the national exploration trust.
  7. He must follow the safety laws and, at the end of mining, a mine closure plan.
Key point

A coal lease is not just a contract. It is a bundle of permissions under many laws.

The Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:19:35)

This special law allows the Central Government to acquire land that contains coal. It works in stages:

  1. Section 4 (preliminary notification): if the Central Government is satisfied that coal is likely to be found in a locality, it issues a preliminary notification. Its officers may then enter the land to survey, dig and bore.
  2. Section 7 (notice of intention): within two years, extendable by one more year, the Government must give notice of its intention to acquire the land; otherwise the first notification lapses.
  3. Section 8 (objections): any interested person may object within 30 days. The Act expressly says that the wish of a person to mine the coal himself is not a valid objection.
  4. Section 9 (declaration): the Government declares the acquisition.
  5. Section 10 (vesting): on publication of the declaration, the land vests absolutely in the Central Government, free from all encumbrances.
  6. Section 11 (vesting in a Government company): the Government may direct that the land shall vest in a Government company, such as a subsidiary of Coal India.
  7. Sections 13 and 14 (compensation): paid by agreement or as fixed by a Tribunal headed by a person who is or has been a High Court judge.

The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 lists the Coal Bearing Areas Act in its Fourth Schedule. From 2015, the better compensation and the rehabilitation and resettlement benefits of the 2013 Act also apply to acquisitions under the Coal Bearing Areas Act. A farmer whose land is taken for a coal mine today is therefore entitled to the modern standards of compensation and resettlement.

Labour Welfare and Safety in the Mining Sector

Mining is one of the most dangerous occupations in the world: miners work underground, in darkness, amid the risk of roof falls, floods, fires, explosions of gas and dust, and lung diseases. The law of mine safety is written in the language of hard experience.

The Mines Act, 1952

For seventy-three years this was the central law. It:

  • provided for a Chief Inspector and Inspectors of Mines;
  • placed duties on the owner, the agent and the manager of every mine;
  • limited daily and weekly working hours and required rest intervals and leave with wages;
  • required facilities such as ventilation, drinking water, first aid and creches;
  • restricted the employment of women below ground;
  • required notice of every accident.

Under Section 57 of this Act, the Coal Mines Regulations, 2017 lay down detailed technical rules for coal mines, covering ventilation, gas testing, support of roofs, use of explosives, and precautions against fire and flooding.

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020

  • Repeals thirteen labour laws, including the Mines Act, 1952.
  • Brought into force, with the other three labour codes, on 21 November 2025.
  • Mine safety is now governed by the Code and the rules and regulations made under it; the DGMS continues to enforce it.
  • Women: the old Mines Act restricted employment of women below ground. The Code keeps a power to regulate the employment of women in dangerous operations, but its approach is to protect women through safeguards rather than simply to exclude them.

Welfare of coal workers

  • Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948: created a provident fund for coal workers, managed by the Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation through a board with representatives of the Government, employers and workers.
  • Coal Mines Pension Scheme, 1998: made under this Act; came into force on 31 March 1998 and replaced an older family pension scheme.
  • The Code on Social Security, 2020, also in force from November 2025, repeals nine older laws, but the Coal Mines Provident Fund Act is not among them. It continues as a separate law for coal workers.
  • The old Coal Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1947 was repealed long ago, in 1986.
Key point

Frequently tested: the Code on Social Security, 2020 did not repeal the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948, while the OSH Code, 2020 did repeal the Mines Act, 1952.

Nuclear Energy

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:24:22)

Nuclear power plants produce electricity by splitting atoms of uranium. They produce very little carbon dioxide and can run day and night. But they raise three serious concerns:

  1. Safety: an accident can release radiation over a large area.
  2. Waste: spent fuel stays dangerous for a very long time.
  3. Security: nuclear materials can be misused for weapons.

Nuclear energy has therefore always been controlled very tightly by the State. Under Entry 6 of the Union List, it is entirely a Union subject.

The Atomic Energy Act, 1962

For more than sixty years this was the main law.

  • Section 3: wide powers to the Central Government to produce, develop and use atomic energy. It could declare information as restricted and declare prohibited areas, control radioactive substances, dispose of radioactive waste safely, and provide for the production and supply of electricity from atomic energy.
  • Section 14: the Government could prohibit, except under its licence, the acquisition, production, possession, use, export or import of prescribed substances and equipment.
  • Nuclear power remained in the hands of the Central Government and its companies, such as the Nuclear Power Corporation of India.

The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board

Safety was supervised by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, constituted on 15 November 1983. The Board was created by an executive order under a general delegation clause of the Act, Section 27, and not by a dedicated statutory provision. Critics said that a regulator created by an executive order is not independent enough.

Nuclear Energy: Civil Liability and the SHANTI Act

The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010

This Act answered the question: who pays if a nuclear accident harms thousands of people?

  • The operator of the plant was liable without proof of fault, up to 1,500 crore rupees for large reactors.
  • Beyond that, the Central Government would provide further compensation, up to an overall limit.
Section 17(b) of the 2010 ActInternational practice
The operator has a right of recourse against the supplier of equipment if the accident resulted from patent or latent defects in the equipment or from sub-standard servicesAll liability is channelled to the operator alone

Because of this clause, foreign suppliers of reactors were reluctant to enter India.

The SHANTI Act, 2025

In December 2025, Parliament passed the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India Act, 2025 (SHANTI). It repeals both the Atomic Energy Act and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act and replaces them with one consolidated law. Its main aims are:

  • to allow private Indian companies to build and operate nuclear power plants under licence;
  • to give the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board a statutory basis; and
  • to revise the liability framework, including the position of suppliers.

The rules under the new law were still being finalised in 2026.

Key point

In the examination, write that the SHANTI Act has replaced the two old laws, and explain why the reform was needed.

The Nuclear Energy Mission

  • Announced in the Union Budget of February 2025, with an outlay of 20,000 crore rupees for research on small modular reactors (smaller nuclear reactors that can be built in factories).
  • Targets: at least five indigenously designed small modular reactors operating by 2033, and 100 GW of nuclear capacity by 2047.
  • India's nuclear capacity in January 2025: about 8,180 MW.

Nuclear power is thus expected to play a much bigger role in the clean energy transition. But the fuels of the past have created the crisis of the present: climate change.

Why the World Is Moving to Clean Energy

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:29:03)

Unit Five: Renewable Energy, Climate Change and Protection of the Environment. After the fuels that built the modern world (coal, oil, gas and uranium), this unit turns to the energy of the future and the environmental crisis that is pushing the world towards it.

If coal is cheap and plentiful, why is the world moving away from it? Four reasons:

  1. Climate change. Burning coal, oil or gas releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat like the glass roof of a greenhouse, causing heatwaves, floods, droughts, melting glaciers and rising seas. The energy sector is the largest source of these gases, so climate change cannot be solved without changing how energy is produced.
  2. Pollution. Coal plants release smoke, ash and harmful gases that damage the lungs of nearby residents; cooking on firewood fills homes with smoke. Clean energy is also a public health question.
  3. Energy security. India imports most of its crude oil. Sunlight and wind cannot be blockaded by any foreign power, so every unit of solar power produced at home makes the country more secure.
  4. Cost. After competitive auctions and large-scale manufacturing, the price of solar power fell sharply; it is now among the cheapest sources of new electricity.
  • Renewable energy is variable (no sun at night, wind not constant), so the grid needs storage and backup.
  • Solar parks need large areas of land.
  • Transmission lines must cross forests and bird habitats.
  • Discoms tied to long contracts with coal plants may be reluctant to buy more renewable power.
  • Workers in coal regions may lose their livelihoods.
Key point

The law must manage this change carefully. This process of change is called the energy transition.

Development of Renewable Energy in India

India began thinking seriously about new energy sources after the oil shocks of the 1970s, when oil prices rose suddenly and sharply.

DateDevelopment
March 1981Commission for Additional Sources of Energy set up in the Department of Science and Technology
September 1982Separate Department of Non-Conventional Energy Sources created
1992Became a full Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources
October 2006Renamed the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE)

Two public companies support the MNRE:

  • Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (1987): a financial institution lending for renewable projects.
  • Solar Energy Corporation of India (2011): runs large solar and wind auctions and signs power purchase agreements with developers.
  • Section 3: national policies must consider renewable sources.
  • Section 61(h): tariff regulations must promote co-generation and renewable energy.
  • Section 86(1)(e): every State Commission must promote renewable energy by providing for grid connection and sale of such electricity, and can fix a percentage of total consumption that each discom must buy from renewable sources.
Key point

The percentage under Section 86(1)(e) is the renewable purchase obligation, the single most important legal tool for renewable energy in India.

The National Action Plan on Climate Change

Before the world agreed on the Paris Agreement, India prepared its own climate strategy. The National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) was released by the Prime Minister on 30 June 2008.

Approach

The plan did not treat growth and environment as enemies: high economic growth is essential to raise living standards and reduce people's vulnerability to climate change, so it sought measures that promote development while also benefiting the climate. Its principles include protecting the poor through inclusive development, efficient demand-side management, faster use of clean technologies, and new market and regulatory mechanisms.

The eight national missions

  1. National Solar Mission
  2. National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency
  3. National Mission on Sustainable Habitat
  4. National Water Mission
  5. National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem
  6. National Mission for a Green India
  7. National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture
  8. National Mission on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change

Two are directly energy missions: the Solar Mission promotes solar power, and the Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency works through the Energy Conservation Act. Its best-known scheme, Perform, Achieve and Trade, sets energy-saving targets for large industries. The States have also prepared State action plans on climate change.

Limitation

The NAPCC is a policy document, not a statute. It creates no legal rights and imposes no penalties by itself. Its missions become legally effective only when carried out through laws such as the Electricity Act and the Energy Conservation Act, or through schemes and regulations made under them.

Key point

Asked to assess the adequacy of the NAPCC, remember: the plan gave direction, but its enforcement depends on other laws.

The Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission

The first and most famous mission under the plan, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM), was launched in January 2010. Since India receives strong sunlight on most days of the year, it aimed to make India a global leader in solar energy.

PointOriginal mission documentRevision by the Union Cabinet, June 2015
Target20,000 MW of grid-connected solar power by 2022Raised fivefold to one lakh MW (100 GW) by 2022
StructureThree phases: up to March 2013; 2013 to 2017; 2017 to 2022. Targets to be reviewed at the end of each phase40 GW rooftop solar and 60 GW large and medium grid-connected projects

Bundling

In the first phase, when solar power was still costly, the mission used bundling:

  1. NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam, the trading company of NTPC, bought solar power from developers under long power purchase agreements.
  2. It bundled this costly solar power with cheaper unallocated power from NTPC coal stations.
  3. It sold the bundle to State discoms at a reasonable average price, and the discoms could count the solar part towards their renewable purchase obligation.

Under the June 2015 revision, the Solar Energy Corporation of India became the main agency for developing projects with viability gap funding.

Key point

Viability gap funding is a capital grant given by the Government to make a project financially viable when its tariff alone cannot cover its cost.

The WTO dispute on domestic content

Case

United States v. India: WTO dispute on India's measures relating to solar cells and solar panels (2016): to build a domestic manufacturing industry, the early phases of the mission required some developers to use solar cells and panels made in India (a domestic content requirement). The United States challenged it before the World Trade Organization; the panel reported in February 2016 and the Appellate Body in September 2016. Held: the requirement discriminated against imported cells and panels and so violated the national treatment rule in Article 3, paragraph 4, of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures. India's plea of government procurement (outside the national treatment rule) was rejected, because the Government was buying electricity while the discrimination was against solar cells, a different product. Its defences based on shortage of supply and compliance with its laws also failed. Principle: countries are free to promote clean energy, but must do so consistently with their trade obligations.

India now supports domestic manufacturing through other tools, such as production-linked incentives for manufacturers and an approved list of models and manufacturers for projects.

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:39:07)

The renewable purchase obligation

Under Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act, each State Commission fixes the percentage of electricity that discoms and certain other consumers must buy from renewable sources. Its validity was tested in the Supreme Court.

Case

Hindustan Zinc Limited v. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (2015): the Rajasthan Commission's regulations required discoms, industries with captive power plants and open access consumers to buy a minimum percentage of electricity from renewable sources, or pay a surcharge for any shortfall. Hindustan Zinc and other captive-plant companies, including cement companies, argued that captive generation had been freed from licensing, so the Commission had no power to burden them. The Rajasthan High Court dismissed their petitions, and they appealed to the Supreme Court.

Held: in May 2015, the Supreme Court (Justice V. Gopala Gowda) dismissed the appeals. Clause (e) gives the State Commission an independent power to promote renewable energy, not limited to fixing tariffs. Read with Article 21 (which includes the right to a healthy environment), Article 48A and the fundamental duty in Article 51A(g) to protect the environment, a reasonable purchase obligation imposed in the public interest is valid. It violates neither Article 14 (equality) nor Article 19(1)(g) (freedom of trade).

Principle: the duty to buy clean energy can lawfully be placed even on those who produce electricity for their own use, because a clean environment is part of the right to life.

The renewable consumption obligation

The obligation has since moved to a new legal home.

PointRenewable purchase obligationRenewable consumption obligation
SourceSection 86(1)(e), Electricity Act; fixed by each State CommissionMinistry of Power notification of 20 October 2023 under the amended Energy Conservation Act
Who is boundDiscoms and certain other consumersDiscoms and designated consumers
ObligationA percentage of electricity bought from renewable sourcesA share of consumption from non-fossil sources, rising from about 30 per cent (2024-25) to about 43 per cent (2029-30)
DefaultSurcharge for shortfall (Rajasthan regulations)Penalties under the Energy Conservation Act

Policies for particular technologies

PolicyDateMain feature
Large hydro as renewable energyMarch 2019 (Cabinet)Hydro projects above 25 MW declared renewable, with a separate hydro purchase obligation
National Wind-Solar Hybrid PolicyMay 2018Plants combining wind and solar on the same land
National Offshore Wind Energy PolicyNotified October 2015Relies on Article 297, as the sea bed of the exclusive economic zone belongs to the Union
National Green Hydrogen MissionApproved 4 January 2023Outlay about 19,744 crore rupees; at least five million tonnes of green hydrogen a year by 2030
Key point

Green hydrogen is hydrogen made by splitting water with renewable electricity; it can replace fossil fuels in industries like steel and fertilisers.

Farmers and households

  • Pradhan Mantri KUSUM scheme (approved February 2019): helps farmers set up small solar plants and solar pumps.
  • Pradhan Mantri Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana (launched February 2024; outlay about 75,000 crore rupees): to help one crore households install rooftop solar and get up to 300 units of free electricity every month.
  • Under an order of January 2019, solar panels in many projects must come from an approved list of models and manufacturers, supporting domestic manufacturing.

Results

  • June 2025: non-fossil sources crossed half of India's installed electricity capacity, five years ahead of the target in the national climate commitment.
  • 31 March 2026: non-fossil capacity about 283 GW, including solar about 150 GW and wind about 56 GW.
  • India is now third in the world in renewable energy capacity.
  • National target (announced at Glasgow, 2021): 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030.

The Draft National Renewable Energy Act, 2015

India's renewable energy law is scattered across the Electricity Act, the Energy Conservation Act and policies and schemes that can change with every government. Investors prefer stable law, so in July 2015 the MNRE released a draft National Renewable Energy Act for public comments. It proposed:

  • a duty on the Government to frame a National Renewable Energy Policy;
  • a National Renewable Energy Advisory Group to advise on policy, and a National Renewable Energy Committee to coordinate ministries;
  • a national renewable energy corporation to support project development;
  • a National Renewable Energy Fund at the Centre and Green Funds in the States, for research, resource assessment, low-cost finance, skills and manufacturing;
  • dedicated renewable energy investment zones; and
  • a stronger system, with incentives, penalties and legal action, to ensure that renewable purchase obligations are actually met.

The draft was never enacted. India still has no single renewable energy statute; renewable energy remains governed by the Electricity Act, the Energy Conservation Act and many policies and schemes.

Key point

Evaluating the draft: its strength was the attempt to give renewable energy a permanent legal foundation and a dedicated fund; its weakness was adding more committees without solving weak discom finances and grid integration; its lesson is that a clean energy transition needs stable law, not only good policy.

Climate Change and Energy Law: International Treaties

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:46:31)

InstrumentAdoptedIn forceKey features
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeMay 1992; opened for signature at the Earth Summit, Rio, June 1992March 1994Central principle in Article 3, paragraph 1: common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities
Kyoto Protocol11 December 199716 February 2005Binding emission targets only for developed countries; Clean Development Mechanism
Paris Agreement12 December 20154 November 2016 (India ratified on 2 October 2016, Mahatma Gandhi's birthday)Obligations on every country (key articles below)
Key point

Common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities: every country must act, but the rich countries that polluted first and have more resources must do more.

Under the Clean Development Mechanism, projects that reduced emissions in developing countries like India could earn credits that developed countries could use.

Key articles of the Paris Agreement

  • Article 2: hold the rise in global average temperature well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5 degrees.
  • Article 4: every country must prepare nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and update them every five years, each more ambitious than the last.
  • Article 6: countries may cooperate, including through carbon markets.

India's commitments

CommitmentContent
Updated NDC, August 2022 (for 2030)Cut emission intensity of the economy by 45 per cent from the 2005 level; about 50 per cent of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil sources (already reached)
Glasgow, 2021Net zero emissions by 2070
NDC for 2035 (approved by the Union Cabinet, March 2026)Emission intensity 47 per cent below the 2005 level; non-fossil share of installed capacity 60 per cent

Two conference decisions

  • Glasgow (2021): the draft decision called for the phase-out of unabated coal power; at India's insistence the final text spoke of a phase-down. India argued that developing countries still need coal for development and for fighting poverty.
  • Dubai, 28th Conference of the Parties (December 2023): in the first global stocktake, countries agreed to contribute to tripling renewable energy capacity and doubling the rate of energy efficiency improvement by 2030, and to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems.

Recent developments

The United States has twice withdrawn from the Paris Agreement; its second withdrawal, ordered in January 2025, took effect in January 2026.

Case

ICJ advisory opinion on the obligations of States in respect of climate change (2025): given in July 2025. Held (unanimously): States have legal obligations to protect the climate system, and a failure to act, including through fossil fuel production, fossil fuel subsidies or the granting of fossil fuel exploration licences, may constitute an internationally wrongful act. Principle: an advisory opinion is not binding like a judgment, but carries great legal weight.

The International Solar Alliance

Launched by India and France on 30 November 2015 during the Paris conference; its framework agreement came into force on 6 December 2017; headquarters in Gurugram, Haryana. It helps countries rich in sunlight to cooperate in solar energy.

Climate Change in Indian Courts

▶ Watch this part of the lecture (2:51:02)

Case

M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India (2024): the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard survives mostly in Rajasthan and Gujarat, which also have the best sunlight and wind and hence many solar and wind projects. The birds cannot see overhead power lines in time and many die in collisions. In April 2021 the Supreme Court had directed that overhead lines in a very large area of the bird's habitat be laid underground wherever feasible. The Government sought modification: undergrounding high voltage lines over such an area was technically very difficult, extremely costly and would seriously harm India's renewable energy programme and climate commitments.

Held: on 21 March 2024, a bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud withdrew the blanket undergrounding direction and appointed an expert committee to decide where undergrounding was feasible and what other measures were needed to protect the birds. Most importantly, the Court recognised a right against the adverse effects of climate change, flowing from Article 14 and Article 21. India has no single umbrella law on climate change, but this does not mean people have no right against its harms.

Principle: renewable energy itself protects the fundamental right against climate change, but it must be balanced with the protection of wildlife, so that neither goal is sacrificed for the other.

Key point

The energy transition is the shift from fossil fuels to clean energy. It is not just a technical change of machines; it has legal, economic, social and environmental sides.

SideWhat the transition requires
LegalStable contracts (investors will not build solar parks if tariffs can be reopened later); land and transmission corridors (questions of acquisition and the rights of local people); storage and flexible grids (the rules now allow consumers to own energy storage systems); critical minerals like lithium (the mining law was amended in 2023); carbon markets (the Energy Conservation Act was amended in 2022)
EconomicDiscoms, the buyers of clean power, must stay financially healthy; transition costs must not make electricity unaffordable for the poor
SocialA just transition for coal-dependent workers and communities
EnvironmentalEven clean energy has impacts, as the Great Indian Bustard case shows; old solar panels and batteries will become waste that must be managed safely

Just transition

Lakhs of workers and whole districts in coal regions like Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Odisha depend on coal mining for their livelihood. A just transition means these workers and communities are not left behind, for example through retraining, new industries and social security. Some developing countries have announced Just Energy Transition Partnerships with rich countries to finance their move away from coal: South Africa first, at Glasgow in 2021, followed by Indonesia and Vietnam in 2022.

Renewable Energy, Climate Change and Energy Security

  • Renewable energy reduces greenhouse gas emissions, so it fights climate change.
  • It is produced at home from sunlight and wind, so it reduces dependence on imported oil and gas and strengthens energy security.
  • Small solar systems can reach remote villages, advancing universal access under SDG 7.
  • But it is variable, so reliability needs storage, flexible generation and strong grids.
Key point

The law must pursue four goals together: access, affordability, security and sustainability. That is the task of Energy Law for the coming decades.

Quick revision

  • Energy Law runs from why energy needs law all the way to the clean energy transition.
  • In every problem, first identify the energy source, the stage of the chain and the regulator involved.
  • Always name the section and support it with the leading case, such as Energy Watchdog for power purchase agreements or Hindustan Zinc for renewable obligations.
  • Where two concepts look similar, such as unauthorised use and theft, or a regulation and an order, write their differences clearly, with an example.
  • These topics serve university examinations, judiciary examinations, UGC NET and CLAT PG, and regulatory and energy practice.

Practise Energy Law MCQs

23 questions. Every answer comes with an explanation and the legal provision behind it.

Practise now

Make this page yours

Sign in to save your reading progress and keep private notes and highlights. Free, and only you can see them.