Skip to content
The Law Easy

Case explanation · Banking Law

Devaynes v Noble (Clayton's Case) 1816 | First-In First-Out Rule in Bank Accounts Explained

  • 4 min

The lecture loads from YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode only when you press play.

From the YouTube description

About this lecture

Banking Law Case 12 of 29 by Law Easy, for LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and Judiciary exams. Case: Devaynes v Noble (Clayton's Case) (1816), English Court of Chancery, judgment of Sir William Grant, Master of the Rolls. FACTS: Devaynes was a partner in a London banking firm. He died in 1809 and the firm went bankrupt about a year later. A customer named Clayton had a current account with the firm, and when Devaynes died the firm owed Clayton about 1,700 pounds. Clayton went on depositing and withdrawing money with the surviving partners. When the firm failed, he tried to recover the old balance from the estate of the dead partner. LEGAL ISSUE: In a running current account, how are later withdrawals applied against the earlier and later credits? JUDGMENT: The court held that in a running current account, the sum first paid in is the sum first drawn out. The withdrawals Clayton made after the death were set against the earliest credits, which made up the old balance. Since he had drawn out more than the old balance, it stood fully paid off and the dead partner's estate was not liable. PRINCIPLE TO REMEMBER: First in, first out in a running account. It is only a presumption about the parties' intention and can be displaced by agreement or a clear contrary intention. It can work silently against a bank or a creditor when a partner dies or leaves a firm. PROVISIONS: Sections 59, 60 and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (appropriation of payments between different debts). Distinguish these from the rule in Clayton's Case. EXAM NOTE: This is a presumption, not a rigid command. A contrary agreement or intention, and modern rules about trust money, may affect the result. PLAYLIST (all 29 cases in order): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbhYsrMKgACA COMPLETE LECTURE (all 29 cases with timestamps): https://youtu.be/ayAN7RLlfPM PREVIOUS CASE (11, Foley v Hill): https://youtu.be/mDYDEA_skoo More law notes: https://www.thelaweasy.com If this helps your exam preparation, please subscribe to Law Easy. This video is for education and is not legal advice. #BankingLaw #ClaytonsCase #ContractAct #CLATPG #Judiciary #LLB #LawEasy

Notes

Notes on Banking Law

All notes on this subject
Banking Law Case compilation

Banking Law: 29 Important Case Laws

Question: Can the Government take over large banks and still be required to respect individual rights?

87 min read

Banking Law Complete notes

Banking Law: Complete Notes

Banking Law (the law and practice of banking in India) runs from why banks exist and why the law watches them so closely, to newer questions such as card frauds, online banking and FinTech. Behind every deposit, cheque, loan and online transfer lies a legal relationship governed by statutes…

106 min read

Practise 120 Banking Law MCQs Check what you have learnt with practice questions on this subject.

Video lectures

More on Banking Law

All lectures on this subject

Learn with video

Watch every lecture free on YouTube

Complete courses, landmark case explanations and quick Shorts from The Law Easy channel. Subscribe to get new lectures as soon as they are published.