Skip to content
The Law Easy

Topic lecture · Constitutional Law I

Puttaswamy Judgment Explained (2017) | Right to Privacy Under Article 21 | Part 15

  • 2 min

The lecture loads from YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode only when you press play.

From the YouTube description

About this lecture

Can the government control every part of your private life just because the Constitution does not use the word 'privacy'? Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) explained in simple English - Article 21 and Part III. Part 15 of 40 in Law Easy's Constitutional Case Laws series for LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary preparation. THE FACTS The case arose during constitutional challenges connected with the Aadhaar system. A retired judge, Justice K. S. Puttaswamy, questioned government collection and use of personal information. The Supreme Court first had to settle whether privacy itself is protected by the Constitution. THE LEGAL QUESTION Is the right to privacy a fundamental right under the Constitution? WHAT THE SUPREME COURT HELD Nine judges considered the question and all nine recognised privacy as a fundamental right protected by Part III, especially Article 21. Privacy includes control over personal information, decisions about your body and important choices in private life. The right is not absolute - a restriction must satisfy legality, a legitimate State objective and proportionality. The Court rejected older statements suggesting the Constitution did not protect privacy. Whether particular parts of Aadhaar were valid was decided later in another judgment. KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER - Privacy is linked with dignity and autonomy - Proportionality: a restriction must be appropriately connected to its purpose and go no further than justified - Privacy does not put a person beyond every law FOR YOUR EXAM Remember: nine-judge bench, 24 August 2017, unanimous, privacy as part of Article 21 and Part III, and the three-part test of legality, legitimate aim and proportionality. CONTINUE THE SERIES Next, Part 16: Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India (2018) | Section 377 Decriminalised https://youtu.be/SJniKv1hf30 Related, Part 17: Joseph Shine v Union of India (2018) | Adultery Law Section 497 Struck Down https://youtu.be/Z0O8Pyoetxk All 40 Constitutional Case Laws (playlist): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT4r9ZZ3tKLM Complete lecture, all 40 cases in one video: https://youtu.be/oUrSfn3wp8s?t=1928 (this case starts at 32:08) Notes and study material: https://www.thelaweasy.com Subscribe to Law Easy for more Constitutional Law, LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary lectures: https://www.youtube.com/@LawEasyin?sub_confirmation=1 Educational content only, not legal advice. Always read the original judgment and check the latest law before relying on a case in an answer or in practice. #ConstitutionalLaw #CLATPG #UGCNETLaw #LawEasy #Article21

Case law

Judgments to read alongside

The written case notes: facts, issues, judgment and the principle to remember.

Case law library

Rameshwar Prasad vs Union of India

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) · 2006

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Normally, a Legislative Assembly is elected, meets, and functions for up to five years unless dissolved earlier. Rameshwar Prasad & Ors. vs. Union of India (2006) asks a startling question: can an assembly be dissolved before it has even held its first me…

Constitutional Law I

Public Interest Foundation vs Union of India

Supreme Court of India (5-Judge Constitution Bench) · 2018

First, let us understand the basic meaning. India's Constitution already lists specific reasons a person cannot become a Member of Parliament under Article 102 . But what happens when a serious social problem — people facing serious criminal charges contesting and winning elections, then going on t…

Constitutional Law I

GVK Industries Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) · 2011

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Article 245 of the Constitution deals with how far laws made by Parliament and State legislatures can extend. GVK Industries Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer (2011) answers a precise question: can Parliament make laws about things that happen outside the terri…

Constitutional Law I

Notes

Notes on Constitutional Law I

All notes on this subject
Constitutional Law I Case compilation

40 Important Constitutional Law Case Laws

Decided: 1967. Core question: Can a public electricity board ignore the Constitution just because it sells electricity? The answer changed how courts understand the meaning of "the State".

80 min read

Constitutional Law I Complete notes

Constitution I One Shot

Definition: Constitutionalism is a system that gives legitimacy to a democratic government.

69 min read

Practise 115 Constitutional Law I MCQs Check what you have learnt with practice questions on this subject.

Video lectures

More on Constitutional Law I

All lectures on this subject

Learn with video

Watch every lecture free on YouTube

Complete courses, landmark case explanations and quick Shorts from The Law Easy channel. Subscribe to get new lectures as soon as they are published.