Skip to content
The Law Easy

Case explanation · Constitutional Law I

Zee Telefilms v Union of India (2005) | Is BCCI the State? Article 12 & 226 | Part 5

  • 2 min

The lecture loads from YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode only when you press play.

From the YouTube description

About this lecture

Cricket is a public passion - but is the body that controls Indian cricket legally 'the State'? Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India (2005) explained in simple English - Articles 12, 32 and 226. Part 5 of 40 in Law Easy's Constitutional Case Laws series for LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary preparation. THE FACTS After a bidding process for television rights to cricket matches, Zee Telefilms challenged action taken by the cricket board (BCCI) and approached the Supreme Court directly under Article 32. THE LEGAL QUESTION Is the cricket board an 'authority' under Article 12 - and if not, can its public functions still be challenged in court? WHAT THE SUPREME COURT HELD By a majority of 3:2, the Supreme Court held that the Board was not 'State' under Article 12. It was not created by a law establishing it as a government authority, and it was not shown to be financially and administratively dominated by the government in the way the Article 12 test requires. But the Court recognised that the Board performs important public functions, so appropriate challenges to its actions may still be considered by a High Court under Article 226. KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER - Government recognition and regulation of cricket are not enough to make BCCI the State - Article 32 is mainly for enforcing fundamental rights; Article 226 gives High Courts wider writ power, including against bodies performing public duties - A 'writ' means a formal court order FOR YOUR EXAM Remember the two conclusions: BCCI was not the State under Article 12, but its public functions may still be open to judicial review under Article 226. CONTINUE THE SERIES Next, Part 6: Keshavan Madhava Menon v State of Bombay (1951) | Article 13 Explained https://youtu.be/8teRhosVdi4 Related, Part 4: Pradeep Kumar Biswas Case (2002) | Article 12 'State' Test Explained https://youtu.be/yrblDTV3BBQ Related, Part 3: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib Sehravardi | Article 12 Instrumentality of State Test https://youtu.be/hSVBZSm4o0g All 40 Constitutional Case Laws (playlist): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT4r9ZZ3tKLM Complete lecture, all 40 cases in one video: https://youtu.be/oUrSfn3wp8s?t=514 (this case starts at 8:34) Notes and study material: https://www.thelaweasy.com Subscribe to Law Easy for more Constitutional Law, LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary lectures: https://www.youtube.com/@LawEasyin?sub_confirmation=1 Educational content only, not legal advice. Always read the original judgment and check the latest law before relying on a case in an answer or in practice. #ConstitutionalLaw #CLATPG #UGCNETLaw #LawEasy #Article12

Case law

Judgments to read alongside

The written case notes: facts, issues, judgment and the principle to remember.

Case law library

Rameshwar Prasad vs Union of India

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) · 2006

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Normally, a Legislative Assembly is elected, meets, and functions for up to five years unless dissolved earlier. Rameshwar Prasad & Ors. vs. Union of India (2006) asks a startling question: can an assembly be dissolved before it has even held its first me…

Constitutional Law I

Public Interest Foundation vs Union of India

Supreme Court of India (5-Judge Constitution Bench) · 2018

First, let us understand the basic meaning. India's Constitution already lists specific reasons a person cannot become a Member of Parliament under Article 102 . But what happens when a serious social problem — people facing serious criminal charges contesting and winning elections, then going on t…

Constitutional Law I

GVK Industries Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) · 2011

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Article 245 of the Constitution deals with how far laws made by Parliament and State legislatures can extend. GVK Industries Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer (2011) answers a precise question: can Parliament make laws about things that happen outside the terri…

Constitutional Law I

Notes

Notes on Constitutional Law I

All notes on this subject
Constitutional Law I Case compilation

40 Important Constitutional Law Case Laws

Decided: 1967. Core question: Can a public electricity board ignore the Constitution just because it sells electricity? The answer changed how courts understand the meaning of "the State".

80 min read

Constitutional Law I Complete notes

Constitution I One Shot

Definition: Constitutionalism is a system that gives legitimacy to a democratic government.

69 min read

Practise 115 Constitutional Law I MCQs Check what you have learnt with practice questions on this subject.

Video lectures

More on Constitutional Law I

All lectures on this subject

Learn with video

Watch every lecture free on YouTube

Complete courses, landmark case explanations and quick Shorts from The Law Easy channel. Subscribe to get new lectures as soon as they are published.