Skip to content
The Law Easy
Human Rights Law Short notes

Can Indians Complain to the UN Human Rights Committee? ICCPR Protocol

India accepted the ICCPR in 1979 but not its First Optional Protocol, so the Human Rights Committee cannot receive individual complaints against India.

4 min read Published 6 views

Cover: Can Indians Complain to the UN Human Rights Committee? ICCPR Protocol

Watch the Short

Can Indians Complain to the UN Human Rights Committee? | ICCPR

On this page

Quick answer

No. A person in India cannot bring an individual complaint (called a "communication") against India before the UN Human Rights Committee, because India has not become a party to the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR. Article 1 of that Protocol says the Committee shall not receive a communication concerning a State party to the Covenant that is not a party to the Protocol. India is bound by the ICCPR itself (it acceded on 10 April 1979), so the Committee still reviews India's periodic reports. A rights claim, however, must be pursued through Indian remedies.

The law

  • ICCPR, Article 40: States parties submit reports on how they give effect to Covenant rights. The Human Rights Committee studies them and may issue "general comments" to States parties.
  • First Optional Protocol, Article 1: a State that becomes a party to the Protocol recognises the Committee's competence to receive communications from individuals subject to its jurisdiction. No communication may be received against a State party to the Covenant that is not a party to the Protocol.
  • Article 2: the author must have exhausted all available domestic remedies.
  • Article 3: a communication is inadmissible if it is anonymous, an abuse of the right of submission, or incompatible with the Covenant.
  • Article 5(2): the same matter must not be under examination in another international procedure. Domestic remedies need not be exhausted where they are unreasonably prolonged.
  • Article 5(4): the Committee forwards its views to the State and the individual.

Status check

According to the UN Treaty Collection, the First Optional Protocol (adopted in 1966, in force since 23 March 1976) has 116 parties. India is not among the parties or the signatories. In India's 2022 Universal Periodic Review, recommendations to ratify the Optional Protocols to the ICCPR were noted by India, not supported.

Views compared with a court judgment

PointCommittee "views" under the Optional ProtocolJudgment of a domestic court
JurisdictionOnly over States that have accepted the ProtocolFlows from the Constitution and statute
Legal characterAn "authoritative determination" by the Covenant's own interpretive body (General Comment No. 33). It is not, as such, the decision of a judicial body.Binding decision of a court
ComplianceRests on the State's duty to act in good faith, with Committee follow-upEnforceable through execution or contempt

Example

Example

Aadil believes that a ban on his writings violates his freedom of expression. He cannot file a communication against India before the Human Rights Committee, because India has not accepted the Optional Protocol. His remedy lies in Indian law. He may claim that his right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) has been violated. He can approach a High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution. If he were a national of a State that is a party to the Protocol, he would first have to exhaust that State's effective domestic remedies before writing to the Committee.

Current-law note

The position can change only if India becomes a party to the Protocol. India's treaty obligations do still matter at home: Article 51(c) of the Constitution directs the State to foster respect for international law and treaty obligations, and Article 253 empowers Parliament to legislate to implement international agreements. For more on the UN treaty bodies, see Human Rights Law: Complete Notes.

Exam point

Exam point

India is a party to the ICCPR (1979) but not to its First Optional Protocol. The Human Rights Committee therefore cannot receive individual communications against India; it can only examine India's reports.

Sources and further reading

Practise Human Rights Law MCQs

100 questions. Every answer comes with an explanation and the legal provision behind it.

Practise now

Make this page yours

Sign in to save your reading progress and keep private notes and highlights. Free, and only you can see them.

Frequently asked questions

Can an Indian citizen file a complaint against India before the UN Human Rights Committee?

No. Individual communications are possible only against States that are parties to the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR. India is not a party, and Article 1 of the Protocol bars the Committee from receiving communications concerning such a State.

Are the Human Rights Committee's views binding?

They are not judgments of a court. General Comment No. 33 calls them an authoritative determination by the body charged with interpreting the Covenant, with some characteristics of a judicial decision. States are expected to respect them in good faith.

Must domestic remedies be exhausted before complaining to the Committee?

Yes. Articles 2 and 5(2)(b) of the Optional Protocol require the author to exhaust all available domestic remedies, unless those remedies are unreasonably prolonged.

Keep reading

Related notes

Human Rights Law Complete notes

Human Rights Law: Complete Notes

Human Rights Law runs, across six units, from what makes a right a human right to newer issues such as artificial intelligence, corruption, business power, and the rights of transgender persons and prisoners. Human rights are engaged whenever a person speaks out, visits a government hospital…

122 min read

Watch

Related lectures