Skip to content
The Law Easy

Labour Law II: 2-Hour Study Guide

These notes cover Labour Law II (Social Security Legislations) for the LL.B. course, following the course outline for July–November 2026 (NLU Odisha, Cuttack). The material is arranged in seven modules and 117 numbered concepts, followed by a last-minute revision section.

237 min read Published

Cover: Labour Law II: 2-Hour Study Guide
On this page

About these notes

These notes cover Labour Law II (Social Security Legislations) for the LL.B. course, following the course outline for July–November 2026 (NLU Odisha, Cuttack). The material is arranged in seven modules and 117 numbered concepts, followed by a last-minute revision section.

Each concept is set out in the same order: the concept, its meaning in brief, a model exam answer, an example and a memory hook. Each case is set out as facts, decision, principle of law, example and conclusion.

ModuleTopicLecture hours in the course outlineConcepts in these notesHigh-importance concepts
ISocial security, the Constitution, the ILO and the four Labour Codes41–91, 5, 6, 8, 9
IICode on Wages, 2019: wages, minimum wage, payment of wages, bonus, claims and gender pay1510–3610, 11, 13, 16–18, 20, 23, 24, 26–29, 31, 32, 35, 36
IIIEmployee's compensation (Code on Social Security, Chapter VII)1437–6137, 38, 43–49, 51–54, 56, 57, 59
IVESI, gratuity, provident fund and other welfare1462–8462, 63, 66–68, 70–77, 79–81, 83
VMaternity and women's benefits585–9486, 87, 89, 92, 93
VIUnorganised, gig and platform workers; contract labour1095–10995–105, 107, 108
VIIInter-State migrant workers4110–117110, 111, 113, 115, 116
Total66 (the rest of the 75 classes are tutorials)Last-minute revision section at the end
Key point

Modules II, III and IV together carry 43 of the 66 lecture hours, that is, about two-thirds of the course.

Signs used in these notes

  • † marks a point that could not be fully confirmed; it should be checked against class notes.
  • ⚠ marks a case whose facts could not be verified.
  • Persons named in the examples are imaginary; they are not the parties to any case.
  • Words in brackets explain difficult terms.

Abbreviations

Short formFull name
CoWCode on Wages, 2019
CoSSCode on Social Security, 2020
IR CodeIndustrial Relations Code, 2020
OSH CodeOccupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020
MWAMinimum Wages Act, 1948
PWAPayment of Wages Act, 1936
ECAEmployees' Compensation Act, 1923
ESI ActEmployees' State Insurance Act, 1948
EPF ActEmployees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
PoG ActPayment of Gratuity Act, 1972
MBAMaternity Benefit Act, 1961
CLRAContract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
ISMW ActInter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979
UWSSAUnorganised Workers' Social Security Act, 2008

Common Errors in Course Outlines, Corrected

The course outline is only an outline. It gives topics, a few section numbers and the names of cases; it does not give the text of the Codes or the facts of any case. In these notes, section numbers of the three Codes follow the enacted text, and case facts follow reports of the judgments. Section numbers of the old Acts follow the course outline where it gives them; otherwise they should be confirmed on the bare Act. A case that could not be checked is marked ⚠.

#What the course outline saysWhat is correct
1"The new Codes have not yet been implemented."The four Labour Codes were made effective on 21 November 2025 (Government of India press release). The course outline still requires the old laws to be covered, with the Codes highlighted. These notes therefore give the Code first and the old Act in one short line.
2Chapter numbers such as "CoW Ch. III = Minimum Wages", "CoSS Ch. II = PF, Ch. III = ESI, Ch. IV = Compensation", "OSH Ch. VII / VIII = contract labour / migrant workers".The Codes number them differently. CoW: Minimum Wages Chapter II; Payment of Wages Chapter III; Bonus Chapter IV. CoSS: Provident Fund Chapter III; ESI Chapter IV; Gratuity Chapter V; Maternity Chapter VI; Employee's Compensation Chapter VII; Building workers Chapter VIII; Unorganised, gig and platform workers Chapter IX. OSH Code: Contract labour = Chapter XI Part I; Inter-State migrant workers = Chapter XI Part II. These notes use the real chapter numbers.
3"Bar on receipt of benefits (Section 77 of the Code)".In the CoSS the bar is in Section 41(4) and Section 41(7). Section 77 deals with payment of compensation when due (Concept 57). The old rule is Section 53 of the ESI Act.
4"C.67 (Income Security)" and "C.202 (Social Protection Floor)".These are Recommendations (R.67 of 1944 and R.202 of 2012), not Conventions. A Recommendation only guides; it is not ratified.
5"Displacement allowance" for migrant workers.Displacement allowance belonged to the old ISMW Act, 1979. The OSH Code's Part on migrant workers (Sections 59–65) provides a journey allowance (Section 61) but no separate displacement allowance (Concept 113).
6Some cases are listed under a topic different from the one they decide.In these notes each case is placed under the topic it really decides (see the table below).

Cases listed under the wrong topic

CaseListed in the course outline underWhat the case really decidesCovered in these notes under
Ludhiana Hand Tools; Align ComponentsFixing minimum wages, Advisory BoardsWages during the COVID-19 lockdown (MHA order of 29 March 2020)Concepts 24 and 117
Manganese Ore v. Chandi Lal SahaMinimum wages: "limited to scheduled employments"Minimum wage must be paid in cash; grain concession and attendance bonus cannot be deductedConcept 19
Jyothi Home IndustriesMinimum wagesPiece-rate workers and home-workers; "guaranteed wages"Concept 22
PUDR v. Union of IndiaFloor wageNon-payment of minimum wage = forced labour (Article 23)Concept 18 (and Concept 5)
Roshan Deen v. PreetilalNotice and claimContracting out (giving up compensation by agreement)Concept 61
Union of India v. United PlantersBonus eligibilityA transfer petition on the 2015 amendment to the Bonus ActConcept 27
Saurashtra Salt; BEST v. AgnesESI: "arising out of employment"Also the leading cases on notional extensionConcepts 47 and 70

Citation and name slips

  • Francis De Costa is cited in the course outline as "1994 SCC (L&S) 195". The final decision of the larger bench is reported as (1996) 6 SCC 1.
  • Rachna Chaurasia is cited as "WP No. 2467/2017". The judgment is Dr. Rachna Chaurasiya v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 29 May 2017), WP No. 24627 of 2017.
  • Two cases could not be traced at all: V. Jayaraj and Batulbibi (marked ⚠).

Module I: Social Security (International and Constitutional Framework)

Module I (Concepts 1–9) covers the meaning of social security and labour welfare, the history of social-security law in India, the need for the Labour Codes, the constitutional basis of labour law, the ILO standards and an overview of the four Labour Codes.

1. Social Security (CoSS Section 2(78))

Exam importance: high

Every worker faces risks: old age, sickness, an accident at work, having a baby, losing the job, or the death of the person who earns for the family. Social security is the help that society gives at such times, so that the worker and the family do not fall into poverty.

  • The help can be money, medical care, or both.
  • It is paid for by the worker, the employer and the government.
Key point

In brief: social security is help (money and medical care) for a worker when the worker cannot earn.

Model exam answer

Definition

Under Section 2(78) of the Code on Social Security, 2020 (CoSS), social security means "the measures of protection afforded to employees, unorganised workers, gig workers and platform workers to ensure access to health care and to provide income security, particularly in cases of old age, unemployment, sickness, invalidity, work injury, maternity or loss of a breadwinner", by means of rights and schemes under the Code. A "breadwinner" is the earning member of the family.

  1. Two aims: income security (money when earning stops) and access to health care.
  2. Two ways of giving:
    • Social insurance: people pay contributions (ESI, provident fund).
    • Social assistance: the government pays from taxes (for example, old-age pensions for poor people).
  3. Risks covered: old age, unemployment, sickness, invalidity (permanent disability), work injury, maternity, and death of the breadwinner.
  4. Who is covered: organised, unorganised, gig and platform workers.
  5. Base: the Directive Principles (Articles 38, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 47) and ILO standards (Convention 102 of 1952).
  6. Tools in the Code: provident fund, ESI, gratuity, maternity benefit, employee's compensation, cess for construction workers, and schemes for unorganised, gig and platform workers.
Note

Updated: the transcript listed gratuity as a contributory social-insurance scheme. The correct position is that gratuity is paid by the employer alone under Section 53 of the Code on Social Security, 2020; no contribution is paid for it. Under Section 2(21), "contribution" means money payable to the Central Board (provident fund) and the Corporation (ESI). Source: The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act 36 of 2020), Ministry of Labour and Employment.

Conclusion: social security is a right-based safety net. It protects the worker's dignity and keeps the labour market stable.

Example

Farhan works in Prince's factory. One day a machine injures Farhan and he cannot work for two months. Because of social security, Farhan gets medical care and part of his wages during that time, so his family does not go hungry.

Memory hook

Social security = a safety net under the worker.

2. Labour Welfare

Exam importance: medium

Labour welfare means the facilities and services given to workers to make work and life better: clean drinking water, a canteen, a rest room, a crèche (day-care for small children), medical help, housing, education and recreation. Social security helps in a crisis; welfare gives daily comfort.

Key point

In brief: labour welfare means everyday comforts and facilities for workers.

Model exam answer

Definition

Labour welfare means all efforts, by law, by employers or by workers, to improve the health, safety, comfort and living standard of workers and their families, over and above wages.

  1. Statutory welfare (by law):
    • welfare facilities in the workplace (OSH Code, Chapter VI, Section 24);
    • a crèche in establishments with 50 or more employees (CoSS Section 67);
    • the Building Workers' Welfare Fund (CoSS Section 108).
  2. Voluntary welfare (the employer's own choice): sports, scholarships, housing loans.
  3. Mutual welfare (by workers): unions and co-operative societies.
  4. Objects: better health and efficiency, industrial peace, and social justice (Articles 42 and 43).
Social securityLabour welfare
AimMoney and health cover in a crisisBetter daily conditions
NatureLegal right to benefitsFacilities and services (legal or voluntary)
ExampleESI sickness benefit, pensionCanteen, crèche, rest room

Conclusion: both are needed. Welfare improves daily life, and social security protects against big risks.

Example

Prince's factory gives Farhan a clean canteen and a rest room (welfare). When Farhan falls ill, ESI pays him sickness benefit (social security).

Memory hook

Welfare = daily comfort. Security = crisis cushion.

3. Historical Evolution of Social Security Law in India

Exam importance: medium

In old India, the family and the village looked after people. When factories came, workers faced accidents and low pay, and there was no help. Small laws came first, then bigger insurance laws after independence, and now the four Labour Codes.

Key point

In brief: evolution (slow growth) means how social security grew step by step, from small laws to the Codes.

Model exam answer

  1. Before 1947:
    • The Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 made employers pay for work injuries. It was the first social-security law.
    • Early maternity laws came in some provinces (for example Bombay, 1929).
    • The Royal Commission on Labour (1929–31) asked for welfare and insurance measures.
  2. After 1947:
    • The Constitution (1950) put welfare in the Directive Principles.
    • ESI Act, 1948: medical and cash benefits.
    • EPF Act, 1952: provident fund, later also pension and insurance schemes.
    • Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.
    • Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
    • Building Workers' Acts, 1996: welfare and cess.
    • Unorganised Workers' Social Security Act, 2008.
  3. Reform reports: the National Commission on Labour of 1969 and the Second National Commission on Labour of 2002 (both are among the prescribed readings). The Second Commission asked for simpler, grouped laws and better cover for unorganised workers.
  4. 2019–2020: Parliament passed the four Codes. They were made effective on 21 November 2025.

Conclusion: the law moved from "the employer must pay for injury" to "the State must protect every worker".

Example

Long ago, if Farhan was hurt in Prince's mill, nobody had to help him. After 1923, Prince had to pay compensation. After 1948, Farhan also got ESI medical care. Today, even if Farhan delivers food through an app, the Code on Social Security has a place for him.

Memory hook

Compensation 1923 → ESI 1948 → PF 1952 → Maternity 1961 → Gratuity 1972 → Codes 2020 (C-E-P-M-G-Codes).

4. Need for Codification

Exam importance: medium

Codification means putting many scattered laws into a few organised books. It was needed because India had too many labour laws, with different definitions, different offices and different forms. This confused workers, employers and courts.

Key point

In brief: codification means merging 29 old central laws into 4 Codes, so that the law is simple and covers more workers.

Model exam answer

  1. Too many laws: 29 central laws (and many State laws) covered the same subjects.
  2. Different definitions: the words "wages" and "employee" meant different things in different Acts. This caused anomalies (odd results) and much litigation. The course outline calls this "divergent wage definitions".
  3. Low coverage: the Minimum Wages Act covered only scheduled employments, and the Payment of Wages Act had a wage ceiling. Most workers in India are in the unorganised sector, and they stayed outside these laws.
  4. Heavy compliance: many registrations, licences, registers and returns. The Codes bring one registration, electronic filing and an Inspector-cum-Facilitator (an officer who guides as well as inspects).
  5. New kinds of work: gig and platform work were not covered by any old law.
  6. Reports: the Second National Commission on Labour (2002) recommended grouping the laws.
  7. Aim: ease of doing business and wider protection for workers.

Conclusion: codification makes labour law simpler, wider and easier to enforce. Critics, however, say that some protections were reduced (for example, by higher thresholds).

Example

Prince owns a small workshop. Before the Codes, he had to follow different laws that defined Farhan's "wages" differently, and he filed many returns. Now one definition of "wages" and one electronic system apply.

Memory hook

29 → 4: many laws, one Code. (Simple, Wide, One-window.)

5. Fundamental Rights Relevant to Labour (Articles 14, 19, 21, 23 and 24)

Exam importance: high

Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Constitution) are basic rights that a person can enforce in court. Five of them matter most for workers:

  • equality (Article 14);
  • freedoms such as forming unions and doing business (Article 19);
  • life with dignity (Article 21);
  • no forced labour (Article 23);
  • no child labour in dangerous work (Article 24).
Key point

In brief: the Fundamental Rights protect the worker's equality, freedom and dignity, and protect against forced labour and child labour.

Model exam answer

ArticleWhat it saysLink with labour
14Equality before law and equal protection of the lawsEqual treatment; equal wages for equal work (CoW Section 3); reasonable classification for coverage.
19Freedoms: Article 19(1)(c), to form associations or unions; Article 19(1)(g), to practise a profession or carry on a businessWorkers form unions. The employer's freedom to run a business is subject to reasonable restrictions (Article 19(6)), such as minimum wage and bonus laws.
21Life and personal libertyIncludes life with dignity, health, livelihood and humane working conditions. It is the basis of social security and safety laws.
23No traffic in human beings, begar (forced work without pay) or other forced labourPUDR v. Union of India (1982): paying less than the minimum wage is forced labour (see Concept 18).
24No child below 14 to work in a factory, mine or other hazardous employmentPUDR: construction work is hazardous.
  • These rights bind the State. Articles 17, 23 and 24 bind private persons too.
  • Labour laws are made to give effect to these rights.
Case

PUDR v. Union of India (1982). Held: paying a worker less than the minimum wage amounts to forced labour under Article 23; and construction work is hazardous employment for the purpose of Article 24. Principle: non-payment of the minimum wage is forced labour, which the Constitution prohibits. (Discussed fully in Concept 18.)

Conclusion: the Fundamental Rights give a legal shield to the worker, and labour laws turn that shield into detailed rules.

Example

Prince makes Farhan work for a very low wage because Farhan has no other choice (an Article 23 problem). Prince also pays Neha less than Farhan for the same job (an Article 14 problem). Both acts are illegal.

Memory hook

14 = Equal · 19 = Free · 21 = Dignity · 23 = No force · 24 = No child in danger.

6. Directive Principles Relevant to Labour (Articles 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 43A and 47)

Exam importance: high

Directive Principles (Part IV of the Constitution) are goals that the State should follow while making laws. Courts cannot force the State to obey them (Article 37), but they guide every labour law, and courts read them together with the Fundamental Rights.

Key point

In brief: the Directive Principles are the State's promises to workers about livelihood, fair pay, humane work and welfare.

Model exam answer

ArticlePromise
38The State is to secure a social order based on justice and to reduce inequality.
39(a) adequate means of livelihood; (d) equal pay for equal work for men and women; (e) the health and strength of workers, and children, are not to be abused, and workers are not to be forced by need into unsuitable work.
41Right to work, to education and to public assistance in unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement (within the State's means).
42Just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief.
43A living wage and conditions of work that ensure a decent standard of life.
43AWorkers' participation in the management of industries (added in 1976).
47Raising the level of nutrition and the standard of living, and improving public health.

Use in labour law

Directive PrincipleLabour law that gives effect to it
Article 39(d)CoW Section 3 (equal wages)
Article 41Pensions and social security
Article 42Maternity benefit (CoSS Chapter VI)
Article 43Minimum wage and floor wage

Conclusion: the Directive Principles are the "why" behind the Codes.

Example

The town where Farhan lives wants a law that helps him when he is old, sick or out of work; Article 41 is the reason. A law giving Farhan's wife Zoya maternity leave comes from Article 42.

Memory hook

38 Justice · 39 Livelihood + equal pay · 41 Help when in need · 42 Humane work + maternity · 43 Living wage · 43A Say in management · 47 Health.

7. Legislative Competence and Constitutional Validity of the Codes

Exam importance: medium

Legislative competence is the power to make a law on a subject: the law-maker must be allowed by the Constitution to make a law on that topic. A law is valid if the law-maker has this power and the law does not violate the Constitution (for example Articles 14, 19 and 21).

Key point

In brief: the Codes are valid because Parliament may make laws on labour, and the Codes do not break the Constitution.

Model exam answer

  1. Concurrent List (List III, Seventh Schedule): both Parliament and the State Legislatures can make laws on these entries (Article 246(2)).
    • Entry 22: trade unions; industrial and labour disputes.
    • Entry 23: social security and social insurance; employment and unemployment.
    • Entry 24: welfare of labour, including conditions of work, provident funds, employers' liability, workmen's compensation, invalidity and old-age pensions and maternity benefits.
  2. Union List: Entry 55 (regulation of labour and safety in mines and oilfields).
  3. Conflict: if a State law clashes with a Central law on a concurrent subject, the Central law prevails (Article 254(1)), unless the State law has received the President's assent (Article 254(2)).
  4. "Appropriate Government": the Codes give power to the Centre for railways, mines, oilfields, major ports and similar Central sectors, and to the State for other establishments (for example CoW Section 2(d)). States also make their own rules.
  5. Test of validity: (a) legislative competence, and (b) no violation of Part III. Courts start with a presumption of constitutionality (an assumption, allowed by law, that the statute is valid).
  6. Directive Principles: the Codes help to achieve Articles 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43.

Conclusion: the Codes fall within the shared (concurrent) legislative power, so they are valid unless a court finds a clash with Part III. No judgment striking down any Code is noted here, and the course outline names none.

Example

Prince's State makes a wage rule that is lower than the Central Code. Farhan goes to court. The lower State rule is invalid because a rule made under the Code cannot go below the Code itself; the State has gone beyond its rule-making power. Article 254 would apply only if a law passed by the State Legislature clashed with the Code.

Note

Updated: the transcript said the Central Code prevails over a lower State wage rule because wages are on the Concurrent List (Article 254). The correct position is that Article 254 deals only with a "law made by the Legislature of a State" that is repugnant to a Central law. A rule made by a State Government under the Code on Wages, 2019 draws its power from the Code (Section 67), so a rule below the Code's standard (for example, a minimum wage below the floor wage, which Section 9(2) forbids) is invalid as beyond that power. Source: The Constitution of India, Article 254, Legislative Department; The Code on Wages, 2019, India Code.

Memory hook

22-23-24 (List III) = Unions, Social security, Welfare. The Centre wins in a clash.

8. ILO Framework (C.102, C.121, C.130, C.183, R.67 and R.202)

Exam importance: high

The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the United Nations body for labour. It makes two kinds of instruments:

  • Conventions: treaties that a country may ratify (formally accept);
  • Recommendations: guidance only.

India is a founding member of the ILO (1919).

Key point

In brief: the ILO sets world standards for social security. India follows many of them in its laws, but has not ratified the main social-security Conventions†.

Model exam answer

InstrumentWhat it coversNote
C.102 Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952Nine branches: medical care, sickness, unemployment, old age, employment injury, family, maternity, invalidity and survivors' benefits. A country must accept at least three.The base standard.
C.121 Employment Injury Benefits Convention, 1964Medical care and cash benefits for work injury, occupational disease and death.Higher standard than C.102.
C.130 Medical Care and Sickness Benefits Convention, 1969Medical care and sickness cash benefit.Higher standard than C.102.
C.183 Maternity Protection Convention, 2000At least 14 weeks' maternity leave; cash benefit of at least two-thirds of earlier pay; protection from dismissal; nursing breaks.Indian law gives 26 weeks.
R.67 Income Security Recommendation, 1944 (the course outline writes "C.67")Guidance on income security.A Recommendation, not a Convention.
R.202 Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (the course outline writes "C.202")Every person should get a national "floor": basic health care, and basic income security for children, for people of working age who cannot earn, and for older persons.A Recommendation.

India's record

  • India has not ratified C.102, C.121, C.130 and C.183†.
  • Even so, Indian laws (ESI, EPF, maternity benefit, employee's compensation) follow many of their ideas.
  • Article 51(c) asks the State to respect international law.
  • The list of Conventions not ratified by India should be confirmed on the ILO NORMLEX page, especially if a different list has been given in class.

Conclusion: ILO standards are the world yardstick, and the Codes try to move India closer to them.

Example

The ILO says a mother like Zoya should get at least 14 weeks' maternity leave. Prince's factory, following Indian law, gives her 26 weeks. Indian law is better than the ILO minimum, even though India has not ratified C.183.

Memory hook

102 = Master Convention (9 branches). 121 = Injury. 130 = Medical/Sickness. 183 = Maternity (14 weeks). 202 and 67 = Recommendations only.

9. The Four Labour Codes: Overview, Objectives, Scheme and Structure

Exam importance: high

Parliament put 29 central labour laws into four Codes: one on Wages, one on Industrial Relations, one on Social Security, and one on Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions. They were made effective on 21 November 2025.

Key point

In brief: four Codes replace 29 old central laws, covering pay, worker–employer relations, social security and safety.

Model exam answer

CodeActOld central laws mergedMain subjects
Code on Wages, 2019Act 29 of 2019 (9 chapters, 69 sections)4: Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976Minimum wage, payment of wages, bonus, equal pay
Industrial Relations Code, 2020Act 35 of 20203: Trade Unions Act, 1926; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947Unions, disputes, lay-off, retrenchment
Code on Social Security, 2020Act 36 of 2020 (14 chapters, 164 sections)9: Employees' Compensation, 1923; ESI, 1948; EPF, 1952; Employment Exchanges, 1959; Maternity Benefit, 1961; Gratuity, 1972; Cine-Workers Welfare Fund, 1981; Building Workers' Cess, 1996; Unorganised Workers' Social Security, 2008Provident fund, ESI, gratuity, maternity, compensation, gig and platform workers
Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020Act 37 of 2020 (14 chapters, 143 sections)13: Factories, 1948; Plantations, 1951; Mines, 1952; Working Journalists Acts, 1955 and 1958; Motor Transport Workers, 1961; Beedi and Cigar Workers, 1966; Contract Labour, 1970; Sales Promotion Employees, 1976; Inter-State Migrant Workmen, 1979; Cine-Workers, 1981; Dock Workers, 1986; Building Workers, 1996Safety, health, welfare, hours of work, contract labour, migrant workers
Note

Updated: the transcript said the Code on Wages, 2019 has 67 sections. The correct position is that it has 9 chapters and 69 sections; Section 67 is the rule-making power and Section 69 is "Repeal and savings". Source: The Code on Wages, 2019 (Act 29 of 2019), India Code.

Total merged: 4 + 3 + 9 + 13 = 29.

Objectives

  1. To simplify and unify the law.
  2. Minimum wage and timely payment for all.
  3. To extend social security to unorganised, gig and platform workers.
  4. Safe and healthy workplaces.
  5. Equal pay for men and women.
  6. One registration, one licence, one return, and electronic filing.
  7. An Inspector-cum-Facilitator in place of a pure inspector.

Legislative competence

Concurrent List, Entries 22, 23 and 24 (see Concept 7).

Scheme and structure

Each Code has chapters on:

  • definitions;
  • the main rights and duties;
  • registration;
  • authorities (the Inspector-cum-Facilitator);
  • claims and appeals;
  • offences and penalties;
  • repeal of the old laws.

The CoSS also creates a Social Security Fund (Section 141) and has a Seventh Schedule that lists the types of aggregators.

Conclusion: the Codes aim to make labour law simple, wide and modern.

Example

Prince has a factory with contract labour, a canteen and a provident fund. Earlier, he followed separate Acts on wages, bonus, gratuity, contract labour and factories. Now he follows four Codes, with one registration for his establishment.

Memory hook

W-I-S-O = Wages, Industrial relations, Social security, OSH. 4 + 3 + 9 + 13 = 29.

Module II: Code on Wages, 2019 – Remunerative Protections

Remuneration means payment for work. This module deals with the protections that the Code on Wages, 2019 (CoW) gives to remuneration.

10. Scope and Applicability (CoW Sections 1, 2(d), 5, 25 and 41)

Exam importance: high

The Code on Wages is the law on pay. It lays down how much minimum pay an employee must get, when and how wages are paid, what can be cut from wages, how bonus is paid and how claims are decided. Its big change is that it covers all employees in all establishments, and not only some listed jobs.

Key point

Applicability means to whom and where a law applies. The Code on Wages applies to every employee in every workplace.

Nature of the Code

The Code on Wages, 2019 (Act 29 of 2019) is a Code to amend and combine the law on wages, bonus and connected matters.

Applicability of the Code at a glance

AspectProvisionPosition under the Code
Extent and commencements.1Extends to the whole of India; comes into force on the date(s) the Central Government notifies (effective from 21 November 2025).
Minimum wagesChapter II; s.5Apply to all employees in all establishments, organised or unorganised.
Payment of wagesChapter III; s.25Applies to all employees, but not to Government establishments unless the Government notifies them.
BonusChapter IV; s.41(2); ss.40–41Applies to establishments in which 20 or more persons are or were employed on any day of the accounting year (s.41(2)); some exemptions (for example LIC, seamen and dock workers) and special rules for the public sector (ss.40–41).
Equal pays.3No discrimination on the ground of gender.
Appropriate Governments.2(d)The Centre for railways, mines, oil fields, major ports, air transport, telecom, banking and insurance, Central public sector companies and similar bodies; the State for all other establishments.
Machineryss.42, 45, 51Advisory Boards (s.42), claims authorities (s.45) and Inspector-cum-Facilitators (s.51).

Old law compared

LawCoverage
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (MWA)Only scheduled employments.
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (PWA)Only employees earning up to ₹24,000 a month in factories, railways and similar places.
Code on Wages, 2019Universal: all employees in all establishments (bonus only where 20 or more persons are employed).

Conclusion: The Code is universal. Every worker gets minimum wage protection.

Example

Prince runs a small tea stall with one helper, Farhan. Under the old MWA, a tea stall might not have been in the "scheduled" list. Under the Code, Prince must pay Farhan at least the minimum wage, because the Code covers every establishment.

Memory hook

One Code, all workers, all workplaces. (Bonus: 20+ persons.)

11. Employee (CoW Section 2(k))

Exam importance: high

An employee is any person who works for pay in an establishment. The word is very wide. It covers skilled and unskilled workers and also clerks, supervisors and managers.

Definition (Section 2(k))

"Employee" means any person (other than an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961) employed on wages by an establishment to do any skilled, semi-skilled or unskilled, manual, operational, supervisory, managerial, administrative, technical or clerical work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment are express or implied.

In short: an employee is anyone who works for wages in an establishment, except an apprentice or a soldier.

Features of the definition

  1. Includes a person declared to be an employee by the appropriate Government.
  2. Excludes apprentices (under the Apprentices Act, 1961) and members of the Armed Forces of the Union.
  3. No wage limit: managers and supervisors are covered.
  4. Express or implied terms: written and unwritten agreements are both covered.

Old law compared

  • Under the MWA, 1948, an employee was someone working in a scheduled employment.
  • Under the PWA, 1936, an "employed person" was covered only up to a wage ceiling.

Conclusion: The Code gives one wide definition, so more people are protected.

Example

Farhan works as a supervisor in Prince's shop and is paid monthly by Prince. Farhan is an "employee" under the Code, even though he is not a labourer.

Memory hook

Employee = paid to work, at any level (except apprentice and army).

12. Worker (CoW Section 2(z))

Exam importance: medium

"Worker" is a narrower word than "employee". It mainly means people doing manual, skilled, technical, clerical or supervisory work, and it leaves out managers.

Definition (Section 2(z))

"Worker" means any person (except an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms are express or implied.

In short: a worker is an employee doing hands-on, technical, clerical or low-level supervisory work.

Inclusions

  • Working journalists and sales promotion employees.
  • For the purpose of an industrial dispute, a person who was dismissed, discharged or retrenched because of that dispute.

Exclusions

  1. Persons subject to the Air Force, Army or Navy Acts.
  2. Police and prison staff.
  3. Persons employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity.
  4. Persons employed in a supervisory capacity drawing wages above ₹15,000 a month (or the amount the Centre notifies).

Employee and worker distinguished

PointEmployee (s.2(k))Worker (s.2(z))
ScopeWide: any level of workNarrower: a smaller group inside "employee"
Managers and administratorsCoveredExcluded
SupervisorsCovered, with no wage limitExcluded if drawing above ₹15,000 a month (or the notified amount)
ApprenticesExcludedExcluded
Armed forcesMembers of the Armed Forces of the Union excludedPersons under the Air Force, Army or Navy Acts excluded
Use in the CodeGeneral term (for example minimum wages under s.5)Used, for example, in s.9: the floor wage is fixed on the minimum living standard "of a worker"
Key point

Every worker is an employee, but a manager is an employee and not a worker.

Conclusion: "Worker" is the smaller group inside "employee".

Example

Farhan operates a machine in Prince's factory, so he is both a worker and an employee. Prince's general manager is an employee, but not a worker.

Memory hook

Worker ⊂ Employee. (Manager = employee, not worker.)

13. Employer (CoW Section 2(l))

Exam importance: high

The employer is the person responsible for paying wages. The Code makes sure that someone is always responsible: the owner, the person in control, the manager, or even the contractor.

Definition (Section 2(l))

"Employer" means a person who employs, directly or through any person, or on his behalf or on behalf of any person, one or more employees in his establishment.

In short: the employer is the person or authority who employs workers and is legally responsible for their pay.

Who is the employer

  1. Government departments: the authority named by the head of the department, or the head of the department if no authority is named.
  2. Local authority: its chief executive.
  3. The definition also includes:
    • in a factory, the occupier (the person with ultimate control of the factory) and the named manager;
    • in any other establishment, the person or authority with ultimate control of its affairs, and the manager or managing director if the affairs are entrusted to one;
    • a contractor; and
    • the legal representative of a deceased employer.

Why the definition is wide

An employer cannot avoid the duty to pay wages by using a contractor.

Conclusion: The Code fixes responsibility on a real person at every level.

Example

Prince hires a contractor to supply Farhan to work in his factory. If the contractor does not pay Farhan, the Code still treats the contractor (and Prince, as the person in control) as responsible.

Memory hook

Employer = Owner + Manager + Contractor + Heir.

14. Establishment (CoW Section 2(m))

Exam importance: medium

An establishment is any place where business or work is done. It includes Government offices. The Code lays down no minimum size.

Definition (Section 2(m))

"Establishment" means any place where any industry, trade, business, manufacture or occupation is carried on, and includes a Government establishment.

In short: an establishment is any workplace – a factory, shop, office, farm or Government office.

Features

  1. Wide: no minimum number of employees, except for bonus, which needs 20 or more persons.
  2. Government included: but Chapter III (payment of wages) applies to Government establishments only if notified (s.25).
  3. Use in the Code: the definition is used to decide who is an employer, which Government is the "appropriate Government", and the bonus set-up (under s.30, departments, undertakings and branches are treated as parts of one establishment).

Conclusion: The definition is wide, so that no worker is left out.

Example

Prince runs a two-person photo studio. Even a small studio is an "establishment", and Farhan, who works there, is covered.

Memory hook

Establishment = any place of work, big or small.

15. Factory (CoW Section 2(n))

Exam importance: low

A factory is a workplace where goods are made using many workers. The Code on Wages does not write a new definition; it borrows the definition from another law.

Definition (Section 2(n))

"Factory" means a factory as defined in clause (m) of section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948.

In short: a factory is a place where manufacturing is done by a set number of workers.

Old and new thresholds

LawWith powerWithout power
Factories Act, 1948, s.2(m) (old)10 or more workers20 or more workers
Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code (OSH Code), s.2(w) (new)20 or more workers40 or more workers

The Factories Act is now merged into the OSH Code. Under OSH Code s.2(w), a factory has 20 or more workers with power or 40 or more without power.

Use in the Code on Wages

The definition matters for the definition of "employer" (the occupier of a factory is the employer) and for deciding the "appropriate Government".

Exam tip

Know both sets of numbers: old 10/20, new 20/40.

Example

Prince's unit has 25 workers using power. It is a factory under the OSH Code. The occupier, Prince, is the "employer" for paying Farhan's wages.

Memory hook

Old factory 10/20 → New factory 20/40.

16. Wages (CoW Section 2(y))

Exam importance: high

"Wages" is the base for many payments: minimum wage, overtime, bonus and (under the Code on Social Security, CoSS) provident fund and gratuity. The Code has one common definition. It includes the core pay (basic pay, dearness allowance and retaining allowance) and leaves out extra items, but with a 50% safety rule so that employers cannot show low "wages" by making most of the pay an "allowance".

Definition (Section 2(y))

"Wages" means all remuneration, whether by way of salary, allowances or otherwise, expressed in money or capable of being so expressed, which would be payable to a person for his employment or work done, if the terms of employment were fulfilled.

In short: wages = basic pay + dearness allowance + retaining allowance, and at least 50% of total pay.

Included

  1. Basic pay.
  2. Dearness allowance (DA): extra pay to meet a rise in prices.
  3. Retaining allowance: payment to keep a worker available.

Excluded – items (a) to (k)

  • (a) Bonus that is not part of the terms of pay.
  • (b) Value of house accommodation, light, water, medical care and other amenities.
  • (c) Employer's contribution to a pension or provident fund, and the interest on it.
  • (d) Conveyance allowance or the value of a travel concession.
  • (e) Sums paid to meet special expenses of the job.
  • (f) House rent allowance.
  • (g) Remuneration under an award, settlement or court order.
  • (h) Overtime allowance.
  • (i) Commission.
  • (j) Gratuity.
  • (k) Retrenchment compensation, retirement benefit or ex gratia (voluntary) payment.

Safeguards in the definition

  1. 50% rule: if the excluded items in (a) to (i) exceed one-half of the total remuneration, the excess is added back to wages.
  2. Equal wages and payment of wages: for equal wages to all genders and for payment of wages, items (d), (f), (g) and (h) are counted as wages.
  3. Payment in kind (Explanation): remuneration in kind up to 15% of total wages counts as wages.

Why one unified definition

Different Acts (the MWA, the PWA, the Bonus Act and others) defined "wages" differently. This led to anomalies and much litigation, and employers could reduce PF and gratuity by keeping "wages" low.

Worked example of the 50% rule

StepAmount
Total pay₹30,000
Basic pay₹12,000
Excluded allowances₹18,000
One-half of total pay₹15,000
Excess of excluded items over one-half (added back)₹3,000
Wages (₹12,000 + ₹3,000)₹15,000

Conclusion: The definition protects workers from "salary splitting".

Example

Prince pays Farhan ₹30,000: ₹12,000 as basic pay and ₹18,000 in allowances. Prince says Farhan's "wages" are only ₹12,000. Under the 50% rule, Farhan's wages are ₹15,000, so his bonus, overtime and other dues are worked out on ₹15,000.

Memory hook

Wages = Basic + DA + Retaining, and never less than 50% of total pay. "50-15": the half rule, and 15% in kind.

17. Floor Wage and National Floor Wage (CoW Section 9)

Exam importance: high

A floor wage is a national bottom level of wage. No State can fix its minimum wage below it. Earlier every State fixed its own minimum wage, so pay differed a lot between States.

Key point

Floor wage = the lowest wage the Centre allows anywhere. States can go higher, but not lower.

Section 9

"The Central Government shall fix floor wage taking into account minimum living standards of a worker, in such manner as may be prescribed."

Features

  1. Living standard: the Centre looks at the minimum living standard of a worker.
  2. Different areas: the Centre may fix different floor wages for different geographical areas.
  3. Consultation: before fixing the floor wage, the Centre may take the advice of the Central Advisory Board and consult State Governments.
  4. Relation with State minimum wages: the minimum wage fixed by an appropriate Government must not be less than the floor wage. If a State's minimum wage is already higher, it cannot be reduced; if it is lower, it must be raised to the floor.
  5. "National" floor wage: it is a single national base that stops a "race to the bottom" between States.

Old law compared

The MWA, 1948 had no national floor wage; each Government fixed its own rates.

Conclusion: The floor wage is a national safety line for wages.

Example

The Centre fixes a floor wage of ₹X a day for Prince's area. Prince's State had fixed a lower minimum wage. The State must now raise it to at least ₹X, so Farhan cannot be paid below ₹X.

Memory hook

Floor = basement. A State's minimum wage can be a higher floor, never a lower one.

18. Minimum Wages (CoW Sections 5 and 6)

Exam importance: high

The minimum wage is the lowest pay an employer may legally give. Courts speak of three levels of wages, and the Code fixes only the minimum.

Key point

Minimum wage = the lowest amount of money that an employer must legally pay a worker.

Three levels of wages

LevelMeaningDoes it depend on the employer's capacity to pay?
Minimum wageBare survival plus preservation of the worker's efficiencyNo (Crown Aluminium)
Fair wageIn between the minimum and the living wageYes
Living wageEnough for a comfortable lifeYes

Provisions of the Code

  1. Duty (s.5): no employer shall pay any employee wages less than the minimum rate notified. This applies to all employees.
  2. Fixing (s.6): the appropriate Government fixes the minimum rates, subject to the floor wage (s.9) and the procedure in s.8. It may fix rates for time work or piece work, by the hour, day or month.
  3. Factors: rates can differ by skill (unskilled, semi-skilled, skilled, highly skilled) and by geographical area, and can take account of arduous work, such as work in extreme heat or humidity, hazardous work or underground work.
  4. Review: rates are to be reviewed and revised at intervals not exceeding five years.

Meaning of minimum wage in case law

A minimum wage must provide for bare survival and keep up the worker's efficiency. The norms of the 15th Indian Labour Conference (1957) are used, and Reptakos Brett added a further 25%.

ComponentNorm
Consumption units3 consumption units for one earner
FoodMinimum food requirement
Clothing72 yards a year
HousingHousing rent
Fuel and lighting20% of the minimum wage
Added by Reptakos Brett (1992)A further 25% for children's education, medical needs, minimum recreation (including festivals), and old age and marriage

Other settled principles

  • Ability to pay is no defence: the employer's weak finances do not justify paying less than the minimum wage (Crown Aluminium).
  • Below-minimum wage is forced labour: PUDR v. Union of India (Article 23).

Old law compared

The MWA, 1948 covered only scheduled employments.

Conclusion: The Code makes the minimum wage a universal right.

Example

The minimum wage for Farhan's job is ₹600 a day. Prince says, "My business is weak, I can pay only ₹450." That is illegal. Prince must pay ₹600, or close the business.

Memory hook

Minimum wage = lowest legal wage. (Minimum < Fair < Living.)

Leading cases on minimum wages

Case

People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 1473) – the "Asiad Workers" case

Facts: Poor labourers worked on construction for the 1982 Asian Games in Delhi. They were employed through contractors and were paid less than the minimum wage. Women got less than men, and children below 14 were working at the sites. A civil-liberties group (PUDR) wrote a letter to the Court, and the Court treated the letter as a petition.

Held: (1) Paying less than the minimum wage is forced labour under Article 23, because a poor person who accepts low pay out of need is not working freely; economic compulsion is also "force". (2) Construction is a hazardous job, so children under 14 cannot be employed in it (Article 24). (3) The Government authorities that were the principal employers must see that the contractors obey the labour laws. (4) A public-spirited group may file such a petition on behalf of the poor.

Principle: Below-minimum wage is forced labour (Article 23). Construction is hazardous work (Article 24). The State must enforce labour laws even where contractors are used. Consent given out of hunger is not real consent.

Illustration: Prince's contractor pays Farhan less than the minimum wage, and Farhan accepts because he needs food. That is forced labour under Article 23, even though Farhan said "yes".

Case

Crown Aluminium Works v. Their Workmen (AIR 1958 SC 30)

Facts: Crown Aluminium took over a unit making aluminium utensils in 1951. When demand fell and costs became higher than selling prices, it proposed in 1952 to cut wages and staff. The workmen's union opposed this, and the dispute went to adjudication.

Held: A wage structure can be revised in principle, but wages cannot be cut below the bare subsistence (minimum) level. The Court explained the three levels: living wage, fair wage and minimum wage. In substance, no industry has a right to exist unless it can pay its workmen at least a bare minimum wage.

Principle: Weak finances do not excuse a wage below the minimum wage. Fair and living wages depend on capacity to pay, but the minimum wage does not. The minimum wage is a floor that cannot be cut, whatever the loss.

Illustration: Prince's business makes a loss, so he cuts Farhan's pay below the minimum wage. He cannot do that. If he cannot pay the minimum, he should not run the business with hired labour.

Case

Workmen v. Reptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. (AIR 1992 SC 504)

Facts: Reptakos Brett ran a pharmaceutical factory in Madras. For about 30 years it paid dearness allowance under a double-linked scheme. In 1983 a dispute arose, and the Tribunal replaced the scheme with one linked only to the cost-of-living index. The workmen appealed.

Held: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. It noted the norms of the 15th Indian Labour Conference (1957): 3 consumption units per earner, minimum food, clothing (72 yards a year), housing rent, and fuel and lighting at 20% of the minimum wage. It then added a further 25% for children's education, medical needs, minimum recreation (including festivals), and old age and marriage. It refused to lower wages that were near the minimum-wage level, even on the ground of financial stringency.

Principle: A minimum wage is a need-based wage: the 15th ILC norms plus 25%. A minimum wage means a decent minimum, and not mere survival.

Illustration: Farhan has a wife and two children. The minimum wage must cover the family's food, clothes, rent and fuel, and 25% more for school, doctor and old age. Prince cannot fix it at survival level only.

19. Components of Minimum Wages (CoW Section 7)

Exam importance: medium

A minimum wage can be built in different ways. It can be a basic rate plus a cost-of-living allowance, or a single "all-in" rate. The Code lists three ways.

Key point

Components = the parts that make up the minimum wage: the basic rate, the cost of living allowance, and the cash value of concessions.

Section 7: what the minimum rate may consist of

OptionMake-up of the minimum rate
(a)A basic rate of wages and a cost of living allowance (an allowance that changes with the cost-of-living index, calculated by the authority the Government appoints).
(b)A basic rate, with or without a cost of living allowance, and the cash value of concessions (for example essential goods supplied at concession rates).
(c)An all-inclusive rate covering the basic rate, the cost of living allowance and the cash value of concessions.

Payment in cash

Minimum wages are to be paid in cash. A concession or bonus cannot be silently counted as part of the minimum wage (Manganese Ore).

Conclusion: The Government may choose the form, but the worker's real minimum must be protected.

Example

The minimum wage for Farhan's job is a basic ₹500 plus ₹100 cost of living allowance a day. Prince cannot say, "I give Farhan cheap rice, so I will pay ₹100 less," unless the Government has allowed it.

Memory hook

Basic + COLA (cost of living allowance), or Basic + Concessions, or All-in.

Case

Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. v. Chandi Lal Saha (AIR 1991 SC 520)

Facts: A manganese mining company paid the minimum wage fixed under the Minimum Wages Act. But it counted the money value of grain given at cheap rates and an attendance bonus as part of the wage, and deducted them. The workers applied to the Labour Court under s.33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act to recover the deducted amounts.

Held: The minimum wage must be paid in cash. Without a Government notification, the cash value of concessions cannot be treated as "wages in kind". An attendance bonus has to be earned and is not part of the minimum wage. The Labour Court had power to decide the claim, because there was no dispute about the rate, only about a wrongful deduction.

Principle: Concessions and incentive bonuses cannot be adjusted against the minimum wage; the minimum wage is an unconditional cash entitlement. Minimum wage first, extras afterwards.

Illustration: Prince gives Farhan cheap grain and a small attendance bonus, and then pays only part of the minimum wage in cash. Farhan can claim the balance in cash.

20. Fixing and Revising Minimum Wages (CoW Section 8)

Exam importance: high

The Government cannot fix wages in secret. It must follow a fair process: it either forms committees, or publishes its plan and takes objections. For a revision made by publishing its plan, it must also consult the Advisory Board.

Note

Updated: the transcript said the Advisory Board must be consulted for every revision. The correct position is that the proviso to s.8(3) requires consultation with the concerned Advisory Board (s.42) only when rates are revised by the notification method in s.8(1)(b), not when a committee is used. Source: The Code on Wages, 2019, s.8(3) proviso (India Code).

Key point

Fixing and revising = the steps the Government must follow to set and update minimum wages.

Two alternative methods (Section 8)

In fixing minimum rates for the first time, or in revising them, the appropriate Government shall follow either of these methods:

MethodWhat it involves
(a) Committee methodAppoint committees (with equal numbers of employers' and employees' representatives, and independent persons not more than one-third) to hold enquiries and advise.
(b) Notification methodPublish the proposals in the Gazette and allow at least two months for objections.

Steps after either method

  1. The Government considers the committee's advice or the objections received.
  2. For a revision made by the notification method, the concerned Advisory Board (s.42) must also be consulted.
  3. The Government notifies the rates; they normally take effect after three months.
  4. Review period: rates must be reviewed at intervals not exceeding five years.
  5. Floor wage: the result must not go below the floor wage (s.9).
Note

Updated: the transcript listed Advisory Board consultation as a step for every revision. The correct position is that it is needed only for a revision by the notification method (s.8(1)(b)); a revision through a committee does not require it. Source: The Code on Wages, 2019, s.8(3) proviso (India Code).

Old law compared

The MWA, 1948 had a similar committee/notification procedure with advisory boards, but only for scheduled employments.

Conclusion: The process makes minimum wages fair, open and regularly updated.

Example

The State wants to raise the minimum wage for Farhan's job. It publishes its plan and invites objections for two months from employers like Prince and workers like Farhan, consults the Advisory Board, and then issues the final notification.

Memory hook

Committee OR Notice (2 months) → Advisory Board (for revision by notice) → Notify → 3 months → Review within 5 years.

21. Advisory Boards – Central and State (CoW Section 42)

Exam importance: medium

Advisory Boards are three-sided (tripartite) bodies of employers, employees and independent persons that advise the Government on wages and on women's employment.

Key point

Advisory Board = a committee of employers, workers and neutral experts that advises the Government.

Central Advisory Board (Section 42(1))

The Central Advisory Board is set up by the Central Government. Its members are:

CategoryRule on numbers
(a) Representatives of employersSets the base number; the employees' side must equal it
(b) Representatives of employeesEqual to the number of employers' representatives
(c) Independent personsNot more than one-third of the total members
(d) Representatives of State GovernmentsFive

Other features

  1. Women (s.42(2)): one-third of the members must be women.
  2. Chairperson: an independent member appointed by the Central Government.
  3. State Advisory Boards (s.42(4)): each State Government forms its own Board on similar lines.
  4. Functions: advising on the fixing and revision of minimum wages, on increasing employment opportunities for women, and on other matters under the Code.

Old law compared

The MWA, 1948 had Central and State Advisory Boards; the Code keeps the idea and adds a women's quota.

Conclusion: The Advisory Boards make wage decisions three-sided and fair.

Example

The Board has members from Prince's employers' group and from Farhan's workers' union, plus an independent expert. Before the State raises minimum wages, the Board hears both sides.

Memory hook

Advisory Board = Employers + Employees (equal) + Independents (not more than one-third); one-third women.

Piece-Rate Wages and Minimum Time-Rate Wages for Piece Work (Code on Wages, Sections 6 and 12)

Exam importance: medium

Concept

Piece-rate wages are wages paid per piece made, for example ₹2 for each beedi rolled. The Code on Wages (CoW) makes sure that a piece-rate worker earns at least as much as a time-rate worker.

Key point

Piece-rate wages = pay per piece. Even so, the piece worker must earn at least the minimum time-rate wage.

The law

  1. Fixing minimum wages (Section 6): the Government may fix minimum wages for time work or for piece work. For piece work, the rate is set so that the worker earns at least what a time-rate worker would earn.
  2. Minimum time rate for piece work (Section 12): where a person on piece work has a minimum time rate but no minimum piece rate, the employer must pay at least the minimum time rate.
  3. Guaranteed wage: a guaranteed daily wage for piece workers, payable even when the employer does not supply enough work, is valid (Jyothi Home Industries v. State of Karnataka).

Old law: the Minimum Wages Act (MWA) also allowed piece-rate and "guaranteed time rate" provisions. The Code repeats them in a simpler form.

In short: a piece rate must never mean below-minimum pay.

Example

Prince rolls agarbatti (incense sticks) at home for Farhan at ₹1 per 100 sticks. At that rate he earns only ₹200 a day, while the minimum time rate is ₹600. Farhan must pay Prince the minimum time rate.

Case

Jyothi Home Industries v. State of Karnataka ((1983) I LLJ 201, Karnataka High Court)

Facts: beedi factory owners challenged a Government notification. It fixed ₹7.40 per thousand beedis rolled, and also a guaranteed wage of ₹4 a day when the employer failed to supply enough tobacco and leaves for about 800 beedis a day. The owners argued that the guaranteed wage was not "wages", and that home-workers were not covered.

Held: the High Court upheld the notification. (1) A "guaranteed wage" is "wages" under the Act. (2) The Government can fix a minimum remuneration for piece work so that piece workers earn like time-rate workers. (3) Home-workers who make articles at home are covered as "employees". The Court rejected the argument that the guaranteed wage was lay-off compensation.

Principle: a piece-rate worker, even a home-worker, is protected, and a guaranteed minimum can be fixed for days when the employer fails to supply work.

Illustration: Farhan does not send enough raw material to Prince's home for two days. Prince still gets the guaranteed daily minimum.

Takeaway: the law protects the weakest worker, the home-based piece worker.

Memory hook

Piece work: never less than the time rate.

Overtime, Hours of Work and Special Provisions (CoW, Sections 10 to 14)

Exam importance: high

Concept

Overtime is work beyond normal working hours. The Code says that overtime must be paid at at least double the normal rate. It also has special rules for part-days, for two kinds of work and for rest days.

Key point

Overtime = extra hours of work; the pay for it is at least twice the normal rate.

Overtime (Section 14)

Where an employee works more than the hours of a normal working day, the employer must pay for every hour (or part of an hour) of extra work at a rate not less than twice the normal rate of wages.

SectionSubjectRule
Section 13Normal working day and rest dayThe appropriate Government may fix the hours of a normal working day and provide for a day of rest, with pay or extra pay if work is done on that day.
Section 10Work for less than a normal working dayIf the employee is required to work for less than a normal day because the employer did not give work, the employee gets a full day's wages. This does not apply where the worker refuses to work.
Section 11Two or more classes of workWhere an employee does two or more classes of work with different minimum rates, the employer must pay at least the minimum rate for each class, in proportion.
Section 12Piece workThe minimum time rate applies (see piece-rate wages above).
Section 14OvertimeNot less than twice the normal rate of wages for every hour or part of an hour.

Old law: Section 14 of the MWA allowed overtime at the "overtime rate fixed under the Act or any law, whichever is higher". The Code states the double rate clearly.

In short: overtime is a right, and it is paid double.

Example

Farhan makes Prince work 3 hours after his normal shift. Prince's normal wage is ₹100 an hour. Farhan must pay at least ₹200 an hour for the extra hours: 3 × ₹200 = ₹600.

Memory hook

Overtime = 2 × normal rate (Section 14).

Payment of Wages: Wage Period and Time of Payment (CoW, Sections 16 and 17)

Exam importance: high

Concept

A worker needs wages on time to live. The Code requires the employer to fix a wage period (a day, a week, a fortnight or a month) and to pay within a fixed time after the period ends. It also sets a short deadline when a worker leaves the job.

Key point

Time of payment = the last day by which the employer must pay the worker's wages.

Wage period (Section 16)

  • The employer must fix a wage period of a day, a week, a fortnight or a month.
  • No wage period can be longer than one month.

Time limit for payment (Section 17)

SituationWages must be paidProvision
Daily-rated employeesAt the end of the shiftSection 17(1)
Weekly wage periodOn the last working day of the week, before the weekly holidaySection 17(1)
Fortnightly wage periodBefore the end of the second day after the fortnight endsSection 17(1)
Monthly wage periodBefore the expiry of the 7th day of the next monthSection 17(1)
Employee removed, dismissed, retrenched or resignsWithin two working daysSection 17(2)
  • Other times: the appropriate Government may fix other reasonable times for payment (Section 17(3)).
  • Other laws: provisions of other laws on the time of payment remain valid (Section 17(4)).

Old law: the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (PWA) also required payment by the 7th day (the 10th day for establishments with 1,000 or more persons) and within two working days when employment ended. The Code adds resignation to the two-day rule.

In short: timely payment is part of the right to wages.

Example

Prince gets a monthly salary from Farhan. His wages for June must reach him before the 7th of July. If Prince resigns on 10 June, Farhan must pay everything due within two working days.

Memory hook

Day = end of shift. Week = last working day. Fortnight = 2 days. Month = 7 days. Exit = 2 working days.

Wages during the COVID-19 lockdown

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) order of 29 March 2020, issued under Section 10(2)(l) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, told private employers to pay full wages to all workers for the lockdown period. Two challenges to this order are important.

Case

Ludhiana Hand Tools Association v. Union of India (W.P.(C) No. 892/2020, Supreme Court)

Facts: an association of small manufacturers from Ludhiana challenged the MHA order of 29 March 2020 in the Supreme Court. It argued that the order clashed with the Industrial Disputes Act, which allows only part (50%) of wages in a lay-off, and that employers with no income could not pay full wages.

Held: the Supreme Court did not decide the main question at that stage. It gave interim relief: no coercive (forceful) action could be taken against employers for not paying full wages. The wider question was left for later hearing.

Principle: whether full wages must be paid during a total shutdown, when the employer has no income, is a difficult question of law between the worker's right to wages and the employer's capacity to pay. The courts avoided forcing employers while the matter was pending.

Illustration: Farhan's factory was shut for two months by the lockdown. Prince asks for full wages; Farhan says he has no income. Farhan could not be punished for not paying in full while the case was pending, but the question remained open.

Takeaway: the issue balanced two rights and was left unsettled at the interim stage.

Case

Align Components Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (W.P. No. 4861/2020, Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench)

Facts: employers challenged the same MHA order of 29 March 2020. They offered to pay 50% of gross wages or the minimum wage, whichever was higher, but not full wages.

Held: on 30 April 2020 the High Court declined to interfere, because a similar question was already before the Supreme Court. It added that in industrial areas where the State had partly lifted the lockdown, employers could deduct the wages of employees who did not report for duty.

Principle: where work was allowed to restart and the worker stayed away, the employer need not pay wages for those days. The main question of full wages was for the Supreme Court.

Illustration: Farhan's area reopens and he asks Prince to come to work. Prince does not come. Farhan may cut his wages for those days.

Takeaway: the right to wages depends on being ready to work when work is possible.

PointLudhiana Hand Tools AssociationAlign Components
CourtSupreme CourtBombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench
ChallengeMHA order of 29 March 2020 requiring full wagesThe same MHA order
Employers' standConflict with the 50% lay-off rule of the Industrial Disputes Act; no income to payWilling to pay 50% of gross wages or the minimum wage, whichever higher
OutcomeInterim relief: no coercive action; main question left openDeclined to interfere; wages of employees not reporting for duty in reopened areas may be deducted

Mode of Payment of Wages and Digitisation (CoW, Section 15)

Exam importance: medium

Concept

Mode of payment means how wages are given: in cash, by cheque, into the bank account or by an electronic (online) method. The Code pushes payment through banks, so that there is a record and no cheating.

Key point

Mode of payment = the way wages are paid: cash, cheque, bank transfer or online.

The law

  1. Section 15: all wages shall be paid in current coin or currency notes, or by cheque, or by crediting the wages in the employee's bank account, or by the electronic mode.
  2. Digitisation mandate: the appropriate Government may direct that certain industrial or other establishments pay wages only by cheque or by crediting the wages in the employee's bank account.
  3. Benefit: payment through the bank creates a record, reduces cheating and helps the worker prove a claim.
Note

Updated: the transcript included "electronic mode" in the Government's power to require a particular mode of payment. The correct position is that the proviso to Section 15 lets the appropriate Government require notified establishments to pay wages only by cheque or by crediting the wages in the employee's bank account; electronic mode is one of the general modes in the main part of Section 15, not part of the proviso. Source: The Code on Wages, 2019, Section 15 (India Code).

Old law: under the PWA, 1936 (Section 6, as substituted in 2017), wages could be paid in coin or notes, by cheque or by crediting the employee's bank account, and the Government could require notified establishments to pay only by cheque or bank credit.

Note

Updated: the transcript said that under the PWA payment by cheque or into the bank needed the employee's written authorisation. That was the position only before the Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act, 2017 (No. 1 of 2017, deemed in force from 28 December 2016). The correct position is that the substituted Section 6 allowed payment by cheque or bank credit without any authorisation, and let the appropriate Government notify establishments that must pay only by cheque or bank credit. Source: The Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act, 2017, Gazette of India Extraordinary, 16 February 2017.

In short: the Code moves wage payment from cash to digital records.

Example

Farhan used to pay Prince in cash and kept no record. The State now orders factories of Farhan's kind to pay wages through the bank. Prince's bank statement now proves his pay.

Memory hook

Coin – Notes – Cheque – Bank – Online. The Government can make it bank-only.

Authorised Deductions from Wages (CoW, Sections 18 to 24)

Exam importance: high

Concept

A deduction is money cut from wages. The Code says no deduction may be made except those it allows, and the total deduction in a wage period cannot be more than 50% of the wages.

Key point

Authorised deductions = the only cuts from wages that the law allows, and never more than half the wages.

General rule (Section 18)

  • Rule (Section 18(1)): no deduction may be made except those authorised by the Code.
  • Cap (Section 18(3)): total deductions in a wage period cannot exceed 50% of the wages. Any excess is recoverable in the manner prescribed (Section 18(4)).
  • Failure to deposit (Section 18(5)): if the employer fails to deposit the amounts deducted, the employee is not responsible.

Deductions allowed (Section 18(2))

  • Fines.
  • Absence from duty.
  • Damage to or loss of goods entrusted to the employee.
  • House-accommodation and amenities supplied by the employer.
  • Recovery of advances (for example travel or conveyance advances) and loans, including house-building loans with interest.
  • Income tax and other statutory levies.
  • Contributions to social security funds.
  • Trade union fees (with the employee's written authorisation).
  • Contributions to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (with authorisation).
  • A few railway-related deductions.

Conditions for particular deductions (Sections 19 to 24)

SectionDeductionConditions
Section 19FinesOnly for acts listed in a notice approved by the Government; the employee must get a chance to show cause; at most 3% of wages for the wage period; no fine on an employee under 15; the fine must be recovered within 90 days; fines may be used only for purposes that benefit the employees.
Section 20Absence from dutyIn proportion to the period of absence; if ten or more employees are absent without notice, up to eight days' wages may be deducted.
Section 21Damage or lossOnly up to the loss caused by the employee's neglect or default, and only after a chance to show cause.
Section 22ServicesAllowed within the rules made under the Code.
Section 23AdvancesAllowed within the rules made under the Code.
Section 24LoansAllowed within the rules made under the Code.

Old law: the PWA, 1936 (Sections 7 to 13) had a similar list, with a 50% cap (75% where there were payments to co-operative societies).

In short: deductions are allowed only for lawful reasons, with fairness and a cap.

Example

Prince's monthly wage is ₹20,000. Farhan wants to cut ₹14,000 for a machine that broke, a loan and a fine. The cap is 50%, that is ₹10,000. Farhan cannot cut more than ₹10,000 in that month, and he must first give Prince a chance to explain the damage to the machine.

Memory hook

Deductions: only listed ones, never above 50%; fine not more than 3%; no fine under 15.

Bonus: Applicability, "Establishment" and Eligibility (CoW, Sections 26, 30, 40 and 41)

Exam importance: high

Concept

Bonus is a yearly payment to employees out of the profits of the business, over and above wages. The Code says who gets it, in which establishments, and at least how much.

Key point

Bonus = a yearly extra payment to workers from the employer's profits.

The law

  1. Applicability (Chapter IV): the Chapter applies to establishments where 20 or more persons are or were employed on any day of the accounting year (Section 41(2)).
  2. Exemptions (Section 41): for example LIC, seamen, dock workers, Government employees, certain educational and charitable institutions, the Reserve Bank, some public financial institutions and inland water transport.
  3. Public sector (Section 40): covered only where the establishment sells goods or services in competition with the private sector and this income is at least 20% of its gross income.
  4. "Establishment" (Section 30): where an establishment has different departments, undertakings or branches, they are treated as parts of the same establishment for bonus. The old Act had a proviso for units with separate balance sheets (see K.C.P. Employees' Association below).
  5. Eligibility (Section 26): every employee drawing wages not more than the amount the Government notifies (₹21,000 a month under the old Act) who has worked at least 30 days in the accounting year.
  6. Payment: bonus is paid out of the allocable surplus (see the bonus formula below), subject to a minimum and a maximum.

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, 1965: coverage of establishments with 20 persons; eligibility ceiling of ₹21,000 after the 2015 amendment; calculation ceiling of ₹7,000 or the minimum wage, whichever is higher.

In short: bonus is a statutory right for eligible employees in covered establishments.

Bonus ceilingBefore the 2015 amendmentAfter the 2015 amendment (retrospective from 1 April 2014)Under the Code
Eligibility limit (wages a month)₹10,000₹21,000Amount notified by the Government
Wage ceiling for calculating bonus₹3,500₹7,000 or the minimum wage, whichever is higherCeiling wage fixed by the Government
Example

Farhan's company has 60 employees. Prince earns ₹15,000 a month and worked 200 days this year. Prince is eligible for bonus: his wage is below the ceiling and he worked more than 30 days.

Case

K.C.P. Employees' Association v. Management of K.C.P. Ltd. ((1978) SCC (L&S) 142)

Facts: K.C.P. Ltd. ran three separate businesses: sugar, cement and heavy engineering. Its Central Workshop (engineering) at Tiruvottiyur, Madras, was losing money. For 1964-65 and 1965-66, the workmen claimed bonus treating the whole company as one establishment. The management said the Workshop was a separate undertaking with its own balance sheet, so its losses alone must decide the bonus.

Held: the Supreme Court said the proviso to Section 3 of the Payment of Bonus Act applied, because separate balance sheets and profit and loss accounts were kept for the Workshop. But it found that the accounts had not been properly maintained, so it sent the matter back to the Tribunal to re-examine and correct the accounts as the Act requires before deciding the bonus.

Principle: a unit is treated as a separate establishment for bonus only if it really keeps proper separate accounts. Doubts on law or facts go in favour of the workers.

Illustration: Farhan has a profitable shop and a losing workshop. Prince works in the workshop. If Farhan keeps proper separate accounts, the workshop is judged alone. If not, the whole business is one establishment and Prince may get bonus.

Takeaway: keep the accounts honest and separate, or the units are counted together.

Case

Union of India v. United Planters' Association of Southern India (TP (Civil) Nos. 884-895/2016, decided 11 July 2022)

Facts: in 2015 Parliament amended the Payment of Bonus Act. It raised the eligibility limit from ₹10,000 to ₹21,000 a month, and the wage ceiling for calculating bonus from ₹3,500 to ₹7,000 (or the minimum wage, whichever is higher). The changes were made retrospective from 1 April 2014. Planters' associations and others challenged the amendment in several High Courts, and the Union asked the Supreme Court to transfer all those petitions to itself.

Held: the Supreme Court refused to transfer the petitions, saying that the High Courts could decide them on their own facts.

Principle: the Supreme Court did not decide the validity of the amendment here; it decided only where the challenges should be heard. The case shows how the eligibility ceiling (₹21,000) and the calculation ceiling (₹7,000 or the minimum wage) came into the bonus law.

Illustration: Farhan says the higher ceiling should not apply to old years; Prince says it should. The Court's answer: let each High Court decide.

Takeaway: the case is mostly about procedure, and it is a good source for the two bonus ceilings.

Memory hook

Bonus = 20+ persons, 30+ days, wage ceiling.

Bonus Formula: Gross Profit, Prior Charges, Available Surplus and Allocable Surplus (CoW, Sections 31 to 35)

Exam importance: high

Concept

Bonus is not a random amount; the law gives a formula. Start with the profit, subtract certain fixed charges, and share what is left: a part of it goes to the workers. That part is the allocable surplus.

Key point

Allocable surplus = 67% of (gross profit − prior charges). It is the pool from which bonus is paid.

Steps in the formula

  1. Gross profit (Section 32): the profit of the accounting year, calculated as prescribed by the Central Government.
  2. Prior charges (Section 34): sums deducted first:
    • depreciation (fall in the value of machines) allowed under the Income-tax Act;
    • direct tax payable for the year (calculated under Section 35); and
    • further sums the Central Government prescribes.
  3. Available surplus (Section 33): gross profit minus prior charges (with the tax adjustment in the proviso).
  4. Allocable surplus (Section 31): 67% of the available surplus (60% for a banking company). Bonus is paid out of this.
  5. Calculation for certain employees: for high-paid employees, bonus is calculated on a ceiling wage fixed by the Government (old Act: ₹7,000 or the minimum wage, whichever is higher).
Formula

Gross profit − Prior charges = Available surplus.

Allocable surplus = 67% × Available surplus.

Worked example

ItemAmount
Gross profit₹50 lakh
Less: depreciation₹10 lakh
Less: direct tax₹12 lakh
Total prior charges₹22 lakh
Available surplus (₹50 lakh − ₹22 lakh)₹28 lakh
Allocable surplus (67% × ₹28 lakh)₹18.76 lakh
Example

Farhan's company earns a gross profit of ₹50 lakh. After depreciation and tax (₹22 lakh) it has ₹28 lakh. Sixty-seven per cent of that, ₹18.76 lakh, is the pool from which Prince and the other employees are paid bonus.

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Sections 4 to 12 (with a longer list of prior charges).

In short: the formula makes bonus fair, predictable and open to audit.

Memory hook

Gross − Prior = Available. 67% of Available = Allocable. (Bank: 60%.)

Minimum Bonus and Maximum Bonus (CoW, Sections 26 to 28)

Exam importance: high

Concept

The law protects the worker in two ways. Even if the company makes no profit, a small minimum bonus must be paid. If the profit is large, the bonus grows but stops at a maximum.

Key point

Minimum bonus = 8⅓% of wages or ₹100, whichever is more. Maximum bonus = 20% of wages.

The law

  1. Minimum bonus (Section 26(1)): an annual minimum bonus of 8⅓% of the wages earned or ₹100, whichever is higher, is payable to every eligible employee (wages up to the notified ceiling and at least 30 days' work). It is payable whether or not there is an allocable surplus.
  2. Maximum bonus (Section 26(3)): if the allocable surplus is more than the minimum bonus payable, the employer pays bonus in proportion to the wages earned, up to 20% of such wages.
  3. Proportionate reduction (Section 27): if an employee did not work on all working days, the minimum bonus is reduced in proportion where it is higher than 8⅓% of the wages for the days worked.
  4. Days counted as worked (Section 28):
    • days of lay-off (as per agreement or standing orders);
    • leave with wages;
    • absence due to temporary disablement caused by an accident arising out of employment;
    • maternity leave with wages.
PointMinimum bonusMaximum bonus
ProvisionSection 26(1)Section 26(3)
Rate8⅓% of wages earned or ₹100, whichever is higherUp to 20% of wages earned
When payableWhether or not there is an allocable surplusWhen the allocable surplus is more than the minimum bonus payable
Worked example (annual wages counted ₹84,000, i.e. ₹7,000 × 12)8.33% × ₹84,000 ≈ ₹7,00020% × ₹84,000 = ₹16,800

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, Sections 10 and 11.

In short: the minimum bonus is the floor, and the 20% limit is the cap.

Example

Farhan's company made no profit this year. Prince, an eligible employee, must still get the minimum bonus. In a very good year, Prince can get up to 20% of his wages.

Memory hook

Bonus 8⅓ – 20: minimum 8⅓% or ₹100; maximum 20%.

Bonus for New Establishments (CoW, Section 26(6))

Exam importance: medium

Concept

A new business usually makes no profit in its early years. The law gives it relief: for the first five years, bonus is payable only in a year in which it earns a profit.

Key point

New establishment: no profit, no bonus, for the first five years.

The law

  1. Rule (Section 26(6)): in the first five accounting years following the year in which the employer first sells the goods produced or renders services from the establishment, bonus is payable only in the accounting year in which the employer derives profit from that establishment.
  2. Effect: the minimum-bonus rule ("payable even if there is no profit") does not apply in those years.
  3. After five years: the normal rules (minimum and maximum bonus, set-on and set-off) apply.

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, Section 16.

In short: the rule protects young businesses and still gives workers a share of any profit.

Example

Farhan opened a new mill three years ago. It made losses in the first two years and a profit this year. Prince gets bonus only for this profitable year.

Memory hook

New business, first 5 years: profit year = bonus year.

Set-On and Set-Off of Allocable Surplus (CoW, Section 36)

Exam importance: high

Concept

Some years are good and some are poor. The law lets the employer carry a good year's extra surplus forward (set-on) and use it to pay bonus in a later poor year. If a poor year's surplus cannot cover even the minimum bonus, the shortfall is carried forward and recovered from later years' surplus (set-off). This evens out bonus over time.

Key point

Set-on = saving the extra surplus for later. Set-off = carrying a shortfall forward to be recovered from future surplus.

Note

Updated: the transcript described set-off as using the past extra surplus to cover a shortfall. The correct position is that using an excess carried forward from an earlier year is part of set-on (Section 36(1) and (2)); set-off is the carrying forward of a deficiency, where the surplus falls short of the minimum bonus, to be set off against the surplus of the following years, up to the fourth year (Section 36(2)). Source: The Code on Wages, 2019, Section 36 (India Code).

The law

PointSet-on (Section 36(1))Set-off (Section 36(2))
When it arisesAllocable surplus is more than the maximum bonus payable in the yearAllocable surplus is less than the minimum bonus payable
What is carried forwardThe excessThe deficiency
PeriodTo the next year, and so on, up to four accounting yearsSimilarly, up to four years, adjusted against future surplus
LimitTotal amount set on cannot exceed 20% of the total wages of the employees—

Order of adjustment (Section 36(4)): the amount carried forward from the earliest year is taken into account first.

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, Section 15.

In short: set-on and set-off give stability over a four-year period.

Example

In Year 1 Farhan's company has an excess surplus of ₹5 lakh, which is set on. In Year 2 profits fall, and the money for paying Prince and the others the minimum bonus is ₹2 lakh short. The shortfall is covered from the ₹5 lakh set on, and ₹3 lakh remains for later years.

Memory hook

Set-ON = Save the extra for later. Set-OFF = Carry the shortfall forward and recover it later. (4 years, 20% cap.)

Note

Updated: the transcript's memory hook said set-off means spending from savings. The correct position is that spending an excess carried forward from an earlier year is still set-on; set-off means carrying forward a shortfall (minimum bonus not covered by the surplus) to be recovered from the surplus of later years (Section 36(2)). Source: The Code on Wages, 2019, Section 36 (India Code).

Disqualification from Bonus (CoW, Section 29)

Exam importance: high

Concept

An employee loses the right to bonus if dismissed for serious wrongdoing. The Code lists the grounds.

Key point

Disqualification: no bonus for an employee dismissed for fraud, violence, theft or sexual harassment.

Grounds (Section 29)

An employee is disqualified from receiving bonus if dismissed from service for:

  1. fraud;
  2. riotous or violent behaviour while on the premises of the establishment;
  3. theft, misappropriation or sabotage (deliberate damage) of any property of the establishment; or
  4. conviction for sexual harassment (a new ground added by the Code).
  • The dismissal must be for one of these reasons.
  • The list is complete (exhaustive).

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, Section 9 (the first three grounds only).

In short: serious misconduct costs the employee the bonus.

Example

Farhan dismisses Prince for stealing goods from the store. Prince loses his bonus for that year. If Farhan had dismissed Prince only for often coming late, the disqualification would not apply.

Memory hook

FRTS: Fraud, Riot/violence, Theft/sabotage, Sexual harassment conviction.

33. Deduction for Misconduct and Adjustment of Customary or Interim Bonus (Code on Wages, ss.37–38)

Exam importance: medium

Meaning

The Code on Wages (CoW) contains two small rules that settle the bonus account between the employer and the employee:

  • if an employee's misconduct caused the employer a loss, the employer may cut that loss from the bonus; and
  • if the employer has already paid a festival bonus or a part-payment of bonus, it can be adjusted against the bonus due.
Key point

In brief: a loss caused by misconduct can be cut from the bonus, and bonus already paid is set against the bonus due.

Exam answer

  1. Adjustment of customary or interim bonus (s.37): if, in an accounting year, the employer has paid a puja bonus or other customary bonus, or has paid part of the bonus before the due date, he may deduct that amount from the bonus payable under the Code.
  2. Deduction for misconduct (s.38): if an employee is found guilty of misconduct causing financial loss to the employer, the employer may deduct the amount of that loss from the bonus payable to the employee for that accounting year.
  3. Limit: the deduction cannot be more than the loss caused, and the misconduct must be proved.

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, ss.17 and 18.

Conclusion: both rules keep the bonus account fair for the employer and the worker.

Example

Prince gave Farhan ₹2,000 as a Diwali bonus. At the end of the accounting year, Farhan's bonus works out to ₹7,000. Prince pays ₹5,000, after adjusting the ₹2,000 already paid (s.37). If Farhan's proven misconduct had caused Prince a loss of ₹1,000, Prince could cut a further ₹1,000 (s.38).

Key point

Memory hook: Already paid = adjust. Proven loss = deduct.

34. Time Limit for Payment of Bonus (CoW s.39)

Exam importance: medium

Meaning

Bonus must be paid within a fixed time after the accounting year ends. Without a time limit, employers could delay payment for years.

Key point

In brief: bonus must be paid within eight months of the end of the accounting year.

Exam answer

  1. Rule (s.39(1)): all bonus must be paid by crediting the employee's bank account within eight months from the close of the accounting year.
  2. Extension: the appropriate Government may extend the period, for sufficient cause, up to a total of two years.
  3. Pending dispute (s.39(2)): where a dispute about bonus is pending, the bonus is payable within one month from the date on which the award or settlement becomes enforceable. The minimum bonus must still be paid within eight months.
  4. Bonus disputes are treated as industrial disputes (s.46).

Old law: Payment of Bonus Act, s.19.

Conclusion: a time limit stops indefinite delay in paying bonus.

Example

Prince's accounting year ends on 31 March. Farhan's bonus must reach his bank account by 30 November, unless the Government extends the time.

Key point

Memory hook: 8 months (extension up to 2 years).

35. Claims, Appeals and Limitation (CoW ss.43–49, 54)

Exam importance: high

Meaning

If an employer does not pay wages, minimum wages or bonus, the employee can make a claim before an officer. If either side is unhappy with the decision, there is an appeal. Both must be filed within a fixed time, called the limitation period.

Key point

Terms to remember:

  • Claim = a request for unpaid dues.
  • Appeal = asking a higher authority to review the decision.
  • Limitation = the time limit, that is, the last date for going to a court or an authority.

Exam answer

  1. Responsibility (s.43): every employer must pay all amounts due under the Code. If the employer defaults, the proprietor or the persons in charge are responsible.
  2. Death of employee (s.44): unpaid dues are paid to the nominee, or deposited with the prescribed authority. On doing so, the employer is discharged.
  3. Claims (s.45): the appropriate Government appoints authorities (officers) to hear claims.
    • An application may be made by the employee, a registered trade union, or the Inspector-cum-Facilitator.
    • It must be made within three years from the date on which the claim arose; this period can be extended for sufficient cause.
  4. Order: the authority can order payment of the claim plus compensation up to ten times the amount claimed. It has the powers of a civil court and should decide the claim within three months.
  5. Appeal (s.49): lies within ninety days to an appellate authority (a higher officer), which should decide the appeal within three months.
  6. Bonus disputes (s.46) are industrial disputes.
  7. Offences (ss.52–56):
    • Cognizance (s.52): a court takes cognizance (notice) of an offence only on a complaint by the Government, an authorised officer, the employee, a registered trade union or the Inspector-cum-Facilitator.
    • Penalty for paying less than what is due (s.54): fine up to ₹50,000 for the first offence. A repeat offence within five years can bring imprisonment up to three months, or a fine up to ₹1 lakh, or both.

Key time limits at a glance

StepTime limit
Filing a claim (s.45)Within 3 years from the date the claim arose (extendable for sufficient cause)
Decision by the authority on the claimShould be within 3 months
Filing an appeal (s.49)Within 90 days
Decision by the appellate authority (s.49)Should be within 3 months

Old law and the Code compared

PointOld lawCode on Wages
Time limit for a claimMinimum Wages Act, 1948 (MWA), s.20: 6 months; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (PWA), s.15: 12 monthsA single, longer period of 3 years
AuthoritiesSeparate authorities under each ActAuthorities appointed under s.45 hear claims under the Code
CompensationLower than under the CodeHigher: up to 10 times the amount claimed

Conclusion: the claim system under the Code is faster and wider, and has a longer time limit.

Example

Prince did not pay Farhan ₹10,000 of wages. Farhan files a claim with the authority within three years. The authority orders Prince to pay ₹10,000 and may add compensation of up to ₹1,00,000. Prince can appeal within 90 days.

Key point

Memory hook: Claim 3 years · Appeal 90 days · Compensation up to 10 × claim.

36. Gender Pay Gap (CoW ss.3–4 and s.2(y), Second Proviso)

Exam importance: high

Meaning

The gender pay gap is the difference between what men and women (and persons of other genders) are paid for the same work. The Code provides that no employer can pay differently for the same work only because of gender.

Key point

In brief: same work, same pay, whatever the gender.

Exam answer

  1. Equal wages (s.3(1)): there shall be no discrimination in an establishment among employees on the ground of gender in matters relating to wages, for the same work or work of a similar nature.
  2. No lowering of wages (s.3(2)): an employer cannot reduce anyone's wages in order to comply with this rule.
  3. Recruitment and conditions of service: there shall be no discrimination on the ground of gender
    • in recruitment for the same or similar work; and
    • in conditions of service, such as promotion, training or transfer,
    except where a law prohibits or restricts the employment of women in that work.
  4. Dispute on "same or similar work" (s.4): decided by an authority notified by the appropriate Government.
  5. Wages counted for equal pay: the second proviso to s.2(y) counts conveyance allowance, house rent allowance (HRA), awards and overtime as part of wages for the purpose of equal wages to all genders.
  6. Women's voice: one-third of the members of the Advisory Board are women (s.42(2)). State Advisory Boards also advise on employment opportunities for women.
  7. Constitutional base: Art. 14, Art. 39(d) and Art. 42.

Old law: Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, now merged into the Code.

Conclusion: the Code widens equal pay beyond wages to recruitment and career growth.

Example

Prince pays Farhan ₹800 a day and pays Neha, who does the same job, ₹600 a day. This is illegal. Prince must raise Neha's wage to ₹800. He cannot reduce Farhan's pay to ₹600 to "make it equal".

Key point

Memory hook: Same work = same pay. Never level down.

Module III: Code on Social Security, 2020 — Employer Liability and Compensation

Key point

Two basic terms:

  • Compensation = money paid for loss or injury.
  • Liability = legal responsibility.

37. Employee's Compensation: Scope and Applicability (CoSS Chapter VII, ss.73–99)

Exam importance: high

Meaning

If a worker is hurt or killed because of work, the employer must pay compensation. The worker does not have to prove that the employer was careless. This is a no-fault rule. Chapter VII of the Code on Social Security, 2020 (CoSS) replaces the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (ECA).

Key point

Definition to remember: employee's compensation = money the employer must pay when a worker is injured or dies because of the job.

Exam answer

  1. Nature: a social-security law that gives quick, no-fault money help for work injury, occupational disease and death.
  2. Who is covered:
    • The Chapter applies to employers and employees to whom Chapter IV (ESI) does not apply (First Schedule).
    • "Employee" for this Chapter means only the persons listed in the Second Schedule (for example, work in railways, factories using power, mines, ships, ports, building and road construction, electric and telephone lines, and pipelines), and others whom the Government adds (s.2(26), third proviso).
  3. Main rules: see the table below.
  4. Authority:
    • A competent authority decides claims (s.90).
    • Civil courts have no jurisdiction (s.90(2)).
    • An appeal lies to the High Court on a substantial question of law (s.99).
  5. New in the Code:
    • an accident while commuting to or from work is covered if there is a nexus with the employment (s.74(4));
    • funeral expenses of at least ₹15,000 (s.76(7)): funeral expenses were already payable under the ECA, s.4(4) (at least ₹5,000 in the Act's text), so what is new is the higher floor;
    • medical expenses are reimbursed (s.76(5)): this is not new, as it continues the ECA, s.4(2A); and
    • an accident outside India is covered (s.2(28)).
Note

Updated: the notes listed funeral expenses and the reimbursement of medical expenses as new in the Code. The correct position is that both already existed under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923: medical expenses under s.4(2A) and funeral expenses (at least ₹5,000) under s.4(4). The Code carries them over in s.76(5) and s.76(7), and raises the funeral floor to ₹15,000. Source: Section 4, Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (Indian Kanoon); The Code on Social Security, 2020, s.76 (Gazette text, Ministry of Labour and Employment).

Main rules of Chapter VII

SubjectSection
Employer's liability for compensations.74
Amount of compensations.76
Payment of compensation and defaults.77
Calculation of (monthly) wagess.78
Distribution of compensations.81
Notice and claims.82
Competent authority; bar on civil courtss.90, s.90(2)
Appeal to the High Courts.99

Old law: ECA, 1923, which covered "workmen" listed in Schedule II.

Conclusion: the Code keeps the no-fault rule and widens it.

Example

Farhan works on Prince's building site. A wall falls and Farhan loses a leg. Farhan need not prove that Prince was careless. Prince must pay compensation because the injury happened in the course of work.

Key point

Memory hook: Work injury = employer pays, no fault needed (if ESI does not apply).

38. Dependant (CoSS s.2(24))

Exam importance: high

Meaning

When a worker dies, the compensation goes to the people who depended on the worker's earnings. The Code lists them. Some relatives are dependants automatically; others are dependants only if they really depended on the worker.

Key point

Definition to remember: a dependant is a person who depends on another for money; for compensation, it is a listed relative of the deceased worker who is entitled to the compensation.

Exam answer

"Dependant" means any of the following relatives of a deceased employee:

GroupConditionRelatives
(a)Always dependants (automatic)A widow; a minor legitimate or adopted son; an unmarried legitimate or adopted daughter; a widowed mother. For ESI, an adopted son below 25 also counts.
(b)Only if wholly dependent on the employee's earningsA legitimate or adopted son or daughter aged 18 or more who is infirm. For ESI, "18" becomes "25".
(c)Only if wholly or partly dependent on the employee's earnings
  • a widower;
  • a parent other than a widowed mother;
  • a minor illegitimate son;
  • an unmarried illegitimate daughter;
  • a daughter who is married and a minor, or widowed and a minor;
  • a minor brother;
  • an unmarried sister, or a widowed sister who is a minor;
  • a widowed daughter-in-law;
  • a minor child of a pre-deceased son;
  • a minor child of a pre-deceased daughter, where no parent of the child is alive; and
  • a grandparent, where no parent of the employee is alive.

Use of the definition: the competent authority shares the compensation among the dependants (s.81).

Conclusion: the definition puts the closest family first and also includes others who truly depended on the worker.

Example

Farhan dies in an accident at Prince's factory. Farhan's wife and minor son are dependants automatically (group (a)). Farhan's elderly father is also a dependant if he lived on Farhan's earnings (group (c)).

Key point

Memory hook: (a) Widow, minor son, unmarried daughter, widowed mother = automatic. (b) Infirm adult child = if wholly dependent. (c) Others = if dependent.

39. Employee for Chapter VII (CoSS s.2(26))

Exam importance: medium

Meaning

For compensation, "employee" means a person employed for wages in an establishment, directly or through a contractor. But for Chapter VII, only persons in the Second Schedule are covered.

Key point

In brief: an employee is a person working for wages in the listed dangerous or important trades.

Exam answer

  1. General meaning (s.2(26)):
    • any person (except an apprentice) employed on wages by an establishment, directly or through a contractor;
    • for skilled, semi-skilled, unskilled, manual, operational, supervisory, managerial, administrative, technical, clerical or any other work;
    • includes a person declared to be an employee by the Government;
    • excludes members of the Armed Forces.
  2. Chapter VII (third proviso): only persons in the Second Schedule, and others added by the Central or State Government, are employees for this Chapter.
  3. No wage ceiling applies for this Chapter. The wage ceiling applies only to Chapter III (except the EPF Scheme) and Chapter IV.

Old law: the ECA, 1923 defined "workman" with a Schedule II list; managers earning above a limit were excluded.

Conclusion: the Code covers the listed trades and also contract workers.

Example

Farhan is a contract worker supplied by a contractor to Prince's factory. He is an "employee" because the Code covers employees engaged through a contractor.

Key point

Memory hook: Employee (Chapter VII) = Second Schedule persons, including contract workers.

40. Employer (CoSS s.2(27))

Exam importance: medium

Meaning

The employer is the person who pays compensation. The Code makes sure that someone real is liable, even if a contractor or a manager runs the business.

Key point

In brief: the employer is the person or authority that employs workers and must pay them compensation.

Exam answer

"Employer" means a person who employs, directly or through any person, or on his behalf, one or more employees in his establishment. It includes the following:

ClauseEstablishmentWho is the employer
(a)FactoryThe occupier
(b)MineThe owner, agent or manager appointed as such
(c)Any other establishmentThe person or authority with ultimate control; and, where the affairs are entrusted to a manager or managing director, that manager or managing director
(d)Any establishmentA contractor
(e)Any establishmentThe legal representative of a deceased employer
—Government departmentThe authority named for the purpose, or the head of the department
—Local authorityIts chief executive

Link with s.85: a principal employer is liable for the compensation of a contractor's workers.

Conclusion: no employer can escape liability by using a middleman.

Example

Prince owns a factory and gives a building job to a contractor. Farhan, a worker of the contractor, is injured. Prince, as the principal employer, must pay the compensation, and can recover the amount from the contractor.

Key point

Memory hook: Employer = Occupier / Owner / Controller + Contractor + Heir.

41. Wages and "Monthly Wages" (CoSS ss.2(88), 78)

Exam importance: medium

Meaning

Compensation is worked out as a share of the worker's monthly wages, so the law lays down exactly how the monthly wages are to be found.

Key point

In brief: monthly wages = the worker's normal pay for a month, used to work out compensation.

Exam answer

  1. "Wages" (s.2(88)): the definition has the same structure as the CoW definition: basic pay, dearness allowance and retaining allowance, minus the listed exclusions, together with the 50% rule and the 15% rule for payment in kind (see Concept 16).
  2. Monthly wages (s.78): the amount of wages deemed to be payable for a month's service, whether the wages are paid by the month, by any other period or at piece rates. It is calculated as shown in the table below.
  3. Ceiling: the Central Government may notify a ceiling on monthly wages for the calculation (s.76(3)).

Calculation of monthly wages (s.78)

ClauseContinuous service with the same employer before the accidentMonthly wages
(a)At least 12 monthsOne-twelfth of the total wages for the last 12 months
(b)Less than one monthThe average monthly amount earned by a similar employee in the same work in the last 12 months
(c)Other cases30 × the total wages earned in the last continuous period ÷ the number of days in that period

Service is continuous when it is not broken by an absence of more than 14 days.

Conclusion: a clear rule for monthly wages makes the amount of compensation certain.

Example

Farhan earned ₹1,20,000 from Prince in the last 12 months. His monthly wages for compensation are ₹1,20,000 ÷ 12 = ₹10,000.

Key point

Memory hook: 12 months → ÷ 12. Under 1 month → similar worker. Otherwise → 30 × (wages ÷ days).

42. Managing Agent (ECA s.2(1); CoSS ss.2(1), 2(27))

Exam importance: low

Meaning

A managing agent is a person or firm who manages the business of the employer on the employer's behalf. Under the old Act, such a person counted as an "employer", so a worker could claim from the person who really ran the business.

Key point

In brief: a managing agent is the person who runs the business for the owner, and is treated as the employer.

Exam answer

LawPosition
Old law: ECA, 1923"Employer" included any body of persons, the managing agent of the employer, and the legal representative of a deceased employer.
CoSSThere is no separate "managing agent" clause. The same idea is covered through:
  • "agent" (s.2(1)): every person, whether appointed as such or not, who, acting on behalf of the owner, takes part in the management, control, supervision or direction of the establishment; and
  • "employer" (s.2(27)), which includes the manager or managing director and, for a mine, the owner, agent or manager.

Reason: to make the person in real control liable for compensation.

Conclusion: whoever really runs the business is responsible.

Example

Prince lives abroad, and a manager runs his factory. Farhan is injured at the factory. Farhan can claim from the person in control, and not only from Prince.

Key point

Memory hook: Managing agent = manager for the owner = also "employer".

43. Partial Disablement (CoSS s.2(55))

Exam importance: high

Meaning

Disablement means loss of the ability to work. It can be full or partial. Partial disablement means that the worker can still work, but earns, or can earn, less than before.

Key point

In brief: partial disablement = the injury reduces the worker's ability to earn, but does not end it.

Exam answer

  1. Permanent partial disablement (s.2(55)): disablement of a permanent nature that reduces the earning capacity of an employee in every employment which he was capable of undertaking at the time of the accident.
  2. Deemed cases: every injury listed in Part II of the Fourth Schedule is deemed to result in permanent partial disablement (for example, loss of a finger or of a toe, each with a fixed percentage of loss of earning capacity).
  3. Temporary partial disablement is covered by "temporary disablement" (Concept 45).
  4. Compensation: a percentage of the compensation for permanent total disablement (Concept 53).

Old law: ECA, s.2(1): partial disablement, temporary or permanent, judged by the reduction in earning capacity.

Conclusion: partial means "less able to earn", not "unable to earn".

Example

Farhan loses two fingers of his left hand in Prince's factory. He can still work, but only at a lower speed. This is permanent partial disablement.

Key point

Memory hook: Partial = part of earning power lost.

44. Total Disablement (CoSS s.2(56))

Exam importance: high

Meaning

Total disablement means that the injury makes the worker unable to do any of the work he could do before the accident.

Key point

In brief: total disablement = the worker cannot do any of the work he could do before the accident.

Exam answer

  1. Permanent total disablement (s.2(56)): disablement of a permanent nature that incapacitates an employee for all work which he was capable of performing at the time of the accident.
  2. Deemed cases: permanent total disablement is deemed to result from
    • (a) every injury listed in Part I of the Fourth Schedule (for example, loss of both hands or of both eyes); or
    • (b) any combination of injuries listed in Part II, where the total percentage of loss of earning capacity reaches 100%.
  3. Compensation: 60% of monthly wages × the relevant factor, or the notified amount, whichever is more (Concept 52).

Old law: ECA, s.2(1): total disablement, temporary or permanent.

Conclusion: total means "cannot work at all in the earlier line of work".

Example

Farhan loses both eyes in an explosion at Prince's factory. He can no longer do any work he did earlier. This is permanent total disablement.

Key point

Memory hook: Total = zero work. (Part I injuries = automatically total.)

45. Temporary Disablement (CoSS s.2(83))

Exam importance: high

Meaning

Temporary disablement is a short-term condition after an injury. The worker needs treatment and cannot do his usual work for some time, but will recover.

Key point

In brief: temporary disablement = the worker cannot do the usual work for a while, but will get better.

Exam answer

  1. Definition (s.2(83)): a condition resulting from an employment injury which requires medical treatment and renders an employee temporarily incapable of doing the work which he was doing before, or at the time of, the injury.
  2. Total or partial: the Code pays compensation for temporary disablement "whether total or partial" (s.76(1)(d)).
  3. Compensation: a half-monthly payment of 25% of monthly wages (Concept 54).

Old law: ECA, s.2(1): temporary partial and temporary total disablement.

Conclusion: temporary disablement gives income support while the worker recovers.

Example

Farhan breaks his arm at Prince's workshop and cannot work for six weeks. After that, he returns to work. This is temporary disablement, and he gets half-monthly payments.

Key point

Memory hook: Temporary = treatment now, task later.

Partial, total and temporary disablement compared

PointPermanent partialPermanent totalTemporary
Sections.2(55)s.2(56)s.2(83)
Effect on earning capacityReduced in every employment the worker could undertake at the time of the accidentEnded for all work the worker could perform at the time of the accidentWorker temporarily unable to do the work he was doing; needs medical treatment
DurationPermanentPermanentFor a limited time
Deemed casesEach injury in Part II of the Fourth ScheduleEach injury in Part I; or Part II injuries totalling 100% loss—
CompensationA percentage of permanent total disablement compensation (Concept 53)60% of monthly wages × relevant factor, or the notified amount, whichever is more (Concept 52)Half-monthly payment of 25% of monthly wages, whether total or partial (Concept 54)

Case on the disablement definitions

Case

V. Jayaraj v. Thanthai Periyar Transport Corporation (1987), Madras High Court: a bus conductor lost almost all his hearing when his bus overturned while he was on duty. He kept his post at the same pay, so the Commissioner fixed his loss of earning capacity at only 20%. Held: keeping the same post and wages is not decisive; the loss of earning capacity must be assessed on the permanent partial disablement actually suffered, and the court raised it to 60%. Principle: disablement is tested by what the injury does to the worker's earning capacity. Partial = earning capacity reduced; total = earning capacity ended for the work he could do; temporary = incapacity for a limited time.

Note

Updated: the notes named this case as T.P. Transport Corporation Ltd. (1989), said it was cited for the definitions of managing agent and of partial, total and temporary disablement, and recorded no facts or holding. The correct position is that the case is V. Jayaraj v. Thanthai Periyar Transport Corporation, decided by the Madras High Court on 25 August 1987. It does not discuss the definition of managing agent or define the kinds of disablement; it holds that a worker who keeps the same job and pay can still suffer a loss of earning capacity from permanent partial disablement. Source: V. Jayaraj vs Thanthai Periyar Transport, Madras High Court, 25 August 1987 (Indian Kanoon).

Example

Farhan, a bus driver in Prince's transport company, loses part of his vision in an accident. If he can still work but earns less, it is partial disablement. If he can never drive again, it may be total disablement.

Key point

Exam tip: in every disablement question, ask two things: what happened to the worker's earning capacity, and for how long?

46. Employer's Liability for Personal Injury (CoSS s.74)

Exam importance: high

Meaning

The employer must pay compensation when a worker suffers a personal injury by accident (or an occupational disease) arising out of and in the course of employment. Three questions decide liability:

  1. Was there a personal injury?
  2. Was it caused by an accident or an occupational disease?
  3. Did it arise out of and in the course of the employment?
Key point

In brief: the employer is liable if the worker is injured by an accident connected with the job.

Exam answer

Section 74(1): if personal injury is caused to an employee by accident, or by an occupational disease listed in the Third Schedule, arising out of and in the course of his employment, the employer is liable to pay compensation.

  1. Personal injury: includes death.
  2. "Arising out of": there must be a cause-and-effect link between the job and the accident.
  3. "In the course of": the accident must happen during the employment, at a place and in circumstances connected with the job (time, place and circumstances).
  4. Breach of orders (s.74(2)): an accident is still treated as being in the course of employment even if the employee was acting against a law or an order, or without instructions, if
    • it would otherwise have been so; and
    • the act was done for the purpose of the employer's business.
  5. Commuting (s.74(4)): an accident while going to or coming from work is deemed to be in the course of employment if there is a nexus between the circumstances, time and place of the accident and the employment.
  6. Direct link (s.74(6)): otherwise, compensation is payable only if the accident or disease is directly attributable to a specific injury or disease arising out of and in the course of employment.
  7. Exceptions: the employer's defences (Concept 48).

Old law: ECA, s.3(1)–(3).

Cases: see Concept 70.

Conclusion: liability is no-fault, but it is limited by the test of "arising out of and in the course of employment" and by the defences.

Example

Farhan's hand is cut by a cutting machine while he works in Prince's factory. This is an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Prince must pay compensation even if Prince was not careless.

Key point

Memory hook (PAO): Personal injury by Accident or Occupational disease + Out of and in the course of employment.

47. Notional Extension of Employer's Premises

Exam importance: high

Meaning

The general rule is that a worker's employment starts when he reaches the workplace and ends when he leaves it. Travel to and from work is normally outside the employment. Under the doctrine of "notional extension" ("notional" means imagined, or treated as if), the law in some cases treats the employer's premises as stretching a little in time and place, so that the worker is still "in the course of employment".

Key point

In brief: notional extension = the workplace is treated as a little bigger than its walls.

Exam answer

  1. General rule: employment begins on reaching the place of work and ends on leaving it.
  2. Extension: courts may extend the premises reasonably in time and space, for example while the worker is
    • entering or leaving the premises;
    • passing through the approach to the workplace;
    • using the employer's transport; or
    • doing something incidental to the job.
  3. Limits:
    • The extension does not cover a worker who is simply a member of the public on a public road or a public ferry (Saurashtra Salt).
    • It does not cover a worker cycling to work on a public road one kilometre away (Francis De Costa).
    • It can apply where the worker uses the employer's transport, or a bus that he has a right to use as part of his job (BEST v. Agnes).
  4. Position under the Code:
    • commuting accidents are now covered if a nexus with the employment is shown (s.74(4); for ESI, s.34(3)); and
    • an accident during an emergency rescue at the premises is also covered (s.34(2)).

Old law: ECA, s.3, read with case law.

Conclusion: the notional extension is limited, and needs a real link with the job.

Within and outside the notional extension

SituationIn the course of employment?Authority
Entering or leaving the premises; passing through the approach to the workplaceYes (reasonable extension in time and space)General rule as extended by courts
Doing something incidental to the jobYesGeneral rule as extended by courts
Travelling in the employer's transport, or in a bus the worker has a right to use as part of his jobYesBEST v. Agnes
Travelling as an ordinary member of the public on a public road or public ferryNoSaurashtra Salt
Cycling to work on a public road one kilometre awayNoFrancis De Costa
Commuting accident with a nexus to the employmentYes, under the CodeCoSS s.74(4); for ESI, s.34(3)
Accident during an emergency rescue at the premisesYes, under the Codes.34(2)

Cases on notional extension

Full case notes appear in Concept 70. The points for which each case is cited under this topic are given below.

Case

Saurashtra Salt: cited on the limits of the doctrine. Held: the notional extension of the employer's premises does not cover a worker who is simply a member of the public on a public road or a public ferry. Principle: where the worker is in the same position as any other member of the public, the accident is not in the course of employment.

Case

Francis De Costa: cited on the limits of the doctrine. Held: the notional extension does not cover a worker cycling to work on a public road one kilometre away from the workplace. Principle: ordinary travel to work on a public road, away from the premises, is outside the course of employment.

Case

BEST v. Agnes: cited for the reach of the doctrine. Held: the notional extension can apply where the worker uses the employer's transport, or a bus that he has a right to use as part of his job. Principle: such travel has a real link with the employment, so the employer's premises are notionally extended to cover it.

Example

Prince's factory has a private lane leading to the gate. Farhan slips in that lane as he walks in for his shift. The lane is treated as part of the workplace, so the accident is in the course of employment. If Farhan had slipped on a public road far away, it would not be.

Key point

Memory hook: Premises + a bit more (time, place). Public road or ferry = out; employer's bus = in.

48. Defences Available to the Employer (CoSS Section 74(1) provisos, Section 74(6)–(7) and Section 84)

Exam importance: high

Even under a no-fault law, the employer has a few defences, that is, reasons why he need not pay compensation. These defences are meant to stop carelessness and misuse.

Key point

In brief: defences are the few situations in which the employer need not pay.

Model exam answer

The employer is not liable in the following cases:

  1. Short disablement (Section 74(1)(a)): for an injury that does not cause total or partial disablement for more than three days.
  2. Drink or drugs (Section 74(1)(b)(i)): where the accident is directly attributable to the employee being under the influence of drink or drugs.
  3. Wilful disobedience (Section 74(1)(b)(ii)): wilful disobedience of an order expressly given, or of a safety rule expressly framed.
  4. Wilful removal of a safety guard (Section 74(1)(b)(iii)): wilful removal or disregard of a safety guard or device which the employee knew had been provided.
  5. Exception to defences 2–4: these defences are not available where the accident causes death or permanent total disablement.
  6. No direct link (Section 74(6)): no compensation is payable unless the injury or disease is directly attributable to a specific accident or disease arising from the employment.
  7. Civil suit filed (Section 74(7)): no compensation if the employee has already sued for damages.
  8. Refusal of medical examination (Section 84): the right to compensation is suspended for the period of refusal or obstruction.
DefenceProvisionAvailable if the accident causes death or permanent total disablement?
Disablement for not more than three daysSection 74(1)(a)Not applicable (the exception covers defences 2–4 only)
Drink or drugsSection 74(1)(b)(i)No
Wilful disobedience of an order or safety ruleSection 74(1)(b)(ii)No
Wilful removal or disregard of a safety guard or deviceSection 74(1)(b)(iii)No

Old law: Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (ECA), Section 3(1) provisos and Section 3(5).

Conclusion: the defences are few, and serious injury or death is always compensated.

Example

Farhan removes the safety guard of a machine on purpose and cuts his finger. Prince, his employer, need not pay. But if the same act had caused Farhan's death, Farhan's family would still receive compensation.

Key point

Memory hook: "3 days, D-D-G": Drink/drugs, Disobedience, Guard removed. Not for death or total disablement.

49. Occupational Diseases (CoSS Sections 2(51), 74(3), 74(5) and 82)

Exam importance: high

Some diseases come slowly from a job, such as lung disease from dust, or lead poisoning. The law treats certain such diseases as if they were accidents.

Key point

In brief: an occupational disease (occupational = linked to one's job) is a listed disease caused by a particular kind of work.

Model exam answer

  1. Definition (Section 2(51)): a disease specified in the Third Schedule as peculiar to the employment.
  2. Deemed accident (Section 74(3)): if an employee in a job listed in the Second Schedule contracts a Third Schedule disease peculiar to that job while in one employer's service for a continuous period of at least six months, the disease is deemed to be an injury by accident. Unless the contrary is proved, it is treated as arising out of and in the course of employment.
  3. Adding diseases (Section 74(5)): the Government may add employments or diseases after giving three months' notice.
  4. Time of the accident (Section 82 provisos):
    • for such a disease, the accident is treated as happening on the first day of continuous absence from work;
    • for partial disablement without absence from work, the two-year claim period runs from the day notice of disablement is given;
    • if symptoms appear within two years after leaving the job, the accident is treated as happening on the day the symptoms were first detected.
  5. Liability of the employer: liability is on the employer in whose service the employee last contracted the disease. The six-month rule protects against short-term jobs.

Old law: ECA, Sections 3(2)–(4); Schedule III (list of diseases).

Note

Updated: the transcript also cited ECA Section 4A here. The correct position is that the old-law provisions on occupational diseases are Section 3(2), (2A), (3) and (4) of the ECA with Schedule III; Section 4A deals only with payment of compensation when due and interest and penalty for default. Source: Section 3, Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (Indian Kanoon).

Conclusion: a slow disease is treated like an accident when it clearly comes from the job.

Example

Farhan works for Prince in a coal-dust area for more than six months and develops a lung disease listed in the Third Schedule. He can claim compensation as if it were an accident.

Key point

Memory hook: Listed job + listed disease + 6 months = deemed accident.

50. Alternate Remedies (CoSS Sections 74(7), 41(7), 85 and 86)

Exam importance: medium

A worker injured at work may have more than one way to get money: compensation under the Code, a civil suit for damages, or ESI benefits. The law does not allow the worker to take them all; he must choose.

Key point

In brief: alternate remedies are the other legal ways to get relief; the worker must choose one.

Model exam answer

  1. Suit or compensation (Section 74(7)):
    • there is no right to compensation if the employee has already instituted a civil suit for damages; and
    • no suit is allowed if he has claimed compensation before the competent authority, or has an agreement for compensation under the Chapter.
  2. ESI or compensation (Section 41(7)(a)): a person eligible for dependants' benefit or disablement benefit under the ESI Chapter cannot claim employee's compensation from the employer.
  3. Contractor or principal employer (Section 85): the worker may claim from the principal employer, or from the contractor instead (Section 85(3)).
  4. Third party (Section 86): if a stranger is legally liable to pay damages, the employer who has paid compensation is entitled to be indemnified by that stranger.
Choice before the workerRuleProvision
Compensation or civil suitOne excludes the otherSection 74(7)
Compensation or ESIA person eligible for ESI dependants' or disablement benefit cannot claim compensation from the employerSection 41(7)(a)
Principal employer or contractorClaim against eitherSection 85, Section 85(3)
Employer and a liable strangerThe employer who paid is indemnified by the strangerSection 86

Old law: ECA, Section 3(5). For the ESI bar and the case of A. Trehan, see Concept 72.

Conclusion: one injury, one remedy: the worker chooses the best.

Example

Farhan is injured on Prince's site. He can either claim compensation under the Code or sue Prince for damages, but not both.

Key point

Memory hook: One injury, one remedy. Choose: Compensation OR Suit (OR ESI).

51. Compensation for Death (CoSS Section 76(1)(a) and (7))

Exam importance: high

If the injury causes death, the family gets a lump sum. It is worked out from the worker's monthly wages and a factor that depends on the worker's age.

Key point

In brief: death compensation = 50% of monthly wages × age factor, or the notified minimum amount, if higher.

Model exam answer

  1. Amount (Section 76(1)(a)): 50% of the monthly wages of the deceased employee × the relevant factor, or an amount notified by the Central Government, whichever is more.
  2. Relevant factor: the number in the Sixth Schedule matched to the employee's completed years of age on his last birthday before the compensation fell due. A younger worker has a higher factor, since more working years were lost.
  3. Enhancement: the Central Government may increase the amounts by notification.
  4. Funeral expenses (Section 76(7)): in addition, the employer must deposit not less than ₹15,000 (or the amount the State prescribes) with the competent authority, for the eldest surviving dependant or for the person who actually paid for the funeral.
  5. Payment: by deposit with the competent authority, followed by distribution among the dependants (Concept 58).
Example

Numerical example: Monthly wages ₹10,000; factor 200. Compensation = 50% × 10,000 × 200 = ₹10,00,000. (In an exam question the factor is given; 200 here is only an illustration.)

Old law: ECA, Section 4(1)(a): 50% × factor, or ₹1,20,000, whichever is more.

Conclusion: the formula gives a bigger amount to a younger worker with higher wages.

Example

Farhan (age 30, monthly wages ₹10,000) dies at work. Prince must deposit 50% × 10,000 × the factor for age 30, plus ₹15,000 for the funeral. Farhan's widow and minor son share the compensation.

Key point

Memory hook: Death = 50% × wages × factor. (Total disablement = 60%.)

52. Compensation for Permanent Total Disablement (CoSS Section 76(1)(b))

Exam importance: high

If the worker becomes permanently unable to do any work, the compensation is a little higher than in a case of death, because the worker is still alive and needs support.

Key point

In brief: permanent total disablement compensation = 60% of monthly wages × age factor, or the notified amount, if more.

Model exam answer

  1. Amount: 60% of the monthly wages × the relevant factor, or the notified amount, whichever is more.
  2. Deemed cases: injuries in Part I of the Fourth Schedule, or Part II injuries adding up to 100% loss of earning capacity (Section 2(56)).
  3. Medical expenses: the employer reimburses the actual medical expenses (Section 76(5)).
  4. Defences do not apply where the accident causes permanent total disablement (Section 74(1)(b)).
Example

Numerical example: Monthly wages ₹10,000; factor 200. Compensation = 60% × 10,000 × 200 = ₹12,00,000.

Old law: ECA, Section 4(1)(b): 60% × factor, or ₹1,40,000, whichever is more.

Conclusion: permanent total disablement gets a higher percentage (60%) than death (50%).

Example

Farhan loses both hands. Prince pays 60% of Farhan's monthly wages × the factor for Farhan's age, plus medical expenses.

Key point

Memory hook: Death 50 · Total disablement 60 · Temporary 25.

53. Compensation for Permanent Partial Disablement (CoSS Section 76(1)(c))

Exam importance: high

For partial disablement the worker gets a share of the permanent total disablement amount. The share equals the percentage of earning power lost.

Key point

In brief: partial disablement compensation = the percentage of earning power lost × the permanent total disablement amount.

Model exam answer

  1. Injury listed in Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Section 76(1)(c)(i)): the percentage of loss of earning capacity shown in the Schedule, applied to the permanent total disablement compensation.
  2. Injury not listed (Section 76(1)(c)(ii)): the percentage of loss of earning capacity as assessed by a medical practitioner, applied in the same way.
  3. Several injuries in one accident (Explanation 1): the amounts are added, but the total cannot be more than the permanent total disablement amount.
  4. Assessment (Explanation 2): the medical practitioner should take into account the percentages given in the Fourth Schedule for different injuries.
Example

Numerical example: Permanent total disablement compensation ₹12,00,000; loss of earning capacity 40%. Compensation = 40% × 12,00,000 = ₹4,80,000.

Old law: ECA, Section 4(1)(c).

Conclusion: the payment is in proportion to the loss.

Example

Farhan loses a finger, and the Schedule shows a 20% loss of earning capacity for that injury. Prince pays 20% of the permanent total disablement amount.

Key point

Memory hook: Partial = % loss × Total amount.

54. Compensation for Temporary Disablement (CoSS Section 76(1)(d) and (4)–(6))

Exam importance: high

For temporary disablement, the worker gets regular payments (not a lump sum) twice a month while he recovers.

Key point

In brief: temporary disablement compensation = 25% of monthly wages, paid half-monthly.

Model exam answer

  1. Amount (Section 76(1)(d)): a half-monthly payment of 25% of the monthly wages, for temporary disablement, whether total or partial.
  2. When payment starts (Section 76(4)):
    • if the disablement lasts 28 days or more: from the 16th day from the date of disablement;
    • if the disablement lasts less than 28 days: after a waiting period of three days.
  3. How long: for as long as the disablement lasts, or five years, whichever is shorter.
  4. Deductions and limit:
    • payments already made by the employer are deducted;
    • a half-monthly payment cannot be more than the difference between half of the wages before the accident and half of the wages after the accident.
  5. Medical expenses (Section 76(5)): the employer reimburses the actual medical expenditure.
  6. End of disablement (Section 76(6)): if the disablement ends before a half-monthly payment falls due, a proportionate sum is paid.
Duration of temporary disablementHalf-monthly payment begins
28 days or moreFrom the 16th day from the date of disablement
Less than 28 daysAfter a waiting period of three days
Example

Numerical example: Monthly wages ₹12,000. 25% = ₹3,000 per half-month.

Old law: ECA, Section 4(1)(d): half-monthly payment of 25%, with a "waiting period" of 3 days.

Conclusion: the worker has a steady income during recovery.

Example

Farhan's monthly wages are ₹12,000. He breaks his leg and cannot work for two months. Prince pays him ₹3,000 every half-month, starting after the waiting period (or from the 16th day, if the disablement lasts 28 days or more).

Key point

Memory hook: 25%, twice a month; 3-day wait; 28-day / 16th-day rule.

55. Accident Outside India (CoSS Sections 2(28), 76(2), 83 and 92)

Exam importance: medium

Some workers work abroad or at sea. If they are injured outside India, the Code still protects them.

Key point

In brief: for an accident outside India, the Code still applies to the listed workers, with adjustments.

Model exam answer

  1. Employment injury (Section 2(28)(ii)): for the compensation Chapter, an accident occurring, or an occupational disease contracted, within or outside India is covered.
  2. Foreign compensation (Section 76(2)): the competent authority must reduce the amount by any compensation already awarded under the law of the foreign country.
  3. Covered workers (Section 83):
    • masters and seamen of ships;
    • the captain and crew of aircraft;
    • persons recruited by Indian companies to work abroad;
    • persons sent abroad with motor vehicles registered in India (drivers, helpers, mechanics, cleaners).
  4. Notice and claim:
    • notice may be served on the master, the captain, or the local agent of the company or owner (Section 83(2));
    • time limits for claims (Section 83(3)): for death, within one year after the news of the death reaches the claimant; if a ship or aircraft is lost with all hands, within 18 months.
  5. Venue (Section 92): the competent authority of the area where the owner or agent resides or carries on business, or where the company's registered office is situated.

Old law: ECA, 1923 (special provisions for seamen, aircraft crew and workmen sent abroad).

Conclusion: workers are protected even beyond India's borders, without double payment.

Example

Prince's Indian company sends Farhan to work in Dubai, and Farhan is injured there. He can claim under the Code, but the authority will reduce the amount by any compensation he received under Dubai law.

Key point

Memory hook: Abroad = covered, but "no double pay". (Death: 1 year; ship lost: 18 months.)

56. Calculation of Compensation: The Factors

Exam importance: high

The amount of compensation depends on a few factors: the kind of injury, the monthly wages, the worker's age (the relevant factor) and the percentage of loss of earning capacity.

Key point

In brief: calculation = kind of injury × wages × age factor × percentage loss.

Model exam answer

FactorRule
Kind of injuryDeath 50%; permanent total disablement 60%; permanent partial disablement = percentage loss × the permanent total disablement amount; temporary disablement = 25%, half-monthly (Section 76(1))
Monthly wagesSection 78 (Concept 41); the Government may notify a ceiling (Section 76(3))†
Relevant factorSixth Schedule: by the completed years of age; the younger the worker, the higher the factor
Percentage loss of earning capacityFourth Schedule (Parts I and II), or medical assessment
Minimum amountsThe notified minimum applies if it is higher (old law: ₹1,20,000 for death; ₹1,40,000 for permanent total disablement)
ExtrasMedical expenses (Section 76(5)); funeral expenses of not less than ₹15,000 (Section 76(7))
ReductionsPayments already made by the employer (proviso to Section 76(4)); compensation received under foreign law (Section 76(2))

Old law: ECA, Section 4 and Schedules I, II and IV.

Key point

Exam tip: Steps in a calculation answer: identify the injury, take the wages, apply the factor, and apply the percentage.

Example

Prince's clerk calculates Farhan's compensation. He takes: injury = permanent partial disablement (40% loss); monthly wages ₹10,000; factor 200. Permanent total disablement amount = 60% × 10,000 × 200 = ₹12,00,000. Farhan gets 40% of that = ₹4,80,000.

Key point

Memory hook: Injury → % → Wages → Factor → Amount.

57. Payment of Compensation and Penalty for Default (CoSS Sections 77 and 133)

Exam importance: high

Compensation must be paid as soon as it falls due. If the employer delays without good reason, he pays interest and a penalty.

Key point

In brief: pay on time or pay more: interest, and up to 50% extra.

Model exam answer

  1. Payment when due (Section 77(1)): compensation under Section 76 is to be paid as soon as it falls due.
  2. Provisional payment (Section 77(2)): if the employer does not accept the full liability claimed, he must pay provisionally the amount he accepts (by depositing it with the competent authority or paying it to the employee), without prejudice to the further claim.
  3. Default (Section 77(3)): if the employer is in default for more than one month from the due date, the competent authority orders:
    • interest at the prescribed rate; and
    • if there was no justification for the delay, a further sum (damages) of up to 50% of the arrears, after giving the employer an opportunity to show cause.
  4. Who receives it (Section 77(4)): the interest and damages are paid to the employee or the dependant.
  5. Offence (Section 133(h)): failure to pay compensation is punishable with a fine of up to ₹50,000; a second offence is punished more heavily (Section 134).

Old law: ECA, Section 4A: interest (12%) and a penalty of up to 50%.

Conclusion: the law punishes delay.

Example

Prince owes Farhan ₹1,00,000 as compensation, due on 1 January. He pays on 15 March with no good reason. The authority can order interest, and up to ₹50,000 more as damages.

Key point

Memory hook: Late over 1 month = interest + up to 50% penalty.

58. Distribution of Compensation (CoSS Section 81)

Exam importance: medium

Death compensation is not handed over by the employer directly to the family. It is deposited with the competent authority, who decides how to divide it among the dependants.

Key point

In brief: distribution means the authority decides who gets how much among the dependants.

Model exam answer

  1. Deposit (Section 81(1)): no payment of death compensation, and no payment of a lump sum to a woman or a person under legal disability, is valid unless it is made by deposit with the competent authority.
  2. Advance: the employer may advance to a dependant up to three months' wages, which is later deducted.
  3. Notice to dependants (Section 81(4)): the authority may publish or serve a notice calling the dependants to appear. If no dependant exists, the balance is returned to the employer.
  4. Apportionment (Section 81(5)): the authority divides the sum among the dependants in such proportion as he thinks fit, or gives all of it to one dependant, after hearing them and recording reasons.
  5. Protection (Section 81(7)–(8)): money due to a woman or a person under disability can be invested for her or his benefit; orders can be varied on account of neglect of children or a change in circumstances.
  6. Fraud (Section 81(9)–(10)): amounts obtained by fraud can be recovered as an arrear of land revenue.

Old law: ECA, Sections 8–9.

Conclusion: the authority protects the family's share and stops misuse.

Example

Farhan dies. Prince deposits the compensation with the authority. Farhan's widow, minor son and mother appear. The authority, after hearing them, divides the sum, and the minor son's share is invested for him.

Key point

Memory hook: Deposit → Notice → Hear → Divide (with reasons).

59. Notice and Claim (CoSS Section 82)

Exam importance: high

The employer should be told about the accident soon, and the claim must be filed within two years. These rules prevent stale claims.

Key point

In brief: notice means telling the employer soon; the claim must be filed within two years.

Model exam answer

  1. Rule (Section 82(1)): no claim is entertained unless:
    • notice of the accident has been given as soon as practicable; and
    • the claim is made within two years of the accident or, in a case of death, within two years of the death.
  2. Contents and service (Section 82(3)): the notice gives the name and address of the injured person, the cause of the injury and the date of the accident. It is served on the employer, or on any one of several employers, or on the person responsible for the management of the branch.
  3. Modes (Section 82(5)): by delivery, by registered post, electronically, or by an entry in the notice-book (Section 82(4) allows the Government to require a notice-book to be kept).
  4. Occupational disease: special dates apply (Concept 49).

Old law: ECA, Section 10 (notice, and a claim within two years).

Conclusion: prompt notice and a two-year limit for claims keep the evidence fresh.

Example

Farhan is injured on 1 March 2026. He must tell Prince soon, and file his claim before 1 March 2028.

Key point

Memory hook: Notice: soon. Claim: 2 years.

60. Exceptions to the General Rule of Notice and Claim (CoSS Section 82(2) and proviso)

Exam importance: medium

The notice-and-claim rule is strict, but the law relaxes it where the employer already knew about the accident or the delay is understandable.

Key point

In brief: the exceptions are cases where late or defective notice does not defeat the claim.

Model exam answer

  1. Defect not a bar (Section 82(2)): the want of notice, or any defect or irregularity in it, is no bar to the claim if:
    1. the claim is for the death of an employee resulting from an accident on the employer's premises (or at a place where he was working under the employer's control), and he died there, or without leaving the vicinity; or
    2. the employer (or a manager) had knowledge of the accident from another source at or about the time it happened.
  2. Sufficient cause (proviso): the competent authority may entertain any claim even if notice was not given or the claim was made late, if satisfied that the failure was due to sufficient cause.
  3. Other relaxations: special time limits for ships and aircraft (Section 83(3)); claims after a State certificate (Section 83(6)).

Old law: ECA, Section 10(2) and proviso.

Conclusion: the exceptions protect a genuine claimant from technical defeat.

Example

Farhan dies in Prince's factory yard after a fall. His family did not send a formal notice, but Prince knew everything about the accident. The claim is not defeated.

Key point

Memory hook: Died on premises or employer knew = no notice needed. Sufficient cause = late is OK.

61. Contracting Out (ECA Section 17; CoSS Sections 74(7), 85 and 89)

Exam importance: medium

"Contracting out" means an agreement by which the worker gives up his right to compensation. The old law declared such an agreement void. A worker cannot sign away a right that the law gives him.

Key point

In brief: contracting out means signing away the right to compensation; the law does not allow it.

Model exam answer

  1. Old rule (ECA, Section 17): any contract or agreement by which a workman gives up his right to compensation is null and void in so far as it removes or reduces the employer's liability.
  2. Registration of agreements (ECA, Sections 28–29; CoSS Section 89):
    • an agreed lump sum, or any settlement with a woman or a person under disability, must be recorded by the competent authority;
    • the authority may refuse to record it if the sum is inadequate, or if the agreement was obtained by fraud, undue influence or other improper means;
    • a recorded agreement is enforceable.
  3. Position under the Code: Chapter VII does not appear to contain a separate "contracting out" clause. The same protection works through:
    • Section 89 (registration of agreements);
    • Section 74(7) (an agreement in accordance with the Chapter); and
    • Section 90 (the authority decides).
  4. Section 85 ("Contracting") is different: it makes the principal employer liable for a contractor's workers. It has nothing to do with contracting out.
  5. Case: Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal (2002).

Conclusion: the worker's right to compensation cannot be bought out cheaply.

Example

Prince makes the injured Farhan sign a paper: "I give up all claims for ₹5,000." The agreement is not valid to that extent, and Farhan can still claim full compensation.

Key point

Memory hook: The right to compensation cannot be signed away.

Case

Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal ((2002) 1 SCC 100; 2002 SCC (L&S) 97).

Facts: Roshan Deen, a 25-year-old workman at a flour mill-cum-sugarcane factory, earned ₹1,500 a month. In March 1995 he was caught in a fast-rotating machine and badly crushed. He suffered fractures of the neck, hands and legs, and a paralysed vocal cord. While his claim was pending before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, an application was filed saying that the parties had made an agreement and that he did not wish to pursue the claim. He said that this had been obtained by fraud.

Held: the Supreme Court found merit in the allegation of fraud. It set aside the High Court's judgment, restored the proceedings before the Commissioner so that the claim could be decided on merits, and ordered an inquiry into the conduct of the advocate involved. It stressed that the Act protects workmen and that liability to pay compensation cannot be reduced or avoided by an agreement (Sections 17, 28 and 29 of the Workmen's Compensation Act).

Principle: an employer cannot avoid compensation by getting the injured worker to sign away his rights. Settlements must follow the safeguards of the Act: registration and a check by the authority. A worker's statutory right cannot be waived by a paper agreement.

Example

Prince gets the injured Farhan to sign a paper that says "no claim". The paper is not a shield for Prince.

Module IV: Code on Social Security, 2020: Insurance, Retirement and Welfare Benefits

  • Insurance: a system in which many people pay small amounts so that those who suffer a loss are paid.
  • Retirement benefits: money for the time after work.

Part A: Employees' State Insurance (ESI), CoSS Chapter IV (Sections 24–52)

62. ESI: Applicability (CoSS Section 1(7)–(8) and the First Schedule)

Exam importance: high

ESI is a health and cash-benefit insurance for workers and their families. It pays for sickness, maternity, work injury and death. The Code says which workplaces are covered.

Key point

In brief: ESI applies to workplaces with 10 or more persons, and to dangerous trades even with one worker.

Model exam answer

  1. Main rule (First Schedule): Chapter IV applies to every establishment in which ten or more persons are employed, other than a seasonal factory.
  2. Hazardous work: it also applies to an establishment carrying on a hazardous or life-threatening occupation notified by the Central Government, even if only one employee is employed.
  3. Plantations: a plantation employer may opt in if the ESI benefits are better than the benefits he provides.
  4. Voluntary extension (Section 1(7)): the Director General of the Corporation may apply the Chapter to an establishment if the employer and the majority of employees agree.
  5. Continued application (Section 1(8)): once applied, the Chapter continues to apply even if the number of employees later falls below the threshold.
  6. Who is covered: employees drawing wages up to the wage ceiling notified by the Central Government (₹21,000 a month under the present rules†). For counting the number of employees, those above the ceiling are also counted (Section 2(26), second proviso).
  7. Start of contributions: contributions become payable from the date (notified) on which the Corporation starts giving benefits.
PointOld law: ESI Act, 1948CoSS, Chapter IV
Basic coverageFactories using power with 10 or more persons (Sections 1–2)Every establishment with 10 or more persons, other than a seasonal factory
Other establishmentsEstablishments notified by the StateHazardous or life-threatening occupations notified by the Central Government, even with one employee; voluntary extension by agreement (Section 1(7)); plantations may opt in

Conclusion: the Code makes ESI universal for all establishments with 10 or more employees, and brings dangerous work in from the first worker.

Example

Prince runs a shop with 12 employees, including Farhan, who earns ₹18,000. ESI applies to the shop and to Farhan. If Prince had only 4 employees in an ordinary shop, ESI would not apply; but it would apply even to one worker in a notified hazardous unit.

Key point

Memory hook: ESI = 10+ persons (1 in hazardous), wage limit ₹21,000.

63. Employer, Employee and Insured Person (CoSS Sections 2(26), 2(27), 2(39) and 28)

Exam importance: high

Under ESI, the employer pays the contributions, the employee is covered, and the covered employee is called an Insured Person.

Key point

In brief: an insured person is a covered employee for whom ESI contributions are payable and who can get ESI benefits.

Model exam answer

  1. Employer (Section 2(27)):
    • the person in control of the establishment: the occupier of a factory, the owner or manager, or the head of a Government department;
    • it also includes a contractor and the legal representative of a dead employer (see Concept 40);
    • for ESI, the employer pays both contributions for every employee, including those brought by a contractor (Section 31(1)).
  2. Employee (Section 2(26)): any person employed on wages, directly or through a contractor.
    • For Chapter IV (ESI), he must draw wages up to the wage ceiling (proviso 1).
    • Persons above the ceiling are still counted for deciding whether the establishment is covered (proviso 2).
  3. Insured Person (Section 28): every employee in an establishment to which the Chapter applies shall be insured. An employee, insured or insurable, for whom contributions are or were payable, and who is entitled to benefits, is called an "Insured Person".
  4. Contract workers: they are covered. The principal employer pays and then recovers from the contractor (Section 31(6)).

Old law: ESI Act, Section 2 (definitions of "employee" in Section 2(9) and "insured person" in Section 2(14)); the ESIC is set up and constituted under Sections 3–4.

Note

Updated: the transcript gave Sections 1–2 of the ESI Act for the definitions and for the constitution of the ESIC. The correct position is that "employee" and "insured person" are defined in Section 2(9) and Section 2(14), while the Corporation is established and constituted under Sections 3 and 4 (Section 1 deals only with the short title, extent, commencement and application). Source: The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Indian Kanoon).

Conclusion: every eligible worker is insured, whoever the immediate employer is.

Example

Farhan works for Prince through a contractor and earns ₹16,000. Prince pays both the employer's share and the employee's share to ESI and later recovers them from the contractor. Farhan is an Insured Person.

Memory hook

Employer pays for all; Insured Person = covered worker with contributions.

64. Authorities under the ESI Chapter (CoSS Sections 5, 24, 37 and 48)

Exam importance: medium

Several bodies run ESI: the Corporation that manages the scheme, its officers, doctors' boards that decide disability, and special courts for disputes.

Key point

In brief: ESI authorities are the bodies that run ESI and settle disputes.

Model exam answer

  1. Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) (Section 5): constituted by the Central Government. Its members include:
    • a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson;
    • up to five Central Government officials;
    • a representative of each State and one for the Union territories;
    • ten employers' representatives and ten employees' representatives;
    • two doctors' representatives;
    • others.
  2. Standing Committee (Section 5(3)): chosen from the Corporation to run day-to-day work. It authorises the officers who operate the Fund's account.
  3. Director General (Section 24): the principal officer. There are other officers too, for example the Insurance Commissioner and the Chief Medical Commissioner.
  4. Medical Board and Medical Appeal Tribunal (Section 37): decide the "disablement question", that is, whether disablement is permanent and the extent of loss of earning capacity.
  5. Employees' Insurance Court (Section 48): decides disputes (see Concept 73).
  6. Inspector-cum-Facilitator (Section 122): for inspection and guidance.
AuthoritySectionRole
ESI Corporation5Runs the scheme
Standing Committee5(3)Day-to-day work; authorises officers who operate the Fund's account
Director General and other officers24Principal officer and staff
Medical Board and Medical Appeal Tribunal37Decide the disablement question
Employees' Insurance Court48Decides disputes
Inspector-cum-Facilitator122Inspection and guidance

Old law: ESI Act, 1948: ESIC constitution (Sections 3–4) and the Employees' Insurance Court.

Conclusion: a Corporation runs the scheme; boards and courts settle medical and legal disputes.

Example

Farhan is injured, and the doctors disagree on his loss of earning capacity. A Medical Board decides. If Farhan and the Corporation disagree on his benefit, the Employees' Insurance Court hears them.

Memory hook

Corporation runs · Standing Committee acts · Board decides disability · Court decides disputes.

65. ESI Fund (CoSS Sections 25–26)

Exam importance: medium

All contributions and other money go into one fund, and the Fund can be used only for listed purposes.

Key point

In brief: the ESI Fund is the common pot of money from which ESI benefits are paid.

Model exam answer

  1. Fund (Section 25): all contributions and user charges paid under the Chapter, and all other money received for the Corporation, are paid into the Employees' State Insurance Fund, which is held and administered by the Corporation.
  2. Other sources: grants, donations, CSR funds and gifts from the Government, local authorities or any person.
  3. Deposit and investment: the money is kept in banks approved by the Central Government and invested as prescribed. The account is operated by officers authorised by the Standing Committee.
  4. Uses (Section 26):
    • payment of benefits and medical treatment;
    • salaries and expenses of the Corporation;
    • hospitals and dispensaries;
    • payments to States or private bodies for medical care;
    • audit;
    • the cost of Employees' Insurance Courts;
    • legal costs;
    • health and welfare measures and rehabilitation of disabled workers;
    • other purposes approved by the Corporation with the Central Government's approval.
  5. Priority (Section 47): dues to the Corporation are a first charge on the assets of the establishment.

Old law: ESI Act, 1948, Sections 26–28 (as the course outline lists them).

Conclusion: the Fund is a protected pool for workers' benefits.

Example

Prince and Farhan both pay contributions, and the money is in the ESI Fund. When Farhan falls sick, his sickness benefit is paid from this same Fund.

Memory hook

Pay in → Pool → Pay out only for listed purposes.

66. Contributions: Employer and Employee (CoSS Sections 29 and 31)

Exam importance: high

ESI is paid for by contributions from the employer and the employee, calculated as a percentage of wages.

Key point

In brief: a contribution is the money paid by the employer and the employee to the ESI Fund.

Model exam answer

  1. Two shares (Section 29(1)): the employer's contribution and the employee's contribution, both paid to the Corporation.
  2. Rates (Section 29(2)): as prescribed by the Central Government. At present: employer 3.25% and employee 0.75% of wages (4% in all)†. Workers earning up to ₹176 a day are exempt from their own share†.
  3. Due date (Section 29(4)): ordinarily the last day of the wage period.
  4. Employer's duty (Section 31):
    • the employer pays both shares for every employee, including contract workers (Section 31(1));
    • he can recover the employee's share only by deduction from wages, and only for the period concerned (Section 31(2));
    • he cannot deduct the employer's share from wages (Section 31(3));
    • sums deducted are treated as entrusted to him (Section 31(4));
    • he bears the cost of remitting the money (Section 31(5));
    • he may recover from a contractor, who keeps a register (Section 31(6)–(8)).
  5. New provisions expanding coverage:
    • hazardous units are covered even with one worker;
    • plantations may opt in;
    • voluntary extension (Section 1(7));
    • contract workers are covered;
    • the Code also allows schemes for unorganised, gig and platform workers (Chapter IX).
  6. Default:
    • dues are a first charge on assets (Section 47);
    • failing to pay contributions is an offence (Section 133(a)): imprisonment up to three years (at least one year if the employee's share was deducted but not paid), with fine.
Employer's shareEmployee's share
Present rate†3.25% of wages0.75% of wages
Who pays it to the CorporationEmployerEmployer
Can it be deducted from wages?No (Section 31(3))Yes, only by deduction from wages for the period concerned (Section 31(2))

Old law: ESI Act, 1948, Sections 38–40 (the course outline gives Sections 26–28, which deal with the ESI Fund).

Note

Updated: the transcript gave the course outline's Sections 26–28 as the old law on contributions. The correct position is that Sections 26–28 of the ESI Act deal with the ESI Fund; contributions are covered by Section 38 (all employees to be insured), Section 39 (contributions) and Section 40 (principal employer to pay contribution in the first instance). Source: The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Indian Kanoon).

Conclusion: contribution rates are set by rules, but the duty to pay is on the employer.

Example

Farhan's wage is ₹20,000. At present ESI rates, the employee's share is 0.75% = ₹150, deducted from his wages; the employer's share is 3.25% = ₹650, paid by Prince from his own pocket. Prince must not deduct the ₹650 from Farhan's wages.

Memory hook

3.25 + 0.75 = 4. Employer pays both, deducts only the worker's share.

67. Sickness Benefit and Maternity Benefit (CoSS Sections 32(1)(a)–(b) and 41(4))

Exam importance: high

When an insured person is sick and cannot work, ESI pays part of the wages. When an insured woman has a baby, ESI pays maternity benefit.

Key point

In brief: sickness benefit is cash when sick; maternity benefit is cash when having a baby.

Model exam answer

  1. Sickness benefit (Section 32(1)(a)): periodical payments to an insured person during sickness certified by a duly appointed medical practitioner.
  2. Maternity benefit (Section 32(1)(b)): periodical payments to an insured woman for confinement, miscarriage or sickness arising out of pregnancy, on a certificate by the authority named in the regulations.
  3. Qualifications, rate and period (Section 32(3)): decided by the Central Government's rules. At present:
    • sickness benefit is about 70% of the average daily wage for up to about 91 days in a year†;
    • maternity benefit is 100% of the wage for 26 weeks†.
  4. Not together (Section 41(4)): an insured person cannot get, for the same period:
    • sickness benefit and maternity benefit;
    • sickness benefit and temporary disablement benefit;
    • maternity benefit and temporary disablement benefit.
    He or she may choose between them (Section 41(5)).
  5. No double claim (Section 41(7)(b)): a woman eligible for ESI maternity benefit cannot claim maternity benefit from the employer under Chapter VI.
  6. No cash for working days (Section 41(2)): no sickness or temporary disablement benefit is payable for a day on which the person works, is on paid leave or holiday, or is on strike.
Sickness benefitMaternity benefit
Section32(1)(a)32(1)(b)
WhoInsured personInsured woman
WhenSickness certified by a duly appointed medical practitionerConfinement, miscarriage or sickness arising out of pregnancy, certified by the authority in the regulations
Present rate and period†About 70% of the average daily wage, up to about 91 days a year100% of the wage for 26 weeks

Old law: ESI Act, Sections 46–50.

Conclusion: ESI gives money in sickness and maternity, but only one benefit at a time.

Example

Farhan has typhoid and cannot work for three weeks; ESI pays him sickness benefit. Farhan's wife Zoya, also an insured person, has a baby. She gets ESI maternity benefit, and cannot also ask Prince for maternity benefit.

Memory hook

Sick: about 70%. Baby: 100% for 26 weeks. One benefit at a time.

68. Dependants' Benefit and Disablement Benefit (CoSS Sections 32(1)(c)–(d), 37 and 41(1))

Exam importance: high

If a work injury disables an insured person, ESI pays a monthly benefit. If the injury kills him, ESI pays a monthly benefit to his dependants.

Key point

In brief: disablement benefit is pay for a work-injury disability; dependants' benefit is pay to the family after a work-injury death.

Model exam answer

  1. Disablement benefit (Section 32(1)(c)): periodical payments to an insured person disabled by an employment injury, certified as eligible by the authority named in the regulations. It can be temporary or permanent.
  2. Medical Board (Section 37): decides:
    • whether the disablement is permanent;
    • the extent of loss of earning capacity;
    • whether the assessment is provisional or final.
    Its decisions can be reviewed for fresh evidence or aggravation.
  3. Dependants' benefit (Section 32(1)(d)): periodical payments to the dependants (defined in Section 2(24)) of an insured person who dies of an employment injury.
  4. Rates (Section 32(3)): decided by rules. At present about 90% of the average daily wage for temporary and permanent total disablement, and the same rate as a pension for dependants†.
  5. No lump sum (Section 41(1)): disablement benefit cannot be commuted (exchanged) for a lump sum, except as the regulations allow.
  6. Bar on compensation (Section 41(7)(a)): a person eligible for these benefits cannot claim employee's compensation under Chapter VII.
Disablement benefitDependants' benefit
Section32(1)(c)32(1)(d)
EventInsured person disabled by an employment injury (temporary or permanent)Insured person dies of an employment injury
Paid toThe insured personThe dependants (Section 2(24))
Present rate†About 90% of the average daily wage (temporary and permanent total disablement)The same rate, as a pension

Old law: ESI Act, 1948, Sections 51 (disablement benefit), 52 (dependants' benefit) and 54–55A (medical boards and review) (the course outline lists Sections 51A, 55, 56 and 57).

Note

Updated: the transcript gave the course outline's Sections 51A, 55, 56 and 57 as the old law on disablement and dependants' benefit. The correct position is that disablement benefit is in Section 51 and dependants' benefit in Section 52, with medical boards in Sections 54–54A and review in Sections 55–55A; Section 51A is the presumption about accidents in the course of employment, and Sections 56–57 deal with medical benefit. Source: The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Indian Kanoon).

Conclusion: ESI gives a regular income for injury and death, and replaces the employer's compensation.

Example

A machine at Prince's factory permanently injures Farhan. The Medical Board assesses a 40% loss of earning capacity, and ESI pays Farhan a monthly disablement benefit. Had Farhan died, his widow and children would have got dependants' benefit.

Memory hook

Injured = Disablement benefit. Dead = Dependants' benefit. Both about 90%, and no double claim.

69. Medical Benefit and Funeral Benefit (CoSS Sections 32(1)(e)–(f), 32(2) and 40)

Exam importance: medium

ESI gives full medical care to the insured person, and it can also extend this care to the family. If the insured person dies, ESI gives a sum for the funeral.

Key point

In brief: medical benefit is free treatment; funeral benefit is money for the last rites.

Model exam answer

  1. Medical benefit (Section 32(1)(e)): medical treatment and attendance for insured persons. The State Government provides it (Section 40), or the Corporation provides it where notified.
  2. Family (Section 32(2)): the Corporation may extend medical benefit to the family of an insured person.
  3. Funeral expenses (Section 32(1)(f)):
    • paid to the eldest surviving member of the family of a dead insured person, or, if there is no family, to the person who actually incurs the funeral cost;
    • the amount is limited to a sum prescribed by the Central Government (₹15,000 at present†);
    • the claim must be made within three months of the death (an extension is allowed).
  4. Health promotion (Section 33): the Corporation may spend from the Fund on health, welfare and rehabilitation of disabled workers.
Medical benefitFuneral expenses
Section32(1)(e), 32(2), 4032(1)(f)
WhatMedical treatment and attendancePayment towards the funeral cost, up to the prescribed sum (₹15,000 at present†)
For whomInsured person; may be extended to the familyEldest surviving family member, or else the person who actually incurs the cost
Provided by / time limitState Government, or the Corporation where notifiedClaim within three months of death (extension allowed)

Old law: ESI Act, 1948, Section 46(1)(e) and Sections 56–59 (medical benefit) and Section 46(1)(f) (funeral expenses) (the course outline lists Sections 55–57).

Note

Updated: the transcript gave the course outline's Sections 55–57 as the old law on medical and funeral benefit. The correct position is that medical benefit is in Section 46(1)(e) and Sections 56–59, and funeral expenses are in Section 46(1)(f); Section 55 deals with review of decisions of a medical board or medical appeal tribunal. Source: The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Indian Kanoon).

Conclusion: health care and a dignified funeral are part of social security.

Example

Farhan's wife Zoya needs an operation, and the ESI hospital treats her free. If Farhan dies, ESI gives funeral money to his eldest surviving family member.

Memory hook

Medical = free treatment (family too). Funeral = eldest family member, claim in 3 months.

70. "Arising Out of" and "In the Course of" Employment (CoSS Sections 2(28) and 34–36)

Exam importance: high

ESI benefits for injury are paid only when there is an "employment injury", that is, an accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of employment. Both limbs (parts) of the phrase must be satisfied.

Key point

In brief: the injury must be caused by the job ("out of") and must happen during the job ("in the course of").

Model exam answer

Definition

Under Section 2(28), "employment injury" means a personal injury to an employee caused by accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of employment.

  1. Meaning of the phrase (case law):
    • "arising out of" needs a causal link between the job and the accident;
    • "in the course of" refers to time, place and circumstances.
  2. General rule: employment begins when the employee reaches the place of work and ends when he leaves it. Journeys to and from work are outside it, except in cases of notional extension (see Concept 47).
  3. Statutory help to the worker: see the table below.
  4. Same test under both laws: the test applies alike under the Code and the old ESI Act (as the course outline notes).
Statutory helpSection
An accident in the course of employment is presumed to arise out of it34(1)
An accident while taking steps in an emergency rescue at the premises34(2)
Commuting with a nexus to employment34(3)
Travelling as a passenger in a vehicle provided or arranged by the employer34(4)
Acting in breach of law or orders, for the employer's business35
Occupational disease listed in Part A, B or C of the Third Schedule36

Conclusion: the commuting rule, first added to the ESI Act as Section 51E in 2010 and now carried into the Code as Section 34(3), reverses the strict approach taken in Francis De Costa.

Note

Updated: the transcript presented the Code's commuting rule (Section 34(3)) as the reversal of Francis De Costa. The correct position is that the strict approach was first displaced by Section 51E of the ESI Act, inserted by the ESI (Amendment) Act, 2010 (Act 18 of 2010) with effect from 1 June 2010, which deems an accident while commuting to or from work to arise out of and in the course of employment where a nexus with the employment is established; Section 34(3) of the Code continues that rule. Source: Section 51E, The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Indian Kanoon).

Example

Farhan is hurt by a machine while working at Prince's factory: both "out of" and "in the course of" are satisfied. But if Farhan is hit by a truck on a public road one kilometre before the factory, it is not an employment injury under the strict case law, though the new Code may cover it if there is a nexus with his employment.

Memory hook

OUT of = Cause. IN the course of = Time, Place, Circumstances. Need BOTH.

Cases

Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. v. Bai Valu Raja

Case

Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. v. Bai Valu Raja (AIR 1958 SC 881): a salt company's works were near a creek opposite Porbandar. Workmen reached the works by crossing the creek in a boat. There was no arrangement between the company and the boatmen; the workmen paid ferry fees like any member of the public. In June 1952 a boat carrying workmen capsized in bad weather (it was overloaded), and some workmen drowned. Their dependants claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, and the Commissioner awarded it.

Held: the Supreme Court allowed the company's appeal and set aside the awards. The workmen were not in the course of employment while crossing the creek; they were using a public ferry like ordinary members of the public.

Principle: employment normally begins when the workman reaches the workplace. The employer's premises may be notionally extended to the places the workmen pass and repass, with reasonable extension in time and space, but not to a public route or public transport, unless the job itself requires it.

Conclusion: the workplace is stretched a little, but not to public places.

Example

Farhan goes to Prince's factory by a public ferry, and the ferry sinks. Prince is not liable, as Farhan was travelling like any other passenger.

General Manager, B.E.S.T. Undertaking, Bombay v. Mrs. Agnes

Case

General Manager, B.E.S.T. Undertaking, Bombay v. Mrs. Agnes (AIR 1964 SC 193; (1963) II LLJ 615): P. Nanu Raman was a bus driver of the Bombay bus undertaking (BEST). After finishing his shift at the depot at 7:45 p.m., he left his bus and boarded another BEST bus to go home. That bus collided with a stationary lorry and Raman died. His widow, Agnes, claimed compensation.

Held: by a majority (one judge dissenting), the Supreme Court held that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment, and the widow was entitled to compensation. BEST drivers in uniform could travel free in BEST buses as of right, because the efficiency of the service required it. Such travel was an implied part of the job, and for a city bus service the buses can be treated like the employer's premises.

Principle: where the employer's transport is used as a part of the service, and not as a mere favour, the journey may be within the notional extension of employment.

Conclusion: the employer's own transport can extend the workplace.

Example

Prince's bus company allows Farhan, a driver, to go home in the company's bus as part of his service terms. The bus crashes and Farhan dies. Farhan's widow can claim compensation.

Regional Director, ESIC v. L. Ranga Rao

Case

Regional Director, ESIC v. L. Ranga Rao ((1982) 1 LLJ 29 (Kar); 1981 (2) Kar LJ 197): on 10 August 1978, at about 9:45 p.m., an employee was run over by an unidentified vehicle on a national highway about 2 km from his factory. He was on his way to join duty at 10 p.m. The Employees' Insurance Court held the death to be in the course of employment and gave benefits to his dependants. The Corporation appealed.

Held: as described in the later Supreme Court judgment in Francis De Costa, the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court took a liberal view. It said:

  • it was immaterial whether the employee went by public transport or on a public road;
  • he must have the choice of route and mode that suits him;
  • greater latitude should be given to employees in growing towns.

The dependants were held entitled†.

Principle: a worker going to duty by a reasonable route and at a reasonable time may be treated as in the course of employment. (The Supreme Court's final decision in De Costa is stricter.)

Conclusion: a more generous view of commuting, which later law (Section 34(3)) has partly accepted.

Example

Farhan walks along the highway to reach Prince's factory before his shift and is hit by a vehicle. On this liberal view, his family could claim.

Regional Director, ESI Corporation v. Francis De Costa

Case

Regional Director, ESI Corporation v. Francis De Costa (course outline citation: 1994 SCC (L&S) 195; final decision: (1996) 6 SCC 1): Francis De Costa worked at J & P Coats (P) Ltd., Koratty. On 26 June 1971 at 4:15 p.m., he was cycling to work (his shift began at 4:30 p.m.) when a lorry belonging to his employer hit him on a public road about 1 km from the factory. He was left totally and permanently unfit for factory work. He claimed disablement benefit under the ESI Act, saying it was an "employment injury".

Held: two judges of the Supreme Court disagreed in 1992, so a larger bench decided the matter in 1996. It held that the injury was not an employment injury, because the accident did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Employment does not begin until the worker reaches the place of employment, and it ends when he leaves it. The notional extension applies only in special cases, for example when the worker is on the employer's premises, is doing something connected with the work, or is in employer-provided transport on the terms of the statute.

Principle: both limbs must be proved. An accident on a public road while going to work is outside employment, unless notional extension applies.

Conclusion: the Court drew a strict line at the factory gate; Section 51E of the ESI Act (2010) softened it, and the Code (Section 34(3)) carries that forward.

Note

Updated: the transcript said the Code has now softened the rule in Francis De Costa. The correct position is that the softening came first through Section 51E of the ESI Act, inserted with effect from 1 June 2010 by Act 18 of 2010 (commuting accidents deemed employment injuries where a nexus is established); Section 34(3) of the Code continues it. Source: Section 51E, The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (Indian Kanoon).

Example

Farhan cycles to Prince's factory and is hit by a lorry one kilometre away. Under this case, he gets no employment-injury benefit. Under the new Code (Section 34(3)) he may, if a nexus with his employment is shown.

Regional Director, ESI Corporation v. Batulbibi ⚠

Case

Regional Director, ESI Corporation v. Batulbibi ((1988) II LLJ 29 (Guj)).

Facts: not verified. The only details traced are that it is a Gujarat High Court decision of 29 June 1987 ((1987) 2 GLR 1099), in an appeal by the ESIC Regional Director, Ahmedabad, against an order of the Employees' Insurance Court, Ahmedabad (21 March 1980).

Held: not verified. The facts and the decision should be checked against class notes.

Principle (from the Code, not from the case): the course outline lists this case under "arising out of and in the course of employment", so the answer should apply the two-limb test, the presumption in Section 34(1), and the general rule with notional extension.

Conclusion: whatever the facts, an answer on this case should set out the two-limb test.

Example

The family of Farhan, who died after an event at the workplace, claims dependants' benefit. The court first asks: did the injury arise out of, and in the course of, his employment?

The commuting cases compared

CaseJourneyResultReason
Saurashtra Salt (SC, 1958)Public ferry across a creek to the worksNot in the course of employmentWorkmen used public transport like ordinary members of the public; notional extension does not reach public routes
B.E.S.T. v. Agnes (SC, majority)Driver going home in another BEST bus after his shiftArose out of and in the course of employmentFree travel as of right was an implied part of the job; buses treated like the employer's premises
L. Ranga Rao (Karnataka High Court)On the way to join duty; run over on a national highway about 2 km from the factoryDependants entitled†Liberal view: choice of route and mode; greater latitude in growing towns
Francis De Costa (SC, larger bench, 1996)Cycling to work on a public road, 1 km from the factoryNot an employment injuryEmployment begins only on reaching the place of employment; both limbs must be proved
Key point

Under the case law, the line is drawn at the factory gate (Francis De Costa), with notional extension only in special cases such as the employer's own transport used as part of the service (B.E.S.T. v. Agnes). Under the Code, Section 34(3) now covers commuting where a nexus with employment is shown.

71. Presumptions (CoSS Sections 34(1) and 36(1); ESI Act Section 51A)

Exam importance: high

A presumption (an assumption the law allows) helps the worker. Once he shows that the accident happened in the course of employment, the law assumes that it also arose out of employment, unless the other side proves otherwise.

Key point

In brief: under a presumption, the court starts by assuming that the accident is work-related.

Model exam answer

  1. Accident (Section 34(1)): for Chapter IV, an accident arising in the course of an employee's employment is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to have arisen out of that employment.
  2. Occupational disease (Section 36(1)): if an employee in an employment listed in the Third Schedule contracts the disease listed against it, the disease is deemed an employment injury, unless the contrary is proved. The service needed depends on the Part of the Schedule (see the table below).
  3. Effect: the burden of proof shifts to the Corporation or the employer.
  4. Limits:
    • under Section 36(3), the presumption in Section 34(1) does not apply to occupational diseases;
    • save as provided, no benefit is payable for a disease unless it is directly attributable to a specific injury by accident (Section 36(2)).
  5. Related presumptions: an emergency rescue (Section 34(2)), commuting with a nexus (Section 34(3)), and travel in the employer's vehicle (Section 34(4)).
Third ScheduleService needed for the deeming rule
Part ANo period of service needed
Part BSix months' continuous service
Part CA period fixed by regulations

Old law: ESI Act, Section 51A (presumption as to an accident arising in the course of employment).

Conclusion: the presumption makes proof easier for the worker.

Example

Farhan collapses after a fall at Prince's factory during working hours. Prince says it was not work-related. Because it happened in the course of employment, the law presumes that it arose out of employment, and Prince or ESIC must prove otherwise.

Memory hook

IN the course of → presumed OUT of. Burden on the other side.

72. Bar on Receipt of Benefits (CoSS Section 41(4) and (7); ESI Act Section 53)

Exam importance: high

An insured worker cannot collect twice for the same injury. If he is entitled to ESI benefits, he cannot also claim employee's compensation from the employer, and an insured woman cannot also claim maternity benefit from the employer.

Key point

In brief: a bar is a legal block on claiming the same benefit twice.

Model exam answer

  1. Compensation (Section 41(7)(a)): a person eligible for dependants' benefit or disablement benefit under the ESI Chapter shall not be entitled to claim employee's compensation from the employer under Chapter VII.
  2. Maternity (Section 41(7)(b)): a woman eligible for maternity benefit under the ESI Chapter cannot claim maternity benefit from her employer under Chapter VI.
  3. Same period (Section 41(4)): no sickness plus maternity benefit, sickness plus temporary disablement benefit, or maternity plus temporary disablement benefit together.
  4. Wrongful benefit (Section 41(8)): a person who received a benefit to which he was not entitled must repay it.
  5. Old law: ESI Act, Section 53 barred a claim for compensation or damages under the Workmen's Compensation Act or any other law for an employment injury.
  6. Case: A. Trehan v. Associated Electrical Agencies (below).
BarSectionEffect
On employee's compensation41(7)(a)A person eligible for dependants' or disablement benefit cannot claim compensation under Chapter VII
On employer's maternity benefit41(7)(b)A woman eligible for ESI maternity benefit cannot claim it from her employer under Chapter VI
On overlapping benefits41(4)No two of sickness, maternity and temporary disablement benefit for the same period
On wrongful benefit41(8)A benefit received without entitlement must be repaid
Old lawESI Act, 53No compensation or damages under the Workmen's Compensation Act or any other law for an employment injury
Common error in course outlines, corrected

The course outline gives this bar as "Section 77 of the Code". In the enacted Code the bar is in Section 41. Under the old law it was Section 53 of the ESI Act.

Conclusion: one injury, one system. ESI replaces the employer's liability for covered workers.

Example

Farhan is an ESI-insured worker injured at Prince's factory. ESI pays him disablement benefit. He cannot also sue Prince or claim compensation under Chapter VII.

Memory hook

ESI covered = ESI only. No double dipping.

Case

Case

A. Trehan v. Associated Electrical Agencies ((1996) 4 SCC 255): Trehan was employed to repair television sets. On 17 July 1987, a component of a set burst while he was repairing it, and he lost the sight of his left eye. He was an insured person under the ESI Act. He claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Held: the Supreme Court held that an employee who is an insured person covered by the ESI Act cannot claim compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. His right is barred by Section 53 of the ESI Act; his remedy is the benefit under the ESI Act (Section 46).

Principle: for an employment injury to an ESI-insured worker, ESI benefits are the remedy, and a compensation claim is barred.

Conclusion: ESI-covered workers are protected by ESI, not by the older compensation law.

Example

Farhan, an ESI-insured worker, loses an eye in Prince's shop. He must claim from ESI, not from Prince under the compensation law.

73. Employees' Insurance Courts (CoSS Sections 48–52)

Exam importance: high

Disputes about ESI are not decided by the ordinary civil courts. They are decided by special Employees' Insurance Courts (EI Courts).

Key point

In brief: the EI Court is the special court for ESI disputes.

Model exam answer

  1. Constitution (Section 48): the State Government constitutes an Employees' Insurance Court for a local area. A person who is or was a judicial officer, or a legal practitioner of five years' standing, can be its Judge.
  2. Matters decided (Section 49(1)):
    • whether a person is an employee, or is liable to pay contribution;
    • the rate of wages or of contribution;
    • who is the employer;
    • the right to any benefit, and its amount and duration;
    • disputes between the employer and the Corporation, or between the employer and a contractor;
    • recovery of contributions, or of benefits wrongly received;
    • similar claims.
  3. Deposit (Section 49(2)): an employer cannot raise a dispute about dues unless he deposits 50% of the amount the Corporation claims. The Court may waive or reduce the deposit, giving reasons.
  4. Bar on civil courts (Section 49(3)): civil courts have no jurisdiction over these matters.
  5. Powers (Section 50): the EI Court has the powers of a civil court to summon witnesses, take evidence and order production of documents. Its orders are enforced as a decree.
  6. Limitation (Section 51): three years from the date on which the cause of action arises.
  7. Appeal (Section 52): to the High Court, only on a substantial question of law, within 60 days. Sections 5 and 12 of the Limitation Act apply.

Old law: ESI Act, 1948 (the Employees' Insurance Court and the appeal to the High Court).

Conclusion: a special forum gives quick, expert justice on ESI matters.

Example

ESIC claims ₹2 lakh of unpaid contributions from Prince, and Prince disputes the claim. He must first deposit ₹1 lakh (50%) with the EI Court. Farhan, if he is refused a benefit, can also approach the same Court within three years.

Memory hook

EI Court: 5-year lawyer or judge · 50% deposit · 3 years to file · 60 days to the High Court.

Part B: Gratuity (CoSS Chapter V, Sections 53–58)

Key point

Gratuity is a "thank-you" payment made to an employee for long service.

74. Gratuity: Applicability and When Payable (CoSS Section 53(1), First Schedule)

Exam importance: high

Gratuity is a lump sum that the employer pays when a long-serving employee leaves the job. The Code says where it applies and when it becomes payable.

Key point

In brief: gratuity is a lump-sum reward for five years or more of service, paid when the job ends.

Model exam answer

  1. Establishments covered (First Schedule):
    • every factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port and railway company;
    • every shop or establishment with ten or more employees on any day of the preceding twelve months;
    • others that the Government notifies.
  2. When payable (Section 53(1)): on termination of employment after continuous service of at least five years:
    • (a) on superannuation (reaching the retirement age);
    • (b) on retirement or resignation;
    • (c) on death or disablement due to accident or disease;
    • (d) on the end of a fixed-term contract;
    • (e) on events notified by the Centre.
  3. Exceptions to the five-year rule: five years' service is not needed on death, disablement, expiry of fixed-term employment or notified events. For working journalists, the period is three years.
  4. On death: gratuity is paid to the nominee, or to the heirs if there is no nomination. A minor's share is deposited and invested until the minor attains majority.
  5. Better terms (Section 53(5)): better terms of gratuity under a contract or an award are not affected.
  6. Not covered: Government employees governed by their own gratuity rules (Explanation 1).
Event ending the employment, or class of employeeMinimum continuous service needed
SuperannuationFive years
Retirement or resignationFive years
Death or disablement due to accident or diseaseNot needed
End of a fixed-term contractNot needed
Event notified by the CentreNot needed
Working journalistThree years

Old law: PoG Act, 1972 (the five-year rule; fixed-term employees were not clearly covered).

Conclusion: gratuity is a right earned after long service, and the Code adds fixed-term employees.

Example

Farhan worked six years in Prince's factory and resigns. He is entitled to gratuity. If he had worked only three years, he would not be entitled, unless he had died or been disabled, or his fixed term had ended.

Memory hook

Gratuity = 5 years (3 for journalists). Exceptions: Death, Disablement, Fixed-term end.

75. Continuous Service and "Completion of One Year of Service" (CoSS Sections 2(17) and 54)

Exam importance: high

The five-year rule counts continuous service. The Code provides that some breaks, such as sickness, leave, lay-off or strike, do not break the service.

Key point

In brief: continuous service is uninterrupted service; small, blameless breaks are ignored.

Model exam answer

  1. Completed year of service (Section 2(17)): continuous service for twelve months.
  2. Continuous service (Section 54(A)): uninterrupted service, including service interrupted by:
    • sickness, accident or leave;
    • absence without leave, unless it is treated as a break in service under the standing orders;
    • lay-off, strike or lock-out;
    • cessation of work not due to the employee's fault.
  3. Deemed continuous service (Section 54(B) and (C)): service is deemed continuous if the employee actually worked at least the days shown below.
    Deemed continuous forDays actually worked (ordinary case)Days actually worked (below ground in a mine, or an establishment working fewer than six days a week)
    One year (Section 54(B)(a)), counting the preceding 12 monthsAt least 240 daysAt least 190 days
    Six months (Section 54(B)(b))At least 120 daysAt least 95 days
    Seasonal establishment (Section 54(C))At least 75% of the days on which the establishment operatedNo separate figure
  4. Days counted as days worked:
    • days of lay-off;
    • paid leave earned in the previous year;
    • absence due to temporary disablement caused by accident;
    • maternity leave up to 26 weeks.
  5. Nomination (Section 55): every employee who has completed one year of service must make a nomination.

Old law: PoG Act, Section 2A (240 and 190 days).

Conclusion: blameless breaks do not cancel the service.

Example

Farhan was sick for a month and on strike for a week, but Prince never ended his service. His service is treated as continuous for gratuity.

Memory hook

240 days = 1 year (190 for mines or a five-day week). 120 days = 6 months.

76. Calculation of Gratuity: Formula and Ceiling (CoSS Section 53(2)–(4))

Exam importance: high

Gratuity is worked out by a fixed formula from the last drawn wages and the years of service, and it has a top limit.

Key point

In brief: gratuity = last monthly wages ÷ 26 × 15 × years of service.

Model exam answer

  1. Rate (Section 53(2)): 15 days' wages for every completed year of service, or part of a year in excess of six months, based on the last drawn wages.
  2. How the wages are taken for different employees:
    EmployeeRule
    Monthly-rated employee (Explanation 3)15 days' wages = monthly wages ÷ 26 × 15
    Piece-rated employeeDaily wages = average of the last three months' wages, without overtime
    Employee in a seasonal establishmentSeven days' wages for each season
    Fixed-term employee, or employee who has diedPaid pro rata (in proportion to the service)
    Disabled employee (Section 53(4))If he worked on reduced wages after the disablement, the wages before the disablement are used for the earlier period
  3. Ceiling (Section 53(3)): the amount cannot exceed the amount notified by the Centre (₹20 lakh under the old Act since 2018; earlier ₹10 lakh†).
Key point

Formula: Gratuity = (Last monthly wages ÷ 26) × 15 × Number of years. A part year of more than six months counts as one more year.

Old law: PoG Act, Section 4 (the ceiling was revised many times).

Conclusion: a clear formula gives certainty.

Example

Farhan's last wages are ₹26,000 and he served 8 years 7 months. Since the part year is above six months, his service is counted as 9 years. Prince pays: 26,000 ÷ 26 × 15 × 9 = 1,000 × 15 × 9 = ₹1,35,000.

Memory hook

÷ 26, × 15, × years. Over 6 months = 1 more year.

77. Forfeiture of Gratuity (CoSS Section 53(6))

Exam importance: high

Forfeiture means losing something as a punishment. An employee loses all or part of his gratuity if he is dismissed for serious wrongdoing.

Key point

In brief: forfeiture means no gratuity, or less gratuity, for serious misconduct.

Model exam answer

Ground on which service is terminatedProvisionExtent of forfeiture
An act, wilful omission or negligence causing damage, loss or destruction of the employer's propertySection 53(6)(a)To the extent of the damage or loss
Riotous or disorderly conduct, or violenceSection 53(6)(b)(i)Wholly or partly
An act that is an offence involving moral turpitude (a serious wrong), committed in the course of employmentSection 53(6)(b)(ii)Wholly or partly
  • Limit: gratuity can be forfeited only for the listed causes, and the termination must be for those causes.

Old law: PoG Act, Section 4(6).

Conclusion: serious misconduct costs the employee gratuity, but only to the extent the law allows.

Example

Prince dismisses Farhan for damaging machines worth ₹50,000. Prince may forfeit ₹50,000 of Farhan's gratuity. If Farhan had been dismissed for violence, Prince could forfeit all or part of it.

Memory hook

Damage = forfeit the loss. Violence or moral turpitude = all or part.

78. Compulsory Insurance and Determination of the Amount (CoSS Sections 55–57)

Exam importance: medium

Employers must be able to pay gratuity when it falls due, so the Code makes them insure their gratuity liability. It also lays down a simple process to fix and pay the amount.

Key point

In brief: insurance means the employer must keep money ready; determination means the employer works out the amount and pays it within 30 days.

Model exam answer

Compulsory insurance

  1. Duty to insure (Section 57): from a notified date, every employer (except the Government) must insure his gratuity liability with an IRDAI-regulated insurer, or, with exemption, run an approved gratuity fund.
  2. An employer with 500 or more persons can be exempted if he sets up an approved fund.
  3. The employer must be registered with the competent authority.
  4. Failure (Section 57(5)): if he fails to pay the premium or the contributions to the fund, he must pay the gratuity himself, with interest, at once.

Determination and payment

  1. Determination (Section 56): the employee (or a person authorised by him) applies. Even without an application, the employer determines the amount and gives notice to the person entitled and to the competent authority.
  2. Payment: within 30 days. Delay carries simple interest, except where the delay was the employee's fault.
  3. Dispute (Section 56(5)): the employer deposits the admitted amount, and the competent authority decides the dispute, with the powers of a civil court.
  4. Appeal (Section 56(8)): within 60 days, which can be extended by another 60 days. An employer who appeals must deposit the amount required.

Offence

  • Section 133(g): failing to pay gratuity is punishable with imprisonment up to one year, or fine up to ₹50,000, or both.

Old law: PoG Act, Sections 4A and 7.

Conclusion: insurance and a time limit make gratuity dependable.

Example

Prince's company is bound to insure its gratuity liability. When Farhan retires, Prince works out the amount, informs the competent authority and pays within 30 days. If Prince delays, he pays interest.

Memory hook

Insure → Determine → Pay in 30 days → Appeal in 60 days.

Part C: Provident Fund (CoSS Chapter III, Sections 14–23)

Concepts 79 to 82 cover the Provident Fund chapter of the CoSS: coverage, the schemes, contributions, pension, insurance and transfer of accounts.

79. Provident Fund: Applicability and Schemes (CoSS Sections 1(4)–(5), 15, 20–21, First Schedule)

Exam importance: high

The Provident Fund is a savings scheme for retirement. The employee and the employer both pay a share of the wages into it every month. The Code sets up three schemes.

Key point

In brief: the Provident Fund is compulsory retirement savings, paid for by both the worker and the employer.

Model exam answer

  1. Applicability (First Schedule): every establishment in which twenty or more employees are employed. If the employer and the majority of the employees agree, the Provident Fund Commissioner can extend it to other establishments (Section 1(5)).
  2. Schemes (Section 15(1)): the Centre may frame:
    • (a) the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme;
    • (b) the Employees' Pension Scheme;
    • (c) the Employees' Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme (EDLI);
    • (d) other schemes for self-employed workers or any class of persons.
  3. Not applicable (Section 20): for example, to co-operative societies with fewer than 50 persons working without power; to Government establishments having their own PF or pension; and to employees already getting PF under another law. The Government may exempt classes of establishments.
  4. Own accounts (Section 21): an establishment with 100 or more persons may, with the Centre's authority, maintain its own PF accounts.
  5. Recognised fund and priority (Sections 18–19): the PF is a recognised fund for income tax, and PF dues are a first charge on the assets.
  6. Appeal (Section 23): lies to the Tribunal against assessment and damages, with a deposit by the employer.

Old law: EPF Act, 1952 and its schemes (EPS, 1995 and EDLIS, 1976).

Conclusion: the Code keeps the three schemes and allows new ones for unorganised workers.

Example

Prince's company has 25 employees. The PF chapter applies, and Farhan becomes a member of the Provident Fund, the Pension Scheme and the insurance scheme.

Memory hook

PF = 20+ persons. Three schemes: EPF + EPS + EDLI (+ others).

80. "Employee" under the PF Chapter and EPF Contributions (CoSS Sections 2(26), 16(1)(a) and 17)

Exam importance: high

The PF chapter uses the general meaning of "employee", with a special rule about the wage ceiling. The contribution is a fixed percentage of wages, paid equally by both sides.

Key point

In brief: the contribution is 10% (or 12%) of wages from the employer, and the same from the employee.

Model exam answer

  1. Employee (Section 2(26)): for Chapter III, "employee" means a person drawing wages up to the wage ceiling, except in the case of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, where the ceiling does not limit membership (first proviso). Employees above the ceiling are still counted in deciding whether the establishment is covered (second proviso).
  2. Contributions:
    HeadProvisionWho paysRate
    Provident FundSection 16(1)(a)Employer10% of wages; 12% for notified classes
    Provident FundSection 16(1)(a)EmployeeAn equal amount. The employee may pay more, but the employer need not.
    Pension FundSection 16(1)(b)Out of the employer's contributionUp to 8⅓% of wages
    Insurance Fund (EDLI)Section 16(1)(c)EmployerUp to 1% of wages, plus administrative charges
  3. Contractors (Section 17): the employer can recover the PF contribution from the contractor. The contractor may recover the employee's share from the employee's wages, but not the employer's share.
  4. Wages here follow the CoSS definition (see Concept 41).

Old law: EPF Act, Section 6 (contributions).

Conclusion: both sides share equally; the employer's share also pays for pension and insurance.

Example

Farhan earns ₹15,000. Prince's company deposits 12% = ₹1,800 and deducts 12% = ₹1,800 from Farhan's wages. The employee's ₹1,800 goes to PF. The company's ₹1,800 is split: ₹1,250 (8⅓%) goes to pension and the rest (₹550) to PF.

Memory hook

12 + 12 (10 + 10 basic). Pension = 8⅓%, out of the employer's share. EDLI ≤ 1%.

Leading cases on higher pension

Case

R.C. Gupta v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (2016), Supreme Court, decided 4 October 2016.

Facts: the employees had salaries above the pension ceiling under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. Under the proviso to para 11(3) of the Scheme, they wished to contribute 8.33% of their actual salary to the Pension Fund and get pension on that higher salary. The authorities said the option was barred by cut-off dates. A Single Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed their claim, but the Division Bench reversed him.

Held: the Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's order. The dates mentioned in the Scheme (the start of the Scheme, or the date on which the salary crossed the ceiling) are only reference dates for working out the pensionable salary. They are not cut-off dates that decide who may exercise the option.

Principle: employees may opt to contribute on their actual higher wages and get pension on them; there is no cut-off date for the option.

Conclusion: a fair reading favours the worker who wants a better pension.

Example

Farhan earns above the pension ceiling and asks to pay pension contributions on his full salary. Under R.C. Gupta, the option cannot be refused merely because of a "cut-off" date.

Case

Employees' Provident Fund Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B. (2022), Supreme Court, decided 4 November 2022.

Facts: in 2014 the pension scheme was amended. The pensionable salary was capped at ₹15,000 (earlier ₹6,500); the pension was to be calculated on the average of the last 60 months (earlier 12 months); and employees who wanted pension on a higher salary had to pay an extra contribution of 1.16% of the salary above ₹15,000. Several High Courts struck down these changes, and the EPFO appealed.

Held: the Supreme Court upheld the 2014 amendment (the ₹15,000 ceiling and the 60-month average) as a reasonable classification under Article 14. But it held the extra contribution requirement invalid, as beyond the EPF Act. It agreed with R.C. Gupta that there is no rigid cut-off date, and it allowed a fresh window for exercising the option†.

Principle: the pension ceiling and the averaging are valid; forcing employees to pay an extra contribution beyond the Act is not.

Conclusion: the Court balanced the scheme's finances with the worker's rights.

Change made by the 2014 amendmentEarlier positionDecision in Sunil Kumar B.
Pensionable salary capped at ₹15,000₹6,500Upheld
Pension on the average of the last 60 monthsAverage of 12 monthsUpheld
Extra contribution of 1.16% of salary above ₹15,000 for pension on a higher salaryNew requirementInvalid (beyond the EPF Act)
Example

Prince's company tells Farhan that he must pay an extra 1.16% to get pension on his higher salary. Under Sunil Kumar B., that demand is not valid, though the ₹15,000 ceiling itself is valid.

81. Pension Scheme and EDLI (CoSS Sections 15(1)(b)–(c) and 16(1)(b)–(c))

Exam importance: high

The Pension Scheme gives a monthly income after retirement, and to the family after death. EDLI is a life-insurance cover linked to the PF deposit.

Key point

In brief: pension is a monthly income after work; EDLI is life cover for the family if the worker dies.

Model exam answer

  1. Employees' Pension Scheme (Section 15(1)(b)) provides:
    • superannuation pension, retiring pension and permanent total disablement pension;
    • widow or widower's pension, children pension and orphan pension;
    • nominee pension.
  2. Pension Fund (Section 16(1)(b)): the money comes from the employer's contribution (up to 8⅓% of wages) and other sums. The Fund is held and run by the Central Board.
  3. EDLI (Section 15(1)(c)): a life insurance benefit to the family of an employee who dies.
  4. Insurance Fund (Section 16(1)(c)): the employer pays up to 1% of wages, plus up to one-fourth extra for administration.
  5. Continuity: the existing EPS, 1995 and EDLIS, 1976 continue for a period under the repeal clause (Section 164(2)(b)).
PointPension SchemeEDLI
Provision for the schemeSection 15(1)(b)Section 15(1)(c)
FundPension Fund (Section 16(1)(b))Insurance Fund (Section 16(1)(c))
Employer's paymentUp to 8⅓% of wages, out of the employer's contributionUp to 1% of wages, plus up to one-fourth extra for administration
BenefitMonthly pension after retirement; pensions to the family after deathLife insurance amount to the family of an employee who dies
Old schemeEPS, 1995EDLIS, 1976

Old law: EPS, 1995 and EDLIS, 1976 under the EPF Act.

Conclusion: pension and insurance give security after retirement and after death.

Example

Farhan retires from Prince's factory and gets a monthly pension. If Farhan had died while in service, his widow would get a widow's pension and a lump sum from EDLI.

Memory hook

Pension = 8⅓% share; EDLI = up to 1%. P for Pension = Post-retirement; E for EDLI = Emergency (death).

82. Transfer of Accounts and Social Security for the Unorganised Sector through PF (CoSS Sections 15(1)(d) and 22)

Exam importance: medium

When a worker changes jobs, his PF money should follow him. The PF system can also be used to run schemes for people who are not in regular jobs.

Key point

In brief: on transfer of account, the PF money moves with the worker; the PF machinery can also serve unorganised workers.

Model exam answer

  1. Transfer (Section 22): where an employee of a covered establishment leaves and joins any other establishment (covered or not), or an employee of an uncovered establishment joins a covered one, his accumulated PF and pension amounts are transferred as provided in the PF or Pension Scheme.
  2. Other schemes (Section 15(1)(d)): the Centre may frame other schemes to give social security benefits to self-employed workers or any other class of persons through the same machinery.
  3. Modification (Section 15(1)(e)): the schemes can be changed, prospectively or retrospectively.

Old law: EPF Act (transfer rules in the Scheme); EPS, 1995 and EDLIS, 1976.

Conclusion: portability of PF protects the worker who moves.

Example

Farhan leaves Prince's company and joins another firm. His PF account moves with him, so he does not lose his savings.

Memory hook

PF follows the worker (portable).

Part D: Other Welfare

Concepts 83 and 84 cover the welfare of building and construction workers, and of beedi, cigar and cine workers.

83. Building and Other Construction Workers: Benefits, Cess and Welfare Fund (CoSS Sections 100–108)

Exam importance: high

Construction workers move from site to site and have no steady employer. So the law charges a cess (a special tax) on the cost of construction and uses it for their welfare.

Key point

In brief: under the Building and Other Construction Workers (BOCW) provisions, a small cess on building cost pays for construction workers' welfare.

Model exam answer

The cess

  1. Levy (Section 100): a cess of not more than 2% and not less than 1% of the cost of construction (excluding the cost of land and compensation under Chapter VII) is collected from every employer doing building or other construction work.
  2. Collection: in advance through the local authority, or by deduction at source for Government or public-sector work.
  3. Interest and self-assessment (Sections 101 and 103): interest is payable on delay. The employer pays the cess and files a return within 60 days of completion.
  4. Penalty (Section 104): for non-payment, up to the amount of the cess. Appeal: Section 105.
  5. Exemption (Section 102): where the State already levies a similar cess.

Beneficiaries

  1. Registration (Sections 106–107): every building worker aged 18 to 60 who has worked for at least 90 days in the preceding 12 months is registered as a beneficiary.
  2. Ceasing to be a beneficiary: at the age of 60, or if he works fewer than 90 days in a year. Absence due to a work injury is ignored.
  3. A worker who was a beneficiary for at least three years before reaching 60 still gets the prescribed benefits.

Welfare Fund and benefits

  1. Welfare Fund (Section 108): each State Building Workers' Welfare Board keeps the Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Fund (made up of the cess, grants and loans). Administrative expenses are limited to 5%.
  2. Benefits: such as accident, medical, maternity, education and pension schemes made under the Code†.

Old law: the BOCW Welfare Cess Act, 1996 and the welfare parts of the BOCW Act, 1996 (the safety and regulation parts are now in the OSH Code).

Conclusion: the cess turns construction spending into a safety net for construction workers.

Example

Prince builds a house costing ₹1 crore (excluding land). At a cess of 1%, Prince pays ₹1 lakh. Farhan, a mason registered as a beneficiary, receives welfare benefits from this Fund.

Memory hook

Cess 1–2% of cost. Workers 18–60, 90 days. Admin ≤ 5%.

84. Beedi and Cigar Workers, Cine Workers and Centrally Administered Welfare Funds

Exam importance: low

Some groups of workers, such as beedi rollers and film workers, had their own special laws and welfare funds. The Codes merge these laws.

Key point

In brief: the old special laws for beedi and cine workers are now inside the Codes.

Model exam answer

WorkersOld lawPosition under the Codes
Beedi and cigar workersBeedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966Repealed and merged into the OSH Code (Chapter XI, Part V). Premises for beedi or cigar work need a licence (Section 74), and the State may permit work at home (Section 76).
Cine workers (welfare fund)Cine-Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1981Repealed by CoSS Section 164.
Cine workers (conditions of work)Cine-Workers and Cinema Theatre Workers Act, 1981Merged into the OSH Code. Audio-visual workers need a written, registered agreement, and the producer is also liable (Section 66)†.
  • Centrally administered welfare schemes: the Labour Ministry, through its Labour Welfare Organisation, runs welfare schemes for beedi, cine, limestone and dolomite, iron ore–manganese ore–chrome ore, and mica mine workers. These were earlier financed through separate welfare cesses and funds; the cesses have been abolished and the schemes are now funded from the Consolidated Fund of India. The Codes place cine workers under the Code's schemes.
  • Aim: medical, education, housing and other welfare help through these schemes.
Note

Updated: the transcript said the Labour Ministry runs welfare funds for these workers. The correct position is that the separate welfare cesses and funds have been abolished; the Ministry, through its Labour Welfare Organisation, continues the welfare schemes for beedi, cine and non-coal mine workers with funding from the Consolidated Fund of India. Source: PIB, Ministry of Labour & Employment, “Social Security Schemes” (23 July 2018).

Old law: the Beedi and Cigar Workers Act, 1966 and the Cine Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1981.

Conclusion: merging the laws simplifies the rules, and the welfare idea continues.

Example

Farhan rolls beedis at home for Prince's beedi factory. The factory premises must be licensed under the OSH Code, and Farhan can benefit from the welfare schemes.

Memory hook

Beedi → OSH Code (licence). Cine fund Act → repealed into CoSS.

Module V: Maternity and Women's Benefits (Code on Social Security, 2020)

Key point

Maternity is the period around pregnancy and childbirth. Delivery is the birth of a child.

CoSS Chapter VI (Sections 59–72) replaces the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (MBA), as amended in 2017.

85. Applicability of Maternity Benefit (CoSS First Schedule, Chapter VI)

Exam importance: medium

Maternity benefit is a woman's right to leave and pay around childbirth. The Code says which workplaces must give it.

Key point

In brief: applicability means which workplaces must give maternity benefit.

Model exam answer

  1. Factories, mines and plantations, including those of the Government.
  2. Shops and establishments in which ten or more employees are or were employed on any day of the preceding 12 months.
  3. Other establishments notified by the appropriate Government.
  4. Eligibility (Section 60(2)): the woman must have actually worked for at least 80 days in the 12 months before her expected delivery. Days of lay-off and paid holidays are counted.
  5. Link with ESI (Sections 61 and 41(7)(b)): if ESI covers her, she gets the ESI maternity benefit and cannot also claim maternity benefit from the employer.

Old law: MBA, 1961 (also 80 days, and 10 or more persons in shops).

Conclusion: all large workplaces must give maternity benefit to women who have worked 80 days.

Example

Prince has a shop with 15 employees. Neha, a saleswoman there, worked 100 days in the last year. She is eligible for maternity benefit.

Memory hook

10+ persons (or a factory, mine or plantation) and 80 days.

86. Prohibition of Employment Before and After Delivery (CoSS Section 59)

Exam importance: high

A woman needs rest after childbirth. So the law forbids work for six weeks afterwards, and protects a pregnant woman from heavy work.

Key point

In brief: no work for six weeks after delivery, and no heavy work during pregnancy if she asks.

Model exam answer

  1. Bar on the employer (Section 59(1)): the employer shall not knowingly employ a woman during the six weeks immediately following her delivery, miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy.
  2. Bar on the woman (Section 59(2)): she shall not work in any establishment during that period.
  3. Arduous work (Section 59(3)): on her request, a pregnant woman shall not be made to do:
    • arduous work;
    • work involving long hours of standing;
    • work likely to interfere with her pregnancy or to cause a miscarriage.
  4. Period of this protection (Section 59(4)): the one month before the six weeks preceding the expected delivery, and any part of those six weeks for which she does not take leave.
  5. No wage cut (Section 69): her wages cannot be reduced because she is given such lighter work.
PeriodRule
One month before the six weeks preceding the expected deliveryNo arduous work, long standing or risky work, if she asks (Section 59(3)–(4))
The six weeks preceding the expected delivery, for any part in which she does not take leaveNo arduous work, long standing or risky work, if she asks (Section 59(3)–(4))
Six weeks immediately after delivery, miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancyThe employer shall not knowingly employ her, and she shall not work in any establishment (Section 59(1)–(2))

Old law: MBA, Section 4.

Conclusion: the law protects the health of mother and child.

Example

Neha delivers a baby on 1 March. Prince cannot let her work until mid-April. In her ninth month, she can ask not to be made to lift heavy loads.

Memory hook

6 weeks after = no work. Before = no heavy work if she asks.

87. Maternity Entitlements: Duration and Maternity Pay (CoSS Section 60)

Exam importance: high

Under the Code on Social Security, 2020 (CoSS), a woman gets paid leave for a set number of weeks around delivery. The pay is her average daily wage.

Key point

In brief: maternity leave is 26 weeks with full average pay (12 weeks if she already has two or more surviving children).

Model exam answer

  1. Right (Section 60(1)): every woman is entitled to maternity benefit at the rate of the average daily wage for the period of her actual absence, before and after delivery.
  2. Duration (Section 60(3)): a maximum of 26 weeks, of which not more than 8 weeks may be before the expected delivery.
  3. Two or more surviving children: 12 weeks, of which not more than 6 weeks may be before delivery.
  4. Death of the woman or the child: the benefit is for the days up to the death (with special rules where the woman dies and the child survives).
  5. Adopting or commissioning mother (Section 60(4)): 12 weeks from the date a child below three months is handed over.
  6. Stillborn child: a stillborn child counts as a child.
Definition

Average daily wage is the average of the wages for the days worked in the three calendar months before the woman stopped work, subject to the minimum wage under the Code on Wages (CoW).

SituationMaximum leave with benefitPart allowed before expected delivery
Ordinary case (fewer than two surviving children)26 weeksNot more than 8 weeks
Two or more surviving children12 weeksNot more than 6 weeks
Adopting or commissioning mother (child below three months)12 weeks from the date the child is handed overNot applicable

Old law: Maternity Benefit Act (MBA), Section 5 (26 weeks after the 2017 amendment; 12 weeks for adoption).

Cases: Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll) and Dr. Kavita Yadav v. Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (below).

Conclusion: the Code gives generous paid leave, with special rules for adoption and commissioning.

Example

Zoya works for Prince and is expecting her first child. She is entitled to 26 weeks of paid leave, and Prince must pay her the average daily wage for each day of absence.

Memory hook

26 weeks (8 before). 2 children = 12 weeks (6 before). Adoption or commissioning = 12 weeks.

Case

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll) (2000) 3 SCC 224; 2000 SCC (L&S) 331 (Supreme Court)

Facts: women engaged by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on a daily-wage "muster roll" were denied the maternity leave that regular staff received. MCD argued that the Maternity Benefit Act did not apply to daily-wage women. The Tribunal ordered MCD to give the benefit to muster-roll women in continuous service for three years or more, and MCD challenged that order.

Held: the principles of Article 11 of CEDAW (the UN convention against discrimination against women) must be read into their contract of service. The women were therefore entitled to all the benefits of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The Act is a social-welfare law and does not exclude daily-wage workers.

Principle: maternity benefit is a right of all women workers, including casual and daily-wage women. The law is read in the light of the Constitution (Article 42) and international standards.

Example: Zoya works for Prince on daily wages. Prince says, "You are not a regular employee, so there is no maternity leave." Under this case, she can still claim maternity benefit.

Conclusion: the label "daily-wage" cannot take away a mother's right.

Case

Dr. Kavita Yadav v. Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2023) (Supreme Court, decided 17 August 2023)

Facts: Dr. Yadav, a pathologist, was appointed Senior Resident (Pathology) in a Delhi hospital on a fixed-term contract. In May 2017 she applied for 26 weeks of maternity leave. The hospital gave her only 11 days, on the ground that her contract ended on 11 June 2017.

Held: the Supreme Court set aside the orders of the Delhi High Court and the Tribunal and directed the hospital to give her the full maternity benefit (under Sections 5 and 8 of the MBA) within three months, less what had already been paid. The benefit is not limited to the contract period.

Principle: a woman in a fixed-term or contractual job who meets the conditions is entitled to the full maternity benefit, even if the benefit period runs beyond the end of her contract.

Example: Zoya has a one-year contract with Prince that ends next month, and she is pregnant. Prince must still give her the full 26 weeks.

Conclusion: maternity benefit does not end when the contract ends.

88. Extended Leave for Illness, Miscarriage and Tubectomy (CoSS Section 65)

Exam importance: medium

Besides the main maternity leave, a woman gets extra paid leave in special medical situations.

Key point

In brief: extra paid leave is given for a miscarriage, an operation to prevent pregnancy, or an illness caused by pregnancy.

Model exam answer

  1. Miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy (Section 65(1)): leave with wages at the rate of maternity benefit for six weeks after it, on proof.
  2. Tubectomy (Section 65(2)): a tubectomy is an operation to prevent pregnancy. The woman gets two weeks' leave with wages after the operation.
  3. Illness arising out of pregnancy, delivery, premature birth, miscarriage or medical termination (Section 65(3)): in addition to any other leave, up to one month of leave with wages ("additional leave").
  4. Proof: as prescribed by the Central Government.
EventLeave with wagesSection
Miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy6 weeks65(1)
Tubectomy operation2 weeks65(2)
Illness arising out of pregnancy, delivery, premature birth, miscarriage or medical terminationUp to 1 month, in addition to other leave65(3)

Old law: MBA, Sections 9, 9A and 10.

Conclusion: the law covers medical complications, not only a normal delivery.

Example

Zoya has a miscarriage. Prince gives her six weeks' paid leave. If she then falls ill from complications, she gets up to one month more.

Memory hook

Miscarriage 6 weeks · Tubectomy 2 weeks · Illness 1 month.

89. Crèche Facility and Nursing Breaks (CoSS Sections 66–67)

Exam importance: high

A crèche (a day-care centre) lets a mother work while her baby is looked after nearby.

Key point

In brief: a crèche is a day-care room that larger workplaces must provide.

Model exam answer

  1. Crèche (Section 67(1)): every establishment covered by the Chapter with fifty or more employees must have a crèche within the prescribed distance, either separately or along with common facilities.
  2. Visits: the mother is allowed four visits a day to the crèche, including her rest intervals.
  3. Sharing: the establishment may use a common crèche run by the Government, a municipality, an NGO or a group of establishments.
  4. Information (Section 67(2)): every woman must be told, in writing and electronically, of all the benefits available under the Chapter at the time of her initial appointment.
  5. Nursing breaks (Section 66): two breaks of the prescribed length for nursing the child until the child is 15 months old, in addition to her rest interval. There is no cut in wages for these breaks (Section 69).

Old law: MBA, Sections 11A and 11 (the crèche for establishments with 50 or more employees was added in 2017).

Conclusion: a crèche lets mothers keep working with peace of mind.

Example

Prince's factory has 80 employees. Prince must provide a crèche where Zoya can leave her baby and which she can visit four times a day.

Memory hook

Crèche = 50+ employees, 4 visits a day. Nursing breaks until 15 months.

90. Work from Home (CoSS Section 60(5))

Exam importance: medium

If the nature of the job allows it, a mother can be allowed to work from home after her maternity leave.

Key point

In brief: the employer may let a new mother work from home, by agreement.

Model exam answer

  1. Rule (Section 60(5)): if the work assigned to a woman is such that she may work from home, the employer may allow her to do so after she has availed the maternity benefit.
  2. Period and terms: as mutually agreed between the employer and the woman.
  3. Nature: the provision is permissive (the employer "may"); it is not a right of the woman.

Old law: MBA, Section 5(5) (added in 2017).

Conclusion: work from home is a flexible option that helps mothers stay in work.

Example

Zoya is a software tester in Prince's firm. After her 26 weeks' leave, Prince agrees that she may work from home for six months.

Memory hook

Work from home: after leave, by agreement.

91. Child Care Leave

Exam importance: medium

Child care leave (CCL) is leave, mostly for government employees, to look after young children. It is longer than maternity leave and separate from it. It is not in the CoSS; it comes from service rules.

Key point

In brief: CCL is long leave to care for a child; it is a service benefit for Government employees.

Model exam answer

  1. Nature: CCL is a service-rule benefit (for Central Government employees, under the Leave Rules), not part of the Code. It allows up to 730 days in a career for a woman employee (and a single male parent) to look after up to two children below 18†. It was recommended by the Sixth Central Pay Commission (source: PIB note of 23 March 2022).
  2. Courts:
    • The Allahabad High Court (Rachna Chaurasiya, 2017) directed 180 days' maternity leave and 730 days' CCL for all women employees, permanent or contractual.
    • The Supreme Court (Shalini Dharmani, 2024) said CCL is a constitutional necessity under Articles 14, 15 and 21.
  3. Difference from maternity leave: maternity leave is for childbirth and is a statutory right of eligible women; CCL is for child care later and depends on service rules.
PointMaternity leaveChild care leave
PurposeChildbirthCare of the child later
SourceStatute (CoSS; earlier the MBA)Service rules (Leave Rules for Central Government employees)
NatureStatutory right of eligible womenService benefit; depends on the service rules
LengthUp to 26 weeks (Concept 87)Up to 730 days in a career

Conclusion: CCL completes the support that maternity leave starts.

Example

Zoya is a Government teacher. After her maternity leave, she takes CCL to look after her sick child, as her service rules allow.

Memory hook

Maternity = birth (statute). CCL = child care (service rule). 730 days.

Case

Shalini Dharmani v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2024) (Supreme Court, April 2024)

Facts: Shalini Dharmani was an assistant professor at a Government college in Himachal Pradesh. Her 14-year-old son has a rare genetic bone disease and needs constant care. She argued that the State's child care leave rules were too limited for her needs.

Held: child care leave is a constitutionally protected right of women employees (Articles 14, 15 and 21, and Article 19(1)(g)). Women's participation in work is an entitlement, not a privilege. The Court directed the State to reconsider its CCL policy (especially for children with disabilities) and to set up a committee headed by the Chief Secretary.

Principle: child care leave supports equality; without it, mothers may be forced to leave work.

Example: Zoya must care for a disabled child. If she gets no leave, she may have to give up her job. The Court says the State must design leave rules that avoid this.

Conclusion: CCL is part of women's right to equal work.

Case

Dr. Rachna Chaurasiya v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 29 May 2017). Some course outlines spell the name "Rachna Chaurasia".

Facts: Dr. Chaurasiya was a lecturer (Radio Diagnosis) at M.L.B. Medical College, Jhansi, appointed on a contract basis in 2009. She had a child in 2016 and approached the High Court on the leave available to women employed on contract†.

Held: the Division Bench directed the State to give maternity leave of 180 days with full pay to all women employees, whether permanent, temporary, ad hoc or contractual, and child care leave of 730 days to all women employees with minor children below 18. Maternity leave is a form of social insurance for maternal and child health.

Principle: the nature of the employment cannot be used to deny maternity leave and child care leave.

Example: Zoya is a contract lecturer. Under this case, she gets the same maternity leave as a permanent lecturer.

Conclusion: women on contract are covered too.

92. Notice of Claim, Payment, Medical Bonus, Additional Leave and Forfeiture (CoSS Sections 62–64 and 70)

Exam importance: high

To get the benefit, the woman gives a notice, and the employer must then pay on time. A medical bonus is paid if no free medical care is given, and the benefit is lost for any period in which she works elsewhere during the leave.

Key point

In brief: notice; payment on time; a ₹3,500 medical bonus if no free medical care is given; and no benefit for the days she works for pay.

Model exam answer

  1. Notice (Section 62): the woman gives written notice to the employer that she will be absent from work, naming a person to receive payment on her behalf.
    • A pregnant woman gives the notice not earlier than eight weeks before the expected delivery.
    • If no notice was given during pregnancy, it may be given as soon as possible after delivery.
  2. Payment (Section 62(5)): the benefit for the period before delivery is paid in advance on proof of pregnancy; the balance is paid within 48 hours of proof of delivery.
  3. No notice, no loss (Section 62(6)): failure to give notice does not disentitle the woman; the Inspector-cum-Facilitator can order payment.
  4. Death (Section 63): if the woman dies, the benefit is paid to her nominee or legal representative.
  5. Medical bonus (Section 64): ₹3,500 (or the amount notified) is payable if the employer provides no free pre-natal and post-natal care.
  6. Additional leave: up to one month for illness (see Concept 88).
  7. Forfeiture (Section 70): a woman who works for pay in any establishment during the period of leave permitted for maternity benefit is not entitled to the benefit for that period.
  8. Notice board (Section 71): the employer must display an abstract of the Chapter.
StepRuleSection
Notice by the womanWritten; not earlier than 8 weeks before expected delivery; or as soon as possible after delivery62
Pre-delivery benefitPaid in advance on proof of pregnancy62(5)
BalancePaid within 48 hours of proof of delivery62(5)
No notice givenNo loss of benefit; Inspector-cum-Facilitator may order payment62(6)
Death of the womanBenefit paid to nominee or legal representative63
Medical bonus₹3,500 (or notified amount) if no free pre-natal and post-natal care64
Working for pay during leaveNo benefit for that period70
Abstract of the ChapterDisplayed by the employer71

Old law: MBA, Sections 6–8.

Conclusion: a simple notice-and-payment procedure protects the mother.

Example

Zoya gives Prince a written notice eight weeks before her expected delivery. Prince pays the pre-delivery amount in advance, pays the rest within 48 hours of the baby's birth, and pays ₹3,500 as medical bonus if no free medical care was given.

Memory hook

Notice · Advance pay · 48 hours · ₹3,500 bonus · No pay for days worked.

93. Dismissal during Maternity (CoSS Section 68)

Exam importance: high

An employer cannot dismiss a woman because she is pregnant or on maternity leave.

Key point

In brief: no dismissal during maternity leave, except for gross misconduct.

Model exam answer

  1. Unlawful acts (Section 68(1)): when a woman is absent from work as allowed by the Chapter, it is unlawful for the employer:
    • to discharge or dismiss her during, or because of, that absence;
    • to give her a notice of discharge or dismissal that expires during that absence; or
    • to vary her conditions of service to her disadvantage.
  2. Dismissal during pregnancy: a discharge or dismissal during pregnancy does not take away her maternity benefit or medical bonus.
  3. Exception: where the dismissal is for gross misconduct as prescribed, the employer may deprive her of the maternity benefit or medical bonus by a written order.
  4. Appeal (Section 68(2)): within 60 days to the competent authority, whose decision is final.
  5. Offence (Section 133(d)): dismissing a woman in contravention of these rules is punishable with imprisonment up to six months, or fine up to ₹50,000, or both.

Old law: MBA, Section 12.

Conclusion: maternity is not a ground for ending a woman's job.

Example

Prince sends Zoya a termination notice during her maternity leave. This is unlawful. She can appeal within 60 days.

Memory hook

On leave = cannot be dismissed. Gross misconduct = the only exception. Appeal within 60 days.

94. Enforcement: Inspectors and Penalties (CoSS Sections 72 and 133–134)

Exam importance: medium

A woman who does not get her benefit can complain to an officer, and an employer who breaks the law can be punished.

Key point

In brief: enforcement means a complaint to the Inspector-cum-Facilitator and punishment for the employer.

Model exam answer

  1. Complaint (Section 72): a woman whose maternity benefit is withheld, or who is dismissed during her leave, may complain to the Inspector-cum-Facilitator.
  2. Powers: the Inspector-cum-Facilitator inquires into the complaint and may order payment of the benefit or pass just orders on the dismissal.
  3. Appeal: within 30 days to the prescribed authority, whose decision is final.
  4. Penalty (Section 133(i) and (d)): failing to give maternity benefit, or wrongly dismissing a woman, is punishable with imprisonment up to six months, or fine up to ₹50,000, or both.
  5. Repeat offence (Section 134): for failing again to pay maternity benefit, imprisonment of two to three years and a fine of ₹3 lakh.
Default by the employerProvisionPunishment
Failing to give maternity benefit, or wrongly dismissing a womanSection 133(i), (d)Imprisonment up to 6 months, or fine up to ₹50,000, or both
Failing again to pay maternity benefit (repeat offence)Section 134Imprisonment of 2 to 3 years and fine of ₹3 lakh

Old law: MBA, Sections 14 and 21 (Inspectors and penalties).

Conclusion: the Code provides a quick complaint route and real penalties.

Example

Prince refuses maternity benefit to Zoya. She complains to the Inspector-cum-Facilitator, who orders Prince to pay. If Prince still refuses, he can be punished.

Memory hook

Complaint → Inspector orders → Appeal within 30 days → Penalty up to 6 months or ₹50,000.

Module VI: Vulnerable Workers (CoSS and OSH Code, 2020)

This Module covers the CoSS and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (OSH Code). "Vulnerable" means easily harmed. "Unorganised" means not part of a regular, formal workplace.

Part A: Unorganised, Gig and Platform Workers (CoSS Chapter IX, Sections 109–114)

95. Unorganised Worker (CoSS Section 2(86), with Sections 2(85), 2(36), 2(75) and 2(90))

Exam importance: high

Unorganised workers are people in small, informal work with no regular employer benefits: home-workers, street sellers, farm and construction labourers, and domestic workers. They are the largest group of Indian workers and the least protected.

Key point

In brief: an unorganised worker is a worker in small, informal work with no regular social security.

Model exam answer

Definition

Under Section 2(86), an unorganised worker is a home-based worker, self-employed worker or wage worker in the unorganised sector, and includes a worker in the organised sector who is not covered by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or by Chapters III to VII of the CoSS.

TermSectionMeaning
Unorganised sector2(85)An enterprise owned by individuals or self-employed workers which, if it employs workers, employs fewer than ten
Home-based worker2(36)A person who produces goods or services for an employer, for remuneration, at home or at another place of the worker's choice
Self-employed worker2(75)A person not employed by an employer who works in the unorganised sector, subject to a notified monthly earning, or who holds cultivable land within a notified ceiling
Wage worker2(90)A person employed for remuneration in the unorganised sector, directly or through a contractor, including temporary, casual, migrant and domestic workers

Old law: Unorganised Workers' Social Security Act (UWSSA), 2008: similar definitions, but it provided only schemes and boards, and implementation was limited.

Conclusion: the Code names each type of unorganised worker and brings them all under registration and schemes.

Example

Farhan sells vegetables from a cart, and Neha rolls incense sticks at home. Both are unorganised workers, and both can register and claim benefits under the schemes.

Memory hook

Unorganised = Home-based + Self-employed + Wage worker (under 10 workers).

96. Gig Worker (CoSS Section 2(35))

Exam importance: high

A gig worker earns from short jobs or projects, without a regular employer–employee relationship.

Key point

In brief: a gig worker is one who earns from "gigs" (short jobs) outside normal employment.

Model exam answer

Definition

Section 2(35): a gig worker is "a person who performs work or participates in a work arrangement and earns from such activities outside of traditional employer–employee relationship".

  1. Features: short-term or task-based work; payment per task; no fixed wage, leave or security.
  2. Wider than platform work: it includes freelancers and offline gigs.
  3. Protection: registration (Section 113) and schemes (Section 114).

Old law: the UWSSA, 2008 had no gig-worker category.

Conclusion: the Code recognises gig work for the first time.

Example

Farhan takes short wall-painting assignments from many clients. He has no single employer. He is a gig worker.

Memory hook

Gig = job by job, not an employee.

97. Platform Worker (CoSS Sections 2(60) and 2(61))

Exam importance: high

A platform worker gets work through an online app or website, such as a delivery app or a ride app.

Key point

In brief: a platform worker is a gig worker who gets work through an online platform.

Model exam answer

  1. Platform work (Section 2(60)): a work arrangement outside a traditional employer–employee relationship in which organisations or individuals use an online platform to access other organisations or individuals to solve specific problems or to provide specific services (or other notified activities), in exchange for payment.
  2. Platform worker (Section 2(61)): a person engaged in or undertaking platform work.
  3. Relation with gig work: every platform worker is a gig worker, but not every gig worker works through a platform.
PointGig workerPlatform worker
ProvisionSection 2(35)Sections 2(60) and 2(61)
Source of workAny work arrangement, including freelance and offline gigsAn online platform (app or website)
RelationshipOutside the traditional employer–employee relationshipOutside the traditional employer–employee relationship
ScopeWider categoryA part of gig work

Conclusion: platform workers are covered by the Code's special schemes.

Example

Farhan delivers food for Prince's delivery app and gets his orders on the app. He is a platform worker (and also a gig worker).

Memory hook

Platform worker = app-based gig worker.

98. Aggregator (CoSS Section 2(2) and the Seventh Schedule)

Exam importance: high

An aggregator (a digital business that brings buyers and sellers together) is the app or website that connects customers with service providers. It is the "platform".

Key point

In brief: an aggregator is the digital company that connects customers to gig and platform workers.

Model exam answer

Definition

Section 2(2): an aggregator is "a digital intermediary or a market place for a buyer or user of a service to connect with the seller or the service provider".

  1. Categories (Seventh Schedule):
    • ride-sharing services;
    • food and grocery delivery services;
    • logistics services;
    • e-marketplaces for goods or services;
    • professional-services providers;
    • healthcare;
    • travel and hospitality;
    • content and media services;
    • any other goods and services platform.
  2. Role: the aggregator pays contributions to the Social Security Fund and takes part in the schemes (Section 114).

Conclusion: the aggregator, though not a classic employer, has social-security duties.

Example

Prince owns a ride-sharing app that connects riders with drivers like Farhan. Prince is an aggregator and must contribute to the fund for drivers like Farhan.

Memory hook

Aggregator = the app in the middle, connecting customer and worker.

99. Social Security Schemes: Central and State (CoSS Sections 6 and 109–112)

Exam importance: high

Instead of one fixed benefit, the Code asks the Centre and the States to frame welfare schemes for unorganised workers.

Key point

In brief: the Centre and the States must make schemes (life cover, health, pension and so on) for unorganised workers.

Model exam answer

  1. Central schemes (Section 109(1)): on life and disability cover, health and maternity benefits, old age protection, education and other benefits.
  2. State schemes (Section 109(2)): on provident fund, employment injury benefit, housing, education for children, skill upgradation, funeral assistance and old-age homes.
  3. Funding (Sections 109(3) and 110): a scheme may be funded:
    • wholly by the Centre;
    • by the Centre and the State;
    • with contributions from beneficiaries or employers; or
    • from CSR funds and other sources.
    States may seek Central help for their schemes.
  4. Contents of a scheme (Section 109(4)): its scope, the authority to implement it, the beneficiaries, its resources, the implementing agencies and grievance redressal. A special purpose vehicle may be set up.
  5. Boards (Section 6): the National Social Security Board and the State Unorganised Workers' Boards advise the Government.
  6. Records and helpline (Sections 111–112): electronic records with continuous numbers to avoid duplication; a toll-free helpline and facilitation centres for information and registration.
  7. Examples of schemes (outside the Code): Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maandhan (pension), Atal Pension Yojana, Ayushman Bharat health cover, the PM insurance schemes, and the e-Shram database†.
Central schemes (Section 109(1))State schemes (Section 109(2))
Life and disability coverProvident fund
Health and maternity benefitsEmployment injury benefit
Old age protectionHousing
EducationEducation for children
Other benefitsSkill upgradation
Funeral assistance
Old-age homes

Old law: UWSSA, 2008 (National and State Social Security Boards; limited implementation).

Conclusion: the Code gives a legal base, but the benefits depend on the schemes actually notified.

Example

The Centre notifies a health-cover scheme, and the State Government notifies a funeral-assistance scheme. Farhan, a registered street vendor, can claim under both.

Memory hook

Centre = Life, Health, Old age, Education. State = PF, Injury, Housing, Funeral.

100. Social Security for Gig and Platform Workers: Aggregator Obligations, Social Security Fund and Contribution (CoSS Sections 114 and 141)

Exam importance: high

For gig and platform workers, the Code asks aggregators to pay a small percentage of their turnover into a fund that pays for the workers' benefits.

Key point

In brief: aggregators pay 1–2% of their turnover (but not more than 5% of what they pay the workers) into a Social Security Fund.

Model exam answer

  1. Schemes (Section 114(1)): the Centre may frame schemes for gig and platform workers on life and disability cover, accident insurance, health and maternity benefits, old age protection and crèche.
  2. Aggregator's role (Section 114(2)): a scheme may set out the role of aggregators, the implementing agencies and the funding.
  3. Funding (Section 114(3)): a scheme may be funded:
    • by the Centre;
    • by the Centre and the States;
    • by the aggregators alone;
    • with contributions from the beneficiaries;
    • from CSR funds; or
    • from other sources.
  4. Contribution (Section 114(4)): aggregators in the Seventh Schedule categories pay 1% to 2% of their annual turnover, as notified, but not more than 5% of the amount paid or payable to gig and platform workers. Tax and cess are not part of the turnover. The date from which the contribution starts is notified (Section 114(5)).
  5. Fund: the contribution goes into the Social Security Fund (Section 141).
  6. Board (Section 114(6)): the National Social Security Board serves gig and platform workers. It includes:
    • five representatives of aggregators;
    • five representatives of gig and platform workers;
    • the Director General of the ESIC;
    • the PF Commissioner;
    • experts;
    • five representatives of State Governments; and
    • a Joint Secretary as Member Secretary.
  7. Other rules (Section 114(7)): interest on late payment, self-assessment of the contribution, and exemption for some aggregators.
Key point

Aggregator's contribution = 1% to 2% of annual turnover (as notified), subject to a ceiling of 5% of the amount paid or payable to gig and platform workers. The lower figure is payable.

Old law: the UWSSA, 2008 did not recognise gig or platform work (a "new frontier").

Conclusion: the industry shares the cost of protecting the workers it depends on.

Example

Prince's delivery app has a turnover of ₹100 crore and pays gig workers like Farhan ₹20 crore. At 2% of turnover, the contribution would be ₹2 crore. But it cannot be more than 5% of ₹20 crore, that is, ₹1 crore. So Prince pays ₹1 crore.

Memory hook

Aggregator pays 1–2% of turnover, capped at 5% of worker payouts.

101. Registration, Database and Unique ID, and Portability of Benefits (CoSS Sections 111–113 and 142)

Exam importance: high

To receive benefits, a worker must first be on record. The Code sets up registration and a unique number, so that the benefit can follow the worker anywhere.

Key point

In brief: registration means getting on the list; the unique ID is the worker's own number; portability means that benefits move with the worker.

Model exam answer

  1. Who must register (Section 113(1)): every unorganised worker, gig worker or platform worker who has completed 16 years of age and has given a self-declaration.
  2. How (Section 113(2)): by an application with documents, including Aadhaar (Section 142). A distinguishable number (unique ID) is assigned. Self-registration on the electronic system is allowed.
  3. Benefit (Section 113(3)): a registered worker can avail the benefits of the schemes; the Government makes its contribution (Section 113(4)).
  4. Database and records (Section 111): electronic records with continuous numbers to avoid duplication (the national database, for example e-Shram†).
  5. Help (Section 112): a helpline and facilitation centres to help register workers.
  6. Portability: because the record is tied to a unique number, benefits can be carried across States and jobs†. (For migrant workers, see Concept 116.)

Old law: UWSSA, 2008 (registration was voluntary and paper-based).

Conclusion: a registered worker with a unique ID is visible to the State and can claim benefits anywhere.

Example

Farhan, aged 25, drives for Prince's app. He registers online with his Aadhaar and gets a unique number. He can now claim under the accident-insurance scheme even if he changes the app or the city.

Memory hook

Age 16+ · Self-declaration · Aadhaar · Unique ID · Benefits travel.

Part B: Contract Labour (OSH Code, Chapter XI, Part I, Sections 45–58)

This Part continues Module VI (Vulnerable Workers). Contract labour is now governed by Chapter XI, Part I (ss.45–58) of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (OSH Code), which takes the place of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA).

102. Contract Labour: Applicability and Definition (OSH Sections 2(m) and 45)

Exam importance: high

Contract labour means workers who work in a factory or office but are hired by a contractor and not by the owner. The Code regulates this triangle: owner, contractor and worker.

Key point

Contract labour = workers hired through a contractor to work for another business.

Definition (Section 2(m))

Contract labour is a worker who is deemed to be employed in or in connection with the work of an establishment when he is hired in or in connection with such work:

  • by or through a contractor;
  • with or without the knowledge of the principal employer.

Includes: an inter-State migrant worker.

Excludes: a worker (other than a part-time worker) who is regularly employed by the contractor, whose employment is governed by mutually accepted standards (including employment on a permanent basis), and who gets increments, social security and welfare benefits.

Applicability (Section 45)

The contract labour Part applies to:

  1. every establishment in which fifty or more contract labour are employed, or were employed on any day of the preceding twelve months; and
  2. every manpower supply contractor who employs fifty or more contract labour.

Work of an intermittent or casual nature

  • The Part does not apply where the work is only intermittent or casual.
  • Work is not intermittent if it is done for more than 120 days in the preceding 12 months.
  • If the work is seasonal, it is not intermittent if it is done for more than 60 days in the preceding 12 months.

Old law and the Code compared

PointCLRA, 1970 (ss.1–3)OSH Code, 2020 (s.45)
Threshold20 or more workmen employed as contract labour50 or more contract labour
Core activitiesNo direct ban (case-by-case prohibition)Contract labour banned in core activities (see Concept 108)

Conclusion: The Code narrows coverage by size (the threshold rises from 20 to 50), but adds a ban on core activities.

Example

Prince's factory takes 60 workers from a contractor, including Farhan. The Code applies. If Prince had taken only 30, the contract labour Part would not apply.

Memory hook

Contract labour = 50+ (old law: 20). Not for casual work (120 days; 60 days if seasonal).

103. Principal Employer (OSH Section 2(zz))

Exam importance: high

The principal employer is the real owner of the workplace where the contract workers work.

Key point

Principal employer = the owner or controller of the workplace that uses contractors.

Definition (Section 2(zz))

Where contract labour is employedPrincipal employer
An office or department of Government or a local authorityThe head of that office or department (or the officer named for the purpose)
A factoryThe owner or occupier of the factory, and the manager named
A mineThe owner or agent of the mine
Any other establishmentAny person responsible for the supervision and control of the establishment

Duties of the principal employer

  • Provide welfare facilities to the contract labour (s.53).
  • Pay wages if the contractor fails to pay (s.55(3)).
  • Engage only licensed contractors (s.54).

Conclusion: The principal employer is the one who cannot hide behind the contractor.

Example

Prince owns a factory and takes labour from a contractor. Prince is the principal employer at the site where Farhan works.

Memory hook

Principal employer = Owner in control of the workplace.

104. Contractor (OSH Section 2(n))

Exam importance: high

A contractor supplies workers to another business, or gets a job done for it through workers.

Key point

Contractor = the middle person who supplies workers or gets work done through workers.

Definition (Section 2(n))

In relation to an establishment, a contractor is a person who:

  1. undertakes to produce a given result for the establishment, other than a mere supply of goods, through contract labour; or
  2. supplies contract labour for any work of the establishment as mere human resource;

and the term includes a sub-contractor.

Duties of the contractor

DutySection
Hold a licences.47
Charge no fee or commission from the workerss.49
Intimate work orderss.50
Pay wagess.55
Give experience certificatess.56

Conclusion: Contractors must be licensed and accountable.

Example

Farhan's contractor supplies 60 workers to Prince's factory for security duty. He is a contractor and needs a licence.

Memory hook

Contractor = Result-maker or Manpower-supplier (sub-contractors included).

105. Registration and Licensing (OSH Sections 3 and 47–52)

Exam importance: high

The establishment must be registered, and the contractor must hold a licence. This lets the Government know who is employing whom.

Key point

Registration is for the establishment. A licence is for the contractor.

Registration of the establishment (Section 3)

  • Every covered employer applies electronically within 60 days.
  • The registration certificate is issued electronically. If it is not issued in time, the establishment is deemed to be registered.
  • Any change is reported within 30 days; closure is reported within 30 days.
  • The application includes details of inter-State migrant workers.
  • This replaces the old "registration of principal employers".

Licensing of contractors (Sections 47–52)

AspectSectionRule
Licence requireds.47No contractor shall supply or engage contract labour except under a licence from the designated authority. The licence states the number of workers and the security deposit. A work-specific licence can be given to a contractor who does not meet all the criteria.
Validity and procedures.48Application is made electronically; the licence is valid for five years; the number of workers can be increased by amendment.
No fee from workerss.49The contractor cannot charge any fee from the workers.
Revocations.51For misrepresentation or breach of conditions, after a show-cause notice.
Appeals.52Filed within 30 days; disposed of within 30 days.
Unlicensed contractors.54Employment of contract labour through an unlicensed contractor is a contravention of the Code.

Old law: CLRA, s.7 (registration of principal employers) and s.12 (licensing of contractors).

Conclusion: One electronic system of registration and licensing makes it easy to trace responsibility.

Example

Prince registers his factory online within 60 days. His contractor obtains a five-year licence for 60 workers. Using an unlicensed contractor would be illegal.

Memory hook

Registration 60 days · Licence 5 years · Appeal 30 days.

106. Registers and Records; Welfare Provisions (OSH Sections 33, 53, 23 and 24)

Exam importance: medium

Employers must keep records of workers and give basic welfare. For contract labour, the principal employer must provide the welfare facilities.

Key point

Registers = records of workers. Welfare = basic facilities such as drinking water and toilets.

Registers and records (Section 33)

The employer must:

  1. maintain registers, electronically or otherwise, showing:
    • work performed, normal hours of work and the day of rest;
    • wages paid and receipts;
    • leave, overtime and attendance;
    • dangerous occurrences; and
    • employment of adolescents;
  2. display notices;
  3. issue wage slips; and
  4. file returns electronically to the Inspector-cum-Facilitator.

Welfare (Section 53)

The welfare facilities under ss.23 and 24 (health, safety and working conditions; welfare facilities) must be provided by the principal employer to the contract labour in the establishment.

Contractor's duties

  • Give an experience certificate on demand (s.56).
  • Make no charges to the workers (s.49).

Old law: CLRA, ss.20–21 (liability for wages) and the welfare sections (canteen, rest rooms, drinking water and first aid).

Conclusion: Records and welfare make the contract worker visible and cared for.

Example

Prince's factory must give Farhan, a contract worker, clean drinking water and toilets, like other workers. Prince's records must show Farhan's hours and wages.

Memory hook

Registers + Notices + Wage slips + Returns. Welfare = by the principal employer.

107. Liability of the Principal Employer (OSH Sections 53–55)

Exam importance: high

The principal employer cannot ignore the contract workers. If the contractor fails to pay, the principal employer must pay, and can recover the amount from the contractor.

Key point

If the contractor does not pay the workers, the principal employer must.

Heads of liability

  1. Wages (s.55(1)–(2)): the contractor is responsible for paying wages, by bank transfer or electronic mode, and informs the principal employer.
  2. Default (s.55(3)): if the contractor fails to pay or short-pays, the principal employer must pay the full or unpaid wages, and may recover the amount from the contractor by deduction from any amount payable to him or as a debt.
  3. Security deposit (s.55(4)): the Government can order payment of unpaid wages out of the contractor's security deposit.
  4. Welfare (s.53): the principal employer provides the facilities under ss.23–24.
  5. Unlicensed contractor (s.54): employment through an unlicensed contractor is a contravention.
  6. Other liabilities: for compensation (CoSS s.85) and for PF and ESI contributions (CoSS ss.17 and 31), with the right to recover from the contractor.

Old law: CLRA, ss.20–21.

Conclusion: The principal employer is the safety net for the contract worker's pay.

Example

Prince's contractor runs away without paying Farhan. Prince must pay Farhan's wages, and can then claim the amount from the contractor's dues or security deposit.

Memory hook

Contractor fails → Principal employer pays → Recover from the contractor.

Cases on absorption of contract labour

Case

Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union ((1997) 9 SCC 377; 1997 SCC (L&S) 1344)

Facts: Contract labourers were engaged for sweeping, cleaning, dusting and watching of the Air India Corporation's buildings. The Central Government issued a notification (9 December 1976) under s.10 of the CLRA prohibiting contract labour in that work. The workers claimed that they should be absorbed by the Corporation as its regular employees.

Held: When contract labour is abolished under s.10, the workers must be absorbed by the principal employer (the "automatic absorption" view).

Principle: Abolition of contract labour was read as leading to absorption into the principal employer's service. This point was later overruled.

Illustration: The Government bans contract labour in Prince's cleaning work. Farhan, a contract cleaner, claims a regular job with Prince. Under this case, Farhan would win.

Conclusion: The case gave wide protection to contract workers, but a larger bench later reversed it.

Case

Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Waterfront Workers Union & Ors. (2001 LLR 691 SC; (2001) 7 SCC 1) (Constitution Bench)

Facts: Contract labour engaged in Steel Authority of India's establishments claimed absorption as regular workers after contract labour was prohibited. The questions were whether absorption is automatic after a s.10 notification, and which Government is the "appropriate Government".

Held: The Constitution Bench overruled Air India (prospectively). Neither s.10 of the CLRA nor any other provision provides for automatic absorption of contract labour on abolition. But where the contract is a sham or a camouflage (a disguise), the workers can be treated as direct employees of the principal employer.

Principle: No automatic absorption after abolition. However, a sham contract is looked through, and the real employer is held liable.

Illustration: Prince's contractor is only a name on paper; Prince controls Farhan's work, pay and duties. A court can treat Farhan as Prince's own employee. But if the contractor is real, Farhan cannot claim a permanent job just because contract labour was banned.

Conclusion: Absorption is not automatic, but the law looks at the reality of the arrangement.

Key point: Air India and SAIL compared

Air India (1997): abolition under s.10 CLRA → automatic absorption. SAIL (2001, Constitution Bench): no automatic absorption (Air India overruled prospectively); but a sham or camouflage contract makes the workers direct employees of the principal employer.

108. Prohibition of Employment as Contract Labour; Advisory Board Recommendations (OSH Sections 2(p), 45(2) and 57)

Exam importance: high

The old law allowed the Government to ban contract labour job by job after taking advice. The Code bans contract labour in core activities directly, with three exceptions.

Key point

Contract labour is not allowed in the core work of a business, except in three cases.

The rule (Section 57(1))

Employment of contract labour in the core activities of any establishment is prohibited.

Core activity (Section 2(p))

A core activity is any activity for which the establishment is set up, and includes any activity that is essential or necessary to that activity.

Not core activities (where the establishment is not set up for them):

  • sanitation and cleaning;
  • watch and ward (security);
  • canteen and catering;
  • loading and unloading;
  • running hospitals, schools, guest houses and clubs as support services;
  • courier support services.

Three exceptions (proviso to Section 57(1))

Contract labour may be engaged in a core activity where:

  1. the normal functioning of the establishment is such that the activity is ordinarily done through a contractor;
  2. the activity does not require full-time workers for the major part of the day or for longer periods; or
  3. there is a sudden increase in work that must be done in a specified time.

Deciding what is core (Section 57(2))

  • The Government appoints a designated authority to advise on whether an activity is core.
  • An aggrieved party may apply.
  • The Government decides.

Advisory Boards

The Government consults the National or State Advisory Board, for example on whether work is intermittent or casual (s.45(2)).

Old law and the Code compared

PointCLRA, s.10OSH Code, s.57
MethodThe Government could prohibit contract labour in a process, case by caseDirect ban on contract labour in core activities
AdviceAfter consulting the Central or State Advisory BoardDesignated authority advises on what is core; National or State Advisory Board consulted (for example under s.45(2))
Test or exceptionsTest: the work is perennial, is ordinarily done by regular workmen, and is enough to employ full-time workersThree fixed exceptions: usual practice, no full-time need, sudden rush of work
CasesAir India and SAIL arose under this section—

Conclusion: The Code replaces case-by-case bans with a direct ban on core activities, and allows fixed exceptions.

Example

Prince's shoe factory cannot hire Farhan through a contractor to stitch shoes, because stitching is core work. But Prince may use a contractor for the canteen or security, which are non-core activities.

Memory hook

Core = no contract labour (3 exceptions: usual practice, part-time need, sudden rush).

109. Offences and Penalties: Contract Labour (OSH Sections 54, 57 and 97; CLRA)

Exam importance: medium

If the principal employer or the contractor breaks the rules, the Code imposes penalties.

Key point

Breaking the contract labour rules leads to fines, and to jail on repetition.

Contraventions

  • Using an unlicensed contractor (s.54).
  • Engaging contract labour in a core activity in breach of s.57.
  • Not paying wages (s.55).
  • Charging fees from workers (s.49).
  • Breaking licence conditions.

Penalties

SituationSectionPunishment
Contravention of the Code, or of an order regulating employment of workers including contract labours.97(1)Penalty of not less than ₹50,000 but up to ₹1 lakh
Repeat offences.97(2)Imprisonment up to three months, or fine up to ₹2 lakh, or both

Other consequences: licences can be revoked or suspended (s.51); the Inspector-cum-Facilitator can inspect and prosecute.

Old law: CLRA, 1970: imprisonment up to three months or a small fine, ss.23–25.

Conclusion: The Code uses fines first, and imprisonment for repeat offenders.

Example

Prince uses an unlicensed contractor to supply Farhan. Prince can be fined ₹50,000 to ₹1 lakh. For a repeat offence, he can be jailed for up to three months or fined up to ₹2 lakh, or both.

Memory hook

₹50,000–₹1 lakh the first time; repeat: 3 months / ₹2 lakh.

Module VII: OSH Code, 2020 – Inter-State Migrant Workers

A migrant is a person who moves from one place to another for work. Inter-State means between two States.

Chapter XI, Part II (ss.59–65) of the OSH Code replaces the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979 (ISMW Act).

110. Inter-State Migrant Worker and Contractor (OSH Sections 2(zf) and 2(n))

Exam importance: high

An inter-State migrant worker is a low-paid worker who has moved from one State to work in another. The Code covers not only workers brought by a contractor but also workers who come on their own.

Key point

Inter-State migrant worker = a worker from one State working in another State, earning up to ₹18,000 a month.

Definition (Section 2(zf); also CoSS Section 2(41))

An inter-State migrant worker is a person employed in an establishment who:

  1. has been recruited directly by the employer, or through a contractor, in one State for employment in an establishment in another State; or
  2. has come on his own from one State and obtained employment in an establishment of another State (the destination State), or has changed his establishment within the destination State;

and who:

  • is employed under an agreement or other arrangement for such employment; and
  • draws wages not exceeding ₹18,000 a month (or a higher amount as notified).

Contractor (Section 2(n))

A person who undertakes to produce a given result through contract labour, or supplies contract labour as mere human resource; the term includes a sub-contractor. An inter-State migrant worker is contract labour (s.2(m)).

What is new

PointISMW Act, 1979 (ss.1–2)OSH Code, 2020
Who is coveredOnly workers recruited by or through a contractorAlso workers who migrate on their own
DefinitionHad definitional gapsWider definition, with a wage ceiling of ₹18,000 a month

Conclusion: A wider definition brings self-migrating workers under protection.

Example

Farhan leaves Odisha on his own and finds a job in Prince's factory in Gujarat at ₹15,000 a month. He is an inter-State migrant worker. Under the old Act, he might not have been.

Memory hook

Migrant = another State + wage ≤ ₹18,000 + (contractor OR on his own).

111. Applicability and Threshold (OSH Section 59)

Exam importance: high

The migrant-worker rules apply only to establishments that employ a minimum number of migrant workers.

Key point

Threshold = the minimum number of migrant workers that brings Part II into play.

  1. Rule (s.59): Part II applies to every establishment in which ten or more inter-State migrant workers are employed, or were employed on any day of the preceding twelve months.
  2. Wage limit: the worker must draw wages of up to ₹18,000 a month (from the definition).
  3. Registration: the establishment's application under s.3 must include information on inter-State migrant workers.
LawThreshold
ISMW Act, 1979Five or more migrant workmen (also applied to contractors employing five or more)
OSH Code, 2020 (s.59)Ten or more inter-State migrant workers

Conclusion: A higher threshold reduces coverage of small employers.

Example

Prince employs 12 migrant workers, including Farhan. Part II applies. If Prince had only 6, it would not apply (though it would have applied under the old Act).

Memory hook

Migrant Part = 10+ migrant workers (old law: 5).

112. Registration of Establishments and Licensing of Contractors (OSH Sections 3 and 47–48)

Exam importance: medium

The establishment must be registered, and contractors who bring migrant workers must be licensed. Both must give details of the migrant workers.

Key point

Register the workplace; license the contractor; tell the Government about the migrant workers.

  1. Registration (s.3): the employer applies electronically within 60 days, giving information on inter-State migrant workers (s.3(2)).
  2. Licence (ss.47–48): a contractor needs a licence, and the application includes information on inter-State migrant workers (s.48(1)). Where a contractor recruits for several States or all India, he may obtain the licence from the Central authority, which consults the States.
  3. No fee from workers (s.49).

Old law: ISMW Act, 1979: registration of establishments by principal employers (ss.4–6) and licensing of contractors (ss.7–11). The course outline also cites ss.14–22 (allowances, wages and the principal employer's liability) and the topic "inadequacy of implementation".

Note

Updated: the transcript linked ss.14–22 of the ISMW Act, 1979 to registration and licensing. The correct position is that registration of establishments is in ss.4–6 (Chapter II) and licensing of contractors is in ss.7–11 (Chapter III); ss.14–22 deal with displacement and journey allowances, other facilities, wages, the principal employer's liability, past liabilities, inspectors and related matters. Source: The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979.

Conclusion: One system for contract labour and migrant workers reduces paperwork.

Example

Prince's contractor brings 15 workers from Odisha. The contractor's licence application must list the migrant workers.

Memory hook

Register + License + List the migrants.

113. Journey Allowance, Displacement Allowance and Return Fare (OSH Section 61)

Exam importance: high

A migrant worker must spend money to travel home. The employer must pay a yearly amount for the journey to and from the worker's native place.

Key point

Journey allowance = the fare, to and fro, once a year, paid by the employer.

Journey allowance (Section 61)

  • The employer must pay every inter-State migrant worker, once in a year, a lump sum amount of fare for the to-and-fro journey between the place of employment and his native place.
  • The rules fix the minimum period of service, how often it is paid, and the class of travel.
  • This annual fare is what the course outline calls the "return fare".

Displacement allowance

Under the old ISMW Act, 1979, a displacement allowance was payable: a one-time payment on recruitment, equal to 50% of monthly wages or ₹75, whichever was higher.

The Code (Part II) has no separate displacement allowance.

Extinguishing debts (Section 65)

Debts owed by the worker to the contractor or principal employer are deemed to be extinguished after the employment ends, and no suit lies to recover them.

BenefitISMW Act, 1979OSH Code, 2020
Journey allowance (return fare)YesYes: annual to-and-fro fare (s.61)
Displacement allowanceYes: one-time payment on recruitmentNo separate displacement allowance
Wage parity and other benefitsYes (ss.14–22, as cited in the course outline)Same benefits as other workers of the establishment (s.60; see Concept 115)

Conclusion: The Code keeps the annual fare but drops the displacement allowance.

Example

Farhan works for Prince in Gujarat, far from his village in Odisha. Once a year Prince must pay Farhan the to-and-fro train fare to his home.

Memory hook

Journey = one return fare a year. Displacement allowance = old Act only.

114. Toll-Free Helpline (OSH Section 63)

Exam importance: medium

A migrant worker in a strange State may not know whom to call. A helpline gives help and information.

Key point

Toll-free helpline = a free phone number for migrant workers.

  1. Section 63: the appropriate Government may provide a toll-free helpline for inter-State migrant workers, in the manner it prescribes.
  2. Uses: to seek help, report problems and get information on benefits.
  3. Nature: the provision is enabling: the Government may provide it (it is not bound to).
  4. Related provision: the same idea appears in CoSS s.112 (helpline and facilitation centres for unorganised, gig and platform workers).

Conclusion: The helpline connects a migrant worker to the State.

Example

Prince's contractor stops paying Farhan. Farhan calls the toll-free helpline and the labour officials take up his complaint.

Memory hook

Helpline = a free call for help (the Government "may" provide it).

115. Duties of Contractors and Principal Employers (OSH Sections 49, 53–55 and 60–61)

Exam importance: high

The contractor and the employer must give a migrant worker suitable conditions of work, equal benefits and help in case of an accident.

Key point

Duties = what the contractor and the employer must do for migrant workers.

Duties under Section 60

It is the duty of every contractor or employer of an establishment employing inter-State migrant workers:

  1. to ensure suitable conditions of work, having regard to the fact that the worker is working in a State different from his own;
  2. in case of a fatal accident or serious bodily injury, to report it to the authorities of both States and to the worker's next of kin;
  3. to extend all benefits available to a worker of that establishment, including benefits under the ESI, EPF and other laws, and the facility of a medical check-up.

Other duties

DutySection
Pay the yearly journey fares.61
Pay wages by bank transfer; if the contractor fails, the principal employer payss.55
Take no fee or commission from workerss.49
Provide welfare facilitiess.53

Old law: ISMW Act, 1979: the contractor's duties (wage parity, records and passbooks).

Conclusion: The migrant worker gets the same benefits as local workers, and extra care.

Example

Farhan is seriously injured in Prince's factory. Prince must report the accident to the authorities of both States and inform Farhan's family in Odisha. Farhan must also get ESI and PF benefits like the local workers.

Memory hook

Suitable conditions · Report accidents to both States · Same benefits as locals · Yearly fare.

116. Portability of Benefits and Social Mapping of Migrant Workers (OSH Sections 21, 62 and 64)

Exam importance: high

Portability means that the migrant worker should not lose ration or welfare benefits when he moves. Social mapping means finding out who the migrant workers are, where they come from and where they work.

Key point

Portability = benefits go with the worker. Social mapping = a record of who the migrant workers are and where they are.

Measures under the Code

MeasureProvisionContent
Public distribution systems.62(a)The Government must make schemes so that a migrant worker can choose to take ration benefits either in his native State or in the destination State.
Construction cess funds.62(b)For a migrant building worker, portability of benefits out of the building and construction cess fund in the destination State.
Portal and statisticss.21The Government is to collect statistics and maintain a portal for inter-State migrant workers.
Studys.64The Government may provide for a study of inter-State migrant workers.
Registration and unique IDCoSS s.113Registration and a unique ID for unorganised workers allow a national database (for example e-Shram).

Social mapping in Odisha (case studies in the course readings)

  • Odisha is a major source State of migrant workers.
  • Many workers from districts such as Ganjam and Balangir go to other States for work in construction, brick kilns and textiles.
  • Mapping records the districts, the contractors and the destinations, so that help can be given at both ends.

Old law: ISMW Act, 1979: passbooks and records, with enforcement failure.

Conclusion: Portability and mapping turn the migrant worker from "invisible" into "counted".

Example

Farhan works in Gujarat but his family's ration card is in Odisha. Under the scheme made under the Code, Farhan can draw his ration in Gujarat. His name is also on the portal, so the State knows where he works.

Memory hook

Portability = ration and cess benefits move with the worker. Mapping = a portal, statistics and a study.

117. COVID-19 as an Illustration

Exam importance: medium

The 2020 lockdown showed why protection of migrant workers matters. Millions of workers lost work overnight, and had no record, no benefits and no way to go home.

Key point

COVID-19 = the crisis that showed the failure of the old law.

What happened

As described in the course readings, the sudden lockdown of March 2020 left large numbers of migrant workers without work, wages, food or transport. Many walked long distances to reach their villages.

Why the ISMW Act, 1979 failed

  • Few establishments and contractors were registered or licensed.
  • There were no reliable records of who the migrants were.
  • There was no portability of ration or welfare benefits.
  • Enforcement was weak.
  • The definition left out workers who migrated on their own.

Wages during the lockdown

The MHA order of 29 March 2020 directing payment of wages was challenged (Ludhiana Hand Tools; Align Components; see Concept 24).

How the Code responds

  • A wider definition that covers self-migrants.
  • Registration and licensing with migrant details.
  • A portal and database.
  • An annual journey fare.
  • A helpline.
  • The PDS option and portability of benefits.
  • Liability of the principal employer for wages.

Caution: these benefits depend on rules, schemes and enforcement by the States.

Old law: ISMW Act, 1979: enforcement failure, with the COVID-19 crisis as the illustration.

Conclusion: COVID-19 exposed the gaps; the Code is meant to close them, if it is enforced.

Example

In the lockdown, Farhan, a migrant worker in Prince's factory in Gujarat, had no wages, no ration and no record of his job. With registration, a portal, a helpline and portable ration, Farhan could have been traced and helped.

Memory hook

COVID = "Not counted, not paid, not portable." The Code: Count · Pay · Port.

Last-Minute Revision: Most Important Definitions

This revision section is for reading just before the exam. Section numbers are from the Labour Codes: the Code on Wages (CoW), the Code on Social Security (CoSS) and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code (OSH Code). "Old law" means the earlier Act with which each Code is compared.

Key point

In an answer, write the relevant definition first. The definitions below are the ones most often needed.

1. Social security (CoSS s.2(78))

Key point

Social security means the measures of protection that give health-care access and income security in old age, unemployment, sickness, invalidity, work injury, maternity or loss of the breadwinner.

2. Wages (CoW s.2(y))

  • Meaning: all remuneration.
  • Includes: basic pay, dearness allowance (DA) and retaining allowance.
  • Excludes: bonus, house accommodation, PF contribution, conveyance, house rent allowance (HRA), awards, overtime, commission, gratuity and retirement benefits.
  • 50% rule: if the exclusions exceed 50%, the excess is added back to wages.
  • Remuneration in kind: counts as wages up to 15%.

3. Employee and worker (CoW ss.2(k) and 2(z))

PointEmployee (s.2(k))Worker (s.2(z))
MeaningAny person employed on wages in an establishment for any skilled, unskilled, managerial, clerical or other work.A narrower class.
ExcludedAn apprentice and a soldier.Managers, and supervisors earning above ₹15,000.
Levels coveredAll levels.No managers; supervisors only if earning up to ₹15,000.

4. Employer (CoW s.2(l))

One who employs directly or through any person. It includes the occupier, the person in control, the manager, the contractor and the legal representative.

5. Floor wage and minimum wage (CoW ss.9 and 5)

TermSectionMeaning
Floor wageCoW s.9The national base wage fixed by the Centre. No minimum wage can be below it.
Minimum wageCoW s.5The lowest legal wage. It applies to all employees and is reviewed at intervals not exceeding five years.

6. Available surplus and allocable surplus (bonus)

  • Available surplus = gross profit − prior charges.
  • Allocable surplus = 67% of the available surplus (60% for banks).

7. Dependant (CoSS s.2(24))

ClassWhoCondition
Always dependantsWidow, minor son, unmarried daughter, widowed motherNone
ConditionalInfirm adult childIf wholly dependent
OthersOther listed relativesIf dependent

8. Employment injury (CoSS s.2(28))

An injury by accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of employment. A commuting accident is covered where there is a nexus with employment.

9. Kinds of disablement

KindSection (CoSS)Meaning
Permanent total disablements.2(56)Unfit for all work he could do before.
Permanent partial disablements.2(55)Reduced earning capacity.
Temporary disablements.2(83)Unfit for the usual work for a time.

10. Insured person and continuous service

  • Insured person (CoSS s.28): a covered employee for whom ESI contributions are payable.
  • Continuous service (CoSS s.54): uninterrupted service. Sickness, leave, layoff and strike are ignored. 240 days = 1 year (190 days in mines).

11. Unorganised, gig and platform workers; aggregator (CoSS)

TermSectionMeaning
Unorganised workers.2(86)A home-based, self-employed or wage worker in the unorganised sector.
Gig workers.2(35)One who earns outside a traditional employer–employee relationship.
Platform workers.2(61)One who does platform work through an online platform.
Aggregators.2(2)A digital intermediary connecting the buyer and the provider.

12. Contract labour and migrant workers (OSH Code)

TermSectionMeaning
Contract labourOSH s.2(m)A worker hired by or through a contractor.
Principal employerOSH s.2(zz)The owner or controller of the workplace.
ContractorOSH s.2(n)One who produces a result through contract labour or supplies manpower.
Inter-State migrant workerOSH s.2(zf)A worker recruited (or self-migrated) from one State to another, with wages up to ₹18,000 a month.
TopicCode and sectionsOld law
Wages definition; equal payCoW 2(y); 3–4Payment of Wages Act (PWA), Minimum Wages Act (MWA), Bonus Act; Equal Remuneration Act
Minimum wage; floor wage; procedure; componentsCoW 5–9; 8; 7MWA 1948
Overtime; hoursCoW 14; 13MWA s.14
Time and mode of payment; deductionsCoW 16–17; 15; 18–24PWA 1936
BonusCoW 26–41 (eligibility 26; disqualification 29; allocable surplus 31; set-on/set-off 36; time 39)Bonus Act 1965
Advisory Boards; claims; appealCoW 42; 45; 49MWA s.20; PWA s.15
Employee's compensationCoSS 73–99 (liability 74; amount 76; default 77; wages 78; distribution 81; notice and claim 82)Employee's Compensation Act (ECA) 1923
ESICoSS 24–52 (benefits 32; presumption 34; bar 41; Employees' Insurance Court 48–52)ESI Act 1948
GratuityCoSS 53–58 (payable 53; continuous service 54; determination 56; insurance 57)Payment of Gratuity Act 1972
Provident fundCoSS 14–23 (schemes 15; contributions 16)EPF Act 1952
MaternityCoSS 59–72 (benefit 60; notice 62; medical bonus 64; leave 65; crèche 67; dismissal 68)Maternity Benefit Act 1961
Building workers cessCoSS 100–108BOCW Cess Act 1996
Unorganised, gig and platform workersCoSS 109–114 (registration 113; gig schemes and contribution 114)Unorganised Workers' Social Security Act (UWSSA) 2008
Contract labourOSH 45–58 (applicability 45; licence 47; welfare 53; wages 55; core activity 57)CLRA 1970
Migrant workersOSH 59–65 (threshold 59; duties 60; journey 61; PDS 62; helpline 63)Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979
PenaltiesCoW 54; CoSS 133–134; OSH 97—

Most Important Differences: Old Law and the Codes

PointOld lawCode
Minimum wage coverageMWA: only scheduled employmentsAll employees; national floor wage
Payment of wages coveragePWA: wage ceiling ₹24,000No ceiling (Government establishments only if notified)
OvertimeRate fixed by lawNot less than 2 times the normal rate
Definition of wagesDifferent in each ActOne definition; 50% rule
Claim time; compensation6 months (MWA), 12 months (PWA)3 years; compensation up to 10 times the claim
Bonus disqualification3 grounds4 grounds (adds conviction for sexual harassment)
Work-injury compensationNo commuting coverCommuting accident covered where there is a nexus; funeral expenses at least ₹15,000
ESI coverageNotified factories and establishmentsAll with 10 or more; hazardous establishments even with 1
GratuityFixed-term employees not clearly coveredFixed-term employees pro rata (no 5-year requirement on expiry of the term)
Maternity leave12 weeks (before 2017)26 weeks; crèche at 50 or more; work from home
Contract labour threshold2050; ban in core activities
Migrant workers5 or more; only contractor-recruited workers; displacement allowance10 or more; self-migrants covered; journey fare, PDS portability, helpline
Gig and platform workersNot recognised (UWSSA 2008)Recognised; aggregator pays 1–2% of turnover

Frequently asked distinctions

PairDistinction
Employee v. workerEmployee: all levels. Worker: no managers; supervisors only if earning up to ₹15,000.
Set-on v. set-offSet-on: the excess is carried forward. Set-off: the deficiency is carried forward. Both for 4 years.
Employee's compensation v. ESIIf the employee is covered by ESI, only ESI benefits are available. If not covered, compensation is claimed under Chapter VII (CoSS).

Most Important Formulas

Wages, overtime and bonus

FormulaRule
WagesBasic + DA + retaining allowance; exclusions capped at 50%; remuneration in kind up to 15%
Overtime2 × the normal rate per hour
Bonus poolGross profit − prior charges (depreciation, direct tax) = available surplus; allocable surplus = 67% (banks 60%)
BonusMinimum 8⅓% or ₹100; maximum 20%; at least 30 days worked; paid within 8 months
Set-on and set-off4 years; cap of 20% of total wages

Employee's compensation

FormulaRule
Death50% × monthly wages × relevant factor (or the notified amount, if more) + funeral expenses of at least ₹15,000
Permanent total disablement60% × monthly wages × relevant factor
Permanent partial disablement% loss of earning capacity × the permanent total disablement amount
Temporary disablement25% of monthly wages, paid half-monthly; from the 16th day (if disablement lasts 28 days or more) or after a 3-day waiting period
Monthly wagesOne-twelfth of the wages of the last 12 months; failing that, the wages of a similar worker; failing that, 30 × wages ÷ days worked
Late paymentAfter 1 month: interest + damages up to 50%
Time limitsNotice as soon as possible; claim within 2 years; appeal to the High Court within 60 days

ESI, gratuity and provident fund

FormulaRule
ESIEmployer 3.25% + employee 0.75% of wages; wage ceiling ₹21,000; Employees' Insurance Court: limitation 3 years, 50% deposit
Gratuity(Last monthly wages ÷ 26) × 15 × years of service; 5 years' service needed; a part-year above 6 months counts as 1 year; ceiling as notified (₹20 lakh); paid within 30 days
Provident fundEmployer 12% (10% in some cases) + employee an equal amount; pension up to 8⅓%; EDLI up to 1%
Note

The ESI employee rate of 0.75%, the ESI wage ceiling of ₹21,000 and the gratuity ceiling of ₹20 lakh could not be fully confirmed. Check them against the latest notification or class notes.

Maternity, building workers, gig workers and contract labour

FormulaRule
Maternity26 weeks (up to 8 before delivery); 12 weeks for a woman with 2 or more children; adoption or commissioning mother 12 weeks; 80 days worked; medical bonus ₹3,500; crèche at 50 or more employees
BOCW cess1–2% of the cost of construction; beneficiaries aged 18–60 with 90 days of work
Aggregator contribution1–2% of annual turnover, capped at 5% of the amount paid to gig and platform workers
Contract labour and migrantsContract labour: 50 or more workers; licence for 5 years. Migrant workers: threshold 10 or more; wage limit ₹18,000

Most Important Case Laws

Minimum wages

Case

Crown Aluminium (1958). Principle: no industry has a right to exist unless it pays at least the bare minimum wage.

Case

Reptakos Brett (1992). Principle: the need-based minimum wage follows the norms of the 15th Indian Labour Conference plus 25%.

Case

PUDR (Asiad case) (1982). Held: payment of less than the minimum wage is forced labour under Art. 23; construction work is hazardous employment under Art. 24.

Case

Manganese Ore (1991). Held: the minimum wage must be paid in cash; concessions and attendance bonus cannot be deducted from it.

Case

Jyothi Home Industries (1983). Held: piece-rate workers and home workers are covered; a guaranteed wage is valid.

Case

Ludhiana Hand Tools; Align Components (2020). Payment of full wages during the COVID-19 lockdown was questioned; no coercive action was to be taken in the meantime; workers who did not report when work resumed are not entitled to wages.

Bonus

Case

KCP Employees' Association (1978). Principle: a unit is a separate establishment for bonus only if it keeps proper separate accounts.

Case

United Planters (2022). Challenges to the 2015 amendment of the Bonus Act (the ₹21,000 and ₹7,000 ceilings) were left to the High Courts.

Employee's compensation and ESI

Case

V. Jayaraj. Principle: disablement is judged by the loss of earning capacity. The facts of this case are not verified.

Case

Roshan Deen (2001). Held: compensation cannot be contracted out; a settlement obtained by fraud is set aside.

Case

Saurashtra Salt (1958). Held: a worker travelling to work by a public ferry was not in the course of employment. Principle: the notional extension of the employer's premises is limited.

Case

BEST v. Agnes (1963). Held: a worker going home in the employer's bus, which he was entitled to use as of right, was in the course of employment.

Case

Ranga Rao (Karnataka High Court, 1981). Took a liberal view of commuting accidents (the worker's choice of route).

Case

Francis De Costa (Supreme Court, 1996). Held: an accident on a public road on the way to work is not an employment injury (the strict rule).

Case

Batulbibi. A Gujarat High Court ESI case. The facts of this case are not verified.

Case

A. Trehan (1996). Held: a worker insured under ESI cannot claim compensation under the old Employee's Compensation Act (the s.53 bar of the ESI Act).

Provident fund and pension

Case

R.C. Gupta (2016). Held: there is no cut-off date for opting for pension on the actual higher salary.

Case

Sunil Kumar B. (2022). Held: the ₹15,000 pension ceiling is valid; the demand for an extra contribution is invalid.

Maternity and child care

Case

MCD v. Female Workers (2000). Held: maternity benefit applies to daily-wage women workers (relying on CEDAW Art. 11).

Case

Dr. Kavita Yadav (2023). Held: a woman employed for a fixed term gets the full maternity benefit even after her contract ends.

Case

Rachna Chaurasia (2017). Held (Allahabad High Court): the State must give 180 days of maternity leave and 730 days of child care leave to all its women employees, even contractual employees.

Note

Updated: the transcript said these leaves are available to all women. The correct position is that the Allahabad High Court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant them to its own women employees, whether permanent, temporary, ad hoc or contractual; it is not a general rule for all women workers, whose statutory maternity benefit is 26 weeks. Source: Allahabad High Court judgment (2019) quoting the Rachna Chaurasia directions, Indian Kanoon.

Case

Shalini Dharmani (2024). Held: child care leave is a constitutional right (Arts. 14, 15 and 21).

Contract labour

Case

Air India (1997) and SAIL (2001, 5 judges). Air India held that contract labour must be absorbed when contract labour is abolished. SAIL overruled Air India: there is no automatic absorption, but courts will look through sham contracts.

Most Important Concepts for Long Answers

  1. Wages: the unified definition, the 50% rule, and why the definition was unified.
  2. Floor wage and minimum wage: with the three wage concepts and the case law.
  3. Bonus: eligibility, formula, minimum and maximum, set-on and set-off, disqualification, time limit.
  4. Employer's liability for compensation: defences, notional extension and the compensation formulas.
  5. ESI: benefits, "arising out of and in the course of employment", presumption, bar, Employees' Insurance Court.
  6. Gratuity: continuous service, formula, forfeiture, insurance.
  7. Provident Fund, Pension Scheme and EDLI.
  8. Maternity benefit: 26 weeks, crèche, protection against dismissal, and the four maternity cases.
  9. Gig and platform workers: definitions, aggregator contribution, registration and unique ID.
  10. Contract labour: licence, ban in core activities, principal employer's liability, and Air India / SAIL.
  11. Migrant workers: definition, threshold, journey allowance, portability, and the COVID-19 illustration.
  12. Constitution and ILO: Arts. 14, 19, 21, 23 and 24; Arts. 38–47; ILO C.102, C.183 and R.202.
  13. The four Labour Codes: 29 laws merged into 4; their objectives and structure.
Key point

Structure every long answer as: definition → section → points → case → example → one-line conclusion.

Quick revision

  • Social security v. welfare: social security is a safety net under the worker; welfare is daily comfort.
  • Fundamental Rights (Arts. 14, 19, 21, 23, 24): Equal, Free, Dignity, No force, No child in danger.
  • Directive Principles: 38 Justice · 39 Livelihood and equal pay · 41 Help · 42 Humane conditions and maternity · 43 Living wage · 43A Say in management · 47 Health.
  • The Codes: W-I-S-O (Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, OSH) = 4 + 3 + 9 + 13 = 29 laws.
  • Wages: Basic + DA + Retaining, never below 50%. Overtime: twice the normal rate.
  • Wage concepts: floor = basement; minimum = lowest legal; fair = middle; living = comfortable.
  • Time of payment: daily = end of the shift; weekly = last working day; fortnightly = within 2 days; monthly = within 7 days; on leaving service = within 2 working days.
  • Deductions: only those listed, never above 50%; fines up to 3%.
  • Bonus: 8⅓% to 20%; 67% of available surplus; FRTS disqualifies; pay within 8 months.
  • Wage claims: claim within 3 years · appeal within 90 days · compensation up to 10 times.
  • Employee's compensation: Death 50 · Total disablement 60 · Temporary 25. PAO = Personal injury by Accident or Occupational disease, arising Out of and in the course of employment.
  • Employer's defences: 3 days; drink or drugs; disobedience; safety guard removed. The defences are not available for death or permanent total disablement.
  • ESI: 10 or more persons; 3.25 + 0.75; an accident IN the course of employment is presumed to arise OUT of it.
  • Gratuity: ÷ 26 × 15 × years; 5 years; forfeited for damage, violence or moral turpitude.
  • Provident fund: 12 + 12; pension 8⅓; EDLI 1.
  • Maternity: 26 weeks (8 before delivery); crèche at 50 or more; 4 crèche visits; no dismissal.
  • Gig workers: the aggregator pays 1–2% of turnover, capped at 5% of payouts.
  • Contract labour: 50 or more; core activity = no contract labour; the principal employer pays if the contractor fails.
  • Migrant workers: 10 or more; ₹18,000; one return fare a year; ration and cess benefits move with the worker.

Practise Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security) MCQs

23 questions. Every answer comes with an explanation and the legal provision behind it.

Practise now

Make this page yours

Sign in to save your reading progress and keep private notes and highlights. Free, and only you can see them.

Keep reading

Related notes

Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security) Complete notes

Labour Law 2 One Shot

This convention sets basic rules to make sure people have support when they need it, like during sickness, unemployment, or old age. It includes benefits for healthcare, family support, and emergencies.

52 min read

Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security)

Female Rights in the Workplace in India

India has made significant progress in empowering women and promoting gender equality in recent years. However, the fight for equal rights and opportunities for women in the workplace is still ongoing. Despite constitut…

7 min read

Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security)

Labour Law II: Previous Year Questions Solved, 2018–2023

These notes answer every question, sub-part and OR-alternative from the six Labour Law II question papers of NLUO, Cuttack, available in the NLUO Library's collection of LL.B. question papers. The papers cover 2018 to 2023. No Labour Law II paper was available for 2020, 2021, 2024 or 2025.

120 min read

Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security) Case compilation

Labour Law II: All Case Laws with Memory Hooks

These notes cover 27 cases of Labour Law II: wages, forced and bonded labour, maternity, Article 21, injury and compensation, gratuity, industrial relations and the Factories Act.

19 min read

Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security)

Labour Law II: Memory Tricks

These notes are a memory toolkit for Labour Law II. Instead of learning each topic as a separate list, they connect the material so that one piece brings back the next.

25 min read

Labour Law II (Wages & Social Security) Complete notes

Labour Law II: Complete Notes

Meaning of Social Security ▶ Watch this part of the lecture (0:34) A worker may grow old, fall sick, get injured at work, lose the job or die, and a woman worker may have a baby; in each case the family income stops. Social security is the help society gives at such times so that the family does no…

101 min read

Watch

Related lectures