Skip to content
The Law Easy
Constitutional Law II Short notes

NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (2018): Article 239AA and the LG

The 2018 Constitution Bench held that Delhi's LG must act on ministerial advice except on a genuine reference to the President, while Delhi remains a Union territory, not a State.

4 min read Published 10 views

Cover: NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (2018): Article 239AA and the LG

Watch the Short

Government of NCT of Delhi v Union of India (2018) | Article 239AA & LG

On this page

Quick answer

In Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (4 July 2018), a five-judge Constitution Bench held that under Article 239AA(4) the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi is bound by the aid and advice of the elected Council of Ministers on matters within the Delhi Assembly's legislative power, unless he refers a difference of opinion to the President under the proviso. That proviso is an exception for real differences, not a licence to refer "every matter". At the same time Delhi is not a State: public order, police and land remain with the Union.

The case

Case

Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India, (2018) 8 SCC 501, Supreme Court of India, 4 July 2018. Bench: Dipak Misra, CJI (for himself, A.K. Sikri and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ), with concurring opinions by D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. The appeals arose from a Delhi High Court judgment of 4 August 2016. Held: the LG has no independent decision-making power on transferred subjects; he must act on ministerial advice or implement the President's decision on a reference.

The constitutional text

Article 239AA (inserted by the Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991) lets the Delhi Assembly legislate on State and Concurrent List matters except Entries 1, 2 and 18 of the State List (public order, police, land) and Entries 64, 65 and 66 so far as they relate to them. Under clause (4), the Council of Ministers aids and advises the LG; on a difference of opinion "on any matter" the LG shall refer it to the President.

Main conclusions of the majority

  • Delhi cannot be given the status of a State; its status is sui generis (a class apart), and the LG is an Administrator, not a Governor.
  • The executive power of the Delhi Government is co-extensive with the Assembly's legislative power; the Union has exclusive executive power over the three excluded subjects.
  • "Any matter" in the proviso does not mean "every matter". The power is an exception for real, reasoned differences; the LG should not act as an obstructionist.
  • Decisions of the Council of Ministers must be communicated to the LG, but his concurrence is not required.

Delhi versus a full State

PointNCT of DelhiA State
HeadLG, an Administrator under Article 239Governor
Assembly's legislative fieldState and Concurrent Lists minus public order, police and landWhole State and Concurrent Lists
Disagreement with ministersLG may refer to the President under the Article 239AA(4) provisoNo equivalent provision
Example

Delhi's Council of Ministers, led by Chief Minister Renu, decides to extend free bus travel in the city. The LG, who has referred every proposal that month, refers this one too without reasons. Under the 2018 ruling this is improper. A decision on police deployment, however, belongs to the Union.

Later developments

  • On 11 May 2023 another Constitution Bench held that the Delhi Government has legislative and executive power over "services" (Entry 41, State List), except services relating to public order, police and land.
  • Parliament then passed the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Act 19 of 2023, deemed in force from 19 May 2023). It created a National Capital Civil Service Authority (the Chief Minister, the Chief Secretary and the Principal Home Secretary) to recommend transfers and postings to the LG, and gave the LG "sole discretion" in specified matters.

Compare the general rule in Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974).

Exam point

Exam point

NCT of Delhi (2018): the LG is bound by ministerial aid and advice under Article 239AA(4); "any matter" is not "every matter"; but Delhi is not a State, and public order, police and land stay with the Union.

Sources and further reading

Practise Constitutional Law II MCQs

100 questions. Every answer comes with an explanation and the legal provision behind it.

Practise now

Make this page yours

Sign in to save your reading progress and keep private notes and highlights. Free, and only you can see them.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi bound by the advice of the Delhi Council of Ministers?

Yes, on matters within the Delhi Assembly's legislative power. The 2018 Constitution Bench held that the LG has no independent decision-making power there; he must act on aid and advice or, after a reference under the proviso to Article 239AA(4), implement the President's decision.

Can the LG refer every decision of the Delhi Government to the President?

No. The Court held that 'any matter' in the proviso does not mean 'every matter'. The reference power is an exception for exceptional situations, and a difference of opinion must have a sound rationale, not mere obstruction.

Which subjects are outside the Delhi Government's power?

Article 239AA(3)(a) excludes Entries 1, 2 and 18 of the State List (public order, police and land) and Entries 64, 65 and 66 so far as they relate to them. The Union has executive power over these subjects.

Keep reading

Related notes

Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitution II One Shot

A child born in India before July 1, 1987, automatically acquired Indian citizenship regardless of their parents' nationality.

57 min read

Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitutional Law II: Complete Notes

Constitutional Law II deals with civil liberties. It is studied in eight units, from the question of who is a citizen of India to how the Constitution enforces the rights it gives. These rights are at work in ordinary life: when a person speaks his mind online, prays in his own way, or is stopped b…

130 min read

Constitutional Law II Case compilation

57 Landmark Constitutional Cases: Complete Notes

These notes cover the 57 most important cases of Indian Constitutional Law. They are the cases that keep coming up in LL.B. examinations, in judiciary examinations and in every serious discussion of constitutional law.

406 min read

Judgments

Related case laws

Case law library

A five-judge Constitution Bench held that Delhi has a sui generis (unique) status under Article 239AA. It is neither a full State nor an ordinary Union Territory, and the Lieutenant Governor is bound by the aid and advice of the elected Council of Ministers, except on public order, police and land. The case matters because it strengthened representative government in Delhi and set out collaborative federalism and constitutional morality as guiding principles for Centre–LG–elected government relations.

Constitutional Law II

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala

Supreme Court of India (13-Judge Constitution Bench) · 1973

First, let us understand the basic meaning. The Basic Structure Doctrine is a rule created by the Supreme Court of India which says: Parliament can amend (change) almost any part of the Constitution, but it cannot change the parts that form the Constitution's core identity — its "basic structure."…

Constitutional Law II

Shankari Prasad vs Union of India

Supreme Court of India · 1951

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Article 13(2) of the Constitution says: the State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges Fundamental Rights, and any law that does so is void. Shankari Prasad Singh Deo vs. Union of India (1951) asked one sharp question: does the word "law" i…

Constitutional Law II

Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan

Supreme Court of India · 1997

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Before 1997, India had no specific law defining or prohibiting sexual harassment at the workplace. Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan (1997) answers a foundational question: when Parliament has made no law on a subject, can the Supreme Court still step…

Constitutional Law II

Watch

Related lectures