Skip to content
The Law Easy

Case explanation · Constitutional Law II

Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain (1975) | Article 329A & Basic Structure | Part 8

  • 3 min

The lecture loads from YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode only when you press play.

From the YouTube description

About this lecture

Can a constitutional amendment be used to protect a particular election from being challenged in court? Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) explained in simple English - Article 329A and the basic structure doctrine. Part 8 of 40 in Law Easy's Constitutional Case Laws series for LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary preparation. THE FACTS Raj Narain challenged the election of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to the Lok Sabha. The Allahabad High Court found electoral wrongdoing and set aside her election. While the dispute was before the Supreme Court, Parliament passed the Thirty-ninth Constitutional Amendment, inserting Article 329A, which tried to place the election of certain high officeholders, including the Prime Minister, beyond normal judicial examination. THE LEGAL QUESTION Can Parliament use its amending power to save a specific election from judicial scrutiny? WHAT THE SUPREME COURT HELD No. The Supreme Court struck down clause (4) of Article 329A. The judges gave different reasons, but the decision is a key application of the basic structure doctrine. Applying the amended election law, the Court ultimately set aside the High Court decision against Indira Gandhi and upheld her election - so striking down the clause did not mean she lost her seat. KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER - Free and fair elections, equality before law and limited constitutional power are central to democracy - An amendment cannot place one election outside effective judicial scrutiny - Elections are still governed by specific provisions and the Representation of the People Act FOR YOUR EXAM Connect with Kesavananda Bharati: Kesavananda explained the basic structure limit, Indira Nehru Gandhi showed it protecting democratic elections in an actual dispute. CONTINUE THE SERIES Next, Part 9: Minerva Mills v Union of India (1980) | Fundamental Rights vs DPSP Balance https://youtu.be/dskSBmxWhFE Related, Part 7: Kesavananda Bharati Case Explained | Basic Structure Doctrine (1973) https://youtu.be/dOZtxbT8gmY All 40 Constitutional Case Laws (playlist): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT4r9ZZ3tKLM Complete lecture, all 40 cases in one video: https://youtu.be/oUrSfn3wp8s?t=908 (this case starts at 15:08) Notes and study material: https://www.thelaweasy.com Subscribe to Law Easy for more Constitutional Law, LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary lectures: https://www.youtube.com/@LawEasyin?sub_confirmation=1 Educational content only, not legal advice. Always read the original judgment and check the latest law before relying on a case in an answer or in practice. #ConstitutionalLaw #CLATPG #UGCNETLaw #LawEasy #BasicStructure

Case law

Judgments to read alongside

The written case notes: facts, issues, judgment and the principle to remember.

Case law library

Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain

Supreme Court of India · 1975

The Supreme Court struck down clause 4 of Article 329A, inserted by the Thirty-ninth Amendment during the Emergency, because it violated the basic structure of the Constitution. The amendment had declared Indira Gandhi's election valid regardless of any court decision. The Court upheld the amended election laws, held that the basic structure doctrine applies to constitutional amendments and not to ordinary laws, and on that basis found her election valid. It is remembered as the first major practical application of the basic structure doctrine after Kesavananda Bharati.

Constitutional Law II

Romesh Thappar vs State of Madras

Supreme Court of India · 1950

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution gives every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression . But does that right stop at merely holding or voicing an opinion, or does it also protect your ability to share and circulate that opinion with others…

Constitutional Law II

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala

Supreme Court of India (13-Judge Constitution Bench) · 1973

First, let us understand the basic meaning. The Basic Structure Doctrine is a rule created by the Supreme Court of India which says: Parliament can amend (change) almost any part of the Constitution, but it cannot change the parts that form the Constitution's core identity — its "basic structure."…

Constitutional Law II

Notes

Notes on Constitutional Law II

All notes on this subject
Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitutional Law II: Complete Notes

Constitutional Law II deals with civil liberties. It is studied in eight units, from the question of who is a citizen of India to how the Constitution enforces the rights it gives. These rights are at work in ordinary life: when a person speaks his mind online, prays in his own way, or is stopped b…

130 min read

Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitution II One Shot

A child born in India before July 1, 1987, automatically acquired Indian citizenship regardless of their parents' nationality.

57 min read

Practise 117 Constitutional Law II MCQs Check what you have learnt with practice questions on this subject.

Video lectures

More on Constitutional Law II

All lectures on this subject

Learn with video

Watch every lecture free on YouTube

Complete courses, landmark case explanations and quick Shorts from The Law Easy channel. Subscribe to get new lectures as soon as they are published.