Skip to content
The Law Easy

Case explanation · Constitutional Law II

Kesavananda Bharati Case Explained | Basic Structure Doctrine (1973) | Part 7

  • 2 min

The lecture loads from YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode only when you press play.

From the YouTube description

About this lecture

Parliament can change the Constitution - but can it remove the very principles that make India a constitutional democracy? Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) explained in simple English - Article 368. Part 7 of 40 in Law Easy's Constitutional Case Laws series for LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary preparation. THE FACTS Kesavananda Bharati was the head of a religious institution in Kerala. He challenged land reform measures affecting the property of the institution. During the case a much larger question arose: could Parliament change any part of the Constitution, without limit, under Article 368? THE LEGAL QUESTION How far does Parliament's power to amend the Constitution extend, especially when amendments affect fundamental rights? WHAT THE SUPREME COURT HELD A bench of 13 judges heard the case. By a narrow majority of 7:6, the Court developed the basic structure doctrine: Parliament can make very wide amendments, but cannot destroy or damage the basic structure of the Constitution. The judgment does not give one closed list of basic features; examples identified in the opinions and later cases include constitutional supremacy, democracy, judicial review, federalism and the rule of law. KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER - 'Parliament can amend the Constitution, but it cannot destroy its basic structure' - The doctrine limits constitutional amendments - it is not a rule that every ordinary law is invalid - Ordinary laws are tested under the relevant constitutional provisions FOR YOUR EXAM The most important case in Indian constitutional law. Know the bench strength (13 judges), the 7:6 majority and why the doctrine protects the Constitution from being rewritten by a temporary political majority. CONTINUE THE SERIES Next, Part 8: Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain (1975) | Article 329A & Basic Structure https://youtu.be/Z8OOMZvA9DQ Related, Part 9: Minerva Mills v Union of India (1980) | Fundamental Rights vs DPSP Balance https://youtu.be/dskSBmxWhFE All 40 Constitutional Case Laws (playlist): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT4r9ZZ3tKLM Complete lecture, all 40 cases in one video: https://youtu.be/oUrSfn3wp8s?t=774 (this case starts at 12:54) Notes and study material: https://www.thelaweasy.com Subscribe to Law Easy for more Constitutional Law, LL.B., CLAT PG, UGC NET Law and judiciary lectures: https://www.youtube.com/@LawEasyin?sub_confirmation=1 Educational content only, not legal advice. Always read the original judgment and check the latest law before relying on a case in an answer or in practice. #ConstitutionalLaw #CLATPG #UGCNETLaw #LawEasy #BasicStructure

Case law

Judgments to read alongside

The written case notes: facts, issues, judgment and the principle to remember.

Case law library

Romesh Thappar vs State of Madras

Supreme Court of India · 1950

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution gives every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression . But does that right stop at merely holding or voicing an opinion, or does it also protect your ability to share and circulate that opinion with others…

Constitutional Law II

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala

Supreme Court of India (13-Judge Constitution Bench) · 1973

First, let us understand the basic meaning. The Basic Structure Doctrine is a rule created by the Supreme Court of India which says: Parliament can amend (change) almost any part of the Constitution, but it cannot change the parts that form the Constitution's core identity — its "basic structure."…

Constitutional Law II

Modern Dental College vs State of MP

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) · 2016

First, let us understand the basic meaning. Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution gives every citizen the right to practise any profession or carry on any occupation, trade or business — and running an educational institution counts as exercising this right. But no right in the Constitution is absol…

Constitutional Law II

Notes

Notes on Constitutional Law II

All notes on this subject
Constitutional Law I Case compilation

40 Important Constitutional Law Case Laws

Decided: 1967. Core question: Can a public electricity board ignore the Constitution just because it sells electricity? The answer changed how courts understand the meaning of "the State".

80 min read

Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitutional Law II: Complete Notes

Constitutional Law II deals with civil liberties. It is studied in eight units, from the question of who is a citizen of India to how the Constitution enforces the rights it gives. These rights are at work in ordinary life: when a person speaks his mind online, prays in his own way, or is stopped b…

130 min read

Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitution II One Shot

A child born in India before July 1, 1987, automatically acquired Indian citizenship regardless of their parents' nationality.

57 min read

Practise 117 Constitutional Law II MCQs Check what you have learnt with practice questions on this subject.

Video lectures

More on Constitutional Law II

All lectures on this subject

Learn with video

Watch every lecture free on YouTube

Complete courses, landmark case explanations and quick Shorts from The Law Easy channel. Subscribe to get new lectures as soon as they are published.