Skip to content
The Law Easy

Case explanation · Constitutional Law II

Waman Rao v. Union of India

  • 13 min
  • 8 chapters

The lecture loads from YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode only when you press play.

From the YouTube description

About this lecture

Understand the landmark Supreme Court decision in Waman Rao v. Union of India (1981) and its significance in Indian Constitutional Law. This video explains how the court addressed the retroactive application of the basic structure doctrine to laws placed in the Ninth Schedule. Learn about the constitutional validity of Articles 31A, 31B, and 31C, along with the application of stare decisis. In this video you will learn: • Understand the retrospective vs prospective application of the basic structure doctrine. • Examine the cut-off date established for judicial review of Ninth Schedule laws. • Learn why Article 31A was held valid for agrarian reform and ceiling legislation. • Explore how Article 31C reinforces the basic structure via Directive Principles of State Policy. • Understand the court's ruling on the 40th Constitutional Amendment enacted during the Emergency. • Analyze the doctrine of stare decisis in constitutional adjudication and Justice Bhagwati's dissent. Topics covered: • Background of Waman Rao v. Union of India (1981) • Prospective application of Basic Structure Doctrine • Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act • Validity of Article 31A and agrarian reforms • Article 31B and Ninth Schedule cut-off date • Validity of Article 31C and Directive Principles of State Policy • Challenge to the 40th Constitutional Amendment, 1976 • Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Constitutional Law • Justice Bhagwati's dissenting opinion Important case laws: • Waman Rao v. Union of India (1981) • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala • Shankari Prasad v. Union of India • I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab • Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan • Ambika Prasad Mishra v. State of U.P. (1980) Statutory provisions discussed: • Article 31A, Constitution of India • Article 31B, Constitution of India • Article 31C, Constitution of India • Article 39, Constitution of India • Article 352, Constitution of India • Article 13(2), Constitution of India • Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act 27 of 1961 Useful for: LL.B. (3-year and 5-year integrated), UGC NET Law, CLAT PG, University semester exams and Judiciary aspirants. Chapters: 00:00 Basic Structure Doctrine and Retrospectivity 01:23 Background Facts and Ninth Schedule 02:46 Key Constitutional Issues 04:17 Validity of Article 31A 06:03 Article 31B and Ninth Schedule Protection 08:29 Challenge to the 40th Amendment 09:54 Doctrine of Stare Decisis and Dissent 12:24 Summary of Waman Rao Judgment Notes and study material: https://www.thelaweasy.com #ConstitutionalLaw #BasicStructureDoctrine #WamanRaoCase #LawEasy #CLATPG

Case law

Judgments to read alongside

The written case notes: facts, issues, judgment and the principle to remember.

Case law library

Waman Rao

Supreme Court of India · 1980

In Waman Rao v. Union of India, the Supreme Court upheld Articles 31A and 31B and the unamended Article 31C. It held that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule before 24 April 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are safe from the basic structure test, but laws added after that date can be challenged if they damage the basic structure. This cut-off line later shaped I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) and is central to the law on Parliament's amending power.

Constitutional Law II

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala

Supreme Court of India (13-Judge Constitution Bench) · 1973

First, let us understand the basic meaning. The Basic Structure Doctrine is a rule created by the Supreme Court of India which says: Parliament can amend (change) almost any part of the Constitution, but it cannot change the parts that form the Constitution's core identity — its "basic structure."…

Constitutional Law II

Golaknath

Supreme Court of India · 1967

In I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), an eleven-judge bench of the Supreme Court held by six to five that Parliament cannot take away or curtail fundamental rights, because a constitutional amendment is also 'law' under Article 13(2). It overruled Shankari Prasad and Sajjan Singh. To avoid legal chaos, it applied the doctrine of prospective overruling for the first time in India, so the past amendments and the challenged land reform Acts stayed valid.

Constitutional Law II

Notes

Notes on Constitutional Law II

All notes on this subject
Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitutional Law II: Complete Notes

Constitutional Law II deals with civil liberties. It is studied in eight units, from the question of who is a citizen of India to how the Constitution enforces the rights it gives. These rights are at work in ordinary life: when a person speaks his mind online, prays in his own way, or is stopped b…

130 min read

Constitutional Law II Complete notes

Constitution II One Shot

A child born in India before July 1, 1987, automatically acquired Indian citizenship regardless of their parents' nationality.

57 min read

Practise 24 Constitutional Law II MCQs Check what you have learnt with practice questions on this subject.

Video lectures

More on Constitutional Law II

All lectures on this subject

Learn with video

Watch every lecture free on YouTube

Complete courses, landmark case explanations and quick Shorts from The Law Easy channel. Subscribe to get new lectures as soon as they are published.