• Today: November 01, 2025

Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd. and Ors

01 November, 2025
1801
PNGRB v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd. (2015) — No Power to Fix Gas Price | The Law Easy

Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd. and Ors. AIR 2015 SC 2978

Supreme Court of India 2015 Energy / Admin Law AIR 2015 SC 2978 7 min read
Author: Gulzar Hashmi | Location: India | Publish Date:
Energy pricing dispute between PNGRB and IGL before Supreme Court of India
Illustration: regulation vs price control in the gas sector.

Quick Summary

This case draws a clear line between regulating a network and fixing consumer price. PNGRB tried to set network tariff and CNG compression charges and asked disclosure on bills. The High Court struck it down. The Supreme Court agreed: the Act has no express power allowing PNGRB to fix or regulate maximum retail price (MRP) to consumers.

Key lesson: Rule-making cannot create a power that Parliament did not write into the statute. Regulation stays inside the four corners of the Act.

Issues

  • Does PNGRB have legal power to fix or regulate the retail price of gas sold to consumers?
  • Can such a power be inferred from rule-making when the Act is silent?
  • Was the 9 April 2012 order under Section 22 valid?

Rules

  • No implied price power: A power cannot be inferred from rule-making if the statute lacks an express provision.
  • Delegated legislation limits: Regulations cannot go beyond, or be repugnant to, the parent Act.

Facts (Timeline)

09 Apr 2012: PNGRB issues order under Section 22 fixing network tariff (₹38.58/MMBtu) and CNG compression charges (₹2.75/kg) for Delhi CGD; directs separate recovery on invoices.
High Court: IGL challenges; Delhi High Court quashes the order, holding the Board lacks power to fix MRP or compel full tariff disclosure to consumers.
Appeal: Parties approach the Supreme Court by special leave.
Supreme Court: Confirms: Act has no express price-fixing power; rule-making cannot create it.
Timeline of PNGRB versus Indraprastha Gas Ltd. case events

Arguments

Appellant: PNGRB

  • Board regulates pipelines, networks, and CGD—pricing follows regulation.
  • Regulations authorize fixing/approving tariffs and charges.
  • Consumer protection requires transparency on invoices.

Respondent: Indraprastha Gas Ltd. (IGL)

  • No explicit power in the Act to fix retail prices to consumers.
  • Delegated legislation cannot travel beyond the Act.
  • 2012 order is ultra vires Section 22.

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that the PNGRB Act, 2008 does not confer any power on the Board to fix or regulate the maximum retail price of gas sold to consumers. The 2012 order could not stand.

The Court stressed that regulation is confined to the statute’s words. Rule-making cannot be used to create a price-fixing power that Parliament did not grant.

Supreme Court gavel representing limits on regulatory price control

Ratio Decidendi

Where the parent statute is silent on price fixation, the regulator cannot read such power into its rule-making or regulatory functions. Delegated legislation must stay within the Act.

Why It Matters

  • Preserves separation between regulation and price control.
  • Reaffirms limits of delegated legislation.
  • Guides energy-sector compliance and consumer billing practices.

Key Takeaways

  1. PNGRB has no statutory power to fix consumer MRP for gas.
  2. Rule-making cannot create powers missing in the Act.
  3. Orders based on such implied powers are ultra vires.

Mnemonic + 3-Step Hook

Mnemonic: “No Act, No MRP.”

  1. Point: Price power must be in the Act.
  2. Apply: Rules can’t add missing powers.
  3. Decide: Order fixing MRP is void.

IRAC Outline

Issue: Can PNGRB fix or regulate gas retail prices to consumers?

Rule: No power can be inferred from rule-making when the statute is silent.

Application: PNGRB Act lacks express MRP power; regulations cannot expand it.

Conclusion: PNGRB’s price directions are ultra vires; order invalid.

Glossary

Delegated Legislation
Rules made by a regulator under powers granted by an Act.
Ultra Vires
Beyond legal power. An action with no authority in law.
MRP
Maximum Retail Price charged to consumers at the endpoint.

Student FAQs

Because regulations cannot create a price-fixing power when the parent Act gives none. Rules must stay within the statute.

No. The Court only said the Board cannot fix consumer MRP. Other regulatory functions remain as per the Act.

Work within the Act’s text or seek an amendment from Parliament. Do not rely on regulations to fill gaps.

That PNGRB acted beyond its legal powers by attempting to fix consumer prices without statutory authority.
Reviewed by The Law Easy
Energy Law Administrative Law Delegated Legislation

Comment

Nothing for now